Authorities say access to Changi intertidal areas unaffected by reclamation, in response to petition
On July 2, The Straits Times reported that about 193ha of land off Changi will be reclaimed – roughly twice the size of Gardens by the Bay.
SINGAPORE - Planned reclamation works to expand Changi Aviation Park will not affect access to popular intertidal areas off Changi Beach Park, the Housing Board and Urban Redevelopment Authority (URA) said in a joint statement on July 28.
The authorities also said the environmental impact assessment report for the project contained security sensitivities that required confidentiality agreements before the public could view it.
They were responding to concerns raised by nature enthusiasts over whether plans for the area will limit public access to the rich shorelines of Changi.
At low tides, the area often draws people hoping to glimpse anemones, octopi, and other marine creatures.
A petition raised by nature guide Neo Xiaoyun and environmental storyteller Julian Paul Lee called for HDB to scale back its plans for the reclamation in the light of the area's intertidal ecosystem.
It also flagged concerns that the Government's consultation of the public over the works had been undermined by its use of non-disclosure agreements.
On July 2, The Straits Times reported that about
193ha of land off Changi will be reclaimed – roughly twice the size of Gardens by the Bay. It is one-fifth smaller than originally planned in order to protect one of Singapore's largest seagrass meadows.
Top stories
Swipe. Select. Stay informed.
Singapore Tanjong Katong sinkhole backfilled; road to be repaved after LTA tests
Singapore Tanjong Katong Road sinkhole did not happen overnight: Experts
Singapore New Mandai North Crematorium, ash-scattering garden to open on Aug 15
Singapore Not feasible for S'pore to avoid net‑zero; all options to cut energy emissions on table: Tan See Leng
Singapore With regional interest in nuclear energy rising, S'pore must build capabilities too: Tan See Leng
World US and EU clinch deal with broad 15% tariffs on EU goods to avert trade war
Asia Displaced villagers at Thai-Cambodian border hope to go home as leaders set to meet for talks
The intertidal areas near the project are one of the last accessible places for the public to experience the rich biodiversity of Singapore's shores, Ms Neo and Mr Lee wrote in the open letter created on July 13.
To date, more than 1,440 people have signed the petition, which called for the Government to review the use of confidentiality agreements for environmental impact assessments and prioritise public access to non-sensitive information in these reports.
Ms Neo and Mr Lee, both 29, wrote that the blanket use of a confidentiality agreement runs counter to the purpose of environmental assessments, which is to incorporate diverse views and protect natural heritage through public input.
HDB and URA said it requires the public to view the hard copy of environmental impact assessments if there are considerations requiring confidentiality, including security sensitivities, such as in the case of the Changi North reclamation.
They said: 'For such (assessments), rather than not disclose them altogether, we would facilitate the viewing of the reports, both during and after the public disclosure period, but would require viewers to sign a non-disclosure agreement, which covers the specific sensitive information within the report.'
The authorities noted that most reports for environmental impact assessments are made online for public feedback for a stipulated period.
Giving more details about the reclamation at Changi North, they said Carparks 6 and 7 of Changi Beach Park will not be affected.
As part of the planning for the Changi North project, the HDB, in consultation with NParks, had engaged stakeholders who have local conservation experience and technical knowledge of the area's biodiversity and habitats. These included nature groups, youth representatives and academics.
Ms Neo told ST that she welcomed the authorities' time and effort to engage with the petition, although there was still room for improvement.
'The use of confidentiality agreements are still worded quite broadly, so this still creates a chilling effect that dissuades meaningful civic engagement,' said the master's student studying geography and environment at the University of Hawaii.
She suggested that the agencies and contractors for future assessments could consider consulting nature guides familiar with the affected areas, as their years of observational data and experience can complement surveys.
The public feedback period for the proposed land reclamation works at Changi North has closed, but members of the public can still e-mail HDB to view the report.
The reclamation project off Changi North is one of several to create more land at the eastern end of Singapore, including the reclamation of about 900ha off Changi Bay.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Times
5 hours ago
- Business Times
SG60: Property valuation amid growing real estate sophistication
THE SG60 Singapore real estate market is a mature one, marked by a large number of buyers and sellers, landlords and tenants, financiers, lawyers, appraisers and brokers; considerable data transparency; and a breadth of options across all real estate types. Reflecting growing sophistication, public housing now includes standard, plus and prime, and the public-private hybrid executive condo. Similarly, private housing covers apartments and condominiums, landed terrace, semi-detached, detached, bungalows and the hybrid strata landed. New asset types emerge from time to time: real estate investment trusts (Reits) where real estate and financial markets intersect, fractionalised real estate using cryptocurrency, data centres to support the new economy, high-specification buildings for biotech companies, student housing, foreign workers dormitories, co-living, co-working spaces, and so on. Against such a backdrop, valuing this array of real estate assets becomes increasingly complex. Property valuations underpin many household and commercial transactions, such as how much banks lend money for a house purchase and the extent to which CPF Ordinary Account balances can be used. They are the basis for gauging a chunk of a company's net asset value (NAV). Valuations also act as a 'check' against overpaying for corporate real estate acquisitions. For example, a Reit buying an asset often uses the formal valuation of the asset as the benchmark to determine the acquisition price and secure shareholder approval. Likewise, a valuation provides a guide to the 'right' price for the disposal of an asset in the books. A NEWSLETTER FOR YOU Tuesday, 12 pm Property Insights Get an exclusive analysis of real estate and property news in Singapore and beyond. Sign Up Sign Up 'Open source' policy Singapore has an 'open source' policy when it comes to property transactions. There is a free public database of prices from public agencies such as the Housing and Development Board (HDB) and the Urban Redevelopment Authority (URA). For the past three years from 2022 to 2024, the total volume of both HDB and private homes sold averaged well over 40,000 units per annum. It is not difficult to interpolate or extrapolate from this rich data set to gauge what a typical property might be worth. Portals such as Edge or SRX also offer free property 'valuations' driven by artificial intelligence (AI). But these 'lay' approaches to valuation typically work well with what are often called 'conventional' properties – HDB resale flats, apartments and condominiums – where the drivers of value are generally well understood, the market is sizeable and data is plentiful. But, there are a host of properties that characterise the SG60 real estate market that will not be easily analysed in the same way. Take a simple example: The value of strata shops in a mall is a function of its micro location (what level is it on, and what direction does it face?), its neighbours (is it near a popular supermarket?), its size (there is such a thing as a discount for large units), and its shape (regular shaped shop units are easier to fit out with little wastage). For such a property, there are generally fewer comparable transactions. Whatever data exists will not easily yield insights into its 'correct' value because of the varied factors that can influence how market participants perceive their worth. The more specialised the property – think a cement plant in Jurong, your neighbourhood petrol station or the Singapore Flyer – the more difficult the valuation assignment. Enter the property valuer. Laymen can claim to be 'experts', especially in residential property valuation – since most of us own or live in one and will inevitably hold an opinion on its value. But, the property valuer is licensed by the Inland Revenue Authority of Singapore (Iras) and undergoes formal tertiary training comprising a three or four-year university course in real estate or its equivalent. Such a course typically covers four pillars of foundational real estate knowledge – law, building technology, urban planning and economics – that collectively underpin the theory and practice of valuation. Beyond academics, the aspiring valuer must be a member of the Singapore Institute of Surveyors and Valuers (SISV), the sole body representing valuation professionals with a history spanning 40 years, before being eligible for licensing. SISV members are subject to the institute's regulations and disciplinary protocols to act professionally and ethically, in accordance with its practice standards. Because the value of a property is often the subject of ubiquitous coffee-shop talk, the true importance and complexity of valuation is often underappreciated, more so in the context of the growing sophistication of the SG60 property market. Here are some examples. In October 2024, a 60-year leasehold site tender at Media Circle in one-north was not awarded because the sole bid of S$461 per square foot per gross floor area (psf GFA), by a Frasers-led consortium, was deemed too low. Media reports had indicated that analysts preliminarily assessed the land at between S$650 and S$1,100 psf GFA. The gap is significant but, arguably, a big part of the divergence can be explained by the zoning of this parcel for long-stay service apartments (or 'SA2' in URA's parlance), a 'pilot housing typology for occupants seeking long-term rental accommodation' of three months or more. Strata subdivision for individual unit sale – which would enable the developer to get his money back earlier – is also not permitted. The valuation challenge in this case is the novel nature of this typology that currently has no direct benchmarks to go by, and that requires perhaps a different operating model compared to conventional service apartments and hotels. Such cases can only be properly analysed by experienced professional valuers, although the level of the final bid vests solely in the developer who, for whatever reason, may prefer to bid at a premium or discount to the value arrived at by the valuer. It is commonly asserted that valuers interpret the market and do not make the market. In other words, they are price takers, and not price setters. Underlying this assertion is the premise that markets are generally efficient, and that buyers and sellers, taken as a collective, behave rationally. So, if there is a large body of bona fide transactions supporting, say, property prices at a particular level, the valuer's role is to 'let the market speak'. Take another example. Commercial properties are being transacted at a gross rental yield of 3 per cent (that is, gross rent as a percentage of value) – which may just about cover interest cost, including spreads, and, therefore, appear low, considering the risks that accompany real estate investment. Why then do market participants accept this level of yield? They are certainly not uninformed or ignorant. There could be various reasons, including the 'Singapore premium' arising from all the oft-cited strengths of Singapore's economy, the robust local currency, the history of upward trending prices over the long term, and so on. Whatever the reasons, that 3 per cent yield is widely believed to be the appropriate 'market' rate and sets the benchmark for how similar properties ought to be valued. But to be defensible, valuations need to be grounded on 'comparables', which are past transactions of similar properties. This process often gives rise to the divergence between what is known as the 'private' market and 'public' market. This is perhaps best illustrated by the hefty discount that asset-heavy listed property companies are trading as a percentage of the company's NAV. The property company's NAV itself is often assessed by the valuation of that company's real estate. The idea is that if the NAV is, say, $1 billion, then the market capitalisation of that company should not deviate sharply from the NAV. This is because rather than trading in the company's shares at undervalued prices, shareholders can be better served by winding up the company, selling off the assets (at or close to valuation) and distributing the net sales proceeds – that is, effectively the NAV – to them. In practice, private and public markets sometimes diverge quite significantly, again for a host of reasons, such as management's (in)ability to grow the business, shareholder fights, high debt levels which may raise the risk of default, and a lack of liquidity. But one main reason is that NAV is anchored historically, that is, valuation is based on past transactions, and is typically done once or twice a year for financial reporting purposes, and therefore tend to adjust much more slowly. By contrast, stock prices are forward-looking and public markets are generally far more efficient, rapidly reacting (or some might say, overreacting) to market 'noise'. Valuation extends not just to capital values or prices, but also to rentals. There's been some public discussion of high rentals for clinics and beloved food and beverage stores. These rentals have been blamed for retail closures and driving costs higher for ordinary people. One executive from a very large landlord has responded recently with a very thoughtful LinkedIn piece on why such perceptions may not do justice to the reality on the ground. For public rental tenders, the routine use of price-quality (PQ) criteria in tender evaluation helps to mitigate the effects of pure price competition. To bring in a valuation perspective to this matter, in the case of clinics, a single high rental bid does not represent the market as a whole. These 'outliers' do occur from time to time and could represent a wide range of possibilities: temporary exuberance, some commercial advantage accruing to the winning bid not recognised by the rest of the market, enormous competitive pressures, and so on. A valuer asked to appraise such properties would arrive at values which are more aligned with the general market, rather than figures which deviate hugely from investor expectations. Of course, for parties transacting a deal, the valuation of the property – be it for sale or purchase, taxation, or an initial public offering – is best seen as a guide rather than the correct 'answer' to how much the property is worth. Breathtaking technological advances in large language models raise the question if valuers will be collateral damage from the all-conquering AI wave. Even complexity cannot be a bulwark against the AI tsunami. Deep implications But for now, the licensed property valuer's training, nous, and judgement set him apart. Just as important, his affiliation with SISV – with its standards of professional practice and ethical conduct – enables him to extend his role beyond the layman's approach of interpolating or extrapolating publicly available data on property prices. He applies his knowledge and experience to a wide variety of situations – increasingly novel and challenging – that have implications on marital choices, childbearing, household wealth, business decisions and public policy options. The writer is first vice-president, valuation & general practice division, Singapore Institute of Surveyors and Valuers
Straits Times
12 hours ago
- Straits Times
Trump's sharp India criticism on tariffs, Russia oil corner Modi as rift deepens
Sign up now: Get ST's newsletters delivered to your inbox - Any expectation of the camaraderie that Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi enjoyed with US President Donald Trump during the latter's first term in office – united in part over the common threat of China – has all but evaporated. India underestimated just how transactional Mr Trump would be in his second term in power, as he has made little distinction between friends and adversaries. Ties have unpredictably and quickly gone south as Mr Trump has torn into India over its long-standing ties with Russia and the slow pace of negotiations for an India-US trade deal. The strain in US-India ties is a challenge for Mr Modi, who also faces domestic calls not to cave into Mr Trump's demands on trade and oil imports from Russia. India has benefitted from cheap Russian energy imports, which the US leader claims is helping to fund Russia's invasion of Ukraine . Mr Trump's vow to 'substantially raise' tariffs on Indian exports to the US from the already substantial 25 per cent because of New Delhi's Russian oil imports, is an indication of his administration's priorities in achieving broader geopolitical goals, say analysts. 'This (oil sanctions) is obviously a pressure tactic the US is using on Russia to get an outcome of its choice in the Ukraine war. We are collateral damage,' Mr Ashok Malik, a partner at the Asia Group business consultancy, told The Straits Times. Top stories Swipe. Select. Stay informed. Singapore More train rides taken in first half-year, but overall public transport use stays below 2019 levels Singapore BlueSG needs time to develop software, refresh fleet, say ex-insiders after winding-down news Asia Cambodia-Thailand border clash a setback for Asean: Vivian Balakrishnan Singapore 'She had a whole life ahead of her': Boyfriend mourns Yishun fatal crash victim Singapore Doctor hounded ex-girlfriend, threatened to share her intimate photos, abducted her off street Asia Trump's transactional foreign policy fuels 'US scepticism' in Taiwan Business Women on corporate boards give firms a competitive advantage, says Australian Governor-General Singapore CEO of sports car distributor accused of offences including multiple counts of false trading 'I think things are very challenging at this juncture. It is the most challenging in a long, long time,' Mr Malik said. Mr Trump came into power promising he would end the war in Ukraine on his first day in office. But a long-term ceasefire has not materialised, and Russia has instead intensified its strikes on Ukraine, much to Mr Trump's frustration. India-Russia-US nexus 'India is not only buying massive amounts of Russian Oil, they are then, for much of the Oil purchased, selling it on the Open Market for big profits,' Mr Trump wrote on his Truth Social platform on Aug 4. 'They don't care how many people in Ukraine are being killed by the Russian War Machine. Because of this, I will be substantially raising the Tariff paid by India to the USA.' Mr Trump has lumped Russia and India together, calling them 'dead economies' in another Truth Social post on July 31, despite the fact that India is the world's fourth-largest economy by nominal GDP after the US, China and Germany. India has a longstanding relationship with Russia dating ba ck to the Cold War, and is the among the largest importer of Russian oil along with China . It imported about 1.75 million barrels a day from January to June 2025, up 1 per cent from a year ago, according to Reuters. On Aug 4, the Ministry of External Affairs called the US President and European Union 's targeting of India for buying Russian oil 'unjustified and unreasonable.' 'India began importing from Russia because traditional supplies were diverted to Europe after the outbreak of the conflict. The United States at that time actively encouraged such imports by India for strengthening global energy markets stability,' the MEA said in a statement. 'India's imports are meant to ensure predictable and affordable energy costs to the Indian consumer. They are a necessity compelled by the global market situation. However, it is revealing that the very nations criticizing India are themselves indulging in trade with Russia. ' The European Union had imposed sanctions on Russian-backed Indian refiner Nayara and banned the import of refined oil made from Russian crude. In particular, New Delhi called out the United States for its continual imports from Russia of 'uranium hexafluoride for its nuclear industry, palladium for its EV industry, fertilisers as well as chemicals.' Mr Trump is not the first US president to disapprove of India's ties with Iran and Russia. But previous US leaders like Mr Joe Biden and Mr Barack Obama chose to look the other way due to the strategic calculation of India's importance as a fast-growing economy a nd as a counter to China in America's Indo-Pacific strategy. In any case, India's ties with Russia are also not what they were once, as Russia has drawn closer to China and Pakistan, while India has grown closer to the West. The South Asian giant has also been diversifying its defence weapon purchases to include products from the US and Israel. But that doesn't mean India can walk away from the Russia relationship as desired by Mr Trump, according to Mr Nandan Unnikrishnan, a Distinguished Fellow at the Observer Research Foundation, a New Delhi-based think tank. 'We need warm relations. India is a growing economy; it is going to consume natural resources and Russia is a country that has every element in huge abundance. We will end up buying a lot of resources,' he said. US-India tariff negotiations Mr Trump is also frustrated that a trade deal with India to his liking has so far not materialised. He has used tariffs to force countries that have a trade surplus with the US into what he claims is a more reciprocal bilateral trade relationship. The US is India's largest export market, with exports reaching US$86.51 billion (S$111.37 billion) from April 2024 to March 2025. India's imports from the US were US$45.33 billion for the same period, according to Indian government figures . While both countries are still locked in negotiations, New Delhi has refused to grant the concessions that the Trump administration is seeking, including the opening up of heavily protected agriculture and dairy sectors to US imports. More than 60 per cent of the Indian population depends on these two sectors for their livelihoods in some form or another. Farmers have opposed opening up of the agriculture and dairy sectors , arguing they would not be able to withstand competition from US agriculture. Unlike US farms, India's farms are small, fragmented and hardly mechanised . In another post on Truth Social on July 30 , Mr Trump criticised India for imposing the most 'strenuous and obnoxious' tariffs in the world. India's refusal to give in to Trump for now may also be seen as a recognition that it is not just trade interests which are at stake. 'Trump has not only unleashed a trade war but is also deploying commercial instruments for geopolitical ends,' India's former foreign secretary Shyam Saran wrote in The Indian Express newspaper on Aug 4. 'These actions threaten India's core interests and its ability to follow a policy of strategic autonomy, which every government, irrespective of its political colour, has remained wedded to since Independence,' he said. 'We should not treat the current disruption in India-US relations as just a trade dispute. It is much more than that.' Mr Modi's response to Mr Trump's belligerent language, which has pushed the Indian prime minister into a corner domestically, took a nationalistic tone. 'The world economy is facing instability and uncertainty. In such times, countries are focusing solely on their own interests. India, too, is on the path to becoming the world's third-largest economy and must remain alert to its own economic priorities,' Mr Modi said in his constituency of Varanasi on Aug 2, even before Mr Trump's latest escalation. 'At a time when the world is going through uncertainty, let us take a pledge to sell only Swadeshi (made in India) goods from our shops and markets. Promoting made-in-India goods will be the truest service to the country.' Political watchers noted that it would be very difficult for the Indian Prime Minister to give any large concessions in the trade deal, given the growing anger within India towards Mr Trump. Even the right-wing Hindu nationalist ecosystem, which has been very supportive of the US president, is angry at what it perceives as a series of other slights to India. This includes Mr Trump's statements on how he engineered the ceasefire between India and Pakistan, after the neighbours were embroiled in a military conflict over a terror attack in Kashmir, and Mr Trump's subsequent hosting of Pakistan's Army chief Asim Muneer in the White House. 'Mr Modi doesn't have much space to manoeuvre on the trade deal. The economic and political costs of accepting US demand are something this government will find difficult to swallow,' said Dr Biswajit Dhar, a trade expert and former professor at Jawaharlal Nehru University. 'We have to wait and watch. What the Trump administration has done is push India into a corner.'
Straits Times
14 hours ago
- Straits Times
Thailand's monitor lizards tipped as next big ‘economic animal' in luxury leather
Sign up now: Get ST's newsletters delivered to your inbox The Thai government has moved to allow the commercial breeding of the reptiles, which are native to the region. BANGKOK - Thailand's Asian water monitors are being championed as a new 'economic animal', poised to enter the lucrative 7.6 billion baht (S$302 million) leather market. The move follows a government decision that allows for the commercial breeding of the reptiles, which are native to the region. The Kasikorn Research Centre reports that the government's Wildlife Preservation and Protection Committee has approved a scheme for licensed individuals to breed the monitors, with breeding pairs costing just 500 baht each from the Department of National Parks. This initiative aims to unlock the commercial potential of the animals in three key areas: leather, medicinal products, and meat. The monitor lizard's hide is expected to command a higher price than traditional cow or buffalo leather, with a single square metre fetching between 4,200 and 14,000 baht. This could significantly boost Thailand's processed leather export market, which was valued at around 7.5 billion baht in 2024. A major selling point for the new industry is the monitor lizard's environmental credentials. Unlike cattle and buffalo, these reptiles do not produce methane gas during digestion. Top stories Swipe. Select. Stay informed. Singapore More train rides taken in first half-year, but overall public transport use stays below 2019 levels Asia Philippines, India shore up ties amid China tensions, US tariff risks Singapore 'She had a whole life ahead of her': Boyfriend mourns Yishun fatal crash victim Singapore Doctor hounded ex-girlfriend, threatened to share her intimate photos, abducted her off street Asia Trump's transactional foreign policy fuels 'US scepticism' in Taiwan Singapore Beauty industry consumers hit by 464% rise in prepayment losses in first half of 2025 Singapore Over 5,900 vape products found in car at Woodlands Checkpoint Singapore 13 taken to hospital after accident involving SBS buses, car in Tampines This difference could reduce greenhouse gas emissions by up to 3.4 million tonnes per animal per year, potentially giving monitor lizard leather a significantly lower carbon footprint than other animal hides. The report also highlights the varied international regulations surrounding the trade of monitor lizards and their products:
