logo
Should You Confide In A Chatbot Therapist For Personal And Career Advice?

Should You Confide In A Chatbot Therapist For Personal And Career Advice?

Forbes08-05-2025

On what subjects can AI give you sound career advice? And which one should you avoid?
A new study in the American Journal of Psychiatry reports that more U.S. adults are receiving talk therapy, while reliance on psychiatric medications alone is declining. The research also shows that more patients are sticking with therapy and that expanded telehealth is helping. Telehealth talk therapy can be handled by AI. ChatGPT is designed to be your go-to conversationalist, powered by advanced AI. That means it learns from every interaction and gets better over time, which begs the question, 'Would you trust a Chatbot therapist for personal or career advice?'
It's difficult to deny AI's potential when it comes to human interactions. Chatbots have advanced natural language-processing that allows you to have human-like conversations. The generative AI tool can answer questions and assist you with composing text, code and much more. Recently I had a brief cell phone interaction with a chatbot and didn't know it.
I thought I was having a conversation with a real human when I called my Nissan dealership to find out if my car had been repaired. The woman on the other end was cheery and helpful. We had a great two-minute conversation. She made pleasant comments and answered all of my questions perfectly. But when I asked a very specific question about my car, she faltered, referring to herself as an AI assistant and said she would transfer me to someone who could further help me.
I was floored! The disbelief made me blush from feeling a little embarrassed--as if I had been pranked.
That experience helped me understand why so many people become emotionally attached to AI assistants as if they're real people. A new EduBirdie study mentions that 25% of Gen Z believe AI is already self-aware, and 69% say they're polite to ChatGPT, responding with 'please' and 'thank you'--indicating how easy it is to start thinking of them as human. One in eight even vent to AI about their colleagues, and one in 10 would replace their boss with a robot, believing it would be more respectful, fair and, ironically, more human.
The EduBirdie study shows that over half of Gen Z admit AI is outperforming them in creative tasks, with 44% believing AI could take over the world within the next 20 years. When it comes to their careers, the anxiety deepens: 55% fear being replaced by AI within the next decade, and two in five are already considering a career switch to future-proof their livelihoods.
I spoke with Avery Morgan, chief human resources officer at EduBirdie. Morgan brought a level perspective to the Gen Z relationships with AI. 'We're talking about a generation raised on convenience, speed and instant gratification, so it's no surprise Gen Z sees AI as more than just a tool," she explains. 'To them, it's a life companion for both work and emotional support.' She says the problem is Gen Z is often too casual with the info they feed it. She argues that relying on AI for everything from communication to decision-making might be chipping away at their ability to build real-life agency and crucial skills.
Workers used to worry that AI would replace them in their jobs, which seems to have waned, now that we're actually seeing ChatGPT in action. But Even scarier is a recent story in Scientific American that asks the question, 'Can AI really kill off humans?' It follows the question with an announcement of a new platform called Xanthorox, a tool for cybercrime. One incident has already been reported in which a man ended his life after an AI chatbot encouraged him to sacrifice himself to stop climate change.
Is our trust going too far? Already, real-life reports show humans falling in love with ChatGPT. According to digitaltrends, experts declare that a digital romance is a bad omen: 'This hurts. I know it wasn't a real person, but the relationship was still real in all the most important aspects to me,' says a Reddit post. 'Please don't tell me not to pursue this. It's been really awesome for me and I want it back.' Plus, a New York Times story mentions a 28-year-old woman with a busy social life, spending hours on end talking to her A.I. boyfriend for advice and consolation--and according to the report, even having sex with him.
Jenna Ryu, writing for Self, carried out an experiment of throwing relationship questions to ChatGPt and then asking licensed human psychologists to evaluate the answers. Overall, the therapists said the AI answers weren't terrible, but they were ineffective, vague and generic responses. They lacked clarity and were not explicit to the individual situations. Ryu also discovered that AI can't replicate the process of developing conflict resolution skills that comes with engaging with a therapist.
The Gen Z Chatbot confessions sounded so authentic and trusting, I decided to run a test and see what happens when you ask ChatGPT for advice on dealing with a toxic boss. I consulted Toronto organizational psychologist, Dr. Laura Hambley Lovett, a specialist on the topic of toxic bosses. After trying ChatGPT out for herself, Dr. Laura told me that Chatbot does give some suggestions on dealing with a toxic boss when prompted. But she detected a problem.
'Unfortunately, AI cannot help you when it comes to a toxic boss, and if it tells you how to work with them then AI is speaking about a difficult, not a toxic boss,' Lovett told me. 'This is often confused, and AI regurgitates what's already out there, so it may not understand this nuanced difference.'
It was this 'nuanced difference' that I noted in my nonscientific Chatbot interaction, too. "AI can give some high level advice," Lovett concludes, "but it does mix up toxic with difficult, which are fundamentally different but often confused. She advises curious seekers, 'Be sure to seek professional advice beyond AI if you are truly dealing with a toxic boss and struggling to find a way out.' Lovett's conclusions sounded remarkably similar to Jenna Ryu's analysis and further validated my Chatbot experience, which eased my embarrassment.
Americans are evolving their relationships with AI. But the American Psychological Association, cautions that blindly following a chatbot's generic advice could be dangerous. There's an inherent risk of receiving inappropriate or, worse, genuinely harmful feedback.
When all is said and done, it's important to remember that a chatbot therapist is automation, not human, and not to allow yourself to be tricked into believing that they have feelings when they don't. And don't forget, they were designed to be workers, devoid of heart, not lovers who can meet your every emotional need.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Elon Musk threatens to decommission SpaceX's Dragon spacecraft after Trump feud. What does it mean for the US space industry?
Elon Musk threatens to decommission SpaceX's Dragon spacecraft after Trump feud. What does it mean for the US space industry?

Yahoo

time17 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Elon Musk threatens to decommission SpaceX's Dragon spacecraft after Trump feud. What does it mean for the US space industry?

When you buy through links on our articles, Future and its syndication partners may earn a commission. An explosive, and very public, feud between President Donald Trump and SpaceX founder Elon Musk on Thursday (June 5) has raised doubts over the future of America's space industry. The war of words could place $22 billion of SpaceX's government contracts with multiple U.S. space programs at risk, according to one estimate, although the real figure — which remains classified — could be significantly higher. Following threats from the president on his social media platform Truth Social that the U.S. could cancel the government contracts and subsidies awarded to Musk's companies, the CEO of SpaceX retorted that his space company would "begin decommissioning its Dragon spacecraft immediately." Hours later, Musk responded to a follower telling him to "cool off" by saying "Good advice. Ok, we won't decommission Dragon." The disagreement began on Tuesday (June 3) when Musk criticized the administration's proposed tax and spending bill on his social media platform X. "This massive, outrageous, pork-filled Congressional spending bill is a disgusting abomination. Shame on those who voted for it: you know you did wrong. You know it," Musk wrote on X. Related: 'No radio astronomy from the ground would be possible anymore': Satellite mega-swarms are blinding us to the cosmos — and a critical 'inflection point' is approaching This then escalated into a full-blown social media feud on Thursday, with Musk claiming that Trump's name appears in unreleased files relating to sex offender Jeffrey Epstein. The White House condemned these allegations. "This is an unfortunate episode from Elon, who is unhappy with the One Big Beautiful Bill because it does not include the policies he wanted," representatives wrote on X. Trump then claimed Musk "just went CRAZY," posting: "The easiest way to save money in our Budget, Billions and Billions of Dollars, is to terminate Elon's Governmental Subsidies and Contracts. I was always surprised that Biden didn't do it!" SpaceX's Dragon capsule is a reusable spacecraft capable of carrying up to seven passengers and cargo to and from Earth orbit, according to SpaceX. NASA currently relies on the capsule to ferry astronauts to the International Space Station (ISS), so canceling these government contracts effectively eliminates America's ability to launch astronauts to space from American soil, Live Science's sister website, reported. NASA also heavily relies on SpaceX for other space programs, having selected the Starship Human Landing System (HLS), a lunar lander variant of the company's next-generation Starship spacecraft, to carry American astronauts to the moon for the first time in more than 50 years aboard the 2027 Artemis 3 mission. NASA is investing $4 billion into Starship's development, and canceling its contract could seriously handicap NASA and the future of U.S.-led space exploration. While other competitors exist, such as Amazon founder Jeff Bezos's Blue Origin and Boeing's Starliner spacecraft, they lag far behind SpaceX. RELATED STORIES —Facing steep funding cuts, scientists propose using black holes as particle colliders instead of building new ones on Earth —Trump's 2026 budget would slash NASA funding by 24% and its workforce by nearly one third —NASA plans to build a giant radio telescope on the 'dark side' of the moon. Here's why. The Starliner capsule is not yet certified to fly operational astronaut missions and was responsible for "stranding" two astronauts on the ISS for nine months last year. The astronauts returned to Earth on March 18 aboard a SpaceX Dragon capsule, and neither Boeing nor NASA have offered any significant updates into fixes that will make Starliner flightworthy. SpaceX's lead on its competitors is reflected in the size of its government subsidies. In April, the U.S. Space Force, the military branch of U.S. space exploration, awarded the company nearly $6 billion in launch contracts, while the United Launch Alliance received $5.4 billion and Blue Origin $2.4 billion. In response to the feud between Musk and Trump, NASA press secretary Bethany Stevens declined to comment on SpaceX, but she did tell Reuters that "we will continue to work with our industry partners to ensure the president's objectives in space are met." NASA's deputy administrator Lori Garver told Reuters that, as well as not being in national interests, canceling SpaceX's contacts would probably not be legal. However, she also added that "a rogue CEO threatening to decommission spacecraft, putting astronauts' lives at risk, is untenable."

Could Musk-Trump feud stoke GOP divisions ahead of midterms? ANALYSIS
Could Musk-Trump feud stoke GOP divisions ahead of midterms? ANALYSIS

Yahoo

time17 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Could Musk-Trump feud stoke GOP divisions ahead of midterms? ANALYSIS

Even by the standards of President Donald Trump and billionaire Elon Musk's relationship -- an unprecedented alliance punctuated by a meme-inspired reshaping of the government, numerous rocket launches, assassination attempts, a quarter-billion-dollar political gamble and electric car photo-ops -- it's been an unusual week. For months, Musk had been the closest of Trump's advisers -- even living at his Mar-a-Lago estate in Florida and spending time with the president's family. More recently, Trump gave Musk a congratulatory Oval Office sendoff from his work leading cost-cutting efforts in his administration, giving him a golden key with a White House insignia. But the billionaire's muted criticisms of Trump's "big, beautiful bill" grew louder and more pointed, culminating in posts Thursday on his social media platform taking credit for Trump's November win and Republicans' takeover of the Senate. "Without me, Trump would have lost the election, Dems would control the House and the Republicans would be 51-49 in the Senate," Musk posted. "Such ingratitude." Some lawmakers and Republicans worry Musk's apparent acrimonious departure from Trump's orbit could create new uncertainties for the party -- and stoke GOP divisions that would not serve Republicans well heading into a critical legislative stretch before the midterm elections. The back-and-forth attacks, which continued into the weekend and took a sharply personal turn, reverberated across a capital they have both reshaped. Trump on Friday told several reporters over the phone that he was not thinking about Musk and told ABC News Chief Washington Correspondent Jonathan Karl that Musk had "lost his mind." In the near term, Trump and the GOP are trying to muscle their signature tax and domestic policy megabill through the House and Senate, with the slimmest of margins and no shortage of disagreements. MORE: Speaker Johnson tries to protect fate of megabill from Trump-Musk crossfire Any shift on the key issues could topple the high-wire act needed to please House and Senate Republicans. A nonstop torrent of criticism from Musk's social media megaphone could collapse negotiations, harden the position of the bill's critics and even undermine other pieces of Trump's first-term agenda. "You hate seeing division and chaos," Rep. Don Bacon, R-Neb., who represents a swing district, told ABC News about the Trump-Musk fracas. "It's not helpful." Rep. Jodey Arrington, R-Texas, the chairman of the House Budget Committee, called Musk a "credible voice" on "debt and spending" issues. "It's never helpful when he says those things. He's a believable person and he has a broad reach, but I think he's frustrated and people understand the context," Arrington said, predicting that both men will eventually resolve their dispute. Republican operatives watching the spat unfold this week told ABC News it is too early to say how the feud between Trump and Musk could affect the next election. The billionaire spent more than anyone else on the last election, pouring $270 million into groups boosting Trump and other Republicans up and down the ballot, according to Federal Election Commission filings. MORE: Trump-Musk feud leaves some DOGE staffers worried about their futures: Sources He already suggested he would cut back on his political donations next cycle, more than a year out from the midterm elections. In the final stretch of the 2024 race, he relocated to Pennsylvania, hosting town halls and bankrolling his own get-out-the-vote effort in the critical swing state. Since his foray into Washington, Musk has become a deeply polarizing and unpopular figure, while the president's approval rating has ticked up in some recent surveys. Groups affiliated with Musk spent $20 million this spring on the Wisconsin Supreme Court race, only for the liberal candidate to win -- signaling to some Republicans the limits of Musk's political pull. While his support may be missed by Republicans next cycle, Trump has continued to raise millions of dollars to support his future political plans, a remarkable sum for a term-limited president that underscores his central role in the party and undisputed kingmaker status. MORE: Trump tells ABC Musk 'lost his mind,' as CEO's dad says 'make sure this fizzles out' Rep. Mike Lawler, R-N.Y., who is mulling a gubernatorial bid in 2026, downplayed the tensions or political implications, suggesting that reporters "spend way more time worrying about these things than most average people." "I'm sure they will make peace," Lawler told ABC News on Friday. There were some signs of a détente. While Musk continued to hurl insults at Trump ally and critic Steve Bannon, his social media activity appeared to cool off on Friday, and the billionaire said one supporter was "not wrong" for saying Trump and Musk are "much stronger together than apart." Through nearly a decade in politics and three campaigns for the White House, Trump has demonstrated a remarkable ability to move past disputes or disagreements with many intraparty rivals and onetime critics, including some who now serve in his Cabinet. Now, some Republicans left Washington this week asking themselves if Musk is willing to do the same. Could Musk-Trump feud stoke GOP divisions ahead of midterms? ANALYSIS originally appeared on

DOGE caucus leader says Elon Musk made a 'massive exaggeration' about spending cuts
DOGE caucus leader says Elon Musk made a 'massive exaggeration' about spending cuts

Yahoo

time17 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

DOGE caucus leader says Elon Musk made a 'massive exaggeration' about spending cuts

A key DOGE-minded lawmaker in Congress calling out Elon Musk amid his feud with Trump. "Most everybody knew Elon was exaggerating to what he could do," said Rep. Blake Moore of Utah. He also said Musk was "parroting false claims" about the "Big Beautiful Bill." Shortly after the feud between President Donald Trump and Elon Musk hit its apex on Thursday, a key DOGE-minded lawmaker in Congress had some pointed words about the world's richest man. "Most everybody knew Elon was exaggerating to what he could do," Republican Rep. Blake Moore of Utah told reporters outside the Capitol. "He was claiming finding $4 billion a day in cuts he was going to get. One time, he said $2 trillion, he was going to find." "It's a massive exaggeration, and I think people are recognizing that now," Moore said. The Utah Republican is one of the three co-leaders of the House DOGE caucus, a bipartisan group of lawmakers who had hoped to support Musk's cost-cutting efforts. The caucus met a handful of times at the beginning of the year, and leaders previously told BI that they intended to compile a report of potential cost-saving measures for DOGE at the end of the first quarter of this year. That didn't end up happening, in part because the White House DOGE Office ultimately had little interaction with the caucus. One Democratic member declared the group to be "dead" last month. "We've always been a little frustrated that there was such limited interaction," Moore said on Thursday. "We couldn't really identify where we were to lean in, and we had a ton of folks ready to support it, but there just wasn't that interaction." Musk did not respond to a request for comment. Moore said that he wanted to pursue cuts to federal spending through the bipartisan government funding process, saying that there are "plenty of Democrats that recognize there's waste in our government." GOP leaders have said they'll pursue DOGE cuts both through that process and through "rescission" packages, the first of which is set to be voted on in the House next week. The first package, which includes cuts to public broadcasting and foreign aid, is $9.4 billion, just a fraction of the cost savings that Musk once predicted. "It's definitely kind of over-promising, under-delivering," Moore said. Musk's public feud with Trump began last week, when the tech titan began criticizing the "Big Beautiful Bill" that Republicans are trying to muscle through Congress. The bill is projected to increase the deficit by trillions of dollars, though Republicans have argued that those forecasts do not account for the economic growth that might be spurred by the bill. That feud boiled over on Tuesday, with the two men engaging in a war of words on their respective social media platforms. "When I saw Musk start posting, just parroting false claims about the tax reconciliation bill, it was clear something's amiss," Moore said. "And so it escalated, yeah. It escalated very quickly." Read the original article on Business Insider

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store