&w=3840&q=100)
Is it a Gaza ceasefire? Why eyes will be on Washington more than Doha
President Donald Trump and Israel's Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu arrive for a news conference in the East Room of the White House, on Feb. 4, 2025, in Washington. AP File
While an Israeli negotiating team is in Qatar to explore the possibility of a ceasefire in Gaza, the real action is expected in Washington today as President Donald Trump hosts Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu for high-stakes talks.
According to reports, Trump, who has described the latest 60-day truce proposal as 'final", is aiming to unveil the potential ceasefire deal alongside Netanyahu at the White House.
With the latest round of indirect ceasefire talks between Israel and Hamas ending without progress and expected to resume in Doha on Monday, the real political pressure and potential breakthrough may now shift to Washington, added reports.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
Netanyahu and Trump share a complicated personal relationship — one that saw Trump expressing open frustration with the Israeli leader just last month during tense efforts to broker a truce with Iran.
Despite past tensions, the two have appeared closely aligned since the US launched airstrikes on Iran's nuclear facilities, a major objective for Israeli military planners, reported The Guardian.
Now arriving in Washington, Netanyahu is seen as politically strengthened at home, which may provide him with the diplomatic space to pursue a ceasefire in Gaza without triggering backlash from his right-wing base that could destabilise his coalition government, added the report, citing analysts.
Hamas seeks key revisions
This week, Hamas gave a 'positive' response to Israel's 60-day ceasefire proposal, but its negotiators are demanding key revisions — including a permanent end to hostilities and a shift in aid distribution oversight from the US and Israeli-supported Gaza Humanitarian Foundation to the United Nations.
The foundation has faced significant criticism, with repeated incidents of Israeli forces firing on civilians at aid distribution points, resulting in hundreds of deaths.
While Israel has rejected these conditions as 'unacceptable', Netanyahu agreed to send negotiators to Qatar for indirect talks with Hamas.
Before departing for Washington on Sunday, he described the moment as a chance 'to expand the circle of peace far beyond what we could have imagined.'
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
Netanyahu said Israeli negotiators in Qatar had clear instructions to pursue a deal based on terms already accepted by Israel, and suggested Trump could play a key role in securing that outcome, according to Reuters.
'We've already transformed the Middle East beyond recognition, and now have a chance to build a brighter future for Israel and the region,' Netanyahu was quoted as saying.
The Qatar talks — the first in six weeks — come as Trump expressed optimism aboard Air Force One on Friday, telling reporters, 'There could be a Gaza deal next week.'
Ahead of the talks, Netanyahu's top adviser, Ron Dermer, met in Washington with Vice President JD Vance, Secretary of State Marco Rubio, and Middle East envoy Steve Witkoff. Sources told The Guardian the discussions focused on postwar plans to eliminate Hamas's control in Gaza and hand over reconstruction to the international community.
The latest version of the deal would have Hamas release 28 Israeli hostages – 10 alive and 18 bodies – over the course of the 60-day ceasefire.
The UN and Palestine Red Crescent Society would be given additional licence to expand aid operations in Gaza. The Israeli army would withdraw first from parts of northern Gaza, and one week later would pull out from parts of the south.
The deal would leave approximately 22 hostages, 10 of them alive, still held in Gaza.
No progress in Doha talks
Meanwhile, even as momentum appears to be building in Washington as Netanyahu prepares to meet Trump today, the latest round of indirect ceasefire talks between Israel and Hamas ended without a breakthrough, BBC reported, quoting a Palestinian official familiar with the negotiations.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
According to the official, the session lasted for nearly three-and-a-half hours and took place in two separate buildings in Doha.
Messages and clarifications were exchanged between the two sides through Qatari and Egyptian mediators, but no progress was achieved.
The official added that talks are expected to resume on Monday, as mediators plan to hold separate meetings with each delegation in an effort to overcome the obstacles and narrow the gaps between the two sides.
According to Reuters, citing two Palestinian officials, the Israeli delegation was not 'sufficiently authorised' to reach an agreement with Hamas because it had 'no real powers'.
Qatari and Egyptian mediators face an uphill task as indirect talks resume on Monday, aiming to resolve the same sticking points that have stalled previous efforts since the last ceasefire collapsed in March.
Since then, Israel has intensified its military campaign and enforced an 11-week aid blockade on Gaza —partially eased in recent weeks — saying the pressure is meant to weaken Hamas and secure the release of hostages.
In the past 24 hours alone, the Israeli military reported striking 130 Hamas targets and killing several militants. Meanwhile, the toll on civilians continues to rise, with Gaza hospital officials reporting over 30 deaths on Sunday.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
The key questions now is if mediators can forge a workable deal, and can Trump convince Netanyahu, in their meeting Monday, that it's time to end the war?
With inputs from agencies

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Fibre2Fashion
32 minutes ago
- Fibre2Fashion
Trump slaps 50% tariffs on Brazil over Bolsonaro trial; Lula responds
US President Donald Trump has imposed sweeping new tariffs on Brazil, citing grievances over the treatment of President Jair Bolsonaro and alleged censorship actions by Brazil's Supreme Court. In a sharply worded letter addressed to Brazilian President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva, Trump announced that, effective August 1, 2025, all Brazilian exports to the US would face a flat 50 per cent tariff—separate from existing sectoral tariffs. Trump called Bolsonaro a 'Highly Respected Leader' and condemned the ongoing legal proceedings against him as 'a Witch Hunt', demanding the trial end immediately. He also accused Brazil of undermining free elections and targeting free speech, pointing to secret censorship orders allegedly sent by the Brazilian Supreme Court to US-based social media platforms. Trump has announced a 50 per cent tariff on all Brazilian exports to the US from August 1, 2025, citing the trial of President Jair Bolsonaro and alleged censorship by Brazil's Supreme Court. In response, Brazilian President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva defended Brazil's sovereignty and judicial independence, calling the claims false and warning of reciprocal measures if tariffs are unilaterally imposed. 'These censorship orders threaten platforms with millions in fines and eviction from the Brazilian market,' Trump wrote. 'We must move away from a trade relationship that has long been unfair and non-reciprocal.' Trump clarified that the tariffs would not apply to Brazilian companies that establish production operations within the US. In a firm response, President Lula reaffirmed Brazil's sovereignty and judicial independence. 'Brazil will not accept any form of tutelage,' he stated. 'The judicial proceedings fall exclusively under the jurisdiction of Brazil's institutions.' Lula rejected Trump's claims of a trade imbalance, noting that US government data reflects a $410 billion surplus in its trade with Brazil over the past 15 years. He also defended Brazil's digital regulation efforts, stressing that freedom of expression must not be conflated with hate speech or illegal content. Lula concluded by warning that any unilateral US tariff hikes would be met under Brazil's Economic Reciprocity Law, asserting that 'sovereignty, respect, and the unwavering defense of the interests of the Brazilian people' will guide its international stance. Fibre2Fashion News Desk (KD)


Time of India
38 minutes ago
- Time of India
Gaza truce possible in one or two weeks but not in a day, Israeli official says
Synopsis A senior Israeli official stated that a Gaza ceasefire and hostage-release agreement between Israel and Hamas could be reached within one to two weeks. During Prime Minister Netanyahu's visit to Washington, the official mentioned that Israel would propose a permanent ceasefire during the 60-day truce, contingent on Hamas disarming. If Hamas declines, Israel will resume military operations.
&w=3840&q=100)

First Post
39 minutes ago
- First Post
In a landmark ruling, court finds Russia guilty of shooting down flight MH17, killing 298 onboard
In a landmark ruling, the European Court of Human Rights found Russia guilty of shooting down Malaysia Airlines Flight MH17 in 2017, killing all 298 passengers and crew onboard read more Families of the victims of the MH17 disaster say they see the decision as an important milestone in their 11-year quest for justice. Reuters Europe's top human rights court delivered damning judgements against Russia on Wednesday, including the ruling that it was Moscow which shot down MH17, killing all passengers, including 38 Australians. The judges at the European Court of Human Rights were delivering rulings on four cases brought by Ukraine and the Netherlands. On Wednesday, the judges ruled that Russia was responsible for widespread violations of international law. Moscow was apprehended for shooting down Malaysia Airlines Flight 17, back in 2014, along with murder, torture, rape, destruction of civilian infrastructure and kidnapping of Ukrainian children after it full-scale invasion of 2022, The Guardian reported. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD The decision was read out in a packed courtroom in Strasbourg. The court's president, Mattias Guyomar, said that Russian forces engaged in 'manifestly unlawful' conduct in the July 2014 attack on the flight. 'The court agreed that the evidence suggested that the missile had been intentionally fired at flight MH17, most likely in the mistaken belief that it had been a military aircraft,' the court said in a statement. 'It was not necessary for the court to decide exactly who had fired the missile, since Russia was responsible for the acts of the Russian armed forces and the armed separatists." 'The court found that no measures had been taken by Russia to accurately identify military targets, in breach of the principles of distinction and precautions," Guyomar furthered. Russia reacts Meanwhile, the Kremlin has maintained that it would ignore what it described as a 'largely symbolic judgment'. Ukraine, on the other hand, lauded the court, calling the ruling 'historic and unprecedented.' Kyiv went on to call the verdict an 'undeniable victory' for the embattled country. The 501-page ruling noted that Russia's refusal to participate in the proceedings also was a violation of the European Convention on Human Rights, the treaty that underpins the court. When asked about the proceedings before the judgment was read, Kremlin Spokesperson Dmitry Peskov dismissed the case altogether. 'We won't abide by it, we consider it void," he said at that time. Meanwhile, families of the victims of the devastating crash saw the judgment as an important milestone in their 11-year quest for justice. Thomas Schansman, whose 18-year-old son, Quinn, was aboard the jetliner, said the judgment made it clear who caused the disaster. Russia 'is responsible for killing my son', Schansman said. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD The tragic story of MH17 On July 17, 2017, a Boeing 777 aircraft was shot down by a Russian-made Buk missile fired from territory in eastern Ukraine controlled by separatist rebels loyal to Moscow. All 298 passengers and crew onboard lost their lives in the tragic incident. The victims of the crash came from 17 countries and included 198 Dutch nationals, 43 Malaysians, 38 Australians and 10 from the UK. In the Wednesday ruling, the judge found that Russia's refusal to acknowledge its involvement in the plane crash violated international law. The court also charged Russia for failing to properly investigate the disaster 'significantly aggravated the suffering' of the relatives and friends of the dead. 'Russia never took any opportunity to tell the truth,' Schansman said. In May this year, the UN's aviation agency also found Russia responsible for the crash. The UN body gave the decision after Australia and the Netherlands launched legal proceedings against Russia under Article 84 of the Convention on International Civil Aviation. It is pertinent to note that the ECHR is an important part of the Council of Europe, the continent's foremost human rights institution. The court's governing body expelled Moscow in 2022, after it launched an all-out invasion of Ukraine. However, the court still has the authority to deal with cases against Russia dating from before its expulsion and, legally, the country is still obliged to participate in the proceedings. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD The European court will now rule on financial compensation at a later date, but Russia's departure leaves little hope that damages will ever be collected. It is also important to note that the decisions in Strasbourg are separate from a criminal prosecution in the Netherlands in which two Russians and a Ukrainian rebel were convicted in absentia of multiple murders for their roles in the downing of Flight MH17.