Brazilian drug smuggler, 25, snared with £625k of cocaine at Scots airport claimed he was going sightseeing
AIRPORT BUST Brazilian drug smuggler, 25, snared with £625k of cocaine at Scots airport claimed he was going sightseeing
Click to share on X/Twitter (Opens in new window)
Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
A BRAZILIAN drugs smuggler who told immigration officials that he crossed the Atlantic to learn English and see Edinburgh has been jailed for five years.
Emanuel Viana-Blausius, 25, told Edinburgh Airport staff that he was going to spend time doing tourist activities in the Scottish capital.
Sign up for Scottish Sun
newsletter
Sign up
1
Viana-Blausius was jailed at the High Court in Edinburgh
He also told staff he would then travel to London to do a language course.
But the High Court in Edinburgh heard he was trying to bring coke into the UK with a street value of £625,000.
UK Border Agency staff were suspicious about his claims and pulled him aside.
He had travelled from his home city of Sao Paolo to Zurich in Switzerland before catching a connecting flight to Scotland.
Prosecutor Ruaraidh Ferguson told judge Lord Lake that Viana-Blausius, of Sao Paolo, was accompanied to baggage reclaim.
Officials confiscated the man's suitcase and opened it.
Mr Ferguson said: 'The suitcase contained a false bottom. The false bottom was kept in place by Velcro and it was covered in clothes.
'Upon removing the bottom, UK Border Agency staff found packages containing compressed white powder.
'This was found to be cocaine.'
The story emerged after Viana-Blausius pleaded guilty last month to being concerned in the supply of cocaine at Edinburgh Airport on December 24 2024.
Brit teen facing life in prison after being 'caught with 14kg of cannabis' in her luggage after huge airport arrest
Mr Ferguson told the court that the accused had no previous convictions for either 'the United Kingdom or Brazil.'
Lord Lake deferred sentence on Viana-Blausius to obtain a report about his background.
On Wednesday, the case called for sentencing.
Defence advocate Lorenzo Alonsi told Lord Lake that his client grew up in poverty and needed to make money for his family.
He said that he worked as a barber and he spoke to somebody about his financial position.
The court heard that this person offered Viana-Blausius a job smuggling the drugs into the UK.
Mr Alonsi added: 'Since being taken into custody in the United Kingdom, he has not had any contact with any of his family back in Brazil.
'He believes his fiancee has given up on him. '
Passing sentence, Lord Lake said: 'I am satisfied in the circumstances that only a custodial sentence would be appropriate.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Herald Scotland
3 hours ago
- The Herald Scotland
Leading KC raises concerns over accused rights in rape trials
However, Mr Ross believes that he should draw attention to the situation for fear of the impact of silence upon the delivery of justice. "We have reached the stage where the victim has lied about things and the court has not allowed the defence to put that before the jury. "How can it be said that someone has had a fair trial when it's been proved that the complainer lied about something important in the course of the inquiry and that was not allowed to be introduced as evidence?" he told The Herald. "There are serious concerns that people are not getting a fair trial when they are not being given the opportunity to provide evidence which might support their innocence". He added: "The lawyers who are taking on these rape and sexual assault cases tend to be less experienced, more junior members of the bar. It's difficult for them to come out and make a claim of this type. "They have their whole career in front of them. At some point they might want to go for a role as a sheriff or a judge, and they will understandably be concerned that if they speak out or are seen to be publicly critical of the criminal justice system that will damage their chances. "But many many lawyers are raising the matter with me. When you hear a lawyer complaining in court about some decision that has gone against them, 90% of the time it's this issue. It is a massive concern." READ MORE: The situation revolves around what evidence is allowed to be heard in open court before a jury. Sometimes known as "rape shield" laws, specific provisions to regulate the use of sexual history evidence were first introduced in Scotland by the Law Reform (Miscellaneous Provisions) (Scotland) Act 1985. These provisions were later repeated in sections 274 and 275 of the Criminal Procedure (Scotland) Act 1995. In response to concerns about their operation, the provisions in the 1995 Act were replaced by new sections 274 and 275 in 2002. The High Court in Glasgow (Image: PA) The provisions are designed to protect complainers giving evidence from irrelevant, intrusive and often distressing questioning. Sections 274 and 275 of the 1995 Act were intended to protect complainers in sexual offence trials from inappropriate questioning about their sexual history and wider character and lifestyle when giving evidence in court. In particular, they were designed to discourage the use of evidence seen as of limited relevance, where the primary purpose of the evidence is to undermine the credibility of the complainer or divert attention from the issues that require to be determined at trial. There are strict rules over what evidence can be heard in rape trials (Image: Getty Images/iStockphoto) However, Mr Ross said the manner in which the rules have been interpreted by the court has been problematic with debate centring on what evidence is judged to be relevant or not. An application to lead evidence of the type struck at by Section 274 must be made at a preliminary hearing – almost always before full preparation for the trial had has been completed - putting the defence at a huge disadvantage. "In the 1985 act the thinking was - why should you be allowed to ask the woman about sex with another man or sex with the accused on a different occasion but in 2002 the scope was extended to include non sexual behaviour," he said. He continued: "At the preliminary hearing you might not have all the case papers, won't know for sure what the complainer is likely to say in evidence, as it might be a year before the trial. "The need for an application within a strict time limit made it very difficult for defence lawyers." He said further restrictions to rules over the admissibility of evidence had since been made in case law. "In short it became extremely difficult to know what you were allowed to ask," said Mr Ross. "Every day you were hearing examples of people saying they thought a piece of evidence was relevant but the judge has ruled that it would not be allowed. "Defendants would be going around with messages, photographs, things they thought would prove them to be innocent and the judges would not allow them to tell the jury about those pieces of exculpatory evidence." Mr Ross went on to say a number of Scottish rape cases relating to the admissibility of evidence were currently before the Supreme Court having had appeals against conviction dismissed. A number of Scottish cases are before the Supreme Court for consideration. (Image: Dan Kitwood) In one of the cases the victim alleged that the accused had raped her when she was 13, claiming she became pregnant and given birth to a child. However, there was no evidence that she had become pregnant or given birth - a matter that the accused wanted to present to the jury. His lawyer had taken the view that it was extremely unlikely that the trial court would allow such evidence to be presented – and the Scottish appeal court agreed with that assessment and refused his appeal. Mr Ross said a second case at the Supreme Court revolved around a man convicted of rape following a work night out. The man was with the woman, whom he supervised, in a pub where both were drinking. "There was apparently CCTV evidence showing the complainer beckoning the accused into a disabled toilet where they had sex," said Mr Ross. "They both later left the bar, got a taxi to his house and woke up next morning in bed together." The woman alleged she was raped. "He was interviewed by police and explained that events at the pub exactly as they had been captured by the CCTV. "He was then charged with rape in the disabled pub toilet and rape in the house." "But the prosecutor became aware that the judge may allow CCTV evidence from the pub, so dropped the pub charge, with the result that the defence was not allowed to lead evidence about what had happened in the pub. His account of what happened in the pub was entirely supported by the CCTV evidence. "It supported his credibility but he wasn't allowed to put the CCTV evidence before the jury as the court ruled that it wasn't relevant to the charges at his house." Mr Ross went on to say that he didn't "accept there is a low conviction rate for rape or sexual assault" as there is a lack of relevant data. He addition he suggested that it was misleading to compare conviction in rape cases rapes to those in other types of crime such as murder. "In a murder case there might be 15 sources of evidence, from eyewitnesses, DNA, finger prints in murder cases, while in a rape case just there is very often only one source of evidence - namely the person making the complaint. "So it's entirely unsurprising that there are lower conviction rates for rape than murder." A spokesperson for Rape Crisis Scotland said: 'We wish Thomas Ross KC would express equal concern about ensuring justice for survivors of sexual violence. 'The conviction for rape cases involving a single complainer is only 24%. The overall conviction rate for all crime is 86%. Too many women are being completely let down by the Scottish criminal justice system. "We continue to hear from women about how distressing their treatment is at the hands of some defence lawyers.' Mr Ross responded: "I've met many women who feel completely let by the Scottish criminal justice system. I've met many men who feel completely let down by the criminal justice system too - including men who believe that the court's interpretation of section 275 deprived them of a fair trial. "With so many people feeling completely let down by the system - maybe its time to have another look at the way it operates." A spokeswoman for the Scottish Courts and Tribunals Service said it would be inappropriate for the Judicial Office to comment on Mr Ross's personal views. A Scottish Government spokesperson said: 'Everyone has the right to a fair trial and to appeal against a conviction or sentence. There are well-established rules on what evidence can be led in sexual offences trials, and clear routes to challenge how these are applied.'
JAMnews
4 hours ago
- JAMnews
Former Armenian defense minister may face criminal charges
Criminal prosecution against Seyran Ohanyan The Armenian parliament spent several hours debating whether to lift the parliamentary immunity of opposition 'Hayastan' bloc deputies Seyran Ohanyan and Artsvik Minasyan. The motion was submitted by prosecutor general Anna Vardapetyan. No decision was reached, and the discussion will continue on July 7. Lawmakers will vote by secret ballot. If the parliament agrees to lift their immunity, criminal prosecution will begin against both deputies. Both lawmakers previously held ministerial positions under the former government. Seyran Ohanyan is a former defense minister, and Artsvik Minasyan is a former minister of environment. The cases against them are interconnected. Prosecutor general Anna Vardapetyan stated that Ohanyan abused his official position by illegally building a private home in a specially protected natural area. Furthermore, he allegedly concealed this property—valued at around 125 million drams (approximately $325,000)—from his annual asset declarations. Artsvik Minasyan, according to the prosecutor general, was aware of the illegal construction. As chair of a ministry commission, he presented the private property as an investment project of the environment ministry, effectively providing legal cover for the unauthorized construction. Here's a media-style English translation of your sentence: Thus, legal grounds were created for the unauthorized construction. 'The investment project served as a legal disguise for an already committed illegal act, which they attempted to present as legitimate,' Vardapetyan said. Following the tender process, the lease and construction rights for the land plot were transferred for 25 years to a relative of Seyran Ohanyan's driver. However, the house does not officially exist in property records. Minasyan maintains that the tender process was not formal and that the ministry of environment had no authority to investigate personal connections between the bidders. The prosecutor general stressed that these are serious crimes, with the statute of limitations still valid. The court will determine the punishment, which could include imprisonment. Opposition factions 'Hayastan' and 'I have honor' boycotted the discussion on Ohanyan's immunity, arguing that it is unlawful to proceed in his absence. Under parliamentary rules, such proceedings can take place only if a deputy's absence is deemed unjustified. The parliamentary speaker stated that Ohanyan's absence could not be considered justified, as he had not submitted any medical documents regarding his health condition. Regarding Artsvik Minasyan, opposition deputies described the process as 'political persecution.' Deputy Taguhi Tovmasyan said Minasyan is being accused of actions that were beyond his legal powers—specifically, whether to demolish or legalize the construction. All sides' perspectives on the case will continue to unfold. Former defense minister built mansion in protected area The case concerns land belonging to the state-run 'Sevan National Park.' According to Armenian law, private ownership is prohibited in this and other specially protected areas. The law also bans major construction projects in such locations. 'Only temporary infrastructure related to sports, recreation, or entertainment is allowed in areas with this status. In other words, projects must serve the public good and benefit everyone. Building a private, fenced residence is strictly prohibited,' prosecutor general Anna Vardapetyan explained. She stated that the value of the illegal construction on the seized land is estimated at around 125 million drams (approximately $328,000). Construction took place between 2010 and 2015 without proper permits. Initially, two applicants submitted bids for the project tender—both reportedly affiliated with Seyran Ohanyan. The repair and reconstruction of the property's swimming pool and sauna were carried out by Sitta Group LLC, a company selected through a defense ministry tender. According to the prosecutor, the son of the company's owner, Grigor Barseghyan, worked at the ministry of defense at the time. He headed the production and technical department of the defense ministry's construction and housing division. Law enforcement authorities found that the defense ministry ultimately did not pay the company for the work. 'The actual owner of Sitta Group LLC, Levon Barseghyan, realizing his company's dependence on Seyran Ohanyan and Ashot Grigoryan [head of the ministry's construction department], and aware that his son worked under Grigoryan's supervision, did not demand the 58 million dram [$152,000] payment, hoping for illegal advantages in future procurement processes,' stated the prosecution's report submitted to parliament. In addition, from 2011 to 2016, the military police provided security for the property, with their salaries—amounting to at least 13.12 million drams (around $34,000)—paid from the defense ministry budget. The prosecutor general said this also constitutes abuse of power. Moreover, the mansion was not included in official records of illegal property subject to confiscation, as it 'does not exist' in official documentation. 'The mansion exists in reality. But in the documents and in the cadastral registry, it does not. Only the land plot is registered, and its listed value is dozens of times lower—just 3 million drams (less than $8,000),' Vardapetyan noted. It is confirmed that the owner of this property is Ohanyan According to the prosecutor general, ownership of the property is confirmed by witness testimonies and search records. She noted that the electricity and gas utility accounts for the house are registered under the name of Seyran Ohanyan's mother-in-law. Ohanyan himself has not denied links to the property. 'Ohanyan admits using the property but has not explained how he financed its construction. He claims it was built using his own funds and savings,' Vardapetyan said. Another former minister accused of abusing power According to prosecutor general Anna Vardapetyan, former minister of environment Artsvik Minasyan admitted during his testimony that he was aware the land plot in question was not vacant. 'The chair of the environmental tender commission, fully aware that an unauthorized structure existed on the site, tells the government that there is no such structure and proposes launching an investment project,' she said. The prosecutor concluded that, in doing so, Minasyan abused his official position. 'The abuse lies in the fact that a private property was presented as an investment project. As a result, the state budget received no revenue. At most, property tax could have been collected—but only if the illegal construction had been legalized. And anyone with basic legal knowledge won't legalize an unauthorized structure in a specially protected area. That's why it was presented as an investment project for a 25-year period,' Vardapetyan explained. Minasyan: 'I acted in the public interest' Unlike Seyran Ohanyan, Artsvik Minasyan attended the parliamentary discussions. After the prosecutor general's remarks, he stated that either Vardapetyan had not been properly briefed or she had not reviewed the case thoroughly. 'They are accusing me of actions that, from a legal perspective, cannot be attributed to me,' he said. The lawmaker argued that claims suggesting the tender was merely a formality were false. He stressed that the body he headed was not required to verify ties between tender participants. 'I not only didn't know who had built the structure, I also didn't know whether Mr. Ohanyan was connected to it. I simply stated that, according to the information provided to me, Ohanyan was using the property,' Minasyan explained. He insisted that he had not exceeded his authority and acted in the public interest. He rejected the accusations and claimed that the process was aimed at discrediting him. 'This wasn't about group interests or personal gain. If there had been such an interest, I would admit it. There was none. I acted in the interest of the public and environmental protection,' Minasyan declared. Ohanyan: 'The goal is to distract the public from real threats' According to PM Seyran Ohanyan, the motion was submitted to parliament during his excused absence due to health issues. He claims that Article 108, Clause 3 of the National Assembly's Rules of Procedure was violated. According to this clause, the matter can be discussed without the deputy only if their absence from the session is considered unexcused. 'On July 1, I sent a letter to the Speaker of the National Assembly stating that I would be unable to attend the extraordinary session, as I have been undergoing rehabilitation treatment since June 27. The treatment is ongoing. The letter was accompanied by a medical certificate,' Ohanyan said. The former defense minister believes that a 'show' is being orchestrated around him and his colleagues, serving two purposes: 'to distract public attention from the severe threats to our state created by their own actions, in coordination with Azerbaijani authorities, to systematically neutralize all political, public, military figures, philanthropists, and clergy who stand for Artsakh, Armenia, the survival of the Armenian people, and its spiritual values.' 'These people are aiming their weapons at the nation' — deputy speaker 'You cannot have a strong army when its leadership is busy building private mansions, saunas, and swimming pools at the expense of the army, national parks, and the people,' said deputy speaker of parliament Hakob Arshakyan. He reminded that the defense ministry's construction department is responsible for building military barracks, trenches, and infrastructure for soldiers—not for constructing private estates for ministers. 'This is exactly what systemic corruption looked like—the kind from which the Armenian people were freed by the 2018 revolution. Now, society wants, can, and has the will to build an Armenia where citizens live under a fair system, feel happy, and are masters of their own country. That is why these people—the former authorities—are now trying to turn their weapons against the people and the legitimate government. We won't allow it,' he said, referring to the recently uncovered coup plot. Follow us – Twitter | Facebook | Instagram Criminal prosecution against Seyran Ohanyan
Daily Mail
14 hours ago
- Daily Mail
BREAKING NEWS Palestine Action will be BANNED after High Court judge refused to block it being branded a 'terror group'
Palestine Action is set to be banned after a High Court judge refused to temporarily block it from being designated a terror group. This is a breaking news story, it'll be updated soon.
