Man (55) accused of directing masked men at New IRA parade to stay in custody
Masked members of a Dissident Republican colour party take part in a commemorative march in Derry (Londonderry) in Northern Ireland on April 21, 2025, to commemorate the 1916 Easter Rising (Credit: PAUL FAITH / AFP)
A security worker accused of directing men in paramilitary uniforms as violence flared during a dissident republican parade in Derry is set to remain in custody.
Thomas Moore had been granted magistrates bail on charges linked to the Easter Monday disorder allegedly orchestrated by the New IRA.
A prosecution appeal against his release was put on hold at the High Court today for further police investigations to be carried out.
The 55-year-old is now expected to be held in custody for at least another three weeks.
Moore, of Farren Park in the city, has been charged with managing a meeting in support of the IRA.
He faces further counts of aiding and abetting in both wearing clothing in support of a proscribed organisation and in failing to comply with conditions imposed by the Parades Commission.
Trouble erupted close to the scene of the annual parade from the Creggan to the Bogside in commemoration of the 1916 Easter Rising.
An estimated 50 petrol bombs and 50 fireworks were thrown at police during the disorder.
Prosecution counsel argued that many of the men who took part in the march were masked and wearing paramilitary uniforms in direct contravention of a condition imposed by the Parades Commission.
She told the court Moore, named as a proposed steward for the event, was identified by an air support unit leading other participants.
'He was observed directing a group of masked and uniformed parade members to their starting point,' the barrister claimed.
After the march got underway a number of youths began to attack PSNI lines with devices loaded in shopping trolleys.
'It's highly likely the disorder was orchestrated by the New IRA to prevent police from disrupting what had become an illegal parade,' counsel submitted.
Moore was also allegedly spotted beckoning some of the masked and uniformed men towards a gazebo for them to change back into civilian clothes.
He then dismantled and put the tent in the back of a work van before being stopped and arrested, according to the prosecution.
In a written statement Moore said he has worked in the security industry for 35 years, stewarding at events ranging from Halloween and Maritime Festivals to football matches, movie sets and US Presidential visits.
He insisted: 'I played no role whatsoever in organising, supporting, assisting or encouraging any illegal activity.'
Defence counsel Gavyn Cairns argued that Moore understood the Easter Monday event would be a completely lawful procession.
'He was stewarding or marshalling a legal parade where participants were permitted to wear period dress… from the 1970s,' the barrister contended.
But adjourning proceedings until May 16, Mr Justice Rooney requested inquiries be made into claims that others convicted of similar offences avoided custodial sentences.
'There is no doubt from the photographs here that there is prima facie evidence,' the judge said.
'My proposal is to adjourn this for a period of three weeks to allow police time to carry out further investigations.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Examiner
3 hours ago
- Irish Examiner
Appeal court throws out massive civil fraud penalty against Donald Trump
An appeal court has thrown out a massive civil fraud penalty against Donald Trump in a New York state lawsuit accusing him of exaggerating his wealth. The decision came seven months after the Republican returned to the White House. A panel of five judges in New York's mid-level Appellate Division said the verdict, which stood to cost the president more than 515 million dollars (£382 million) and rock his property empire, was 'excessive'. After finding that Mr Trump engaged in fraud by flagrantly padding financial statements that went to lenders and insurers, Judge Arthur Engoron ordered him last year to pay 355 million dollars (£263 million) in penalties. With interest, the sum has topped 515 million dollars. The total — combined with penalties levied on some other Trump Organisation executives including Mr Trump's sons Eric and Donald Jr — now exceeds 527 million dollars (£391 million), with interest. Judge Arthur Engoron (Shannon Stapleton/AP) 'While the injunctive relief ordered by the court is well crafted to curb defendants' business culture, the court's disgorgement order, which directs that defendants pay nearly half a billion dollars to the State of New York, is an excessive fine that violates the Eighth Amendment of the United States Constitution,' Judges Dianne T Renwick and Peter H Moulton wrote in one of several opinions shaping the appeals court's ruling. Judge Engoron had also imposed other punishments, such as banning Mr Trump and his two eldest sons from serving in corporate leadership for a few years. Those provisions have been on pause during the appeal, and Mr Trump was able to hold off collection of the money by posting a 175 million dollar (£130 million) bond. The court, which was split on the merits of the lawsuit and the lower court's fraud finding, dismissed the penalty Judge Engoron imposed in its entirety while leaving a pathway for further appeals to the state's highest court, the Court of Appeals. The appeals court, the Appellate Division of the state's trial court, took an unusually long time to rule, weighing Mr Trump's appeal for nearly 11 months after oral arguments last autumn. Normally, appeals are decided in a matter of weeks or a few months. New York attorney general Letitia James, who brought the suit on the state's behalf, has said the businessman-turned-politician engaged in 'lying, cheating and staggering fraud'. The president and his co-defendants denied wrongdoing. In a six-minute summation of sorts after a months-long trial, Mr Trump said in January last year that he was 'an innocent man' and the case was a 'fraud on me'. He has repeatedly maintained that the case and verdict were political moves by Ms James and Judge Engoron, who are both Democrats. The Justice Department has subpoenaed Ms James for records related to the lawsuit, among other documents, as part of an investigation into whether she violated the president's civil rights. New York attorney general Letitia James (Yuki Iwamura/AP) Her lawyer Abbe D Lowell has said that investigating the fraud case is 'the most blatant and desperate example of this administration carrying out the president's political retribution campaign'. Mr Trump and his lawyers said his financial statements were not deceptive because they came with disclaimers noting they had not been audited. The defence also noted that bankers and insurers independently evaluated the numbers and the loans were repaid. Despite such discrepancies as tripling the size of his Trump Tower penthouse, he said the financial statements were, if anything, low estimates of his fortune. During an appellate court hearing in September, the president's lawyers said many of the case's allegations were too old, a claim they made unsuccessfully before trial. The defence also says Ms James misused a consumer protection law to sue Mr Trump and improperly policed private business transactions that were satisfactory to those involved. State attorneys said the law in question applies to fraudulent or illegal business conduct, whether it targets everyday consumers or big corporations. Though Mr Trump insists no one was harmed by the financial statements, the state says the numbers led lenders to make riskier loans than they knew, and that honest borrowers lose out when others boost their net-worth numbers. The state has argued that the verdict rested on ample evidence and that the scale of the penalty comported with Mr Trump's gains, including his profits on properties financed with the loans and the interest he saved by getting favourable terms offered to wealthy borrowers. The civil fraud case was one of several legal obstacles for Mr Trump as he campaigned, won and started a second term as president.
The Irish Sun
7 hours ago
- The Irish Sun
Putin IS ready to meet Zelensky face-to-face, says his stooge Lavrov – but vaguely adds ‘issues need to be worked out'
This is not the first time the Kremlin has raised unidentified 'issues' to be sorted out STALLING FOR TIME Putin IS ready to meet Zelensky face-to-face, says his stooge Lavrov – but vaguely adds 'issues need to be worked out' VLADIMIR Putin is ready to meet Ukraine's President Zelensky, according a top Kremlin minister - but only after working through a list of vague "issues". Pressure has been mounting on Vlad to sit down with Zelensky since the White House summit - but the latest update looks suspiciously like well-worn stalling tactics. 2 Putin is apparently ready to meet Zelensky Credit: AFP 2 Zelensky has been ready for some time to meet Putin Credit: The Mega Agency Advertisement Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov said: "Our president has repeatedly said that he is ready to meet, including with Mr Zelensky." But he insisted the meeting would only happen "with the understanding that all issues that require consideration at the highest level will be well worked out, and experts and ministers will prepare appropriate recommendations. "And, of course, with the understanding that when and if - hopefully, when - it comes to signing future agreements, the issue of the legitimacy of the person who signs these agreements from the Ukrainian side will be resolved." Following the Alaska summit, Trump said he had begun arranging a meeting between the Russian and Ukrainian leaders. Advertisement Momentum seemed to build after Zelensky and EU leaders met the President in Washington - during which Trump took a 40-minute call with Putin. The blueprint is for a head-to-head between Zelensky and Putin, followed by a trilateral meeting with Trump. More to follow... For the latest news on this story, keep checking back at The U.S. Sun, your go-to destination for the best celebrity news, sports news, real-life stories, jaw-dropping pictures, and must-see videos. Like us on Facebook at TheSunUS and follow us on X at @TheUSSun
The Irish Sun
7 hours ago
- The Irish Sun
Grotesque paedophile who tried to rape 7-year-old girl agrees to be surgically CASTRATED in deal with prosecutors
The sex offender has been described as a "predator" after his latest crime was uncovered FOR THE CHOP Grotesque paedophile who tried to rape 7-year-old girl agrees to be surgically CASTRATED in deal with prosecutors A SICK paedophile who tried to rape a seven-year-old girl has agreed to be surgically castrated as part of his plea deal. Serial sex offender Thomas Allen McCartney, 37, accepted the punishment after pleading guilty to first-degree attempted rape of a child under the age of 13. 3 Serial sex offender Thomas Allen McCartney, 37, has agreed to be chemically and surgically castrated after he tried to rape a seven-year-old girl Credit: Vernon Parish Sheriff's Office 3 Advertisement The Louisiana native still faces 40 years in prison. McCartney has been designated as a "Tier Three" offender after his grotesque crimes were uncovered. In February 2023, a horrified mum walked in on McCartney "engaging in sexual contact" with her daughter, according to KPLC. He was already a known sex offender after being convicted in 2011 of attempted aggravated sexual assault. Advertisement Court documents show he also has one count of felony carnal knowledge of a juvenile from 2006 on his records. Due to his disturbed history and latest offence, McCartney made the decision to take a plea deal that involves him being castrated, the Vernon Parish DA office said. District Attorney Terry Lambright told People it will involve him being physically and chemically castrated. Chemical castration is a procedure that typically involves using medication to reduce testosterone or other sex hormones to lower a person's sex drive. Advertisement Whereas surgical castration involves removing a man's testicles or a woman's ovaries in order to stop their production of sex hormones. Lambright added: "This is a horrific crime that never should have happened. 'My police chief dad raped me for 11yrs as leader of twisted paedo sex cult whose members would chase me through woods "Thomas McCartney is a predator that needs to be locked away from others in our community." The deal also states he will serve 40 years with the Louisiana Department of Corrections. McCartney could have refused to undergo the treatment but he would have faced up to five extra years on his sentence without the possibility of an early release. Advertisement The ruling comes after Louisiana became the first US state where judges can order sex offenders with child victims to undergo surgical castration. It follows a bill which was signed into law by Republican Gov. Jeff Landry last year. The US became one of only a handful of countries who allow for castration to be handed out as a punishment. Others include Czech Republic, Madagascar and states in Nigeria. These rulings have been strongly criticised by Amnesty International and human rights organizations in the past. Advertisement Surgical castration can be viewed as a violation of human rights as it can take away a person's bodily integrity, dignity, and freedom from cruel or degrading treatment. Some international organisations also argue it is a form of inhumane treatment. Another issue is that it is a permanent procedure so cannot be undone. Chemical castration is often viewed as a more accepted alternative. Several US states have laws allowing for its use which sees pharmaceutical drugs given to the individual in order to halt their sex drive. Advertisement Louisiana's new surgical castration law LOUISIANA is the first US state to allow surgical castration to be used as a punishment for sex crimes under a new law signed by Republican Gov. Jeff Landry. This law went into effect on August 1, 2024, and allows judges to order people found guilty of certain sex crimes against minors to undergo surgical castration. In most cases, it only applies to offenders found guilty of aggravated sex crimes against a child under 13. However, it is down to the individual if they chose to undergo the surgery. They can refuse but it would result in them being sentenced to three to five years extra on their sentence without the possibility of getting out early. It was argued that the bill will act as a strong deterrent for any child sex abusers and therefore protect children.
