'keeping Americans safe, both at home & abroad': Why US is pulling staff from the Middle East as nuclear talks with Iran stall
The United States is reducing its diplomatic and military footprint in parts of the Middle East amid rising tensions with Iran, as nuclear negotiations appear to stall and regional instability looms.
The State Department on Wednesday ordered the departure of all nonessential staff from the US Embassy in Baghdad, citing a commitment 'to keeping Americans safe, both at home and abroad.' The embassy had already been operating with limited staff.
Additionally, the State Department is authorising the optional departure of nonessential personnel and family members from diplomatic posts in Bahrain and Kuwait. The US military is also following suit, with Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth approving the voluntary departure of military dependents from multiple locations across the region.
US Central Command said it is 'monitoring the developing tension.'
White House spokesperson Anna Kelly noted that the decisions came after a regular review of American personnel abroad. 'This decision was made as a result of a recent review,' she said.
The move comes as efforts to revive the stalled US-Iran nuclear negotiations face fresh setbacks. Talks aimed at curbing Iran's nuclear programme in exchange for sanction relief have reportedly reached a deadlock, with the next round—originally planned for this weekend in Oman—now in doubt.
Two US officials, speaking anonymously, said it was increasingly unlikely the talks would go ahead.
President Donald Trump offered a pessimistic assessment in a recent interview, saying he is 'getting more and more less confident about' reaching a deal. 'They seem to be delaying, and I think that's a shame,' he told the New York Post podcast Pod Force One.
Iran, meanwhile, rejected threats of force. 'Iran is not seeking a nuclear weapon, and US militarism only fuels instability,' its mission to the UN wrote online.
Defence Minister Gen. Aziz Nasirzadeh added that if war were imposed, 'the opponent's casualties will certainly be more than ours,' warning the US that its regional bases 'are within our reach.'
Separately, the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) Board of Governors is considering a censure resolution against Iran, which could trigger the reimposition of UN sanctions under the still-active 2015 nuclear deal. The US withdrew from that deal during Trump's first term.
Amid the growing risk of conflict, the UK's Maritime Trade Operations Centre warned ships to exercise caution in the Persian Gulf, Strait of Hormuz, and Gulf of Oman—areas where Iran has previously seized or attacked vessels.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
34 minutes ago
- Time of India
‘You're unfit to lead': Hegseth grilled over Signal chats, Greenland invasion plan; House hearing erupts over Pentagon chief's evasive responses
Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth faced intense scrutiny at a combative House Armed Services Committee hearing on Thursday, after appearing to confirm that the Pentagon has contingency plans to invade Greenland and Panama if necessary. He also refused to provide direct answers about his use of encrypted Signal chats to discuss military operations — a move that triggered bipartisan concern over potential breaches of protocol. 'Our job at the Defense Department is to have plans for any contingency,' Hegseth said in response to Rep. Adam Smith's (D-Wash.) pointed question about whether the Pentagon had invasion plans for Greenland or Panama. While it's standard for the Pentagon to prepare contingency strategies, Hegseth's vague responses prompted a sharp rebuke from Rep. Mike Turner (R-Ohio): 'I sure as hell hope that is not your testimony.' Hegseth attempted to defuse the moment by saying, 'We look forward to working with Greenland to ensure that it is secured from any potential threats.' The session grew heated as Hegseth evaded repeated questions about his alleged disclosure of operational details — including strike times and munitions — during U.S. attacks on Houthi rebels in Yemen, shared via Signal with both military officials and family members. Lawmakers pressed him on whether he had revealed classified material, but he avoided directly answering. 'What's not classified is that it was an incredible, successful mission,' Hegseth said, sparking more backlash. Rep. Seth Moulton (D-Mass.), a Marine veteran, challenged Hegseth on his accountability: 'Would you hold yourself accountable if the Inspector General finds that you leaked classified information?' Hegseth only replied that he serves 'at the pleasure of the president.' In one of the most charged moments of the hearing, Rep. Salud Carbajal (D-Calif.) told Hegseth, 'You're an embarrassment to this country. You're unfit to lead. You should just get the hell out.' Republican lawmakers defended Hegseth, criticising what they called 'flagrant disrespect,' while Hegseth responded, 'I'm happy to take the arrows' in pursuit of what he called difficult decisions. Lawmakers also questioned the politicisation of the military following a recent campaign-style speech by former President Donald Trump at Fort Bragg, where uniformed troops were seen cheering and booing political opponents, with MAGA merchandise sold nearby. Gen. Dan Caine, chair of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, told the committee he was unaware of any violations, reaffirming that service members must remain apolitical. Hegseth was further grilled on his stance regarding women and transgender troops. He defended cutting diversity programs and asserted he wants the 'most capable troops,' but avoided clear answers on gender equality in combat roles. 'It depends on the context,' he said, arguing that women 'carry a rucksack differently.'
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Client services for client state: Trump's reset with Pak is marked by a transactional, short-horizon foreign policy
ADVERTISEMENT ADVERTISEMENT ADVERTISEMENT Our forefathers believed that we were different from Hindus in every possible aspect of life. Our religion is different. Our customs are different. Our traditions are different. Our thoughts are different. Our ambitions are different.… That was the foundation of the Two-Nation Theory. It was laid on the belief that we are two nations, not one.'That was Pakistan Army chief Gen — now Field Marshal — Asim Munir speaking at the Convention for Overseas Pakistanis in Islamabad on April 17. Less than a week later in Pahalgam , Pakistani terrorists killed 1 Christian and 24 Hindu tourists, as well as a local Muslim who resisted the assailants, after the killers established their victims' religious identities.A link between Munir's rant and the Pahalgam massacre is a possibility. But the rage in India in response to the attack went far beyond what Pakistan had expected. Perhaps it had assessed that India would do what it had done after the 2016 Uri attack when 18 Indian soldiers were killed. Or, in response to the 2019 Pulwama suicide bombing, which killed 41 Indian paramilitary soldiers. On both earlier occasions, India had reacted with one-off counterattacks in POK and Balakot. Rawalpindi probably expected a similar reaction time, the storyline changed. India's counter, launched on May 7, forced the Pakistani DGMO to speak to his Indian counterpart on May 10, and seek a ceasefire. The world is now aware of what transpired between May 7 and 10, although many would not want to talk about it. Suppliers of military equipment to Pakistan — the US, China, and Turkey — will probably be reevaluating their equipment that succumbed to Indian, Russian and French the Americans got into the act, mostly to save their major non-Nato ally. The resounding success of the Indian response had taken them aback. One wondered about the urgency of Trump 's self-described 'intervention' to stop matters escalating on the India-Pak front when the Ukraine war and IsraelHamas conflict — or even the Houthi battles in Yemen — have been allowed to last for years. Indian denials about US intervention have been ignored by the Americans. The Pakistanis, of course, eagerly accepted this anxiety seems to centre around India's destruction of Pakistan's Nur Khan airbase. Remember, according to Pakistani journalist and security expert Imtiaz Gul, the base is 'under American control', where even senior Pakistan Army officers are not allowed to has been extremely useful to the US. Its defence minister Khawaja Asif asserted that they had been fighting America's dirty wars for 30-odd years. From a strategic perspective, it's well-known that the US has been helping Pakistan to keep India 'occupied', while they get a geographic toehold near Iran and China. Both China and the US would like to have total control over Pakistan, to have a base looking at their interests to the east and economic rise, its decisions to choose its sourcing and look after its own interests, cause concern to the US. India tends to get under its skin, as its commerce secretary Howard Lutnick grumbled recently. Which is why the restart of the old game of hyphenating India and Pakistan, ignoring Indian sensitivities, while propping up these decisions may have been made earlier, announcements of $1 bn to Pakistan by IMF, $40 bn by World Bank, and another $800 mn during Operation Sindoor were bad optics. The latest signallings include inviting Munir to attend the 250th US Army Day celebrations in Washington on June 14 — which also happens to be Trump's 79th birthday. Undoubtedly, Munir will meet officials from the State Department and Pentagon, and get promises for military Central Command commander Michael E Kurilla, testifying before the House Armed Services Committee in Washington earlier this week, described Pakistan as a 'phenomenal partner' in anti-terrorism operations. He emphasised the need for the US to maintain relationships with both India and Pakistan, stating that he didn't 'believe it is a binary switch that we can't have one with Pakistan if we have a relationship with India'. In that case, the US shouldn't have a problem with India's relations with Russia and the a matter of conjecture if this US-Pak partnership is about Iran, Central Asia or even India. Pakistan is looking at buying 40 more Chinese J-35A stealth fighter aircraft, a rival of the US F-35, with a listed price of $9 bn, but on offer at 50% the value. This will mean that 80% of Pakistan's military purchases will be from China. Pakistan's debt to China, including CPEC, already amounts to nearly $70 April 26, World Liberty Financial (WLF) agreed to help build Pakistan's blockchain infrastructure, promote stablecoin-based remittances, and tokenise real-world assets. The agreement seeks to position Pakistan as a crypto-forward nation. Eric Trump, the president's son, is associated with WLF, whose executives met Pakistani PM Shehbaz Sharif as well as Munir. Enough such conditions, India should be prepared for Pahalgam-style attacks in the future, while expecting no assistance from China, and ambivalence from the US.
The Print
an hour ago
- The Print
Record of Pakistan on terrorism very clear: MEA on top US general hailing ties with Pak
'We have to have a relationship with Pakistan and with India. I do not believe it is a binary switch that we can't have one with Pakistan if we have a relationship with India,' US Army General Michael Kurilla, Commander of US Central Command (CENTCOM), had said. MEA spokesperson Randhir Jaiswal's remarks at his weekly media briefing here came in response to a query on the recent comments made by a top US general on Washington's ties with New Delhi and with Islamabad. New Delhi, Jun 12 (PTI) Pakistan's record on terrorism is 'very clear' and the Pahalgam attack is only the recent example of cross-border terrorism, the Ministry of External Affairs said on Thursday. 'We should look at the merits of the relationship for the positives that it has,' the US general said during a testimony before the US House Armed Services Committee. Briefing the media here, Jaiswal said, 'The record of Pakistan, of what Pakistan is, is very clear'. 'We all know the Pahalgam attack is only the recent example of cross-border terrorism. I would remind you that only recently one of the conspirators of the 26/11 attack, Tahawwur Rana was extradited from the United States to India. 'Obviously, none of us have forgotten that Pakistan gave shelter to Osama bin Laden. It is significant that the person, and you would be aware, Dr Shakil Afridi, who helped locate Osama bin Laden, is still imprisoned by the Pakistani military,' he said. The MEA spokesperson was also asked about reports suggesting that Pakistan Army Chief Field Marshal Asim Munir has received an invitation to attend the US Army Day celebrations on June 14. 'On invitation part, I would urge you to be better informed as to who are the people who are invited, there are foreign leaders who have been invited or not. Take your questions to the American side, they will be in a better position to answer it,' Jaiswal told reporters. He was also asked about the India-Bangladesh ties during the media interaction. 'Our ties with Bangladesh is well-known, I have said from this podium several times. We want a positive and constructive relationship with Bangladesh that is anchored in the aspirations of the people of the two countries,' he said. He was also asked if India is monitoring the situation in West Asia. 'We are following the development very closely. And, yes, we have a large diaspora population in that region. Our embassies all across the region, they are in touch with our community members also guiding them on their safety and security,' Jaiswal said. PTI KND RHL RHL This report is auto-generated from PTI news service. ThePrint holds no responsibility for its content.
