logo
Thousands of child abuse records kept in storage costing €80,000 a year

Thousands of child abuse records kept in storage costing €80,000 a year

Irish Times2 hours ago

Thousands of institutional child abuse records are sitting in a storage facility costing more than €80,000 a year, because of a failure to legislate to retain the records in the
National Archives of Ireland
.
The documents include allegations of abuse from about 15,600 survivors of industrial and reformatory schools. All of the survivors are under a strict legal gagging order that means they cannot discuss details of their redress case, and it is understood that the overwhelming majority have never had access to their redress board transcripts.
The State's independent advocate for survivors of institutional abuse has now called for all records relating to institutional abuse to be held in one place, where they would be accessible to survivors.
The
Residential Institutions Redress Board
(RIRB), which has paid out almost €1 billion in redress since 2002, accepted its last application in 2011. But the largely wound down board is running under a skeleton staff because it remains responsible for managing the sensitive files.
READ MORE
The RIRB has spent more than €2.2 million in security and storage over the last 16 years, due to the sensitivity of the documents.
The Government had said that if and when a body like the RIRB was dissolved, the records it held would legally need to be destroyed. This had been contested by academics and survivor advocacy groups.
The RIRB was set up in 2002 to pay awards to those who suffered abuse as children in reformatory, industrial schools or other institutions that were regulated or inspected by the State. Survivors who were awarded redress lost the right to speak publicly about it. Under the legislation that set up the RIRB, it is a criminal offence to publish any information about a redress application or award, including details about the survivor, the alleged perpetrator and the institution.
The RIRB records, which are understood to be highly sensitive, include allegations of serious abuse against named perpetrators and detailed medical and psychological reports of survivors.
[
A simple question stopped Ireland in its tracks: why were so many children incarcerated?
Opens in new window
]
In 2019 the Government tried to pass a law that would place the records of the RIRB and other redress bodies under a seal for 75 years. The legislation was abandoned after a backlash from survivors, their advocates and the public.
In 2022 the Government decided instead to set up a
National Centre for Research and Remembrance
for Ireland's many institutional abuse scandals. Martin Fraser, Ireland's ambassador to the UK, is leading a steering group tasked with setting up the centre, which will include an archive of records under the National Archive.
In July 2022 Mr Fraser met the RIRB to discuss some of the legislative issues around retaining the records. In its annual report for 2022 the RIRB said it was working with Mr Fraser's steering group 'so as to allow for the early introduction of legislation providing for the retention of the board's records so that as many victims and survivors as possible will benefit from that legislation'. Three years on, there is no sign of the legislation. The Irish Times understands there have been legal complexities about drafting such a law for the files.
A spokesman for the
Department of Education
said that 'while the original legislation provided for disposal of the records, it is now envisaged that new legislation will instead provide for the transfer of the records to the National Archives so that they can be preserved for posterity'.
'Work is ongoing on the complex and sensitive issues relating to the wide range of records which are relevant to the National Centre for Research and Remembrance, including those held by the RIRB,' the spokesman said.
Since 2009 the RIRB has spent more than €2.2 million on security arrangements due to the sensitivity of the documents it is responsible for. In 2009-2014 the RIRB spent more than €1.58 million on 24-hour security – around a quarter of a million a year – for its Belfield Office Park in Dublin 4 due to the sensitive nature of the documents it held. In 2014, after it moved to a new office on St Stephen's Green, the RIRB's security expenses dropped due to the existing security arrangements at its new office. In 2015-2023 the RIRB spent more than €696,000 on secure off-site storage for the files. In 2023, the year for which the most recent data is available, the cost of secure off-site storage was more than €83,800.
[
State accused of 'stonewalling' and 'hiding evidence' over Magdalene laundries
Opens in new window
]
Many survivors later complained they had found the RIRB to be 'adversarial' and felt as though they had been 'on trial'. Some were cross-examined during oral hearings by the religious congregations responsible for their alleged abuse.
Patricia Carey, the Special Advocate for Survivors of Institutional Abuse, said she was 'aware of the trauma and upset caused to survivors through the evidence giving and evidence testing process of the Residential Institutions Redress Board'.
'There is a frustration from survivors of all institutions that their files are not being held and stored in one place, where they would be accessible,' Ms Carey said.
Anyone who was awarded redress by the RIRB is entitled to a transcript of their testimony to the board. But it is understood that of the more than 15,000 survivors awarded redress, only a small minority have so far done so.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Thousands of child abuse records kept in storage costing €80,000 a year
Thousands of child abuse records kept in storage costing €80,000 a year

Irish Times

time2 hours ago

  • Irish Times

Thousands of child abuse records kept in storage costing €80,000 a year

Thousands of institutional child abuse records are sitting in a storage facility costing more than €80,000 a year, because of a failure to legislate to retain the records in the National Archives of Ireland . The documents include allegations of abuse from about 15,600 survivors of industrial and reformatory schools. All of the survivors are under a strict legal gagging order that means they cannot discuss details of their redress case, and it is understood that the overwhelming majority have never had access to their redress board transcripts. The State's independent advocate for survivors of institutional abuse has now called for all records relating to institutional abuse to be held in one place, where they would be accessible to survivors. The Residential Institutions Redress Board (RIRB), which has paid out almost €1 billion in redress since 2002, accepted its last application in 2011. But the largely wound down board is running under a skeleton staff because it remains responsible for managing the sensitive files. READ MORE The RIRB has spent more than €2.2 million in security and storage over the last 16 years, due to the sensitivity of the documents. The Government had said that if and when a body like the RIRB was dissolved, the records it held would legally need to be destroyed. This had been contested by academics and survivor advocacy groups. The RIRB was set up in 2002 to pay awards to those who suffered abuse as children in reformatory, industrial schools or other institutions that were regulated or inspected by the State. Survivors who were awarded redress lost the right to speak publicly about it. Under the legislation that set up the RIRB, it is a criminal offence to publish any information about a redress application or award, including details about the survivor, the alleged perpetrator and the institution. The RIRB records, which are understood to be highly sensitive, include allegations of serious abuse against named perpetrators and detailed medical and psychological reports of survivors. [ A simple question stopped Ireland in its tracks: why were so many children incarcerated? Opens in new window ] In 2019 the Government tried to pass a law that would place the records of the RIRB and other redress bodies under a seal for 75 years. The legislation was abandoned after a backlash from survivors, their advocates and the public. In 2022 the Government decided instead to set up a National Centre for Research and Remembrance for Ireland's many institutional abuse scandals. Martin Fraser, Ireland's ambassador to the UK, is leading a steering group tasked with setting up the centre, which will include an archive of records under the National Archive. In July 2022 Mr Fraser met the RIRB to discuss some of the legislative issues around retaining the records. In its annual report for 2022 the RIRB said it was working with Mr Fraser's steering group 'so as to allow for the early introduction of legislation providing for the retention of the board's records so that as many victims and survivors as possible will benefit from that legislation'. Three years on, there is no sign of the legislation. The Irish Times understands there have been legal complexities about drafting such a law for the files. A spokesman for the Department of Education said that 'while the original legislation provided for disposal of the records, it is now envisaged that new legislation will instead provide for the transfer of the records to the National Archives so that they can be preserved for posterity'. 'Work is ongoing on the complex and sensitive issues relating to the wide range of records which are relevant to the National Centre for Research and Remembrance, including those held by the RIRB,' the spokesman said. Since 2009 the RIRB has spent more than €2.2 million on security arrangements due to the sensitivity of the documents it is responsible for. In 2009-2014 the RIRB spent more than €1.58 million on 24-hour security – around a quarter of a million a year – for its Belfield Office Park in Dublin 4 due to the sensitive nature of the documents it held. In 2014, after it moved to a new office on St Stephen's Green, the RIRB's security expenses dropped due to the existing security arrangements at its new office. In 2015-2023 the RIRB spent more than €696,000 on secure off-site storage for the files. In 2023, the year for which the most recent data is available, the cost of secure off-site storage was more than €83,800. [ State accused of 'stonewalling' and 'hiding evidence' over Magdalene laundries Opens in new window ] Many survivors later complained they had found the RIRB to be 'adversarial' and felt as though they had been 'on trial'. Some were cross-examined during oral hearings by the religious congregations responsible for their alleged abuse. Patricia Carey, the Special Advocate for Survivors of Institutional Abuse, said she was 'aware of the trauma and upset caused to survivors through the evidence giving and evidence testing process of the Residential Institutions Redress Board'. 'There is a frustration from survivors of all institutions that their files are not being held and stored in one place, where they would be accessible,' Ms Carey said. Anyone who was awarded redress by the RIRB is entitled to a transcript of their testimony to the board. But it is understood that of the more than 15,000 survivors awarded redress, only a small minority have so far done so.

Families deported to Nigeria could have left voluntarily, says Minister
Families deported to Nigeria could have left voluntarily, says Minister

Irish Times

time17 hours ago

  • Irish Times

Families deported to Nigeria could have left voluntarily, says Minister

Minister for Justice Jim O'Callaghan has defended the State's handling of the deportation of 35 people to Nigeria on Wednesday, saying those removed had previously been asked to leave voluntarily. Speaking on Sunday on RTÉ Radio 1's This Week programme, the Minister said: 'Each person who was on the aeroplane that went back to Nigeria had their own individual narratives of persecution assessed by the International Protection Office , and on appeal, and subsequently they got a deportation order that wasn't responded to. 'They were requested to leave voluntarily and that didn't happen.' The Garda National Immigration Bureau carried out the operation, which involved 21 men, nine women and five children, who were deported on a chartered flight from Dublin Airport to Lagos, Nigeria on Wednesday night. The children involved were deported as part of family groups. READ MORE Friends of the families deported, who were living with them at an International Protection Accommodation Services (Ipas) centre in west Dublin, described the scenes last week as upsetting and 'traumatising'. Farhiya Ali, a mother living with her four children in the centre, said: 'The kids were coming down for breakfast when these five men wearing cargo pants, big jackets arrived. 'They came into the third floor, stood in front of the bedroom door, took the three kids back in and told them to pack up. We heard them say: 'You are going to be deported.' As soon as the other children heard then they were all crying. It was such a horrific scene.' Three siblings from one family were among those deported. They had lived at their accommodation since January 2022 with their mother and father. [ Families facing deportation are 'at serious risk of destitution', warns refugee council Opens in new window ] Asked about the criticism from families at the Ipas centre about the manner of the deportation of children, Mr O'Callaghan said: 'This is not a pleasant part of my job. I don't relish doing this, but it has to be done. If we have an immigration system or an asylum system that doesn't have a consequence for people who are ruled not to be entitled to stay here then the system becomes meaningless.' Asked whether he would put Nigeria on Ireland's safe list of countries, Mr O'Callaghan said: 'There's a difference here between putting a country on the safe list for the purposes of international protection under the [International Protection] Act, and determining whether or not to send somebody back to a country from whence they came.' [ Ministers accused of giving 'half the picture' on refugees as more than 40% get positive decisions Opens in new window ] Applicants from designated safe countries of origin receive their interview date on the day they apply for international protection, reducing their waiting time for an interview. 'There's faster time frames for Nigeria at present anyway because of the heightened number of people from Nigeria claiming asylum in Ireland,' said the Minister. 'It doesn't mean if you're not on the safe list of countries from international protection, we can't send you back to the country where you came from.'

‘The country is going to the dogs': How agitators exploited the Carlow shooting
‘The country is going to the dogs': How agitators exploited the Carlow shooting

Irish Times

timea day ago

  • Irish Times

‘The country is going to the dogs': How agitators exploited the Carlow shooting

The shooting in Carlow last Sunday was shocking, but what followed online was depressingly familiar. As soon as word emerged of an incident at the Fairgreen Shopping Centre, far-right agitators surfaced online, like moths to a flame, spouting confident falsehoods before any facts were known. How could they know the details so quickly? They couldn't, but that didn't deter them. Offline, figures from the same ideological milieu travelled to the town to use the backdrop of the shooting as an opportunity to rant about immigration, the Government or the media – again, a well-established playbook that by now is both predictable and exhausting. And all details that had little to nothing to do with the incident itself. Just one hour after the incident in Carlow, Derek Blighe, formerly the president of the minor far-right Ireland First political party, posting on X, claimed – without evidence, because there was none – that 'apparently 7 people including a child have been shot'. This post has been viewed just shy of 400,000 times on the platform, but at the time of writing includes no note by X stating that it is false. Philip Dwyer, once associated with Ireland First, travelled to Carlow and livestreamed himself shouting at members of the fire brigade outside the shopping centre for not furnishing him with details about the supposed number of casualties. He then returned to a familiar topic. 'The country is going to the dogs. Everyday there's something going on … crime, mental health … migrant crime. I'm looking around me here in Carlow … good God. The diversity … the non-Irish people,' he said. READ MORE Back online, British far-right agitator Tommy Robinson posted on X that there were 'multiple reports of a suspected terror attack in Carlow, Ireland … gunman shot dead by Gardaí'. Another viral post, viewed over 200,000 times on X. Journalists, gardaí and emergency responders at the scene were berated for not releasing details about the incident fast enough. And when they did release details, they were admonished when those details didn't match the narrative circulating on social media. Carlow has quickly become another case study in how false and misleading information pollutes our online information environment, and why our democratic institutions must better equip themselves to counter this challenge. By now, we have a good grasp of the facts. Shortly after 6.15pm last Sunday, a man entered the Fairgreen Shopping Centre and fired a number of shots into the air. In the ensuing panic, a young girl suffered a minor leg injury when fleeing the scene. Outside the shopping centre, the man used his firearm again and died from a self-inflicted gunshot wound. No one else was shot and gardaí did not discharge their firearms. Evan Fitzgerald, from Kiltegan, Co Wicklow, walked through the Fairgreen Shopping Centre in Carlow firing a shotgun into the air The gunman was later named as Evan Fitzgerald, from Kiltegan, Co Wicklow, a 22-year-old who appeared in court last month on charges related to offences associated with purchasing firearms on the dark web last year. This was established through media reporting and garda statements, four of which were released by Monday lunchtime. In the second of those statements , gardaí confirmed the ethnicity and nationality – white Irish – of the man who died at the scene. In their fourth statement, they shared detailed information about the incident. Media reports described him as 'vulnerable'. [ Man dead after shots fired in Carlow shopping centre, Army bomb disposal team called to scene Opens in new window ] The practice of gardaí sharing such specific information regarding a suspect and an unfolding situation is unprecedented. It signals the force's attempts to combat the spread of harmful misinformation before it has potentially deadly consequences. We don't have to look too far back to recall how online misinformation and hate can fuel offline violence in the space of a few hours. Rioting broke out across the UK last summer after the Southport stabbing when anti-migrant and anti-Muslim narratives helped instigate violence, while closer to home, we all remember the Dublin riots of November 2023. More recently, police in Merseyside acted similarly in the aftermath of the car ramming incident at the Liverpool FC parade . Blighe, Dwyer and Robinson have a track record of portraying their respective countries as places of lawlessness, neglected by authorities and riven by (typically migrant) crime. They opportunistically jump on any purported incident they believe – usually incorrectly – reinforces this sentiment and, in the words of Steve Bannon, accordingly 'flood the zone with shit' online. It is, at its heart, part of a wider nativist, populist strategy employed internationally by the far right to appeal to the public for political support, monetised subscriptions and broader cultural influence. While evidence was still being gathered, none of these figures could have been aware of what had transpired. Yet they – and many others – worked swiftly to fill an information vacuum that develops after such incidents while gardaí, local services and the media work to establish the facts. It is no coincidence that the three operate 'blue tick' accounts on X. The platform offers financial rewards for creating viral, sensationalist content, with few repercussions when that content later turns out to be wrong. These posts are then weaponised by far-right figures for their own ideological agendas, and sometimes used to exploit tragic cases such as this one. [ Carlow shooting: Taoiseach criticises spreading of misinformation and 'blatant lies' online Opens in new window ] There is an ongoing conflict between old and new media systems here. The slower, methodical practices of police and media in reporting on such incidents is rarely a match for the rapid sharing of content online that includes serious and potentially harmful claims with no factual basis. All of this signals how fundamentally broken our online information ecosystem has become. This is best encapsulated in the tiring trope that is typically found in online spaces after reports of an incident like the Carlow shooting emerge: repeated cries that the gardaí or mainstream media are deliberately not releasing information about an incident. Delay is interpreted as deceit and fact checking becomes censorship. This week, Taoiseach Micheál Martin said this kind of misinformation can result in a lot of 'public disquiet' and needs to be addressed. 'There is a family in mourning right now. The level of misinformation on Sunday was quite shocking, and we can't just ignore that and say: 'Well, we don't have to do anything about that.'' This wasn't a question of freedom of speech, he said. 'I wouldn't overstate the impact on clamping down on blatant lies online as a sort of incursion or an undermining of freedom of speech.' The Carlow shooting has quickly become another reminder that unless we address these imbalances – between old and new media, the power of social media and the need to stop misinformation – trust in our core democratic principles and institutions will continue to erode. Ciarán O'Connor is a researcher and journalist who focuses on extremism and technology

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store