Attenborough film shows seabed ‘devastation' says MP in bottom trawling ban call
The camera follows large nets which are dragged along the ocean floor using a metal beam, with sea creatures indiscriminately caught inside before they are brought to the surface.
Rotherham MP Sarah Champion told MPs that 'David Attenborough's latest film Ocean revealed the shocking devastation caused by bottom trawling' and referred to calls from environmental campaigners to 'take action at the UN conference in just four weeks'.
At Foreign Office questions, Ms Champion asked: 'Will the Government use the conference to announce a ban on all bottom trawling in marine protected areas?
'And why has the minister still not set out when we will ratify the ocean treaty which will keep our Sids (small island developing states) and overseas territories safe?'
Minister Catherine West replied: 'The climate and ocean adaptation sustainable transition (Coast) programme is improving vulnerable coastal communities' resilience to climate change including protecting and restoring coastal habitats, supporting nature-based solutions and improving small-scale fisheries management, and including the issue which she raises – the use of bottom-towed gear over rock and reef habitats in 13 Marine Management Organisation areas.'
Greenpeace UK's co-executive director Will McCallum, Oceana UK executive director Hugo Tagholm and Blue Marine Foundation chief executive Clare Brook have previously written to Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer urging him to prioritise ratifying the Global Ocean Treaty – also known as the Biodiversity Beyond National Jurisdiction (BBNJ) Agreement – to conserve the high seas and help protect 30% of the world's oceans.
They have also called for a full ban on bottom trawling, which they said would help marine ecosystems in UK domestic waters 'recover' from the practice's 'devastating impact'.
It comes ahead of the 2025 UN Ocean Conference in June, which is being held in Nice on the Mediterranean coast.
Commons foreign affairs committee chairwoman Dame Emily Thornberry, the Labour MP for Islington South and Finsbury, later told the Commons: 'I know there's a lot going on, but the Biodiversity Beyond National Jurisdiction Treaty is important.
'It's about our blue planet. It's about our oceans.
'It used to be that we had a leadership position in it. In fact, when we were leading it, 115 countries signed that treaty, but it needs to be ratified as well, and very few countries are ratifying it including Britain.
'And when we ask the Government about it, the Government says it's because they haven't got enough time. Have they dropped the ball?
'Is there a Bill? Are we going to ratify it, and will we ratify it before the UN Ocean Conference?'
Ms West replied: 'We will redouble our efforts to get into the legislative queue and do all (that's) necessary to ensure and maintain our leadership on this important area.'
In his documentary, Sir David said the bottom trawling net moves along the seabed 'destroying nearly everything in its path', even if it is not wanted on the surface.
'It's hard to imagine a more wasteful way to catch fish,' the 99-year-old said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
South Wales Argus
36 minutes ago
- South Wales Argus
Mauritius ‘to receive £35bn' for Chagos deal over 99 years
Conservative shadow foreign secretary Dame Priti Patel accused ministers of trying to 'cover up' the cost of ceding the Chagos Islands to Mauritius, accusing them of using an 'accountancy trick' to price the deal at £3.4 billion. The higher figure, released after a freedom of information request to the Government Actuary's Department, is a nominal amount. Adjusted to account for inflation, the deal is thought to be worth an average £101 million a year in 2025/26 terms, lowering the value to around £10 billion in today's money. The UK Government has agreed to cede the Chagos Archipelago to Mauritius but retain control of the military base on Diego Garcia. Ministers feared that without a deal, the base's future was in doubt amid challenges in international courts and tribunals. Dame Priti Patel said it was a terrible deal for the taxpayer (Stefan Rousseau/PA) 'We've all known it's a terrible deal with huge costs to hard-pressed British taxpayers,' Dame Priti wrote in The Telegraph, which first reported the figures. 'But for months, ministers in public and Parliament have sought to cover up the true amounts.' Dame Priti also warned that 'instead of owning up to the costs, Labour has used an accountancy trick to claim the amount was only £3.4 billion – still a vast waste of money'. She described the £35 billion figure as 'mind-blowing', and labelled Foreign Secretary David Lammy as ''Calamity' Lammy'. Dame Priti accused him, Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer, Attorney General Lord Hermer and special envoy for the negotiations Jonathan Powell of being 'the worst team of negotiators in history'. The figures, seen by the PA news agency, show that the Government used a Treasury principle to reduce the figure by between 2.5% and 3.5% per year to £3.4 billion. This 'social time preference', used since 2003, is based on the idea that taxpayers would prefer to get their return on the deal sooner rather than later.
The Guardian
an hour ago
- The Guardian
Albanese's Palestinian statehood decision won't please everyone – but it's better than the horrifying status quo
As Anthony Albanese and Penny Wong prepared to announce Australia's recognition of the state of Palestine on Monday, nervous anticipation rippled around Parliament House. Staffers gathered in windows above the prime minister's courtyard, ready to take photos of the announcement unfolding below. Anne Aly, the first Muslim woman to sit in cabinet, watched from one floor up as Albanese and Wong fronted the media, while the country's most senior bureaucrat, Steven Kennedy, paced nervously nearby. Australia, Albanese declared, would join partners including France, the UK and Canada in recognising Palestine at the United Nations next month, saying peace could only be temporary until both Israeli and Palestinian statehood was permanent. Sign up: AU Breaking News email Reflecting on the bloody war in Gaza, and the escalation currently being engineered by Israel's prime minister, Benjamin Netanyahu, Albanese said recognition was a step towards a two-state solution and would help stem the humanitarian crisis playing out on televisions and smartphones around the world. 'The toll of the status quo is growing by the day, and it can be measured in innocent lives,' Albanese said. 'The world cannot wait for success to be guaranteed. That only means waiting for a day that will never come.' Despite being signalled for months – and coming after images of starvation out of Gaza and huge numbers of demonstrators crossing the Sydney Harbour Bridge – Monday will stand as a landmark moment of Albanese's prime ministership. Albanese himself has been making speeches about Palestinian statehood for decades. Under pressure from Labor's base, he made his move as part of a global pushback against Israel's plans for more fighting in Gaza, anger at Israel's settlements, and as calls for humanitarian aid fell on deaf ears. Five Al Jazeera journalists were killed on Monday, victims of a targeted Israeli airstrike on their tent. Former minister Ed Husic has described the growing energy against the war as a tide of 'moral momentum'. Labor was ultimately satisfied with commitments from the Palestinian Authority to demilitarise Gaza, reform governance, hold elections, stop payments to prisoners and provide basic services including education. Albanese secured the assurances from Mahmoud Abbas, the 89-year-old leader of the authority, the organisation set up in the wake of peace agreements in the 1990s. Critically, Abbas recognised Israel's right to exist. Whether Albanese's decision is a turning point, or remembered as a symbolic move in the decades-long mire of conflict, will be determined by whether Abbas can deliver, and whether Netanyahu, who appears to be extending the war to ensure his own political survival, will ever allow peace. Albanese himself is also aware he is breaking with the United States and risking the ire of Donald Trump, who is still one of Netanyahu's closest backers. Trump has linked Canada's decision on recognition to tougher trade tariffs. Sign up to Breaking News Australia Get the most important news as it breaks after newsletter promotion Like Netanyahu, the opposition leader, Sussan Ley, and frontbenchers Angus Taylor and Michaelia Cash, say recognition rewards Hamas for its terror and murder. The Liberals echoed the Trump administration's concerns that any advantage to Hamas would slow down progress on peace, given previous ceasefire talks have failed. But Netanyahu is increasingly isolated and Australia's decision reflects growing anger about Palestine's suffering among everyday people here. The move won't be enough for some supporters, either. The Australia Palestine Advocacy Network said trade and diplomatic relations with Israel should be cut off, warning Palestinian rights are not the gift of western states. The Greens want an end to weapon component exports and Labor Friends of Palestine say more sanctions are needed. They are almost certainly right that more needs to be done. But Australia recognising Palestine is a step towards peace – and as Wong said, doing the same thing but hoping for a different outcome is the only certain road to failure. Tom McIlroy is Guardian Australia's chief political correspondent
Western Telegraph
2 hours ago
- Western Telegraph
Mauritius ‘to receive £35bn' for Chagos deal over 99 years
Conservative shadow foreign secretary Dame Priti Patel accused ministers of trying to 'cover up' the cost of ceding the Chagos Islands to Mauritius, accusing them of using an 'accountancy trick' to price the deal at £3.4 billion. The higher figure, released after a freedom of information request to the Government Actuary's Department, is a nominal amount. Adjusted to account for inflation, the deal is thought to be worth an average £101 million a year in 2025/26 terms, lowering the value to around £10 billion in today's money. The UK Government has agreed to cede the Chagos Archipelago to Mauritius but retain control of the military base on Diego Garcia. Ministers feared that without a deal, the base's future was in doubt amid challenges in international courts and tribunals. Dame Priti Patel said it was a terrible deal for the taxpayer (Stefan Rousseau/PA) 'We've all known it's a terrible deal with huge costs to hard-pressed British taxpayers,' Dame Priti wrote in The Telegraph, which first reported the figures. 'But for months, ministers in public and Parliament have sought to cover up the true amounts.' Dame Priti also warned that 'instead of owning up to the costs, Labour has used an accountancy trick to claim the amount was only £3.4 billion – still a vast waste of money'. She described the £35 billion figure as 'mind-blowing', and labelled Foreign Secretary David Lammy as ''Calamity' Lammy'. Dame Priti accused him, Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer, Attorney General Lord Hermer and special envoy for the negotiations Jonathan Powell of being 'the worst team of negotiators in history'. The figures, seen by the PA news agency, show that the Government used a Treasury principle to reduce the figure by between 2.5% and 3.5% per year to £3.4 billion. This 'social time preference', used since 2003, is based on the idea that taxpayers would prefer to get their return on the deal sooner rather than later.
