
South Africa's road to political unity is long
Does the ANC really need whites in its ranks? ANC Youth League president Collen Malatji sparked this controversial debate when he said he wants to see more racial diversity in the party.
He made the remarks during a youth rally in the Eastern Cape at the weekend, where he expressed concern over the lack of white participation in the youth league.
Malatji questioned why, decades after democracy, young white South Africans are still largely absent from the ANC's structures, especially considering the pivotal role played by figures like Joe Slovo, Denis Goldberg and other white comrades during the liberation struggle.
'We have to ask ourselves,' Malatji said, 'why white youth do not see the ANC as their home any more. Why did they join in the past, and what's pushing them away now?'
His comments come at a time when South African politics remains racially polarised. While the ANC continues to dominate the black vote, it has seen declining support among other racial groups.
Meanwhile, opposition parties like the DA and Freedom Front Plus (FF+) are struggling with their own identity challenges.
The DA, in particular, appears unsure whether it is a black-led liberal party or a white-dominated opposition.
As Malatji pointed out, the DA 'doesn't know whether it is a black or white party' – an identity crisis that speaks volumes about the broader racial tensions that still shape voter behaviour.
ALSO READ: 'I don't see white people here': Malatji laments lack of diversity in the ANCYL
The ANC, once celebrated as a nonracial movement, was a political home to South Africans of all races during the fight against apartheid.
Leaders such as Slovo, Ruth First and Beyers Naudé symbolised the inclusive, values-driven vision of the ANC.
Today, that image is fading. The ANC's inability to attract white youth is not just a numbers issue – it is a reflection of a deeper identity crisis and a drift away from its founding ethos.
There are several reasons why white South Africans, particularly the youth, feel disconnected from the ANC today.
First, race-based policies such as affirmative action and broad-based black economic empowerment, though aimed at redressing historic injustices, are often perceived by some as exclusionary or even hostile.
This perception, whether fair or not, creates emotional and ideological distance. Second, the ANC's track record in governance has hurt its credibility.
Years of corruption scandals, poor service delivery and internal factional battles have driven many away – regardless of race.
For middle-class voters, both black and white, trust in the party's ability to lead effectively has eroded.
ALSO READ: 'Extend that apology to black South Africans,' says ActionSA over Macpherson's hobo comment
Malatji, however, believes the presence of white voices is essential – not only for symbolic reasons but also for restoring a sense of shared purpose. 'Bringing in white youth isn't about chasing votes,' he said.
'It's about restoring a vision of unity that was central to the liberation movement.'
In other words, inclusivity strengthens the ANC's moral and political legitimacy. It reaffirms the principle that the party belongs to all South Africans, not just one group.
Yet despite these intentions, the racial divide in voting remains deeply entrenched. Last year's general election showed that most South Africans still vote largely along racial lines.
Black voters remain loyal to the ANC, EFF, Inkatha Freedom Party and lately uMkhonto weSizwe party, while the majority of white voters support the DA or FF+.
Coloured and Indian voters are split across smaller parties, often guided by regional or economic concerns.
This racialised voting pattern has been reinforced by South Africa's unequal society, where race still closely aligns with access to education, wealth and services.
Political parties, whether intentionally or not, often speak past each other – targeting specific racial or cultural groups rather than building a shared national narrative.
ALSO READ: Half a million white South Africans have left the country in 25 years
So what would it take for the ANC – or any party – to truly bridge this divide? First, parties need to rebuild public trust through clean governance, transparency and delivery. Actions speak louder than speeches.
Second, they must embrace inclusive language and stop relying on racial identity as a political tool.
Third, they need to actively engage young people of all races – especially in schools, universities and communities – where future leadership is shaped.
In the past, many whites, coloureds and Indians joined the ANC not just because it was a black-led movement, but because it stood for justice, democracy and human rights.
Today, that moral clarity is harder to find. The ANC will need to rediscover and live out those founding values if it hopes to regain that kind of cross-racial support.
Malatji's comments, while controversial to some, may be an important reminder that the struggle for a nonracial South Africa is far from over.
Whether the ANC – or any other party – can build a truly inclusive future depends on whether they are willing to listen, reform and lead with integrity.
The road to unity is long. But acknowledging the gap, as Malatji has done, is at least a start.
NOW READ: Does Africa still need liberation parties?

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Citizen
10 minutes ago
- The Citizen
SA's efforts to repair US ties undermined internally, says Lamola amid tariff fallout
The US is South Africa's third-largest trading partner, accounting for 7.5% of total exports. International Relations and Cooperation Minister Ronald Lamola has assured the public that support programmes will help offset the 30% tariff by the United States (US) on South African exports. Lamola, along with Trade, Industry and Competition Minister Parks Tau, spoke at a media briefing on Monday about how government plans to respond. The 30% tariff was first announced by US President Donald Trump in April. Although there was a three-month delay to allow for trade talks, South Africa has not managed to secure a new deal with the US. South Africa responds to US tariffs On Monday, Lamola expressed disappointment at the US decision to go ahead with the tariff, which is a tax charged on goods bought from other countries. The minister explained that discussions with the US over the past year focused on resolving key trade issues, but despite those efforts, the North American powerhouse went ahead with the 30% tariff. 'South Africa has been engaging the US at various levels with a view to ensure predictability in trade,' he said. Lamola appeared to criticise some groups within South Africa who may have hurt the country's relationship with the US. 'It is unfortunate that this government's efforts in resetting the relationship with the US have been undermined by some actors within South African society.' ALSO READ: Ramokgopa dismisses claims US tariffs target BEE policy but admits it needs 'tweaking' Representatives from the Democratic Alliance (DA), AfriForum, the Solidarity Movement, and Freedom Front Plus (FF Plus) travelled to the US this year to voice concerns over South African policies such as broad-based black economic empowerment (B-BBEE) and the Expropriation Act. This coincided with Trump's executive order granting refugee status to Afrikaners, citing claims of persecution, while also cutting US financial aid to South Africa in response to the International Court of Justice (ICJ) case brought by President Cyril Ramaphosa's administration against Israel. As a result, the South Africa government has repeatedly accused the groups of sowing division in the country. Some exports will remain exempt The tariffs will take effect at midnight on Friday, 8 August. However, goods that are already in transit before that time and arrive before 5 October will still be subject to the current 10% tariff instead of the higher 30%, according to Lamola. Lamola highlighted that the US is South Africa's third-largest trading partner, accounting for 7.5% of total exports. He said the government remains committed to pursuing a fair and balanced trade deal. 'Thus, we will continue to engage the US with a view to conclude a deal that advances the interests of both countries… rather than extractive relations that deprive the country of the ability to beneficiate our mineral wealth by mimicking extractive colonial era trade relations.' READ MORE: US tariff of 30%: Rand weakest in 3 months, thousands of jobs in danger The minister also stressed that South Africa posed no trade threat to the US economy or its national security. 'South African exports do not compete with US producers and do not pose a threat to US industry. On the contrary, our exports are crucial inputs that support America's own industrial base. 'Our agriculture exports are even counter-seasonal, meaning they fill gaps in the US market, not replace domestic products.' Watch the briefing below: Economists estimate that the new tariffs could reduce South Africa's economic growth by 0.2%. However, Lamola pointed out that 35% of South African exports will remain exempt. These include products like copper, pharmaceuticals, semiconductors, critical minerals, stainless steel scrap and energy-related products. He also mentioned that South African companies have already adapted to steel and aluminium tariffs that were introduced under Section 232 of the US Trade Expansion Act back in 2018. 'However, the heightened policy uncertainty creates instability in trade and may have an impact on exports.' US tariffs support measures To respond to the impact of the tariffs, the government will roll out several key support measures. This includes an export support desk that will act as a single point of contact for companies affected by the US tariff hike. The desk will provide ongoing updates, assist with exploring new international markets, and connect exporters with South African embassies and high commissions abroad. An economic relief package is also being prepared to help companies cope with short-term financial pressures and develop longer-term plans to protect jobs and production. 'The details of these are being finalised and will be communicated shortly,' Lamola continued. In addition, an export and competitiveness support programme will be launched to provide working capital and funding for plant and equipment upgrades to address short to medium term needs across all industries. READ MORE: South African farmers on the frontline of US tariff hikes The government is also working closely with the Department of Labour to prevent job losses. Existing tools, such as the Unemployment Insurance Fund (UIF), will be adjusted to better respond to the challenges created by the tariff hike. Lamola announced that a legal exemption, known as a block exemption, will be introduced under the Competition Act. This will allow companies to legally coordinate their efforts, such as sharing export infrastructure and market information, which would normally be restricted under competition laws. 'The block exemption details the scope of application. A draft block exemption will be published by the end of the week so that the process can be concluded expeditiously.' We are proactively and collaboratively diversifying our trade portfolio. Through the coordinated action of the @PresidencyZA, @DIRCO_ZA , and @the_dtic , we're making significant inroads into new, high-growth markets across the world #SAinAction #EconomicResilience… — Minister: International Relations and Cooperation (@RonaldLamola) August 4, 2025 In the long term, Lamola said South Africa is strengthening relationships with trade partners across multiple continents. He added that, although the new tariff presents challenges, it also opens the door to expand trade through the African Continental Free Trade Area (AfCFTA) and to explore new markets such as the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) and Türkiye. NOW READ: Tau launches urgent support measures for exporters affected by US tariffs

TimesLIVE
10 minutes ago
- TimesLIVE
Process to appoint ambassador to US at advanced stage: Lamola
The process to appoint a new ambassador to the US is at an advanced stage, international relations and co-operation (Dirco) minister Ronald Lamola told journalists on Monday. Lamola was speaking during a media briefing with trade, industry and competition minister Parks Tau. He said the process to appoint an ambassador was not easy due to the expulsion of former ambassador Ebrahim Rasool earlier this year, adding that President Cyril Ramaphosa has been giving careful consideration and due diligence. In March US secretary of state Marco Rubio shocked South Africans when he posted on social media platform X that Rasool was 'no longer welcome' in the US. 'Ebrahim Rasool is a race-baiting politician who hates America and hates at @POTUS. We have nothing to discuss with him and so he is considered persona non grata. ' This was in reaction to Rasool's comments at a foreign policy seminar where he reportedly told attendees US President Donald Trump was leading a white supremacist movement in America and the world.


The Citizen
40 minutes ago
- The Citizen
Remaining Wolwespruit squatters to face action under invasion policy
The Tshwane metro has committed to dealing with the squatters who have settled outside the secured Wolwespruit wetland area through the TMPD and implementation of its land invasion prevention strategy. The move comes after the metro began the eviction of residents from the Wolwespruit wetland on July 11, relocating only 70 South African nationals to Pienaarspoort. According to the metro, these individuals were the only ones officially registered during a survey conducted prior to the relocation process. However, concerns have arisen after about 30 South Africans who were not counted during the initial survey have now erected makeshift structures in surrounding areas just outside the secured wetland on Solomon Mahlangu and Delmas Road. These squatters claim to have nowhere else to go, a situation that has sparked frustration among local ratepayers. Despite earlier promises that all South African residents at Wolwespruit would be relocated, the metro has clarified that only those verified during the official registration process were moved. The metro said that the remaining individuals will be dealt with in accordance with existing land invasion policies. Spokesperson Selby Bokaba clarified that the 70 South Africans were documented in 2021, and formed part of the official relocation plan. 'The city prevented any further invasion and growth of the Wolwespruit settlement from that date,' he said. Reports have since emerged that about 30 South African citizens remain stranded outside the now-secured wetland. Bokaba acknowledged the presence of the squatters but said they had arrived after hearing that South Africans would be relocated. 'It is unfortunate that these are individuals who came for the opportunity of receiving stands,' he said. He said they are trying to get access to temporary accommodation by creating the impression that the metro made an error and had not relocated all South Africans. 'Currently, there is no plan in place to accommodate those who were not part of the original group.' According to Bokaba, remaining individuals will be dealt with through the city's land invasion prevention strategy, which is being implemented by the TMPD. Bokaba added that the wetland property, has been handed over to the Public Investment Corporation, and security measures are now in place to prevent any further settlement. He also confirmed that the relocation process for Wolwespruit residents is complete, with no further relocations planned. 'Long-term solutions for those still residing near the area are not on the table, and the city maintains that the area will be secured and protected from further invasion.' However, local ratepayers are calling on the city's human settlement department to remove the squatters camping outside the Wolwespruit wetland. A resident, Allison Hayward, said while the relocation brought initial relief, the process has been deeply flawed – particularly the failure to account for all South Africans who had been living there. She said the Human Settlements department originally registered only 70 South Africans for relocation to Pienaarspoort. 'However, an estimated 30 more citizens, overlooked in the planning, are now stranded.' She said the squatters now occupy an area that is not suitable for habitation. 'It is a public sidewalk space meant for pedestrian use. The conditions are unhygienic, unsafe, and already showing signs of deterioration,' she explained. Hayward said residents are now not only dealing with the costly and time-consuming rehabilitation of the Wolwespruit wetland, but may now have to to fix pavements if swift action is not taken. 'We simply can't allow the people to reside on the sidewalks as this will just lead to the growth again and become Wolwespruit 2.0. 'We are proud of our neighbourhood, and urgent intervention is required in this matter to finalise and close this eviction process once and for all.' ALSO READ: Wolwespruit wetland cleared after 20-year standoff Do you have more information about the story? Please send us an email to [email protected] or phone us on 083 625 4114. For free breaking and community news, visit Rekord's websites: Rekord East For more news and interesting articles, like Rekord on Facebook, follow us on Twitter or Instagram or TikTok.