
US court allows Trump officials to end protected status for 60,000 migrants
This means that the Republican administration can move toward removing an estimated 7,000 people from Nepal whose temporary protected status designations expired on 5 August. The TPS designations and legal status of 51,000 Hondurans and 3,000 Nicaraguans are set to expire 8 September, at which point they will become eligible for removal.
The 9th US circuit court of appeals in San Francisco granted the emergency stay pending an appeal as immigrants rights advocates allege that the administration acted unlawfully in ending temporary protected status designations for people from Honduras, Nicaragua and Nepal.
'The district court's order granting plaintiffs' motion to postpone, entered July 31, 2025, is stayed pending further order of this court,' wrote the judges, who are appointees of Bill Clinton, George W Bush and Donald Trump.
Temporary protected status is a designation that can be granted by the homeland security secretary, preventing migrants from being deported and allowing them to work. The Trump administration has aggressively sought to remove the protection, thus making more people eligible for removal. It's part of a wider effort by the administration to carry out mass deportations of immigrants.
Secretary Kristi Noem can extend temporary protected status to immigrants in the US if conditions in their homelands are deemed unsafe for return due to a natural disaster, political instability or other dangerous conditions.
Immigrant rights advocates say TPS holders from Nepal have lived in the US for more than a decade while people from Honduras and Nicaragua have lived in the country for 26 years, after Hurricane Mitch in 1998 devastated both countries.
'The Trump administration is systematically de-documenting immigrants who have lived lawfully in this country for decades, raising US-citizen children, starting businesses, and contributing to their communities,' said Jessica Bansal, attorney at the National Day Laborer Organization, in a statement.
Noem ended the programs after determining that conditions no longer warranted protections.
In a sharply written 31 July order, US district judge Trina L Thompson in San Francisco kept the protections in place while the case proceeds. The next hearing is 18 November.
She said the administration ended the migrant status protections without an 'objective review of the country conditions', such as political violence in Honduras and the impact of recent hurricanes and storms in Nicaragua.
In response, Tricia McLaughlin, the assistant secretary at the DHS, said: 'TPS was never meant to be a de facto asylum system, yet that is how previous administrations have used it for decades.'
The Trump administration has already terminated TPS designations for about 350,000 Venezuelans, 500,000 Haitians, more than 160,000 Ukrainians and thousands of people from Afghanistan and Cameroon. Some have pending lawsuits in federal courts.
Lawyers for the plaintiffs argued that Noem's decisions are unlawful because they were predetermined by Trump's campaign promises and motivated by racial animus.
But Drew Ensign, a US deputy assistant attorney general, said at a hearing Tuesday that the government suffers an ongoing irreparable harm from its 'inability to carry out the programs that it has determined are warranted.'
In May, the US supreme court allowed the Trump administration to end TPS designations for Venezuelans. The justices provided no rationale, which is common in emergency appeals, and did not rule on the underlying claims.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Daily Mail
7 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Top Republican spectacularly QUITS Congress after drama with Trump and plots next big move
A top Republican who has been a thorn in the side of the MAGA agenda has announced his intention to leave Congress. Texas Congressman Chip Roy announced that he plans to depart Capitol Hill after four terms and seek the role of Texas state attorney general back home in the Lone Star state. His decision comes after he earned the wrath of Donald Trump for getting in the way of his MAGA agenda. In a media release announcing his latest move, Roy noted that 'watching Texans unite in response to the devastating Hill Country floods made clear that I want to come home.' The deadly floods that raged through Texas earlier this summer claimed at least 135 lives, including the lives of over two dozen young girls and their counselors at the Christian summer camp, Camp Mystic. Roy also added in his media release that he wants to take his 'experience in Congress, as a federal prosecutor, and as First Assistant Attorney General to fight for Texas from Texas.' The congressman previously worked under current Texas AG Ken Paxton, who is running in a messy primary for U.S. Senate against incumbent John Cornyn. Roy notably turned on his former boss when Paxton was accused of 'bribery, abuse of office, and other charges' back in 2020, then urging him to resign from office. During his time in Congress, Roy has at times not been afraid to buck members of his own political party, causing headaches for House Speaker Mike Johnson and even President Donald Trump. Roy, along with other members of the conservative House Freedom Caucus, were holdouts on President Trump's $3.3 trillion tax and spending cut bill. They caused a scene threatening to tank Trump's 'one big, beautiful, bill' due to projected increases in the national debt tied to the package. Despite weeks of threats, he eventually folded and voted for the bill. Roy also caused a headache for Speaker Mike Johnson's re-election bid in January. He didn't want Johnson to be elected speaker again because he claimed he wasn't conservative enough to lead the Republicans. Again, he eventually got in line and backed Johnson's re-election. It's become somewhat of a pattern for Roy to threaten to go against GOP leadership on key priorities, but then eventually fold and support. And it hasn't gone unnoticed by Trump, who has called him out publicly. Back in December of 2024, Trump accused Roy of 'getting in the way' of his agenda, and called for Roy to face a primary challenger for his congressional seat. Despite Roy's tough track record with GOP leadership, other lawmakers on Capitol Hill took time Thursday to congratulate Roy on his achievements during his time in Washington. Tennessee Representative Tim Burchett was one of Roy's colleagues to weigh in on the Texans' decision, posting on X that he hates to lose his friend in Congress, despite the desire to sometimes 'pinch his ears', adding that he 'will miss him.' Utah Senator Mike Lee posted on X that there is 'no more fearless and respected conservative in Congress than @chiproytx' adding that he 'wholeheartedly' endorses Roy in 'his campaign for Texas Attorney General' and that 'Chip has delivered for Trump in Congress.' In 2023, Chip Roy endorsed Florida Governor Ron DeSantis for president before he had even announced a formal bid for the office. At the time, Roy noted that the 'next President of the United States must be a vibrant and energetic leader with the faith, vision, and courage to chart a new course.' Roy is one of several high-profile members of the House Freedom Caucus to announce decisions to seek other offices, mainly in their home states. Rep. Ralph Norman announced a run for South Carolina governor last month, Rep. Andy Biggs will be seeking the same office in Arizona, and Rep. Byron Donalds is running to be governor of Florida.


Reuters
7 minutes ago
- Reuters
US to rule on biofuel waivers, but big oil refiners may need to wait, sources say
Aug 21 (Reuters) - President Donald Trump's administration is expected to rule on a growing backlog of requests from small oil refiners seeking relief from U.S. biofuel laws as early as Friday, but will delay a decision on whether larger refiners must compensate by boosting their own biofuel blending, according to two sources familiar with the planning. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency on Friday will announce decisions on some of the 195 pending small refinery exemption requests that date back as far as 2016, the sources said. The rulings will not be a sweeping win for small refiners, and will include some partial denials of waivers, according to one of the sources briefed on the decisions. The administration is also expected to issue a supplemental rule as early as next week to seek public comment on whether larger refiners should make up for the exempted gallons in a process known as reallocation, the source said. How the administration deals with exemption requests and the reallocation issues will have consequences for the oil and agricultural industries, and impact the price of commodities from gasoline and renewable diesel to soybeans and corn, along with the companies that produce them. In the past, widespread exemptions without reallocation have sent renewable blending credit prices lower, denting prices for corn-based ethanol and soybean-based biofuel. The EPA and White House did not respond to requests for comment. The U.S. Renewable Fuel Standard requires refiners to blend biofuels like ethanol into the fuel pool or by the tradable credits, known as RINs, from refiners who do. Small refiners can petition the EPA to receive an exemption if they can show financial hardship. The EPA has a mounting backlog of such requests going back years - the result of political indecision and legal wrangling across multiple administrations. Both the agriculture and the oil industries are keen for resolution. Granting exemptions without forcing other refiners to make up the difference increases the supply of credits and puts downward pressure on their prices. Farm and biofuel groups have lobbied the EPA to limit the number of exemptions and to force other refiners to make up for exempted gallons. The oil industry is strongly opposed to reallocation, arguing it creates an uneven playing field and imposes burdensome regulatory costs. The EPA said earlier this year that it would force larger refiners to make up for future exempted gallons, but was silent on how it would treat exempt gallons from the dozens of backlogged requests. The supplemental rule will include various options in a bid to test how the market may respond, the sources said.


Reuters
7 minutes ago
- Reuters
US labor, advocacy groups urge states to reject Tesla's $29 billion Musk pay
Aug 21 (Reuters) - A coalition of U.S. labor unions and progressive advocacy groups urged state financial officers overseeing public pension funds to oppose fresh pay awards for Tesla (TSLA.O), opens new tab CEO Elon Musk, warning the excessive cost poses risks to workers' retirement savings. A mix of labor unions and liberal advocacy groups, including the American Federation of Teachers and MoveOn, urged state officials to press asset managers to reject Musk's new pay plans and push for stronger board independence at the EV maker, in a letter exclusively shared with Reuters. Many states manage pension funds for teachers and other employees, which are among the largest U.S. investors. Tesla and Musk did not immediately respond to requests for comment. The appeal comes amid a legal saga over Musk's record pay package. In January last year, Delaware Chancellor Kathaleen McCormick voided Musk's 2018 package, then valued at about $56 billion, calling it an "unfathomable" award by a conflicted board. Tesla this month granted Musk 96 million new shares valued at about $29 billion as a good-faith interim payment while his 2018 pay package remains under appeal. The Tesla board said to shareholders that retaining Musk is essential, as his leadership is critical for the company's transition from an EV maker to a robotics and AI-focused firm. In June last year, Tesla shareholders ratified the payout and approved relocating the company's legal home to Texas, but the court case remained unresolved, with McCormick later allowing for appeals that could extend for months. The groups urged officials to oppose any new pay package and to vote against directors who fail to show independence from Musk. "Shareholders in Tesla shouldn't be taking dilutions so that the wealthiest man in the world can be handed additional Tesla shares," some of the advocates said via email. Tesla has not yet published a proxy outlining the ballot items at the next annual meeting, but the groups expect the issue to be included.