Shooters want a ‘right to hunt'. How about a right not to be shot?
Despite the bill being framed around conservation and environmental management, the shooting community isn't talking about protecting habitats or restoring biodiversity. It's celebrating a 'right to hunt', access to silencers and myriad other 'benefits' from a shooting industry proverbial Christmas shopping list.
This bill is not about conservation; it's a Trojan horse for the gun lobby, and it seems it's being ushered in through backroom political deals. The NSW government appears willing to trade public safety for political convenience, seeking the Shooters Party's support to push through its own legislation, such as the workers' compensation bill.
We've been here before. The Shooters, Fishers and Farmers Party has previously pushed similar agendas – and now it's leaning heavily on the conservation framework, a justification emphatically rejected by conservation bodies.
The last time the state government did a deal with the Shooters Party, in 2012, it led to hunting being permitted in national parks – alongside bushwalkers, campers and families. Public safety took a back seat to political convenience.
Loading
Let's take a look at some of the proposed changes in this new bill. It seeks to:
Establish a conservation hunting authority. This would revive an idea that failed spectacularly in the past. The former Game Council was abolished in 2013 after a scathing review found public safety was not prioritised. Rather, we got poor governance and prioritising hunter interests over public good. A new authority would inherit the same structural conflicts – once again, it would be a proxy for the firearm industry.
Recognise and make provision for a 'right to hunt'. This strikes at the very heart of Australia's firearm safety framework. The National Firearms Agreement – signed by all states, including NSW – affirms that gun ownership is a privilege, not a right, and must always be subject to the overriding principle of public safety. This is also the primary objective of the NSW Firearms Act. Since the Port Arthur tragedy of 1996, nearly 90 per cent of Australians have supported our firearm safety framework or want it tighter. This new hunting bill seeks to rewrite the fundamental tenet of firearm safety. Who but firearm users would want laws that make it easier to get and use a gun?
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
7NEWS
an hour ago
- 7NEWS
Nationals MP Barnaby Joyce gives grim warning amid major push for work from home changes
Nationals MP Barnaby Joyce has warned Aussies are at risk of losing their jobs if they continue to work from home, amid the new boom in artificial intelligence (AI) in the workplace. The Australian Services Union (ASU) argues that employers should be forced to give employees six months' notice before requiring they return to the office in a submission to the Fair Work Commission. The union is also arguing for the presumption that work from home requests be approved and that if an employer seeks to vary or pause work from home arrangements, the six-month notice period should apply. In auxiliary to the rule, an employer would be required to have genuinely tried to reach agreement with the employee to accommodate the employee's circumstances. The employer would be required, under the clause, to respond within 14 days of an office worker's request to work from home and is required to set out the business grounds, if refused. Appearing on Sunrise, Joyce took aim at the proposal. 'It's absurdity,' Joyce said. 'What you're doing there is encouraging people not to employ people. 'You can't just say you're going to work from home today or you won't have a job.' Barr challenged Joyce, saying a lot of people can work from home. Joyce replied: 'I think you got to be careful. 'It's not a myth, AI is coming. 'What you're doing is encouraging people to say 'ok, stay home for the whole week because you don't have a job anymore'. 'AI is coming into clerical work and remove jobs left, right, and centre. 'I'd be doing everything in your power to try and keep your jobs because if people can prove they don't need to come to the office, then the office can prove they can be replaced by AI. 'Be really careful in not being enthusiastic about not going to the office and getting to work.' Barr pressed Joyce on how to protect the jobs. 'I don't know whether you can, that's the problem. 'What you have to do is broaden the base of the economy, so there are alternate jobs to go to. 'But in our genius, we have decided to go to net zero and intermittent power, so we don't have an industrial base to absorb those jobs and that is one of the big problems we've got.' Barr then pressed Albanese minister Tanya Plibersek on businesses claiming there will be a net increase in jobs due to AI. Plibersek said: 'I think there will be different types of jobs. 'A lot of the repetitive work will be done by AI in the future and what we need to do is make sure there are good jobs available for Australians in new and emerging industries as well. 'We've got real capacity to develop some of those AI tools right here. 'The big data centres we're going to need to run some of these programs can be based right here and they can be powered by renewable energy. 'We have the cheapest form of energy available to us here in Australia. 'Solar, wind, we know it's the cheapest form of new energy.' Barr pressed Joyce on Aussies learning a trade, as AI can't replicate the work. Joyce said: 'You are dead right. 'They should because I can assure to my accountancy days, electricians overwhelmingly earn more money than people who have graduated with arts degrees or junior degrees. 'Doctors can go and make good money, no doubt about that. 'But AI won't be able to turn itself into a plumber or itself into an electrician or a chippy, so trades are a place where you can sustain a good level of employment. 'But if you are just in clerical work ... that's what its genius does, (it) replaces people but it doesn't have hands and it doesn't have feet.'
News.com.au
2 hours ago
- News.com.au
Sydney families flee due to staggering average cost of houses
It's the huge cost of buying a home in Sydney that's sending families fleeing Australia's largest city and as interest rates tumble, it's a problem that's about to become even worse. According to the latest predictions, the median house price in Sydney is forecast to jump by another 7 per cent in 2025-26, to a staggering $1.83 million. That's nearly twice the value of the average home in Australia, which has surpassed $1 million for the first time, according to the Australian Bureau of Statistics. Those figures mean that the typical house price in Sydney will rise by $112,000, which is more than the average full-time worker earns before tax ($103,000). By comparison, the median house price in Melbourne is tipped to rise by 6 per cent, to $1.1 million. However, that's after two years of downturns in the Victorian market. As business leaders, economists and political leaders gather in Canberra for Treasurer Jim Chalmer's economic roundtable, it's a question that is at the heart of the push to overhaul planning approvals to build more houses and even consider new options including modular homes. Finance Minister Katy Gallagher was hit with the big question on Monday morning, conceding it is a huge problem. 'By mid-next year the median house price in Sydney, according to forecasts, is expected to hit $1.8 million,'' ABC host James Glenday said. 'The median full-time worker earns about $90,000. How can people under the age of 40 get excited about productivity and making the economy efficient when they can't afford to buy a home?.' Senator Gallagher said the problem was longstanding. 'That is exactly the discussion that needs to be had around housing and for us it is around the fact that we haven't built enough houses for decades in this country and the fact we have to look at how we speed that up and how we offer a range of housing options for people,'' she said. 'Whether that be from looking at how we deal with the supported housing sector or affordable housing all the way to home ownership. 'We went to the election with policies around that. There is more work we have to do. It takes too long to build a house. That adds to the cost of housing. We have to make sure we are tackling these issues, otherwise these problems will continue.' For many Australians, it's a case of voting with their feet. According to the Muval's Family Relocation Report — based on over 41,000 family moves across Australia over the past six years — there are now more families leaving Sydney than moving there. Despite huge flows of migrants, Sydney City and Inner South with a netâ€'negative family migration of 0.18, followed by Melbourne Inner (0.23), Sydney's Eastern Suburbs (0.32), Parramatta (0.42) and Inner West (0.45). 'Greater Sydney has experienced the highest loss of families, with a ratio of just 0.31, meaning that for every family that moved in, more than three have moved out,' the report revealed. 'This may reflect the city's soaring cost of living, rising property prices, and a growing desire among families for more space and less congestion.' All of the regions where more families are moving out than moving in were in Sydney, Melbourne and the ACT. 'Meanwhile, affordability pressures are driving major shifts in ownership: nearly 17 per cent of families are going from owner-occupier to renter, while just 6.3 per cent are moving in the opposite direction — a stark reminder of how tough homeownership is becoming for many.' Last week, a leaked Treasury document revealed a number of recommended outcomes for the federal government's productivity round table. The pre-written list, prepared for cabinet, revealed advice from the Treasury to pause changes to the National Construction Code. It also recommends measures to speed up housing approvals, including a national artificial intelligence plan to cut environmental red tape. A suite of reforms is designed to clear a backlog of 30,000 housing approvals currently being assessed under the Environment Protection and Biodiversity (EPBC) Act. The Housing Industry Association (HIA) has urged Treasurer Jim Chalmers to take urgent action. The HIA's submission to Treasury highlighted the taxes and charges on a typical house and land package in Sydney can now exceed $500,000 adding huge imposts on family mortgages. 'The Treasurer's roundtable presents a critical opportunity to address the barriers that are holding back new housing supply. You cannot talk about productivity, economic growth or improving living standards without discussing housing,' HIA managing director Jocelyn Martin said. 'Red tape, regulation and delay are adding enormous costs to the delivery of new homes. If we want to see real reform, we need to boost productivity in our industry, cut the burden of unnecessary building and planning rules, and start making it easier to build homes.'
Perth Now
2 hours ago
- Perth Now
‘Rubbish': Chalmers riled by red-tape claim
Treasurer Jim Chalmers has rubbished opposition claims that Labor has introduced more regulations in the past three years than under the Coalition's time in government. Opposition productivity and deregulation spokesman Andrew Bragg will drive the claim hard in a speech on Monday evening, arguing that the Albanese government's heavy-handedness is hampering productivity. Mr Chalmers dismissed it as 'rubbish' and said 'if the Coalition had answers on productivity, they wouldn't have presided over the worst decade for productivity growth in the last 60 years'. 'Never forget that this Coalition took to the last election a policy for higher income taxes for all 14 million taxpaying working Australians, a policy for lower wages, higher deficits and more debt,' he said. 'I think that goes to the lack of credibility when it comes to the Coalition. 'My fear is that they have learned nothing from the last election. 'They have learned nothing from the last term of the parliament. They are still the same nasty negativity which was rejected by the Australian people on 3 May.' Senator Bragg will claim Labor 'has introduced 5034 regulations in just three years'. 'In addition to these 5000 new rules, 400 new laws were enacted last parliament,' he will tell the Sydney Institute. 'Labor re-regulation has crushed entrepreneurship and innovation in our economy.' It echoes a call from Productivity Commission chair Danielle Wood to cut red tape across the board. The Albanese government's Economic Reform Roundtable will bring together unions, business leaders, policy experts and politicians. NewsWire / Martin Ollman Credit: News Corp Australia Pressed on whether the government would look at easing regulations, Mr Chalmers said 'we need to make sure it is serving a useful purpose'. 'Our goal is to make sure that regulation is fit for purpose, that is serving an economic end,' he said. In particular, he said the 'view of government is some of this regulation is getting in our way when it comes to building more homes or building more energy projects'. 'We want standards and protections for people, but we also need to make sure we are not getting in our own way,' Mr Chalmers said. 'Danielle Wood was making that point effectively this morning on radio and will be later in her speech as well. 'Where regulation is unnecessary and duplicated, where it is not serving a useful purpose, we should seek to wind it back and we intend to do that.' 'Genuine' Meanwhile, Finance Minister Katy Gallagher has defended Labor's Economic Reform Roundtable amid a waves of opposition 'cynicism'. The Coalition has been largely sceptical of the talks, with shadow treasurer Ted O'Brien warning they have 'been engineered to rubber stamp a doubling down on Labor's failed tax and spend strategy'. Mr O'Brien will, nonetheless, be attending the 'privileged talkfest', as he has described it. Similarly, Sussan Ley last week decried the roundtable as 'choreographed' after a leak revealed the Treasury prepared advice on outcomes before the meetings even took place. Senator Gallagher said on Monday 'the cynicism around hosting this and that all ideas have been predetermined' was an incorrect read. Finance Minister Katy Gallagher says Labor's Economic Reform Roundtable is 'genuine'. Martin Ollman / NewsWire Credit: News Corp Australia 'That is not the case,' she told the ABC. 'It is a genuine meeting of civil society, the union movement, industry leaders and government to look at some of these challenges we have got across our economy and see if there's areas of consensus. 'And in the last couple of weeks with the coverage of the ideas and submissions that are coming forward to that meeting, there is no shortage of ideas.' The highly anticipated roundtable will kick off on Tuesday and, as Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has described, bring together 'a range of people with a range of views'. The point of getting unions, business leaders, and policy experts in the same room as politicians is building consensus on how to boost productivity – how efficiently an economy produces goods and services. Noting she was hesitant to pre-empt discussions, Senator Gallagher said she expected a mix of immediate and long-term measures to come out of it all. 'Government has its own mandate from the election,' she said. 'We have a platform we took to that. We are implementing that step by step.' She said the Albanese government was 'hoping that there are areas of consensus that can come out of this meeting'.'There will be definitely areas that will be able to move quickly and others that would be long term,' Senator Gallagher said.
