logo
Trump seeks to delay appeal of $83 million judgment in E. Jean Carroll case

Trump seeks to delay appeal of $83 million judgment in E. Jean Carroll case

Yahoo20-06-2025
The Justice Department and attorneys for President Donald Trump on Friday asked a federal appeals court in New York to delay oral arguments scheduled for next week in Trump's appeal of his $83 million defamation case.
Trump is appealing a 2024 verdict ordering him to pay former magazine columnist E. Jean Carroll $83 million for defaming her in 2019 when he denied her accusation that he sexually assaulted her in the dressing room of a Bergdorf Goodman department store in the mid-1990s. Trump has denied all allegations.
MORE: Appeals court says DOJ cannot represent Trump in appeal of E. Jean Carroll case
On Wednesday, a three-judge panel of the 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals rejected Trump's attempt to have the government substitute for him as a party in the case -- and his attorneys now argue that they should be allowed to appeal before oral arguments take place on June 24.
"The United States and President Trump are entitled to immediate review of the panel's erroneous Westfall Act decision by this Court en banc and, if necessary, by the Supreme Court," a joint filing from Trump and the Justice Department said Friday.
DOJ lawyers say that since some of Trump's alleged conduct in the case fell within the scope of his role as president, the Justice Department should be able to defend him in court.
"The Attorney General certified that President Trump was acting within the scope of his federal office or employment at the time of his 2017 statements, made from the White House, out of which Plaintiff-Appellee's claims arose. As a result, the United States should have been substituted as a defendant in place of President Trump," they argued in Friday's filing.
The 2nd Circuit last week upheld a separate, $5 million damage award to Carroll that Trump must pay.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

A brief history of Trump pretending not to know things
A brief history of Trump pretending not to know things

Boston Globe

timea few seconds ago

  • Boston Globe

A brief history of Trump pretending not to know things

Less than a week after the Justice Department took the highly unusual step of sending Todd Blanche, deputy attorney general and Trump's former personal lawyer, to interview Maxwell for more than nine hours over two days, she was quietly moved from a federal minimum-security prison in Florida to a less-restrictive facility in Texas. Get The Gavel A weekly SCOTUS explainer newsletter by columnist Kimberly Atkins Stohr. Enter Email Sign Up But according to Trump, that decision was news to him. Advertisement Perhaps the president really has no clue as to what's happening in his administration. But Trump's pleas of ignorance are an escape hatch he has deployed for years. Here's a brief history of notable moments in Trump's performative ignorance. The David Duke endorsement (2016): After Trump launched his first presidential campaign by excoriating Mexican immigrants and later promising to enact a Advertisement James Comey's firing (2017): Months into his first term, Trump dumped James Comey as FBI director. At the time, White House officials claimed that Trump fired Comey solely on the recommendation of deputy attorney general Hush money paid to Stormy Daniels (2018): Trump Advertisement Project 2025 (2024): At a Heritage Foundation event in 2022, Trump said the conservative group 'would lay the groundwork and detail plans for exactly what our movement will do and what your movement will do when the American people give us a colossal mandate to save America.' Two years later, Trump Trump seems to treat ignorance — saying 'I don't know' or 'I didn't know'— as evidence of his innocence. He's testing that theory again as his self-inflicted Epstein scandal refuses to go away. But whether this tactic will allow him to dodge accountability this time, no one knows. Advertisement Renée Graham is a Globe columnist. She can be reached at

Mass shooting in Baltimore leaves 6 people wounded, including 5-year-old: police
Mass shooting in Baltimore leaves 6 people wounded, including 5-year-old: police

Fox News

time2 minutes ago

  • Fox News

Mass shooting in Baltimore leaves 6 people wounded, including 5-year-old: police

Six people, including a 5-year-old girl, were wounded in a shooting Saturday night in Baltimore, Maryland, according to police. Baltimore Police responded to a call at around 8: 45 p.m. regarding a shooting at Spaulding and Queensberry Avenues, Police Commissioner Richard Worley said at a news briefing. Officers arrived at the scene to find six victims — four males and two females, including the 5-year-old girl, who was shot in the hand. Worley said the child's injury does not appear to be serious. The young girl, as well as a 23-year-old woman and three men aged 32, 33 and 52, suffered non-life-threatening injuries, Worley said. Another victim, a 38-year-old man, was listed in critical condition and underwent surgery at a hospital, the commissioner said. Homicide Detectives were called to the scene, given the severity of the 38-year-old man's condition. Worley said it appeared people were hanging out outside when a gunman opened fire. No suspects have been arrested in connection with the shooting. The incident remains under investigation.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store