Singapore needs to embrace Bitcoin to maintain status as financial hub: Jeremy Tan
[SINGAPORE] Singapore needs to welcome Bitcoin-related businesses to maintain its status as a global financial hub, said retired businessman Jeremy Tan at an event on Wednesday (Jun 11).
The 34-year-old rose to prominence last month during the general election as one of just two independent candidates, pulling in 36.16 per cent of the votes in Mountbatten SMC. He lost to the People's Action Party's Gho Sze Kee.
During the nine-day campaign and on his election website, Tan promoted Bitcoin as an inflation-proof asset that Singaporeans should have. He also proposed several policies, including the creation of a Singapore dollar-denominated Bitcoin exchange-traded fund (ETF).
At a fireside chat hosted by cryptocurrency exchange Gemini, Tan said that he believes Singapore will have an advantage in the global economy if the government creates Bitcoin-related laws.
'We need to recognise Bitcoin as a separate entity from other forms of cryptocurrencies,' he told an audience of some 200 people, mostly males in their late teens and early 20s.
'The difference between the previous Bitcoin cycle and the current Bitcoin cycle is that the bad actors are no longer in the market.'
BT in your inbox
Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox.
Sign Up
Sign Up
He referred to former crypto billionaire Sam Bankman-Fried as one of the se 'bad actors'.
The American's crypto exchange, FTX, collapsed in 2022, and he is now serving a 25-year sentence for committing fraud; he stole US$8 billion from customers.
Saad Ahmed, Asia-Pacific head at Gemini and the host of the fireside chat, pointed out the increasing institutionalisation of cryptocurrency. He said one of the key catalysts of this is the approval of Bitcoin ETFs.
As at Thursday, the largest such ETF by market cap, iShares Bitcoin Trust, had a 16.57 per cent year-to-date return. Its market cap stands at US$72.6 billion.
Tan said that companies trading Bitcoin earn from the cryptocurrency's volatility, adding that that small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) should consider investing their reserves in Bitcoin.
'If we can change the way SMEs think about Bitcoin as a treasury, then we can change the way SMEs become more productive going forward.'
He also said that there is a growing market for advisory services for SMEs which wish to invest in the cryptocurrency.
'There are many companies here that want to store (their treasury) in Bitcoin, but they do not know how to structure their business to do so,' he said.
He added that unless the Singapore government starts to reform its Bitcoin laws, the advisory services industry will not be able to grow.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
AsiaOne
38 minutes ago
- AsiaOne
'Can't get through to anyone': Jetstar Asia passengers facing issues with refund applications, Singapore News
Unable to reschedule flights and receive refunds, many Jetstar Asia passengers are voicing their frustrations as they try to adjust their travel plans. Jetstar Asia announced on Wednesday (June 11) morning that it will be ceasing operations effective July 31 after years of financial losses, and will be operating on a "progressively reduced schedule" for the next few weeks. In a statement on Wednesday, it said that customers with bookings after July 31 would be offered full refunds for their flights, but many are facing difficulties in claiming refunds. 'Can't get through to anyone' Speaking to AsiaOne, an affected passenger, who wanted to be known as Megan, said that she has been unable to get help from customer service. The 27-year-old had booked a flight to Bangkok in August and received an email on Wednesday afternoon that provided a form to apply for a refund. She received what seemed like "an automated response" later that night, informing her that Jetstar Asia was looking into the matter. "I tried to message them on Instagram and also tried to use the live chat function but I can't get through to anyone," she lamented, adding that she had no time to purchase travel insurance prior to the sudden announcement. The next day, she received a follow-up email saying that she was "not eligible for a monetary refund" and that they were unable to process her request. Instead, Jetstar Asia offered her a credit voucher and provided a link to contact customer service, though she was unable to connect with a live agent due to high volumes of traffic on the website. Megan has since rebooked her flights with a different airline and is still unsure of how to proceed with the refund. Other affected passengers have also shared their experiences in the comments of Jetstar Asia's Facebook and Instagram pages, detailing similar experiences. Pending refunds But some Jetstar passengers have had more success, including 23-year-old Tan who booked her flights through Her flight to Bali is scheduled for July 31, Jetstar Asia's last day of operations, and her flight back to Singapore was booked for Aug 3, she told AsiaOne. Her departing flight will proceed as scheduled, and alerted her that she would need to change her return flight, upon which she will receive a refund. Rescheduled flight Another affected passenger AsiaOne spoke to, Phillina Teo, had her flight to Bali rescheduled instead. Upon hearing the news on Wednesday morning, she immediately called customer service to check if her upcoming flight was affected, but was reassured that it would carry on as planned. It was only later that night that she received an email informing her that the flight was being cancelled. "At this point I was so frustrated as I was given wrong information," the 29-year-old said, adding that she called customer service again on Thursday and requested a change of flight instead. Explaining her rationale for not wanting a refund, she said: "Rebooking a flight now will be so much more expensive than when I first booked it." Updating passengers A spokesperson for the airline told AsiaOne on June 13 that there was a "systems issue" with the refund form. "This error has now been fixed and we are reaching out to impacted customers to let them know their refund is being processed and that we sincerely apologise for any confusion and inconvenience," the spokesperson said, adding that all impacted customers have been contacted. It also said that customers may experience "longer than normal wait times" on their calls and Live Chat due to increased traffic volumes. Case working closely with Jetstar Asia In a statement on Thursday (June 12), Melvin Yong, MP for Radin Mas SMC and president of the Consumers Association of Singapore (Case), said that the association is working with Jetstar Asia to clarify how it intends to handle and process these refunds and rescheduled flights. Case has received three complaints regarding passengers facing difficulties with their refunds as of Thursday, reported The Straits Times. Income Insurance covering affected customers Income Insurance will be covering eligible customers affected by Jetstar Asia's closure as a gesture of goodwill, it said in a statement on Thursday. Affected customers who have purchased Income Travel Insurance with pre-trip cancellation cover prior to June 11 will be able to claim for "unused and prepaid expenses such as accommodation, travel packages, local tours, amusement park tickets and transport expenses". The cessation of Jetstar Asia's operations would not normally fall within Income Travel Insurance's insured events for trip cancellations, which only account for events such as natural disasters, riots and family bereavement. "We recognise the stress and anxiety that our customers are experiencing due to the impact of this sudden news," said Dhiren Amin, Chief Customer Officer of Income Insurance. AsiaOne has also reached out to Jetstar Asia for comment. [[nid:719004]]
Business Times
2 hours ago
- Business Times
Millions of acres of public land sales slated for US tax Bill
[WASHINGTON] The sale of millions of acres of federal land would provide billions of dollars to help pay for President Donald Trump's massive package of tax cuts and spending in the Senate's version of the Bill released on Wednesday (Jun 11) night. As much as around 1.2 million hectares of land owned by the Bureau of Land Management and the US Forest Service would be mandated for sale in the legislation. The measure, requiring each agency to sell a small percentage of the hundreds of millions of acres of land they manage in eligible states that include Alaska as well as western states, could raise as much as US$10 billion over 10 years, according to a fact sheet. The plan is part of a broader effort to generate as much as US$29 billion through a combination of expanded oil, gas, coal and geothermal lease sales, and new timber sales made public in the legislation unveiled by the Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee. Similar energy requirements, included new energy lease sales in the coastal plain of Alaska's Arctic National Wildlife Refuge, were included in the House version of the bill, which passed by a one-vote margin last month. The sale of public lands to help pay for the legislation has been a political lightning rod. A plan to sell about 500,000 acres of federal land in Utah and Nevada was stripped by the House version of the Bill amid opposition from Republicans such as Montana Representative Ryan Zinke. The concept of public land sales has also enraged environmental and conservation groups, who say the proposal threatens wildlife as well as access to lands for outdoor recreation, hunters and fisherman. 'It's a travesty that Senate Republicans are putting more than 3 million acres of our beloved public lands on the chopping block to sell at fire-sale prices to build mega mansions for the ultra-rich,' said Patrick Donnelly, a director at the Center for Biological Diversity. A NEWSLETTER FOR YOU Tuesday, 12 pm Property Insights Get an exclusive analysis of real estate and property news in Singapore and beyond. Sign Up Sign Up Republicans have said the sales are needed to provide cheap land to help address a housing crisis, and to help western states, where the government owns large swaths of federal land, to restore the areas to economic production and associated tax revenue. 'This proposal allows a fraction of 1 per cent of federal land to be used to build houses,' the Senate energy committee said in the fact sheet. 'In doing so, it will create thousands of jobs, allow millions of Americans to realise the American dream, and reduce the deficit and fund our public lands.' The Senate bill aligns with a Trump administration plan to identify areas of 'underutilised' land suitable for development. Interior Secretary Doug Burgum told the Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee Wednesday the agency had identified some 250,000 acres near cities where development could lower the cost of housing. But New Mexico Senator Martin Heinrich, the panel's top Democrat, said the idea was deeply unpopular in the West with 'animosity that runs the entire political spectrum.' 'These are places that belong to all of us,' Heinrich said in an interview Thursday. 'Once this stuff gets sold off to developers, we'll never get it back. It will be behind a no trespassing sign.' BLOOMBERG
Business Times
2 hours ago
- Business Times
Homeowners battle insurers over US$2.9 trillion climate risk
[PARIS] When Bernard Weisse first noticed a tiny crack in the outer wall of his house on the outskirts of Paris, he dismissed it as little more than a nuisance. But in the four years since, a spiderweb of fissures has spread from floor to ceiling and snaked into virtually every corner of his home. 'We can hear loud cracking noises especially when it's warm outside,' said the retired salesman and father of three. 'Sometimes, I think we should get all our stuff together and leave.' Like a growing number of people around the world, Weisse is grappling with subsidence – a term for the sinking land that's causing damage to homes and other structures built on it. The slow-moving climate disaster has already caused tens of billions in damage and has the potential to affect 1.2 billion people in areas accounting for more than US$8 trillion of economic output. While groundwater extraction, mining and earthquakes also cause the ground to shift, global warming vastly increases the risks. What happens is that soil swells with winter rain and then shrinks as it dries in the heat, cracking foundations in the process. Because of its soil and its status as the world's fastest-warming continent, Europe is particularly exposed. The European Central Bank estimates the region's potential damage from sinking land at more than 2.5 trillion euros (S$3.69 trillion) across all euro-area financial institutions. Although most of that is classified as 'low risk,' this summer is forecast to be one of the hottest and driest on the continent, creating perfect conditions for subsidence damage. For Weisse, the cost for repairs could climb to as much as 200,000 euros to keep his two-story home from crumbling. That would be part of the estimated 43 billion euros in damage that households face by 2050 in France alone, according to insurance trade group France Assureurs. With that much money at stake, it's set off a battle over who will ultimately have to pay. A NEWSLETTER FOR YOU Tuesday, 12 pm Property Insights Get an exclusive analysis of real estate and property news in Singapore and beyond. Sign Up Sign Up Weisse's town of Presles-en-Brie has teamed up with 14 nearby villages and sued the state to have their subsidence issues recognised as a natural catastrophe like flash floods and wildfires. That would trigger payments from insurers and the government, powerful opponents for the municipalities. 'It's David against Goliath,' said Dominique Rodriguez, who's been mayor of the pastoral community of 2,300 people for more than three decades. So far, the big guys are winning. In Presles-en-Brie, at least 40 homeowners have sought subsidence compensation since 2020, and while two houses were granted recognition under a public-private insurance programme called CatNat, others were rejected. Europe is the epicentre because of its clay-rich soil and relatively high population density. Also, buildings from the 1970s and 80s – when a postwar housing construction boom was still underway – are particularly susceptible. While Presles-en-Brie is an early victim, the issues are global. Jakarta has sunk more than 2.5 metres in a decade, and Teheran drops as much as 22 centimetres a year. In the US, Houston is most affected, with 40 per cent of the city subsiding more than half a centimetre a year. More than 425,000 Dutch houses will be exposed over the next decade, with subsidence already lowering house prices by as much as 5 per cent, according to a recent study by the Tinbergen Institute. Repair costs can exceed 100,000 euros per home and are rarely covered by insurance. 'The situation is urgent,' said Karsten Klein, director of advocacy at Vereniging Eigen Huis, a Dutch homeowners association. 'Waiting until homes become uninhabitable is not an option.' In London, shifting ground levels over the next five years are set to affect two-fifths of the housing stock, or more than a million homes, according to the British Geological Survey. Across the UK, there have been a half dozen 'surge years' for subsidence over the last two decades. With the country experiencing one of its driest springs in a century, 2025 could end up as another 'high risk' year, according to Geobear, a company that undertakes repairs. Insurance claims for the hazard jumped 78 per cent between 2019 and 2023 and the average payout rose 40 per cent over that period, according to data provided by the Association of British Insurers. While the UK is one of the few countries in the world where insurers cover subsidence damage, it's tricky to manage because the impacts can be affected by local conditions like trees soaking up water. A few years ago, central London suffered the most from subsidence, but now it affects eastern neighbourhoods more, according to satellite data from Geobear says its data supports the shift of the subsidence burden to eastern London, where the surface is less built up and so more exposed. If movements are related to clay shrinkage, then it makes sense that places like Barking are hit harder, said Otso Lahtinen, Geobear's chief executive officer. In France, half of all single-family homes could be affected by subsidence by the end of the decade, according to Paul Esmein, head of the French insurance lobby. Since 2016, the country's insurers have paid about 1 billion euros a year for subsidence claims. That amount tripled in 2022, when European temperatures hit their second-highest level. To cope with rising losses from natural disasters and provide protection for homeowners, France launched a public-private insurance programme in 1989 called CatNat – a system that puts the state and the industry on the same side as costs surge. Homeowners are compensated for damage after their municipality has been awarded a CatNat certification. Otherwise, insurers are free to reject claims. Despite the challenges faced by communities like Presles-en-Brie, France's system is close to a best-case scenario for homeowners, which have little to no recourse to have subsidence damage covered in most other countries. 'Since its creation, the French system for recognising natural disasters has constantly adapted to the damage suffered by the population,' the French interior ministry said in response to Bloomberg questions, adding that the criteria for subsidence recognition was relaxed last year. In the case of Presles-en-Brie, the interior ministry said natural disaster conditions was recognised for part of 2020 as soil moisture was determined to be abnormal. It didn't comment on the ongoing dispute. Allianz France says that over the last decade subsidence constituted 60 per cent of all CatNat damages in the country, almost double the rate of the previous 15 years. 'The trend is getting more complicated with climate change,' said Pierre Vaysse, chief underwriting officer for property and casualty at the French insurer. 'The forecast is that claims will at least increase by 50 per cent and probably double by 2050.' France's CatNat system lost 49 million euros in 2024, its eighth straight annual deficit. Known as the Central Reinsurance Fund, the programme is paid for by a national surcharge on insurance policies, which was raised by eight percentage points in January to account for climate change. For homeowners, the strained system means higher premiums but with no certainty of coverage, and there's a risk that insurers abandon vulnerable areas as has happened in parts of the US prone to hurricanes and wildfires. Potential repairs include foundation reinforcements known as micropiles and injecting compounds into the soil to stabilise the clay. In some cases, the costs can approach the value of the home. With selling hardly a viable option, owners have little choice but to fork out the money themselves. 'There is a real threat that the damage will end up dislocating our entire house,' said Weisse, the owner of the damaged house in Presles-en-Brie. Burdened by the impact of climate change, the insurance system is 'on its last legs,' said Regis Thauvin, who handles subsidence issues for the town council and is also affected. 'We can't just tell people to wait a year and a half for a decision to be made before doing the necessary work.' The legal fight with the state has been going on since late last year and the towns, which represent about 72,000 people in total, are still waiting for a court date. As of early June, the government hadn't sent experts to review local damage. The municipalities are prepared to take their case to the European Court of Human Rights if they lose, according to Rodriguez, the mayor of Presles-en-Brie. 'We have little hope that our legal appeal will eventually succeed,' he said. 'But the residents welcome our action and the fact that we're at least trying to make ourselves heard.' BLOOMBERG
