Woman may have accidentally served foraged mushrooms in deadly lunch that killed three, court hears
An
Australian
woman accused of using poisonous mushrooms to murder three elderly relatives of her estranged husband gave on Wednesday her account of the fatal lunch, in a case that has gripped the public.
Erin Patterson (50) is charged with the July 2023 murders of her mother-in-law Gail Patterson, father-in-law Donald Patterson and Gail's sister, Heather Wilkinson, along with the attempted murder of Ian Wilkinson, Heather's husband.
The prosecution accuses her of knowingly serving the guests lethal death cap mushrooms in a Beef Wellington pastry dish at her home in Leongatha, a town of about 6,000 some 135km from Melbourne.
She denies the charges, with her defence calling the deaths a 'terrible accident', but faces a life sentence if found guilty.
READ MORE
She wept repeatedly on Wednesday as she told the court she might have accidentally included foraged mushrooms in the meal she served.
'Now I think there was a possibility there were foraged ones in there,' Ms Patterson said in questioning by her lawyer, Colin Mandy.
The court also heard that Ms Patterson, who began giving evidence on Monday as the first witness for her own defence, had invented medical issues partly to elicit sympathy from her estranged husband's relatives, as she felt they were growing apart.
'I didn't want their care of me to stop, so I kept it going. I shouldn't have done it,' she told the court.
'Did you lie to them?' Mr Mandy asked.
'I did lie to them,' she replied, through tears.
The prosecution accuses Ms Patterson of having invented the medical issues to lure the victims to her home for the meal, a claim she denies.
Previously the court heard that shortly after the lunch, Ms Patterson disposed of a food dehydrator found to contain traces of death cap mushrooms, while mobile phones she owned were reset to factory status three times.
On Wednesday, Ms Patterson said she had disposed of the dehydrator before a visit from child protection workers investigating her living arrangements.
'I was scared of the conversation that might flow about the meal and the dehydrator,' Ms Patterson said. 'I was scared they would blame me for it, for making everyone sick. I was scared that they would remove the children.'
The phones were reset either due to damage or because she panicked during the police investigation, she told the court.
The prosecution rested its case on Monday, after a month of evidence from witnesses, including relatives and medical, forensic and mushroom experts.
The trial, which began on April 29th, has drawn intense media interest, with podcasters, journalists and documentary-makers descending on the town of Morwell, about two hours east of Melbourne, where it is being held.
State broadcaster ABC's daily podcast about the proceedings is currently Australia's most popular, while many domestic newspapers have run live blogs.
The trial, set to conclude this month, continues. – Reuters
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Times
9 hours ago
- Irish Times
Dublin firefighter accused of raping woman in Boston hotel says he ‘didn't touch' her, US court hears
The Dublin firefighter arrested on rape charges over St Patrick's Day weekend last year told Boston detectives he 'didn't touch' the female complainant in an audio played in a US court on Wednesday. The complainant, a 29-year-old attorney, claims she was raped by Terence Crosbie (39) while his Dublin Fire Brigade colleague Liam O'Brien slept in a separate bed in a shared hotel room. She said she had consensual relations with Mr O'Brien after meeting him at The Black Rose bar in Boston. She subsequently fell asleep and, she says, later woke up to a man raping her. The man was later identified as Mr Crosbie. He denies the charges and has pleaded not guilty. READ MORE On Wednesday, the third day of the trial in Boston, jurors heard an audio recording of Mr Crosbie denying having sex with the woman, touching her or finding her in his bed when he returned to his room at the Omni Parker House hotel in Boston in the early hours of March 15th, 2024. 'There's nothing missing there, there's nothing I'm skipping, there's nothing I'm leaving out,' Mr Crosbie said, after repeated questioning by the detectives. Boston Police detective Joseph McDonough testified that the woman did not recall Mr O'Brien's name and did not recall meeting Mr Crosbie before the alleged assault. The court was told that the detective tracked down Mr Crosbie with the help of hotel security footage as well as images of Mr O'Brien and Mr Crosbie provided to him by a federal agent. He said that on March 16th, 2024 – a day after the complainant reported the rape – he approached Mr Crosbie by the lift of the hotel. Detectives initially asked Mr Crosbie of his whereabouts on March 14th and March 15th. Mr Crosbie said he was one of 10 members of Dublin Fire Brigade who travelled to Boston to march in the city's St Patrick's Day parade. He said that he interacted with the woman, later identified as the complainant, on Thursday night at The Black Rose bar and again briefly, when the woman went up to the hotel room with Mr O'Brien. The Black Rose Irish pub in Boston Mr Crosbie said he waited in a chair in the corridor outside of room 610 while the complainant and Mr O'Brien were inside. He told detectives that when he returned to the room, he knocked on the door, used his phone as a torch and 'didn't see anybody in the bed'. Mr Crosbie said he removed his pants and shirt, pulled the bed covers off while still wearing his boxer shorts and got into the bed. A minute and a half after he laid down, he said he 'heard a girl moving' and saw her collect her belongings in the dark and leave. He told detectives he did not have any interactions with the complainant before she left. 'Didn't say hello, didn't say goodbye, didn't say anything,' Mr Crosbie said. When detectives asked whether Mr Crosbie had sex with the woman, he replied: 'No, I didn't touch her.' The detectives also asked Mr Crosbie if the woman was crying as she left. 'I don't know – it didn't sound like she was crying,' he replied. Mr Crosbie was arrested later that evening after booking an early flight back to Ireland and boarding a plane. The detective seized Mr Crosbie's luggage and took photos of his clothing, including a series of specialised T-shirts and jumpers with emblems featuring American flags in the shape of shamrocks and embroidered lettering saying: 'Dublin Fire Brigade Boston 2024.' Mr Crosbie was identified as wearing similar clothing in surveillance video taken of The Black Rose and the Omni Parker House hotel shown to the court. The Omni Parker House hotel in Boston where the woman alleges she was raped. The woman previously testified that she and Mr O'Brien had consensual sex and then she fell asleep in a separate bed. She told the court in tears that she 'woke up to somebody on top of me' and they were raping her. She said the man, alleged to be Mr Crosbie, disparaged Mr O'Brien while assaulting her. She claimed that while Mr Crosbie was having sex with her, he said: 'I know you want this; [Mr O'Brien] can't even do this for you – what a loser.' She testified that she told him to 'stop' and that she eventually managed to manoeuvre her legs off the side of the bed and break free. According to the complainant, Mr Crosbie continued to follow her around the hotel room. When she collected her clothes and went to the bathroom, she said Mr Crosbie tried to get in and 'was jiggling the handle' after she locked the door. Under cross examination on Wednesday, Mr Crosbie's defence attorney Daniel C Reilly asked Mr McDonough about discrepancies in the complainant's earlier interviews. Mr Reilly asserted that the woman did not provide detectives with details of Mr Crosbie attempting to push his way into the bathroom until April 8th – weeks after the alleged assault – in an email. 'In her prior interviews she did not mention being in a separate bed [from Mr O'Brien] when Mr Crosbie arrived,' Mr Reilly said. Mr McDonough confirmed that was correct. Jurors previously heard that Mr O'Brien was listed as a potential witness as part of the jury selection process. On Wednesday Mr Reilly said 'Mr O'Brien declined to participate in this trial'. Mr McDonough said that was correct. On Wednesday, jurors also heard from Lindsey Walsh, a physician at Massachusetts General Hospital, and the second medical professional to testify that the woman was found to be suffering from a vaginal tear hours after the alleged assault.
Irish Times
11 hours ago
- Irish Times
Harvey Weinstein found guilty of sex crime in New York retrial
A Manhattan jury found Harvey Weinstein guilty on a sex crimes charge on Wednesday in a retrial after a state appeals court last year overturned the former movie mogul's 2020 conviction . Weinstein, once one of the most powerful figures in Hollywood, was accused by prosecutors in the case of raping an aspiring actor and assaulting two other women. Weinstein (73) pleaded not guilty and has denied assaulting anyone or having non-consensual sex. The jury found Weinstein guilty on one of the three counts he faced, which stemmed from his alleged assault of former production assistant Miriam Haley in 2006. The jury found Weinstein not guilty of a charge stemming from his alleged assault of Kaja Sokola in 2002 when she was a 16-year-old aspiring actor. The jury has not yet reached a verdict on the third count, which charges him with raping aspiring actor Jessica Mann in 2013. They will resume deliberations on that count on Thursday. In closing arguments on June 3rd, the prosecution told the 12 jurors that the evidence showed how Weinstein used his power and influence to trap and abuse women. READ MORE The defence countered that the accusers lied on the witness stand out of spite after their consensual sexual encounters with the Oscar-winning producer failed to result in Hollywood stardom. Jurors reached their partial verdict on the fifth day of sometimes fractious deliberations. The retrial began on April 23rd. Weinstein has had a litany of health problems and attended the retrial in a wheelchair. A jury had in February 2020 found Weinstein guilty of raping Ms Mann and sexually assaulting Ms Haley. Ms Sokola's allegation was not part of that case. The conviction was a milestone for the #MeToo movement, which encouraged women to come forward with allegations of sexual misconduct by powerful men. But the New York court of appeals, the state's highest court, threw out that conviction in April 2024. It said the trial judge erred by letting women testify that Weinstein had assaulted them, though their accusations were not the basis of the criminal charges. Though the 2020 conviction was thrown out, Weinstein has remained behind bars because of his 2022 rape conviction in California, which resulted in a 16-year prison sentence. He is appealing that verdict. More than 100 women, including famous actors, have accused Weinstein of misconduct. The retrial was handled by prosecutors with the office of Manhattan district attorney Alvin Bragg. They portrayed Weinstein as a serial predator who promised career advancement in Hollywood to women, only to then coax them into private settings where he attacked them. The defence rejected that characterisation, saying Weinstein engaged in 'mutually beneficial' relationships with his accusers, who ended up with auditions and other show business opportunities. Weinstein cofounded the Miramax studio, whose hit movies included Shakespeare in Love and Pulp Fiction. His own eponymous film studio filed for bankruptcy in March 2018, five months after sexual misconduct accusations against him became widely publicised. Weinstein has experienced several health episodes while being held at New York City's Rikers Island jail, and in September was rushed to a hospital for emergency heart surgery. – Reuters
Irish Times
11 hours ago
- Irish Times
Attorney general scandal adds to Spanish government woes
The unprecedented legal action being taken against Spain 's attorney general which could see him go on trial and has fuelled calls for his resignation is just the latest in a litany of scandals which have left the Socialist-led government of Pedro Sánchez struggling for stability. This week, a supreme court investigating judge recommended that the attorney general, Álvaro García Ortiz, should face trial for his alleged role in leaking secret information to the media about a tax fraudster. In March 2024, Spanish media reported details of a plea deal which Alberto González Amador, boyfriend of the conservative president of the Madrid regional government Isabel Díaz Ayuso, had proposed to the general attorney's office. The tax office had found that González Amador had avoided paying about €350,000 from earnings made from importing healthcare material during the Covid-19 pandemic. READ MORE The media reports corrected a false claim made by Díaz Ayuso's team that the attorney general's office had been the one to offer a deal. The investigating judge, Ángel Luis Hurtado, has now accused the attorney general himself of being the source of the reports. According to the judge, the leak aimed 'to make clear that, according to [García Ortiz], the attorney general had not offered any deal of this kind'. Díaz Ayuso, a prominent figure on the right, has been a fierce critic of the government. If he does go on trial, which now looks likely, and were to be found guilty, García Ortiz could receive a jail sentence of up to four years. However, the most damaging allegation, as far as the government is concerned, was that the attorney general, who it proposed for the post, was acting on the orders of the prime minister's office. The left-wing coalition government has staunchly defended the attorney general and justice minister Félix Bolanos flatly denied the claim the government was involved in the leak. [ Catalan amnesty expected to get court blessing amid political turmoil Opens in new window ] 'I regret very much that the supreme court should make such a serious assertion without any evidence, because that never happened,' he said. However, the opposition says García Ortiz cannot remain in his post. 'The situation regarding the attorney general is unprecedented in our democracy, you must demand his resignation,' Alberto Núñez Feijóo, the leader of the conservative Popular Party (PP), told Sánchez in Congress on Wednesday. The opposition leader has cast this as the latest in a series of scandals to affect the government. Sánchez's wife, Begona Gómez, has been investigated for possible business irregularities and his musician brother, David, is due to go on trial for alleged influence peddling in being appointed to a public post. A former Socialist minister, José Luis Ábalos, is being investigated on suspicion of profiting from a kickback scheme when he was in government. Meanwhile, a former Socialist party official, Leire Díez, has been caught on tape offering favourable treatment to a businessman in exchange for incriminating information on the police unit carrying out investigations into several cases affecting the government. Many judicial experts have said the attorney general's position is untenable. However, a large number have also expressed concerns about the judge's investigation, pointing to an apparent lack of evidence against García Ortiz. Tensions between the government and the judiciary have been escalating since Sánchez's administration introduced an amnesty law for Catalan nationalists last year. Many on the left see the ongoing investigations as part of a campaign by magistrates with right-wing allegiances. Government spokeswoman Pilar Alegría said that 'at this point certain judges are doing things which are difficult to understand'. A recent poll by the national statistics institute found that 78 per cent of Spaniards do not trust the impartiality of their justice system in cases involving political parties.
