logo
How Moderna Went From Pandemic Hero to Vaccine Victim

How Moderna Went From Pandemic Hero to Vaccine Victim

Hindustan Times3 days ago

The Trump administration is seeking to reshape the regulation, recommendations and development of vaccines. Moderna was once a darling of the first Trump administration, which went to great lengths to help the company develop its Covid-19 vaccine that protected millions of people from the virus. Now the biotech is caught in the crossfire of Trump 2.0 as vaccine-making comes under fire.
In the latest setback for Moderna, the Food and Drug Administration on Friday approved its next-generation Covid shot for a narrower population of patients than the company intended. The approval grants use of the vaccine only in older adults and people aged 12 to 64 with health risks.
Moderna is in a precarious position. The company bet big on mRNA, the underlying technology powering its vaccines, to develop shots that could treat or prevent different diseases. But after securing riches from its Covid shot, it failed to diversify its pipeline. That has become detrimental for Moderna as the Trump administration casts a critical eye on the technology and seeks to reshape the regulation, recommendations and development of vaccines.
The Department of Health and Human Services recently canceled a contract worth $766 million that was awarded to Moderna to develop mRNA-based vaccines for pandemic-level influenza including bird flu. The FDA released a new framework for approving Covid vaccines, introducing more stringent rules that require more testing. And Moderna withdrew its application with the FDA for its flu-Covid combo shot, which analysts said could have been because it fell short of the new standards.
The beleaguered company is seeking to cut costs and find a path forward postpandemic. Its shares have fallen about 35% this year because of low demand for the Covid shot and disappointing sales of its respiratory-syncytial-virus vaccine. Moderna's share price, which peaked in 2021 at $484, has dropped to prepandemic levels of about $25.
'It's just a bad time to be in the vaccine business,' said Jared Holz, healthcare strategist at financial firm Mizuho. 'The proclivity that this administration has shown is certainly not in their favor.'
HHS will continue to seek advancements through evidence-based technologies that meet the gold standard of science, a spokeswoman said.
Moderna's troubles underscore just how much the regulatory environment has shifted since Trump's re-election. The new framework for vaccine approval requires new Covid shots for certain children and adults to undergo randomized, controlled trials.
HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr., a longtime vaccine skeptic, said recently that certain shots for respiratory diseases including mRNA vaccines have 'never worked.' In mid-May, Kennedy said the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention would no longer recommend that pregnant women and children get Covid-19 vaccines as a matter of routine. The industry is also navigating an FDA that has shed thousands of workers.
While many vaccine makers, including Pfizer, face government headwinds, most are better positioned because they sell more products. Moderna has just three approved vaccines and has been struggling to advance its pipeline, which includes treatments for cancer and rare diseases and vaccines for a herpes virus and Lyme disease.
In withdrawing the approval application for a flu-Covid vaccine, Moderna said it did so after consulting with the FDA, which asked for more flu data, and would resubmit after study results come later this year.
The government contract was awarded during the Biden administration, and the bird-flu shot showed positive results in an early-stage study, Moderna said.
But the government terminated the contract after it concluded that the bird-flu vaccine 'was not scientifically or ethically justifiable,' an HHS spokesman said at the time. 'This is not simply about efficacy—it is about safety, integrity and trust,' he said, adding that mRNA 'remains under-tested.'
A Moderna spokesman said the 'results during the pandemic speak for themselves, including demonstrated efficacy and a safety profile established in over a billion people worldwide.'
Moderna Chief Executive Stephane Bancel said at an investor conference in May that the new administration seems focused on Covid vaccination for people at high risk, a goal he said is a 'net positive' and a large market.
Bancel said in an interview in May that Moderna understands it has the burden of proving the safety and efficacy of its products that are based on a newer technology.
'We have exactly the same goal,' Bancel said. 'We wouldn't want to put on the market a product that is not efficacious, that is not safe.'
Before the pandemic made Moderna a household name, the company had no FDA-approved products. Then, in 2020, the biotech won billions for Covid vaccine development as part of Trump's Operation Warp Speed, which helped support vaccine testing in thousands of people.
Moderna's Covid vaccine went on to be used globally and has been credited with saving millions of lives. The vaccine pushed Moderna's annual sales to nearly $20 billion for two years, and its staff grew to 5,800 people.
Moderna made their next goal treating or preventing certain diseases by doubling down on mRNA technology. But development of new mRNA products has been slow. Some studies for other vaccines haven't yielded the data Moderna hoped for and others hit regulatory setbacks. Moderna's vaccine for RSV has struggled to gain market share against shots from Pfizer and GSK, with underwhelming sales.
Meanwhile, the company didn't use its cash to expand beyond mRNA, leaving it dependent on one technology for growth.
'They built a tank for the war, and now the war is over,' Holz said. 'They don't, in my mind, really have a business anymore.'
Last fall, Moderna said it would cut research costs by 20% and some staff, and trim its pipeline of experimental drugs. It began 2025 by slashing its guidance and pledged another $1 billion in cost cuts.
The company has also continued spending on drug development. It had $8.4 billion on hand as of March 31, down from $9.5 billion three months earlier. Holz said that Moderna must raise money or issue debt, because it is on track to run out of cash in 18 months.
Moderna has said it expects to end the year with about $6 billion in cash and investments, and plans to reduce spending and stop losing money in 2028. Moderna has also said it isn't going to raise more equity.
Moderna's future hinges on whether its vaccines in development pan out, as well as whether there is more uptake of the new Covid shot and potential expansion of its RSV shot. The FDA is set to rule on that expansion in June.
Write to Jared S. Hopkins at jared.hopkins@wsj.com and Peter Loftus at Peter.Loftus@wsj.com
Get 360° coverage—from daily headlines to 100 year archives.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

‘Ready to facilitate for a reasonable fee': Russia mocks Donald Trump-Elon Musk feud, offers 'peace talks' & business haven for Tesla CEO
‘Ready to facilitate for a reasonable fee': Russia mocks Donald Trump-Elon Musk feud, offers 'peace talks' & business haven for Tesla CEO

Time of India

time34 minutes ago

  • Time of India

‘Ready to facilitate for a reasonable fee': Russia mocks Donald Trump-Elon Musk feud, offers 'peace talks' & business haven for Tesla CEO

Russia mocks Donald Trump-Elon Musk feud, offers 'peace talks' & business haven for Tesla CEO (Picture credit: AP) The spectacular fallout between US President Donald Trump and Elon Musk has become a source of mockery and intrigue in Moscow, where senior officials and media figures are treating the public feud as both comedy and opportunity. "Elon, don't be upset!" posted nationalist senator Dmitry Rogozin, the former head of Russia's space agency, on Musk's platform X. "If you encounter insurmountable problems in the US, come to us. Here you will find reliable comrades and complete freedom of technical creativity," he added, in a tone mixing humour with a clear invitation. Former Russian President Dmitry Medvedev took the trolling a step further, offering to mediate between the feuding duo. 'We are ready to facilitate the conclusion of a peace deal between D and E for a reasonable fee,' he wrote on X, before jokingly requesting Starlink shares as payment. As per the news agency Reuters, the episode has been widely ridiculed as an example of chaos in Washington, with Margarita Simonyan, editor-in-chief of RT, deriding it as 'modern US political culture, sort of like the English Industrial Revolution. Only in reverse.' The Trump-Musk relationship imploded after Musk criticised Trump's flagship legislative proposal as an 'abomination.' Trump responded with rare public disappointment, telling reporters in the Oval Office, 'Elon and I had a great relationship. I don't know if we will anymore.' He later suggested slashing Musk's lucrative government contracts, saying, 'The easiest way to save money in our Budget, Billions and Billions of Dollars, is to terminate Elon's Governmental Subsidies and Contracts.' The spat escalated quickly, with Musk accusing Trump of 'ingratitude' and reposting claims that the president appeared in government documents linked to Jeffrey Epstein, allegations he shared without providing evidence. The feud also triggered a $100 billion drop in Tesla's market value and prompted Musk to threaten decommissioning SpaceX's Dragon spacecraft, a key part of Nasa missions, before walking it back. The Russian elite appears to be relishing the distraction. Kremlin spokesperson Dmitry Peskov, as reported by Reuters, dismissed the feud as an internal US matter but expressed confidence in Trump's ability to manage it. Others, like hardline nationalist businessman Konstantin Malofeyev, saw strategic value in the squabble. 'We can just be glad that they won't have time for us,' he said, calling it 'the best time to strike back' against Ukraine. Meanwhile, the White House ruled out any imminent reconciliation. A senior official said that Trump had no plans to speak to Musk, dismissing rumours of a scheduled call. When asked by ABC whether he intended to reconnect with his ex-ally, Trump replied bluntly: 'You mean the man who has lost his mind?' As the public spat continues to reverberate, it has turned into a political spectacle that offers both global amusement and serious implications.

Trump, Musk, and the Big Beautiful Breakup
Trump, Musk, and the Big Beautiful Breakup

Time of India

time34 minutes ago

  • Time of India

Trump, Musk, and the Big Beautiful Breakup

Donald Trump, left, and Elon Musk depart the White House to board Marine One en route to New Jersey, March 21, 2025, in Washington. (AP) TOI correspondent from Washington: The epic war between the world's richest man and the world's most powerful man kept America -- and the world -- enthralled on Friday as attempts to bring about a truce between Elon Musk and Donald Trump failed. There was a brief prospect of reconciliation on Thursday night as mutual friends tried to patch things up after Musk ratcheted up his attacks on the President, linking Trump to the pedophile Epstein. 'Time to drop the really big bomb: @realDonaldTrump is in the Epstein files. That is the real reason they have not been made public. Have a nice day, DJT!' he posted on X. Trump ignored the charge but he responded to the broader issue of their falling out, saying he had asked Musk to leave the White House because he was 'wearing thin,' and he (Musk) went "crazy" because the administration took away his EV Mandate that forced everyone to buy Electric Cars that "nobody else wanted." Things went further south when the President posted, "The easiest way to save money in our Budget, Billions and Billions of Dollars, is to terminate Elon's Governmental Subsidies and Contracts. I was always surprised that Biden didn't do it!' That triggered Musk to warn that he would decommission SpaceX's Dragon spacecraft, critical for NASA's International Space Station operations, a threat he later retracted. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Trending in in 2025: Local network access control [Click Here] Esseps Learn More Undo Amid the heated, real-time exchanges on social media, billionaire hedge fund manager Bill Ackman got in a word edgewise, asking the warring duo to reunite "for the benefit of our great country." Musk responded, "You're not wrong," and reportedly sought a Trump phone call, which the President rejected on Friday, characterizing Musk as the "man who has lost his mind." Officials though warned the President could change his mind. Chances of a truce appeared to have been derailed by Musk himself after he mused about the President's political mortality in the hours before, telling social media gadabout Laura Loomer that "Trump has 3.5 years left as President, but I will be around for 40+ years…" This came after he tried to talk up JD Vance for the Oval Office following a Trump impeachment proposed by some critics. But the US vice-president smacked down the idea, saying, "President Trump has done more than any person in my lifetime to earn the trust of the movement he leads. I'm proud to stand beside him." Several GOP lawmakers rallied around Trump saying Musk had "gone too far" in the feud. Musk also posted a poll on X asking, "Is it time to create a new political party in America that actually represents the 80% in the middle?" There were more than 5 million responses, with more than 80 percent saying "yes." A variety of other characters waded into the drama, offering millions of political junkies a constant high. While Ackman and other billionaires and tech bros sought to keep a lid on the explosion, former Trump advisor Steve Bannon and other MAGA hardliners, who see Musk as an interloper, poured gasoline on the fumes, demanding Trump seize's Musk's SpaceX invoking national security provisions and deport Musk, although the South Africa born Tesla boss is now a US citizen. A current Trump advisor Peter Navarro, among many in the President's inner circle happy with the departure of the man some called a "co-President," said Musk was just 'a special government employee with an expiration date.' Russia too stepped into the American swamp, offering Musk political asylum if his feud with Trump went further south. Some of the feuding bordered on the petulant, with several media outlets reporting that Trump now plans to sell the red Tesla S that he bought with great fanfare after celebrating Musk and his cars on the White House lawns just a few weeks ago. The banner headline in the NewYork Post said it all: I HATE MY X.

Why Trump and Nasa cannot afford to cut SpaceX contract over Musk feud
Why Trump and Nasa cannot afford to cut SpaceX contract over Musk feud

First Post

time37 minutes ago

  • First Post

Why Trump and Nasa cannot afford to cut SpaceX contract over Musk feud

The feud raised questions about how far Trump, an often unpredictable force who has intervened in past procurement efforts, would go to punish Musk, who until last week headed Trump's initiative to downsize the federal government read more Elon Musk and President Donald Trump's violent feud on Thursday might have a significant impact on many US space initiatives and jeopardise around $22 billion of SpaceX's federal contracts. Musk's criticism of Trump's tax-cut and spending legislation, which started last week, was the starting point of the dispute, which swiftly got out of hand. When Musk talked in the Oval Office, Trump snapped at him. Then, Musk attacked Trump in a string of X postings, threatening to revoke federal contracts with Musk's businesses. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Musk took the warning seriously and announced that he would begin 'decommissioning' SpaceX's Dragon spaceship, which is used by Nasa. Hours later, however, Musk appeared to reverse course. Responding to a follower on X urging him and Trump to 'cool off and take a step back for a couple of days,' Musk wrote: 'Good advice. Ok, we won't decommission Dragon.' Still, Musk's mere threat to abruptly pull its Dragon spacecraft out of service marked an unprecedented outburst from one of Nasa's leading commercial partners. Under a roughly $5 billion contract, the Dragon capsule has been the agency's only US vessel capable of carrying astronauts to and from the International Space Station, making Musk's company a critical element of the US space program. The feud raised questions about how far Trump, an often unpredictable force who has intervened in past procurement efforts, would go to punish Musk, who until last week headed Trump's initiative to downsize the federal government. If the president prioritized political retaliation and canceled billions of dollars of SpaceX contracts with Nasa and the Pentagon, it could slow US space progress. Nasa press secretary Bethany Stevens declined to comment on SpaceX, but said: 'We will continue to work with our industry partners to ensure the president's objectives in space are met.' STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Musk and Trump's tussle ruptured an extraordinary relationship between a US president and industry titan that had yielded some key favours for SpaceX: a proposed overhaul of Nasa's moon program into a Mars program, a planned effort to build a gigantic missile defence shield in space, and the naming of an Air Force leader who favoured SpaceX in a contract award. Taking Dragon out of service would likely disrupt the ISS program, which involves dozens of countries under a two-decade-old international agreement. But it was unclear how quickly such a decommissioning would occur. Nasa uses Russia's Soyuz spacecraft as a secondary ride for its astronauts to the ISS. SpaceX's rise SpaceX rose to dominance long before Musk's foray into Republican politics last year, building formidable market share in the rocket launch and satellite communications industries that could shield it somewhat from Musk's split with Trump, analysts said. 'It fortunately wouldn't be catastrophic, since SpaceX has developed itself into a global powerhouse that dominates most of the space industry, but there's no question that it would result in significant lost revenue and missed contract opportunities,' said Justus Parmar, CEO of SpaceX investor Fortuna Investments. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Under Trump in recent months, the US space industry and Nasa's workforce of 18,000 have been whipsawed by looming layoffs and proposed budget cuts that would cancel dozens of science programs, while the US space agency remains without a confirmed administrator. Trump's nominee for Nasa administrator, Musk ally and billionaire private astronaut Jared Isaacman, appeared to be an early casualty of Musk's rift with the president when the White House abruptly removed him from consideration over the weekend, denying Musk his pick to lead the space agency. Trump on Thursday explained dumping Isaacman by saying he was 'totally Democrat,' in an apparent reference to reports Isaacman had donated to Democrats. Isaacman has donated to some Republican but mostly Democratic candidates for office, according to public records. Musk's quest to send humans to Mars has been a critical element of Trump's space agenda. The effort has threatened to take resources away from Nasa's flagship effort to send humans back to the moon. Trump's budget plan sought to cancel Artemis moon missions beyond its third mission, effectively ending the over-budget Space Launch System rocket used for those missions. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD But the Senate Commerce Committee version of Trump's bill released late on Thursday would restore funding for missions four and five, providing at least $1 billion annually for SLS through 2029. Since SpaceX's rockets are a less expensive alternative to SLS, whether the Trump administration opposes the Senate's changes in the coming weeks will give an indication of Musk's remaining political power. SpaceX, founded in 2002, has won $15 billion of contracts from Nasa for the company's Falcon 9 rockets and development of SpaceX's Starship, a multipurpose rocket system tapped to land Nasa astronauts on the moon this decade. The company has also been awarded billions of dollars to launch a majority of the Pentagon's national security satellites into space while it builds a massive spy satellite constellation in orbit for a US intelligence agency. In addition to not being in US interests, former Nasa Deputy Administrator Lori Garver said cancelling SpaceX's contracts would probably not be legal. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD But she also added, 'A rogue CEO threatening to decommission spacecraft, putting astronauts' lives at risk, is untenable.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store