logo
Israel kills more than 130 Palestinians in 24 hours

Israel kills more than 130 Palestinians in 24 hours

Middle East Eye2 days ago
Israeli forces killed more than 130 Palestinians in Gaza in a single day, including several children who were attempting to collect water for their hungry families in the besieged enclave.
The Palestinian health ministry reported on Sunday that at least 139 bodies had been brought to Gaza's hospitals in the past 24 hours, with a number of unaccounted people presumed dead under the rubble.
Medical officials told reporters that at least 24 Palestinians had been killed whilst on their way to a food distribution site near Rafah run by the controversial Israeli- and US-backed Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF).
According to the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights, nearly 800 Palestinians have been killed while trying to access aid in Gaza between late May, when the GHF launched its operations, and 7 July. Scores more have been killed since then.
Meanwhile, health officials said seven children were killed after an Israeli air strike targeted a water distribution site in central Gaza.
Read more: Israel kills more than 130 Palestinians in 24 hours
A Palestinian family mourns their relative, after a child, was killed in Israeli strikes on tents sheltering displaced people, on 14 July 2025, in the southern Gaza Strip (Hatem Khaled/Reuters)
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

At least 80 killed in Gaza since Wednesday morning
At least 80 killed in Gaza since Wednesday morning

Middle East Eye

time8 hours ago

  • Middle East Eye

At least 80 killed in Gaza since Wednesday morning

Around 81 Palestinians, including 25 aid seekers, were killed since the early hours of Wednesday by Israeli attacks on different areas in Gaza, according to medical sources. According to the United Nations, at least 875 people have been killed trying to get food, since the Israeli-US-backed Gaza Humanitarian Foundation started operating in the strip in late May. At least 674 of these deaths occurred 'in the vicinity of GHF sites', according to the United Nations.

Miller says Americans will live better lives without immigrants
Miller says Americans will live better lives without immigrants

Gulf Today

time9 hours ago

  • Gulf Today

Miller says Americans will live better lives without immigrants

Michael Hiltzik, Tribune News Service Stephen Miller, the front man for President Donald Trump's deportation campaign against immigrants, took to the airwaves the other day to explain why native-born Americans will just love living in a world cleansed of undocumented workers. "What would Los Angeles look like without illegal aliens?" he asked on Fox News. "Here's what it would look like: You would be able to see a doctor in the emergency room right away, no wait time, no problems. Your kids would go to a public school that had more money than they know what to do with. Classrooms would be half the size. Students who have special needs would get all the attention that they needed. ... There would be no fentanyl, there would be no drug deaths." Etc., etc. No one can dispute that the world Miller described on Fox would be a paradise on Earth. No waiting at the ER? School districts flush with cash? No drug deaths? But that doesn't obscure that pretty much every word Miller uttered was fiction. The gist of Miller's spiel — in fact, the worldview that he has been espousing for years — is that "illegal aliens" are responsible for all those ills, and exclusively responsible. It's nothing but a Trumpian fantasy. Let's take a look, starting with overcrowding at the ER. The issue has been the focus of numerous studies and surveys. Overwhelmingly, they conclude that undocumented immigration is irrelevant to ER overcrowding. In fact, immigrants generally and undocumented immigrants in particular are less likely to get their healthcare at the emergency room than native-born Americans. In California, according to a 2014 study from UCLA, "one in five US-born adults visits the ER annually, compared with roughly one in 10 undocumented adults — approximately half the rate of US-born residents." Among the reasons, explained Nadereh Pourat, the study's lead author and director of research at the UCLA Center for Health Policy Research, was fear of being asked to provide documents. The result is that undocumented individuals avoid seeking any healthcare until they become critically ill. The UCLA study found that undocumented immigrants' average number of doctor visits per year was lower than for other cohorts: 2.3 for children and 1.7 for adults, compared with 2.8 doctor visits for US-born children and 3.2 for adults. ER overcrowding is an issue of long standing in the US, but it's not the result of an influx of undocumented immigrants. It's due to a confluence of other factors, including the tendency of even insured patients to use the ER as a primary care center, presenting with complicated or chronic ailments for which ER medicine is not well-suited. While caseloads at emergency departments have surged, their capacities are shrinking. According to a 2007 report by the National Academy of Sciences, from 1993 to 2003 the US population grew by 12%, hospital admissions by 13% and ER visits by 26%. "Not only is (emergency department) volume increasing, but patients coming to the ED are older and sicker and require more complex and time-consuming workups and treatments," the report observed. "During this same period, the United States experienced a net loss of 703 hospitals, 198,000 hospital beds, and 425 hospital EDs, mainly in response to cost-cutting measures." Trump's immigration policies during his first term suppressed the use of public healthcare facilities by undocumented immigrants and their families. The key policy was the administration's tightening of the "public charge" rule, which applies to those seeking admission to the United States or hoping to upgrade their immigration status. The rule, which has been part of US immigration policy for more than a century, allowed immigration authorities to deny entry — or deny citizenship applications of green card holders — to anyone judged to become a recipient of public assistance such as welfare (today known chiefly as Temporary Assistance for Needy Families, or TANF) or other cash assistance programs. Until Trump, healthcare programs such as Medicaid, nutrition programs such as food stamps, and subsidized housing programs weren't part of the public charge test. Even before Trump implemented the change but after a draft version leaked out, clinics serving immigrant communities across California and nationwide detected a marked drop off in patients. A clinic on the edge of Boyle Heights in Los Angeles that had been serving 12,000 patients, I reported in 2018, saw monthly patient enrollments fall by about one-third after Trump's 2016 election, and an additional 25% after the leak. President Joe Biden rescinded the Trump rule within weeks of taking office. Undocumented immigrants are sure to be less likely to access public healthcare services, such as those available at emergency rooms, as a result of Trump's rescinding "sensitive location" restrictions on immigration agents that had been in effect at least since 2011. That policy barred almost all immigration enforcement actions at schools, places of worship, funerals and weddings, public marches or rallies, and hospitals. Trump rescinded the policy on inauguration day in January. The goal was for Immigration and Customs Enforcement, or ICE, agents "to make substantial efforts to avoid unnecessarily alarming local communities," agency officials stated. Today, as public shows of force and public raids by ICE have demonstrated, instilling alarm in local communities appears to be the goal. The change in the sensitive locations policy has prompted hospital and ER managers to establish formal procedures for staff confronted with the arrival of immigration agents.

UK's Lammy urged to honour pledge to help evacuate injured children from Gaza
UK's Lammy urged to honour pledge to help evacuate injured children from Gaza

Middle East Eye

time11 hours ago

  • Middle East Eye

UK's Lammy urged to honour pledge to help evacuate injured children from Gaza

Britain has 'a clear moral obligation' to provide state-funded medical treatment in the UK to Palestinian children injured in the Gaza war, a doctor for a charity helping to evacuate children from the warzone has said. The comments from Dr Tareq Hailat of the Palestinian Children's Relief Fund (PCRF) came after Foreign Secretary David Lammy told MPs on Wednesday that he would be 'happy to do more' if requests for the medical evacuations of Palestinian children were made. In April, two girls from Gaza arrived in the UK, becoming the first Palestinian children to be evacuated to the country for specialist medical treatment, entirely funded by charitable donations. The evacuation came through the Project Pure Hope initiative in partnership with PCRF, 17 months after organisations and healthcare workers first started pushing for a legal pathway to bring children from Gaza to the UK for treatment. An earlier attempt to bring five children for treatment in January 2024 was unsuccessful when they were unable to obtain visas from the Home Office. New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters Meanwhile, the need for medical evacuations for children in Gaza, already overwhelming the short list of countries offering help, has only grown with Medicine Sans Frontiers pleading this week for more countries to open their doors. Currently, healthcare workers tell MEE that around 5,000 children are believed to be among at least 12,000 patients in Gaza that the World Health Organisation says need to be evacuated outside Gaza to access care. A UN-sponsored report warned this week that ten children a day are losing one or both limbs in Gaza due to Israel's assault on the Palestinian enclave. 'Power of the state' Lammy, testifying before the International Development Committee on Wednesday, was asked by Labour MP Sam Rushworth whether there was 'more that we can do for the children of Gaza'. Rushworth said he and other MPs had recently met with a British plastic surgeon who had just returned from Gaza and showed them video footage and images of children suffering in Gaza. 'Tens of thousands are orphans and many of them are dying because they are not able to receive medical treatment. To date, just two have entered the UK' - Sam Rushworth MP 'As you know, tens of thousands are orphans and many of them are dying because they are not able to receive medical treatment. To date, just two have entered the UK,' Rushworth said. 'I understand that there are complexities around this, but I know that I would be happy to take a Palestinian child into my home. I'd be happy to help fund their treatment, but we are not able to without the power of the state behind it.' Lammy responded: 'We have supported the [Project Pure] Hope charity initiative to bring children to the UK. I am happy to do more if those requests come in.' He then outlined British efforts to treat Palestinians in Gaza, including through field hospitals in Gaza run by UK Med and a polio vaccination campaign. 'I don't want to suggest that with hospitals bombed and lots of aid not able to get in that people aren't experiencing real medical emergencies, second by second and minute by minute in Gaza,' Lammy said. 'But we are doing a lot in the medical space particularly and will continue to do so. And if there are more children that we can work with [Project Pure] Hope and others to bring in, of course, we will do that.' Gaza's healthcare system has been devestated by Israel's 21-month assault on the enclave. MSF said this week that Israel, whose authorities must sign off on evacuations, has now "reduced medical evacuations to a minimum". Ten children a day losing a limb in Gaza, warns UN-backed body Read More » PCRF's Hailat told MEE that, unlike with Ukrainians, who received direct government support when they were brought to the UK for medical treatment, the two girls that came in April were funded privately "after 17 gruesome months of advocacy". "Now, with Israel severely limiting medical evacuations from Gaza since our first cases, Britain has a clear moral obligation: to treat Palestinian children with the same urgency and state backing as it did Ukrainians, and to press Israel to open and guarantee safe passage for those needing life-saving care," he said. Labour MP Kim Johnson, who has been pressing the government to bring more Palestinian children for treatment, said it was "disgraceful" the only two had been brought so far. "We need urgent, coordinated action - not passive promises," Johnson told MEE. "Every child deserves a chance at a healthy life, yet Palestinian children are being systematically denied this, while hundreds of Ukrainian children in need of healthcare were welcomed with open arms." Johnson said the government should lead other countries to commit to "a bloc-wide humanitarian effort to bring Gaza's children to safety". "It is utterly unjustifiable that we are refusing access to treatment to children from Gaza when we have the capacity and the expertise – we just need the political will."

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store