Tenants win £260,000 of rent back in legal fight with London ‘rogue landlord'
The group of current and former residents of Olympic House and Simpson House in Hackney took companies owned by John Christodoulou to tribunal for operating unlicensed houses in multiple occupation (HMOs), which meant the buildings were not subject to the safety and quality standards required by law.
The London Renters Union, which represents the tenants' group that brought the claim, said the lack of licensing left residents vulnerable to hazardous conditions, including fire risks due to inadequate safety measures.
Cyprus-born Christodoulou, 59, is based in Monaco and, according to the Sunday Times rich list last year, has an estimated wealth of £2.5bn. The Guardian has contacted his company Yianis Group for comment.
Jordan Osserman, a spokesperson for the campaign, said: 'This case shows how the law is rigged against renters. Christodoulou makes millions off our rent while flouting the law and cutting corners on safety.'
During the hearing earlier in March, the judge in the first-tier tribunal (property chamber), Robert Latham, said: 'The respondent can only be characterised as a rogue landlord.'
After a lengthy legal battle that began in 2020 – when the landlord rejected residents' request for rent relief during the Covid-19 crisis, telling them they could use money saved on lunches to pay their rent in full – 46 residents from 15 different flats across Olympic House and Simpson House have been awarded a combined total of £263,555.68.
The ruling forms part of a rent repayment order (RRO). These were introduced in housing legislation in 2016 and empower the property chamber of the first-tier tribunal to force a landlord who has broken the law on housing standards to pay back part, or all, of the rent.
There are now concerns that Christodoulou may not pay, despite the order. The London Renters Union said the tenants had discovered that the landlord was attempting to liquidate the companies that the judgments are against after transferring ownership of Olympic House and Simpson House from one company to another within his corporate group at a large loss or undervalue.
Marc Sutton, a member of Somerford Grove Renters, which represents 170 flats in Olympic House, Simpson House and St John's Court in Hackney, all majority-owned by Christodoulou, said: 'This appears to be a deliberate attempt to evade financial responsibility through corporate restructuring.
'These tactics highlight how wealthy landlords manipulate corporate structures to avoid accountability while tenants suffer the consequences.'
Osserman added: 'Even when we win in court, landlords like Christodoulou can game the system to avoid paying up.' He added: 'The only way we can fight back is by organising and taking collective action.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Sun
7 hours ago
- The Sun
UK's biggest bailiff firm forced to issue REFUNDS after overcharging hard-up households
THE UK's biggest bailiff firm has been forced to issue refunds after overcharging hard-up households hundreds of pounds. Marston Holdings has apologised after charging people multiple "enforcement fees" - which are £235 each - relating to unpaid road traffic penalties. 1 This is a fixed fee added to debts when a bailiff visits someone's home in England and Wales. Thousands of people may have been wrongly charged more than one enforcement fee by the company, sources told The Guardian. Marston said the issue with its systems had now been fixed and refunds had been sent to everyone affected. However, minutes of a trade body meeting last month said the company, which was alerted to the issue in April, was reviewing seven years' worth of cases. It also said the company would be setting up a full refunds scheme with a dedicated call centre that would operate for three years. Marston works for several public bodies to recover debts, including dozens of local authorities, Transport for London, National Highways and HM Courts and Tribunals Service (HMCTS). Bailiff watchdog the Enforcement Conduct Board (ECB) slammed the incident as "unacceptable". ECB boss Chris Nichols said: 'It is very concerning to see breaches of regulations that are there to protect the public from overcharging. 'This is unacceptable behaviour, and the ECB is taking strong action to ensure that people who have been impacted are found and refunded, and that this behaviour is never repeated. 'We have ensured that Marston has signed up to a robust action plan to put this right.' 6 easy ways to boost your credit rating A spokesperson for Marston Recovery told The Guardian: 'In the spring of this year an issue was identified where some individuals with multiple unpaid road traffic penalties had been overcharged enforcement fees. The issue has been fixed. 'Letters, with cheques for a full refund plus interest at 8%, have been sent out to all of those affected. "Those letters include an apology and guidance on how to contact us if there are any questions or help is required.' It added: 'Since the issue first came to light, we have worked closely with the ECB … and all of our clients. "We take full ownership and have worked hard to do the right thing by repaying people back what they are owed.' It comes after The Sun revealed that Council Tax debt is "skyrocketing", with the use of bailiffs by councils having increased by an average of 13 per cent in the last year. How to get help with debt There are several ways you can get help to clear your debt to avoid bailiffs turning up at your door. Groups like Citizens Advice, StepChange and National Debtline can help you manage your debt and negotiate with your creditors. Citizens Advice says it's important to work out a budget and k eep an eye on your bank balance. Try and pay off more than the minimum on credit cards each month, and pay your most expensive credit card first. If you've got several debts and can't pay them all, it's important to prioritise. Your rent, mortgage, council tax and energy bills should be paid first, as the consequences can be serious if you don't pay. You should always have a look at what free options are available for managing debt before you turn to a private firm for support. There's also a government scheme to help manage debt called Breathing Space, which gives you the right to legal protection from creditors for up to 60 days. .
Daily Mirror
9 hours ago
- Daily Mirror
DWP confirms when it will start taking payments straight from bank accounts
The new Public Authorities (Fraud, Error and Recovery) Bill will be introduced from April 2026 and will give the Government power to recover money straight from bank accounts The Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) has confirmed when a major crackdown on benefit cheats will come into force. The new Public Authorities (Fraud, Error and Recovery) Bill will be introduced from April 2026 and will give the Government power to recover money straight from bank accounts of those who have committed benefit fraud. The DWP will be able to request bank statements of those who are under investigation, but it will not have direct access to bank accounts. There will be new requirements for banks and building societies to flag where there is a potential breach of eligibility rules for benefits. The DWP will also be able to apply to the court to ban people from driving for up to two years. It is hoped the new powers will save taxpayers £1.5billion over five years. The Public Authorities (Fraud, Error and Recovery) Bill forms part of wider government plans to save a total of £8.6billion. An estimated £7.4billion was lost to benefit fraud last year. Other measures include DWP organised crime investigators being allowed to apply to for search warrants to seize evidence against fraudsters, including computers and smartphones. The time limit for civil claims against Covid fraud will also be doubled from six to twelve years. DWP minister Liz Kendall said back in March: "The social security system that we inherited from the Conservatives is failing the very people that it is supposed to help and is holding our country back. "The facts speak for themselves. One in 10 people of working age are now claiming a sickness or disability benefit. Almost one million young people are not in education, employment or training - one in eight of all our young people." In more DWP news, pensioners have been told they have until September 15 to opt out of the Winter Fuel Payment worth up to £300. Winter Fuel Payments are being paid this year to pensioners who were born before September 22, 1959 - but if you earn over £35,000 a year, then your Winter Fuel Payment will be automatically recovered by HMRC. This will be done through PAYE, or through self-assessment return. If you earn over £35,000, then there is an option to opt out of getting your Winter Fuel Payment. You can do this by filling out a form on or by contacting the Winter Fuel Payment Centre by post or telephone. The income eligibility is based per person. You can check if your Winter Fuel Payment will be clawed back by HMRC on this page.
The Independent
12 hours ago
- The Independent
Qantas fined over £43 million for illegally sacking 1,800 workers during Covid pandemic
A judge on Monday fined Qantas Airways 90 million Australian dollars ($59m or £43m) for illegally firing more than 1,800 ground staff at the start of the Covid-19 pandemic. The penalty is in addition to the AU$120m ($78m) in compensation that Australia's biggest airline had already agreed to pay its former employees. Australian Federal Court Justice Michael Lee said the outsourcing of 1,820 baggage handler and cleaner jobs at Australian airports in late 2020 was the 'largest and most significant contravention' of relevant Australian labour laws in their 120-year history. Qantas agreed in December last year to pay AU$120m ($78m) in compensation to former staff after seven High Court judges unanimously rejected the Sydney -based airline's appeal against the judgment that outsourcing their jobs was illegal. The Transport Workers Union, which took the airline to court, had argued the airline should receive the largest fine available — AU$121,212,000 ($78,969,735). Lee ruled that the minimum fine to create a deterrence should be AU$90m ($59m), noting that Qantas executives had expected to save AU$125m ($81m) a year through outsourcing the jobs. Lee questioned the sincerity of Qantas 's apology for its illegal conduct, noting that the airline later unsuccessfully argued that it owed no compensation to its former staff. 'If any further evidence was needed of the unrelenting and aggressive litigation strategy adopted in this case by Qantas, it is provided by this effort directed to denying any compensation whatsoever to those in respect of whom Qantas was publicly professing regret for their misfortune,' Lee said. "I do think that the people in charge of Qantas now have some genuine regret, but this more likely reflects the damage that this case has done to the company rather than remorse for the damage done to the affected workers,' Lee added. Qantas chief executive Vanessa Hudson, who was the airline's chief financial officer during the layoffs, said in a statement after Monday's decision: 'We sincerely apologise to each and every one of the 1,820 ground handling employees and to their families who suffered as a result.' 'The decision to outsource five years ago, particularly during such an uncertain time, caused genuine hardship for many of our former team and their families," she said. 'Over the past 18 months, we've worked hard to change the way we operate as part of our efforts to rebuild trust with our people and our customers. This remains our highest priority as we work to earn back the trust we lost,' she added. Lee ruled that AU$50m ($33m) of the fine go to the union, because no Australian government agency had shown interest in investigating or prosecuting Qantas. 'But for the union … , Qantas' contravening conduct would never have been exposed and it would never have been held to account for its unlawful conduct,' Lee said. 'Hence the union has brought to the attention of the court a substantial and significant transgression of a public obligation by a powerful and substantial employer,' Lee added. A hearing will be held at a later date to decide where the remaining AU$40m ($26m) of the fine will go. Michael Kaine, national secretary of the union that represents 60,000 members, said he felt vindicated by Monday's ruling, which ends a five-year legal battle that Qantas had been widely expected to win. 'It is a significant — the most significant — industrial outcome in Australia's history, and it sends a really clear message to Qantas and to every employer in Australia: Treat your work force illegally and you will be held accountable,' Kaine told reporters. 'Against all the odds, we took on a behemoth that had shown itself to be ruthless, and we won,' Kaine added. Qantas has admitted to illegally dealing with passengers as well as employees in its responses to pandemic economic challenges. Last year, Qantas agreed to pay AU$120m ($78m) in compensation and a fine for selling tickets on thousands of cancelled flights. The Australian Competition and Consumer Commission, a consumer watchdog, sued the airline in the Federal Court, alleging that Qantas engaged in false, misleading or deceptive conduct by advertising tickets for more than 8,000 flights from May 2021 through to July 2022 that had already been cancelled.
