Trump says likely to meet Putin 'very soon'
The potential summit was discussed in a call between Trump and Ukrainian leader Volodymyr Zelensky that, according to a senior source in Kyiv, included NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte and the leaders of Britain, Germany and Finland.
"There's a good chance that there will be a meeting very soon," Trump told reporters at the White House, when asked when he would meet the Ukrainian and Russian leaders.
He gave no indication where the meeting with Putin might take place.
The New York Times and CNN, citing people familiar with the plan, said Trump plans to sit down with Putin as early as next week, and then wants a three-way meeting with the Russian leader and Zelensky.
Trump's phone call with Zelensky came after US envoy Steve Witkoff met Russian leadership in Moscow earlier in the day for talks described by the Kremlin as "productive" -- with Trump's deadline looming to impose fresh sanctions over Russia's war in Ukraine.
"Great progress was made!" Trump wrote on his Truth Social platform, adding that afterward he had briefed some European allies.
"Everyone agrees this War must come to a close, and we will work towards that in the days and weeks to come," he said.
Minutes later, however, a senior US official said that "secondary sanctions" were still expected to be implemented in two days' time.
Trump, who had boasted he could end the conflict within 24 hours of taking office, has given Russia until Friday to make progress towards peace or face new penalties.
Three rounds of Russia-Ukraine talks in Istanbul have failed to make headway on a ceasefire, with the two sides far apart in their demands.
Russia has escalated drone and missile attacks against its neighbor, a US and European Union ally, to a record high and accelerated its advance on the ground.
"A quite useful and constructive conversation took place," Putin's aide Yuri Ushakov told journalists, including AFP, after the three-hour meeting with Witkoff.
The two men exchanged "signals" on their positions, Ushakov said, without elaborating.
Zelensky confirmed his call with Trump and confirmed European leaders had taken part, although he did not name them.
- Sanctions threat -
Trump has voiced increasing frustration with Putin in recent weeks over Russia's unrelenting offensive.
The White House has not officially outlined what action it would take against Russia, but Trump told reporters it plans to impose "a lot more secondary sanctions" targeting Russia's key trade partners, possibly targeting China.
Earlier in the day he had ordered steeper tariffs on Indian goods over New Delhi's continued purchase of Russian oil.
The move would aim to stifle Russian exports, but would risk significant international disruption.
Trump said Tuesday he would await the outcome of the Moscow talks before ordering any economic sanctions.
"We're going to see what happens," he told reporters. "We'll make that determination at that time."
Without explicitly naming Trump, the Kremlin on Tuesday slammed "threats" to hike tariffs on Russia's trading partners as "illegitimate."
Russia's campaign against Ukraine since February 2022 has killed tens of thousands of people, destroyed swaths of the country and forced millions to flee their homes.
Moscow has demanded that Ukraine cede more territory and renounce US and EU support if it wants the fighting to stop.
Kyiv is calling for an immediate ceasefire, and Zelensky last week urged his allies to push for "regime change" in Moscow.
- Nuclear rhetoric -
The Witkoff visit came as Moscow-Washington tensions are running high.
Trump said he had ordered two nuclear submarines to be moved following an online row with former Russian president Dmitry Medvedev, and that they were now "in the region."
Moscow then said that it was ending a self-imposed moratorium on nuclear-capable intermediate-range missiles, suggesting that it could deploy such weapons in response to what it alleged were similar US deployments within striking distance of Russia.
Ukrainian emergency services reported on Wednesday that at least two people were killed and 12 others wounded in Russian shelling of a holiday camp in the southern Zaporizhzhia region.
bur-ft/aha
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
22 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Donald Trump Jr posts meme showing his father throwing sex toy onto WNBA court
Donald Trump Jr has taken to Instagram to post a meme of his father, President Donald Trump, throwing a green dildo from the White House roof. 'Posted without further comment,' the president's eldest son wrote in the caption accompanying the photoshopped image, which brings together Trump's unexpected appearance on the roof overlooking his new patio makeover of the Rose Garden on Tuesday with six female basketball players shooting hoops. Don Jr's meme appeared to be referencing an incident last week when a sex toy was flung onto the court in the middle of a WNBA game between the Golden State Valkyries and the Atlanta Dream. The prank led the WNBA to condemn it as dangerous and misogynistic and to threaten anyone involved with stadium bans and even potentially arrest. Indiana Fever guard Sophie Cunningham pleaded with fans not to bombard her fellow players with dildos, only to suffer a near-miss when one was tossed at her earlier this week. While Don Jr's post had accumulated almost 107,000 likes at the time of writing, it has also met with criticism and condemnation. 'So funny! Now RELEASE THE EPSTEIN FILES,' its top comment read, according to Mediaite. 'Remember these are the same people who bash trans people because they care about 'women's sports'. Er, ok,' wrote former MSNBC host Mehdi Hasan when the meme was recirculated on X. 'I wonder if he'd be ok with guys throwing dildos at his daughter while she was playing basketball,' another user wrote on X. One person who loved it was Brian Glenn, White House reporter for Real America's Voice and boyfriend of Georgia Republican Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene, who responded: 'Greatest IG account. Ever.' Don Jr has a long track-record of posting memes, often to troll his father's political enemies or comment on contemporary culture war issues. Late last month, he posted an AI image of his father in tight denim to satirize the Sydney Sweeney American Eagle jeans furore, commenting, in homage to Zoolander: 'That Hanse…. Um, Donald is so hot right now!!!' He has previously drawn fire for posting a fake image of former House Speaker Nancy Pelosi wearing lingerie to send up her hosting Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky in Washington, D.C., in 2022 and raised eyebrows by joking about the FBI raiding his stepmother Melania Trump's bedroom at Mar-a-Lago. The same year, the self-described 'general in the meme wars,' sparked even greater upset by posting a picture of a hammer and a pair of underwear with the comment: : 'Got my Paul Pelosi Halloween costume ready.' A reference to the shocking attack on the veteran Democrat's husband by an intruder who broke into their San Francisco home, the post caused an uproar and, for once, Don Jr relented and took it down.
Yahoo
22 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump's Call to Remove Undocumented from Census Could Impact Education Funding
President Donald Trump has proposed removing undocumented people from an upcoming U.S. Census, a move that while difficult to execute could dramatically reduce school funding in some states, experts say. In an early-morning Truth Social post Thursday, Trump said he told the U.S. Department of Commerce to begin work on a new census 'based on modern day facts and figures' adding, 'People who are in our Country illegally WILL NOT BE COUNTED IN THE CENSUS.' The U.S. Census count is held once a decade and helps determine federal education funding. Bruce Baker, a professor at the University of Miami and a leading scholar on public school financing, said that if fewer people are counted, federal funding for schools, which is based on census data and child poverty rates, would shrink. Get stories like this delivered straight to your inbox. Sign up for The 74 Newsletter 'The states that depend more on federal aid have the most to lose,' he said. And while the percentage of such aid is relatively small, he said, 'these days, every dollar matters.' Pew Research reports the federal government provided 13.6% of total funding for public elementary and secondary schools in fiscal 2022, according to Census Bureau data. The National Education Association said the money helps lower class size, support students with disabilities and feed hungry children. It breaks down the data by state. Other studies confirm federal education funding varies widely across the U.S. Mississippi reported the greatest percentage of federal education aid in 2022, coming in at 23.3% followed by South Dakota at 21.7%, Montana at 20.9%, Alaska at 20.6% and Arkansas at 20.4%. Federal money is delivered to schools in many forms. In fiscal year 2024, Pew notes, the Education Department doled out $18.8 billion for schools with large numbers of poor, neglected, delinquent and other 'educationally disadvantaged' students, $15.5 billion for special education programs for children with disabilities, $5.5 billion for school improvement, and $2.2 billion for career, technical and adult education among many other grants. The federal government also spent billions on COVID recovery. Trump's call to revise the census comes amid massive cutbacks at the education department, changing how critical programs are implemented — and toward the end of a nail-biting summer with many in education gripped by fear after the administration temporarily withheld $7 billion in funding. It also comes just weeks after he announced undocumented children could no longer participate in Head Start. In addition, adults without papers were banned from career and technical education programs and adult education, though both groups now have a brief reprieve. The nation is home to some 11 million undocumented immigrants. California had 2.6 million such residents in 2022, followed by Texas, with more than 2 million and Florida which had 590,000, according to data released last year. Related This isn't the first time Trump has tried to tinker with the U.S. Census: In his first term, he proposed the addition of a citizenship question, one critics say would have resulted in a dramatic undercount and produced a massive loss of funding in immigrant-heavy communities where even those in the country legally would be fearful of responding. The matter made its way to the Supreme Court, with Chief Justice John Roberts casting the deciding vote against the addition. Julia Gelatt, associate director of the U.S. Immigration Policy Program at the Migration Policy Institute, said Trump could try to obtain residents' immigration status in two ways: add questions about citizenship to the census itself, as he earlier proposed, or try to pull information from other federal data. In either case, she said, undocumented immigrants and those who live, work and study alongside them, would lose out. 'If there are more people in a community, there is more need for infrastructure,' she said. 'U.S. citizens would be hurt if that funding was insufficient.' However, Trump's census plan would be difficult to enact and it's unclear when it would be implemented: Population counts take several years to plan. Also Congress, not the president, determines the manner of conducting the tally. Trump's intention to exclude undocumented immigrants from the census, coupled with his earlier attack on birthright citizenship, is enough to roil those concerned about the dignity of all U.S. residents. 'If you don't count all people, you won't be able to provide equal protection to all people,' said Alejandra Vázquez Baur, a fellow with The Century Foundation. 'So this plan to not count undocumented people is a clear abandonment of that constitutional promise of equal protection.' And with each new edict targeting the undocumented, she said, she fears the nation will inch closer to a direct attack on Plyler v. Doe, the landmark 1982 Supreme Court ruling that a child cannot be denied a public education based on immigration status. Hayward Derrick Horton, a professor of sociology at the University of Albany, said the census impacts all areas of civic life, calling it the engine that makes society work. He noted, too, that the U.S. Census is the gold standard for data collection and is respected globally. 'So, what's being threatened is not only the integrity of what this society is about in terms of being able to know exactly how many people we have and the allocations of the right resources to the right places, but it also invalidates this society to the world,' he said. Horton said he believes the fear of losing a numerical majority — and the power and money that comes with it — is driving these efforts to erase an entire group — in this case, mostly Hispanic immigrants — from the census. White people comprised 80% of the total U.S. population in 1980. Recent reports put the current figure at less than 60%. White residents will no longer be the majority by 2045, The Brookings Institution reported. 'Here in the U.S., the white population controls the wealth, status and power — and they also control the numbers,' he said. Solve the daily Crossword
CBS News
22 minutes ago
- CBS News
A new EPA proposal could shift U.S. auto makers' strategy on EVs
A new Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) proposal to revoke a landmark greenhouse gas finding could reshape the auto industry, which until now has had to abide by strict emissions guidelines. The EPA on July 29 announced it is planning to revoke an "endangerment finding" from 2009 that has served as the legal and scientific basis for the agency's regulation of greenhouse gas emissions across multiple industries, including motor vehicles, power plants, oil and gas producers and aircraft. The proposal, which still needs to go through a public comment period, focuses on regulations affecting the auto industry. If passed, it would repeal all greenhouse gas standards for light-, medium- and heavy-duty vehicles and heavy-duty engines. "With this proposal, the Trump EPA is proposing to end 16 years of uncertainty for auto makers and American consumers," Lee Zeldin, the administrator of EPA, stated in the announcement. Strict standards for emissions and fuel efficiency introduced during the Obama administration and expanded during the Biden administration, which also provided generous EV funding, has led many auto makers to add electric vehicles to their fleets in recent years. Others, like Volvo, have taken things a step further and committed to a fully electric future. But the landscape is shifting under President Trump, who has pushed forward a deregulatory agenda. Experts say that if this proposal passes, it will ease pressure on auto makers to produce electric cars, enabling them to adapt their mix of EV and gas-powered vehicle offerings to meet consumer demand. "It gives auto makers a little bit better ability to build, to produce and put vehicles on market that are more closely aligned with the pace of electric adoption right now," said Stephanie Brinley, a principal automotive analyst at S&P Global. John Bozzella, president and CEO Alliance for Automotive Innovation, which represents most of the major car manufacturers in the U.S., said in an email to CBS MoneyWatch that the trade association is reviewing the announcement. "At the same time," he added, "there's no question the vehicle emissions regulations finalized under the previous administration aren't achievable and should be revised to reflect current market conditions, to keep the auto industry in America competitive, and to keep the industry on a path of vehicle choice and lower emissions." A spokesperson from the EPA said Congress never explicitly gave EPA authority to impose greenhouse gas regulations for cars and trucks and that the agency's proposal to revoke the endangerment finding "does not prohibit vehicle manufacturers from developing EVs or different vehicles." Experts say that even amid a shifting regulatory landscape, consumer preference will continue to drive auto makers' decisions. "Their focus is going to be on making vehicles more affordable and dealing with the fact that consumers, not the government, are standing in the way of the mass adoption for EVs," Patrick Anderson, founder of Michigan-based consulting firm Anderson Economic Group. The rate of electric vehicle adoption has been steady over the last several years, although the majority of Americans still fuel their cars at the pump. Demand for the vehicles has waned over the last year, according to data on light vehicle registration from S&P Global Mobility. From January to May, the electric vehicle market share was 7.3%, compared with 8% for the entire year of 2024, data from the auto intelligence provider shows. But while consumer demand may have stalled slightly over the past year, auto makers will still want to offer low-emissions products in order to stay competitive both at home and abroad, Ivan Drury, director of insights at online car marketplace Edmunds, told CBS MoneyWatch. "Every auto maker is a global competitor, and even though they might not be selling as well here, they could sell elsewhere better," he said. Experts say the proposal, if passed, wouldn't drastically change any near-term plans of auto makers, given the time and money they have already invested in their product lines. "If had already planned to build X number of this kind of vehicle, you can change that, but not necessarily tomorrow," said Brinley. "So that's gonna have to be planned out." Product development cycles at car manufacturers span five to 10 years, according to a report from Eurasia Group, a global research firm. The exact strategy and speed with which companies make changes would vary from auto maker to auto maker, according to experts. "For now, auto makers would enjoy the flexibility and lower costs from less stringent emissions limits, particularly in their nonelectric fleet planning," the report from Eurasia says. There are concerns among some companies that the EPA's proposal, if passed, would inject a degree of chaos into industry, David Victor, a professor at University of California San Diego, told CBS MoneyWatch. Also, the rule-making process will likely be challenged in the courts, he said. "[Auto makers] will not get a reliable new set of rules anytime soon," said Victor. The EPA is holding a virtual public hearing on the proposed rule on Aug. 19-20, with a public comment period open through Sept. 15.
