Oak Park Heights announces new mayor, available council seat
'Mayor McComber left some big shoes to fill, but in this time of transition, I am committed to providing steady leadership and ensuring continuity for our community,' Dougherty said in the announcement. 'I look forward to continuing to serve our community with dedication, working alongside our Council, staff and residents.'
Dougherty previously served as deputy mayor and has had a seat on the Oak Park Heights City Council since 2013. He and his wife also own the Water Street Inn and the Cover Park Manor Bed & Breakfast.
The city council is accepting applications for Dougherty's vacated council seat through Thursday, July 3, according to the announcement. Dougherty and the new council member will serve in these roles until November 2026, when a special election for the positions will occur.
Both special elections would be for a two-year term to finish the remaining terms of McComber and Dougherty.
Applications for Oak Park Heights City Council can be found on the city's website at cityofoakparkheights.com or at City Hall at 14168 Oak Park Blvd. N.
As mayor, Dougherty will help plan for the 2028 closure of the Allen S. King plant in Oak Park Heights. The plant currently provides close to 28 percent of Oak Park Heights' tax base. When running for city council in 2024, Dougherty said one of his priorities was coming up with a plan to minimize the effects the tax base loss will have on Oak Park Heights residents.
Obituary: How a bridge got Mary McComber, mayor of Oak Park Heights, into local politics
U of M researchers are planting 'survivor' trees in hopes of defeating Dutch elm disease
State fund helps Oak Park Heights plan for PFAS treatment
Oak Park Heights state of emergency declared to deal with water main break
Four Stillwater teachers suspended for cheating on training program
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
26 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Charlotte Mayor Vi Lyles defends Jennings settlement, makes the case for reelection
Many candidates describe Charlotte City Council as dysfunctional and lacking in transparency, but as Mayor Vi Lyles seeks a fifth term, she wants to improve that perception. However, she says she's standing by the decision to settle with Charlotte-Mecklenburg Police Chief Johnny Jennings. The city is paying more than $300,000 to its top cop after Jennings says he was mistreated by former councilmember Tariq Bokhari during the councilman's quest to secure outer carrier vests. PREVIOUS COVERAGE: Charlotte City Council settles with Chief Johnny Jennings The settlement sparked controversy when the city refused to disclose until Jennings made it public under pressure. Channel 9's Joe Bruno sat down with the mayor to talk about the state of the city and her efforts to secure her fifth term this November. Lyles: 'I believe that we treat people fairly. If you know, in our HR programs, and all of the things that we do, that Johnny isn't any different than other people that we've actually had these kinds of contracts with. I just tell you, by the person that he is, is because he gave the media the story, and it wasn't something that we would have done.' Bruno: 'So the city never would have revealed this?' Lyles: 'We'd have to ask a lawyer that, and I'm not a lawyer today.' She's the mayor today and wants to call herself that a year from now. As she campaigns for another term, she is aggressively backing the sales tax increase for transit. She says she also understands public safety needs to be a priority. Bruno: 'How safe do you consider Charlotte?' Lyles: 'I think it all depends on where you live and what you're doing and whether or not we have a program for you at this time.' She says if given another term, she wants to see the city prioritize addressing homelessness. 'I think the housing of the unhoused is one of the things that we have to tackle pretty immediately,' she said. Her fifth term isn't guaranteed. She's facing four challengers in the Democratic primary, but she says her work isn't finished and she's prepared to make the case to voters. Charlotte's city council primaries are Sept. 9. Early voting began Thursday. Before you head to the voting booth, check out our Political Beat Candidate Guide. We asked every candidate key questions on topics that matter to you. VIDEO: Where you can vote early in Charlotte for the primary election Solve the daily Crossword
CBS News
an hour ago
- CBS News
Mountain venue refunds Denver City Council money after retreat postponed amid budget shortfall
Just days after the Denver City Council had decided to postpone a $26,000 mountain retreat amid layoffs and a budget shortfall, the venue where the event was planned has agreed to refund that money. On Tuesday, the city council announced it would be postponing the pricey retreat after CBS Colorado Investigator Brian Maass's report on the timing of the retreat. Ten of Denver's 13 city council members had been planning to attend a $26,000 retreat in the foothills near Bailey Aug. 27-29 for team building and professional development. That retreat was postponed, and on Thursday, Maass learned that the city council would not lose any money on the planned retreat. The city council confirmed that Lone Rock retreat in Park County has agreed to refund $16,500 that was already paid and the other costs have been voided. The other $10,000 was earmarked for the facilitator and transportation, but the city council said they were able to cancel those commitments, so they won't lose any money. Earlier this week, Sandoval had told Maass that the council retreat had been in the works since December 2024, and the contract was signed on May 8. Two weeks later, Mayor Mike Johnston revealed the depths of the city budget problems that would necessitate city workers being laid off, others needing to take furlough days and belt-tightening across city agencies. Sandoval stated in an earlier interview that she had tried to void the contract to get the city's money back, but at that time, it was not an option.
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Ranked-choice voting: Let voters (not parties) rule
In Annapolis, voters may soon get a bigger say in city elections. Members of the Annapolis City Council are considering adopting ranked-choice voting. It may sound new and complicated but it's actually quite simple and has been around since the 1850s, first originating in Denmark. Under ranked choice, voters have the chance to not only pick their top pick for office but to essentially rank their runners-up. How does this make a difference? Imagine a crowded primary race for mayor, for example, where no candidate is likely to win an outright majority of votes. Under the current system, that doesn't matter. The candidate who garners a plurality of votes still wins. But under ranked-choice voting, voters list their second, third, fourth and so on choices, too. And if there's no majority winner, these rankings are factored in — by eliminating the lowest polling candidate and redistributing that individual's second-choice votes and so on. That continues with bottom-listers dropping out until a candidate racks up a clear majority. What's the impact? Potentially profound. Suddenly, there's much less incentive to bad-mouth opponents or to follow party orthodoxy. Getting a shoutout from an opponent is actually helpful. Maryland doesn't have much experience with the system. Currently, Takoma Park is the only municipality where it's in use. But the state sure has a lot of experience with the downside of single voting: electing candidates with as little as 36.2% of the vote (the share Sarah K. Elfreth won in a crowded 22-person primary for a seat in the U.S. House of Representatives vacated by U.S. Rep. John Sarbanes last year). Party loyalists aren't wild about ranked choice. They complain it's involved, it only helps the opposing party (whichever one that is) and can even leave the winner of a plurality in the dust if he or she doesn't fare well as a second or third choice in a crowded field. But given ranked choice is in use for statewide races in red-state Alaska as well as Takoma Park (AKA the 'People's Republic of Takoma Park' for its left-leaning politics), you have to wonder if fears of partisan disadvantage are overblown. The New York City mayor's race had ranked choice. It helped New York State Assemblyman Zohran Mamdani win the primary, but he also had a plurality (43.5%), so it didn't change the outcome. What it did cause, observers say, was for Mamdani to 'cross-endorse' fellow progressive candidates. Such teamwork is uncommon but hardly undemocratic. New York didn't choose a socialist-leaning Democrat because of ranked-choice, but did it impact Mamdani's election strategy? Probably. Polls show it engaged his base and broadened participation. And that's somehow a bad thing? Peter Jensen is an editorial writer at The Baltimore Sun; he can be reached at pejensen@ Solve the daily Crossword
