Iowa communities to receive $5.5 million for brownfield site cleanup
Five Iowa communities have been selected to receive $5.5 million in grants from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency to clean up and restore blighted or contaminated properties.
Sites selected in Iowa are former grocery stores, a YMCA building, a meat packing plant, abandoned businesses and a smelting facility. The EPA Brownfields Program helps a community to assess, clean up and eventually reuse contaminated sites that would otherwise be unusable.
The City of Clinton received a grant for a little over $1 million, which City Administrator Matt Brooke said will be used to remove the pool section of the city's former YMCA.
SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
The former YMCA building is contaminated with asbestos and lead, which make it unsuitable for redevelopment until it is remediated.
'This grant funding will enable Clinton to continue a crucial environmental cleanup project,' Brooke said in a press release sent by EPA. 'Clinton continues to work toward a cleaner and greener community for all people to live, work, and enjoy.'
Iowa Western Community College receives EPA grant for job training
The Iowa grants are part of a nationwide allotment of $267 million in brownfields grants.
EPA Administrator Lee Zeldin said the program will help to create new opportunities for businesses and housing while strengthening local economies.
'EPA's Brownfields program demonstrates how environmental stewardship and economic prosperity complement each other,' Zeldin said in a statement. 'Under President Trump's leadership, EPA is Powering the Great American Comeback, ensuring our nation has the cleanest air, land, and water while supporting sustainable growth and fiscal responsibility.'
The EPA Brownfields Program started in 1995, but saw a significant boost in funding under former President Joe Biden's Bipartisan Infrastructure Plan.
Another recipient of the recently awarded funding, East Central Intergovernmental Association, has facilitated brownfield clean up projects in eastern Iowa through its participation in the Brownfield Revolving Loan Fund with EPA. The association was awarded $1.5 million to help replenish the fund, which EPA said has been 'high performing.' The fund thus far has supported projects like the YMCA remediation in Clinton and a property in Dubuque.
'Many communities are burdened with brownfield sites but lack the resources to address them,' said Dawn Danielson, ECIA's brownfields coordinator. 'The ripple effect of EPA's investments is transformational, not only for the site itself but also for surrounding properties.'
Danielson said the remediated sites typically become 'catalysts for economic development' in the area and breathe 'new life' into communities.
Le Mars Mayor Rob Bixenman, similarly said the grant will revitalize 'key areas' of the community and help to accelerate the city's community development plan.
Le Mars was awarded $400,000 to assess and develop clean up plans at a former Walmart, meat packing plant, landscaping company and unused hotel along the city's business corridor.
The City of Keokuk was also selected to receive just under $2 million to clean up a 16-acre site that formerly smelted and refined zinc and lead. According to EPA, the site is contaminated with coal tar, zinc smelting residuals that are high in polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, or PAH, and heavy metals. The plant opened in 1915 and operated until the 1980s.
The site has received a number of EPA grants as the city works to clean up the site and hopefully attract a redeveloper.
The City of Red Oak was also selected and will receive a $500,000 grant to conduct site assessments and community engagement for unused properties along its Broadway Street.
SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Los Angeles Times
an hour ago
- Los Angeles Times
After Trump greets Putin with red carpet treatment, Ukrainians feel betrayed
KYIV, Ukraine — In Kyiv, Ukrainians living under near daily Russian bombardment watched with astonishment as their country's most important ally rolled out a red carpet in Alaska for the man they blame for more than three years of war, bloodshed and loss. Natalya Lypei, 66, a Kyiv resident, was taken aback: The images flashing on her phone screen showed President Trump greeting Vladimir Putin warmly and clapping as the Russian leader approached him, after having been escorted into the country by four American fighter jets. Trump also ignored the arrest warrant issued for Putin by the International Criminal Court that has kept him mostly confined at home or in nations that are strong allies of Moscow. 'How can you welcome a tyrant like that?' she asked, echoing the views of many Kyiv residents. The red carpet treatment, the lack of concrete decisions for Ukraine and, most significant, neglecting the significance of sanctions — a policy that could turn the tide in Kyiv's favor — have felt like a betrayal for Ukrainians who have borne enormous suffering in the almost 3½ years since Russia's full-scale invasion. Tens of thousands of Ukrainian service members have been killed or wounded, thousands of civilians have been killed in Russian strikes, and a fifth of the country is under occupation, severing families, properties and Ukraine's territorial integrity. On Ukrainian social media, memes of Putin and Trump walking down a red carpet strewn with dead Ukrainian bodies were widely shared. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky had anticipated that the meeting would be a boon for Putin and that there would be little in the way of results. Speaking to reporters in the days leading up to the summit, he said it would end up being a public relations victory for the Russian leader. Above all else, he said, Putin was seeking a photo on American soil — which he got in Friday's meeting. It was the first time in a decade that Putin had stepped foot in the U.S., ending international isolation spurred by the 2022 Ukraine invasion; in other words, it was a win. For Lypei, whose serviceman son was killed last year, it was like attending another funeral, a fresh loss. This time, she said, her country's hopes for a just peace. 'It hurts me a lot that my child died in a full-scale war, and today we saw a new funeral,' she said. Her 34-year-old son fought with Ukraine's 79th Brigade and was killed in the Donetsk region, one of the areas Putin wants Ukraine to cede to Russia as a condition for a truce. 'I do not wish anyone that sorrow, that sadness, those tears,' she said. Natalya Cucil, 60, another Kyiv resident, said she was surprised that Trump did not produce any results from the meeting, despite his stated efforts to end the war. 'There are no results and we don't know if there will be, although we always expect something and hope for it,' she said. Pensioner Anatolii Kovalenko, 72, said no matter what was discussed between the two leaders, it is clear his country's adversary has won in the sphere of public relations. 'Putin won this meeting 100%,' he said. Kullab and Babenko write for the Associated Press.
New York Post
an hour ago
- New York Post
Printout identifying gift, menu at Trump-Putin summit left at hotel printer
WASHINGTON — An eight-page printout containing non-public information such as President Trump's gift for Vladimir Putin and their anticipated lunch menu was allegedly left at an Anchorage hotel printer hours before the high-profile Ukraine peace summit. The embarrassing snafu revealed little if any sensitive security information — as most scheduled items on the agenda for the summit on the military's Joint Base Elmendorf–Richardson already were public information — but immediately became a media sensation after being reported by NPR. The formerly publicly funded news outlet reported that three guests at the four-star Hotel Captain Cook found the papers in a public printer. Advertisement 3 A US official mistakenly left planning documents for Friday's Anchorage peace talks in a public printer. REUTERS Two pages contained the menu for an ultimately aborted lunch, which was to include filet mignon with brandy peppercorn sauce and a salad with champaign vinaigrette, and a third included a seating chart with the two presidents centered around a board room-style table. Two additional pages contained the names, photos and participants of an anticipated expanded meeting between Russian and US officials — with aides instructed that the Russian leader's name is pronounced 'POO-tihn.' Advertisement It also revealed Trump intended to gift Putin was an American bald eagle desk statue, and listed three phone numbers of advance staffers who help set up the events. The White House had already published most of the scheduled events listed in the document, though much ultimately didn't happen or were abbreviated as Trump ditched his plan to seek an immediate cease-fire and instead returned to Washington optimist about brokering a full peace deal. 3 The documents contained few bombshells because most of the planned events were already announced in the daily White House schedule. REUTERS 3 Russian and US leaders ultimately left early as Trump phoned Europe to discuss a possible full peace deal rather than a cease-fire. POOL/AFP via Getty Images Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky is due at the White House Monday to discuss Putin's request that he relinquish the remainder of Donetsk province in exchange for a robust international peacekeeping force including British and French troops to shield against further Russian aggression.
Time Magazine
an hour ago
- Time Magazine
Trump is Seduced By Summits, but He Failed to Deliver Again
The red carpet was perfectly rolled out. The military flyover was precisely timed. The backdrop reading 'Pursuing Peace' was strategically positioned for maximum photogenic impact. And yet, when the curtain fell on Donald Trump's carefully choreographed summit with Vladimir Putin in Alaska, the American president had little to show for his theatrical diplomacy except the bitter taste of being outmaneuvered by a more cunning adversary. The Alaska meeting, which concluded without the Ukraine ceasefire Trump had promised, represents the latest chapter in a troubling pattern: the 45th and 47th president's persistent confusion of stagecraft for statecraft. Where Reagan walked away from Reykjavik rather than accept a bad deal, Trump seems perpetually seduced by the optics of the moment, the handshake photo, the joint press conference that suggests progress where none exists. The Art of the Non-Deal Putin emerged from Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson having achieved precisely what he came for: legitimacy on American soil, the erosion of Western unity, and a platform to present his territorial demands as reasonable 'agreements.' Trump, meanwhile, offered the unconvincing assurance that they had made 'many, many points that we agreed on'—diplomatic speak for admitting you've been played. The choice of venue itself revealed Trump's weakness for symbolism over substance. Alaska, purchased from Russia 158 years ago for $7.2 million, was supposed to be a clever metaphor for American strength. Instead, it became the stage for Putin to pitch his own 'land deal of the century'—demanding Ukraine surrender the very territories his forces have failed to fully capture. The irony was lost on Trump, but certainly not on Putin, who understands better than most that in diplomacy, symbols matter only when backed by resolve. A Familiar Pattern of Failure This debacle echoes the spectacular miscalculation of Trump's 2018 Singapore summit with Kim Jong Un—another masterclass in mistaking pageantry for progress. There, too, Trump was mesmerized by the unprecedented nature of the meeting, the historical backdrop, the made-for-television moments that would supposedly cement his legacy as a dealmaker. Like Putin in Alaska, Kim understood exactly what he was getting: international legitimacy, a pause in American pressure, and the optics of parity with the world's most powerful leader. What did Trump get? A vague promise of denuclearization that Kim had no intention of keeping, and a suspension of joint military exercises with South Korea that Beijing and Pyongyang had long desired. The pattern is unmistakable: Trump approaches these encounters like a real estate developer staging a property showing, focused on creating an atmosphere of possibility rather than nailing down concrete commitments. He mistakes the buzz of activity, the presence of cameras, the gravity of the moment for actual achievement. The Seduction of the Summit What makes Trump particularly vulnerable to these diplomatic theater productions is his fundamental misunderstanding of how authoritarian leaders operate. Unlike democratic politicians who must constantly justify their actions to skeptical publics and hostile media, autocrats like Putin and Kim arrive at these summits with clear, patient, long-term objectives. Putin came to Alaska not to end the war in Ukraine but to begin the process of ending American support for Ukraine. His goal was never a quick ceasefire but rather the gradual normalization of Russian territorial conquest through the legitimizing embrace of American diplomacy. Every moment Trump spent treating Putin as a reasonable partner rather than an international pariah advanced this strategic objective. The Russian president's post-summit warning that Ukraine and European capitals shouldn't 'throw a wrench in the works' of the peace process revealed the game: having failed to divide NATO through military conquest, Putin is now attempting to fracture the alliance through American diplomatic concessions. The Price of Performance Trump's defenders will argue that dialogue is better than silence, that even unsuccessful summits can lay the groundwork for future progress. This misses the fundamental asymmetry at work. For Putin, every day the war continues while sanctions remain suspended is a victory. Every photograph of him being treated as a legitimate world leader undermines the international isolation that represents the West's most powerful non-military weapon. The real casualty of the Alaska summit was not Ukrainian territory —though Putin's demands for Donetsk and Luhansk remain on the table—but American credibility. European allies who watched Trump roll out the red carpet for a war criminal while Ukraine continues to suffer daily bombardment now have a legitimate reason to question whether Washington can be trusted to maintain its commitments when the going gets tough. Learning from Reagan's Example The contrast with genuine statecraft could not be starker. When Ronald Reagan met Mikhail Gorbachev at Reykjavik in 1986, he too was tempted by the prospect of a historic breakthrough. But when Gorbachev tried to extract concessions on the Strategic Defense Initiative, Reagan walked away. No deal was better than a bad deal. Trump's inability to make this calculation – his compulsive need to claim victory even in defeat – makes him uniquely ill-suited for the delicate work of great power diplomacy. Putin, who has spent decades studying American presidents, understands this weakness and exploits it ruthlessly. The lesson from Alaska is not that diplomacy with adversaries is impossible, but that it requires the kind of patient, principled approach that prioritizes substance over spectacle. Until Trump learns to distinguish between the art of the deal and the art of the photo opportunity, he will continue to find himself outmaneuvered by craftier opponents who understand that in international relations, the best performance is often no performance at all. The cameras have left Anchorage, but the consequences of Trump's latest diplomatic theater will linger long after the final curtain call.
