UK creating ‘murder prediction' tool to identify people most likely to kill
The UK government is developing a 'murder prediction' programme which it hopes can use personal data of those known to the authorities to identify the people most likely to become killers.
Researchers are alleged to be using algorithms to analyse the information of thousands of people, including victims of crime, as they try to identify those at greatest risk of committing serious violent offences.
The scheme was originally called the 'homicide prediction project', but its name has been changed to 'sharing data to improve risk assessment'. The Ministry of Justice hopes the project will help boost public safety but campaigners have called it 'chilling and dystopian'.
The existence of the project was discovered by the pressure group Statewatch, and some of its workings uncovered through documents obtained by Freedom of Information requests.
Statewatch says data from people not convicted of any criminal offence will be used as part of the project, including personal information about self-harm and details relating to domestic abuse. Officials strongly deny this, insisting only data about people with at least one guilty conviction has been used.
The government says the project is at this stage for research only, but campaigners claim the data used would build bias into the predictions against minority-ethnic and poor people.
The MoJ says the scheme will 'review offender characteristics that increase the risk of committing homicide' and 'explore alternative and innovative data science techniques to risk assessment of homicide'.
The project would 'provide evidence towards improving risk assessment of serious crime, and ultimately contribute to protecting the public via better analysis', a spokesperson added.
The project, which was commissioned by the prime minister's office when Rishi Sunak was in power, is using data about crime from various official sources including the Probation Service and data from Greater Manchester police before 2015.
The types of information processed includes names, dates of birth, gender and ethnicity, and a number that identifies people on the police national computer.
Statewatch's claim that data from innocent people and those who have gone to the police for help will be used is based on a part of the data-sharing agreement between the MoJ and GMP.
A section marked: 'type of personal data to be shared' by police with the government includes various types of criminal convictions, but also listed is the age a person first appeared as a victim, including for domestic violence, and the age a person was when they first had contact with police.
Also to be shared – and listed under 'special categories of personal data' - are 'health markers which are expected to have significant predictive power', such as data relating to mental health, addiction, suicide and vulnerability, and self-harm, as well as disability.
Sofia Lyall, a researcher for Statewatch, said: 'The Ministry of Justice's attempt to build this murder prediction system is the latest chilling and dystopian example of the government's intent to develop so-called crime 'prediction' systems.
'Time and again, research shows that algorithmic systems for 'predicting' crime are inherently flawed.
'This latest model, which uses data from our institutionally racist police and Home Office, will reinforce and magnify the structural discrimination underpinning the criminal legal system.
'Like other systems of its kind, it will code in bias towards racialised and low-income communities. Building an automated tools to profile people as violent criminals is deeply wrong, and using such sensitive data on mental health, addiction and disability is highly intrusive and alarming.'
A Ministry of Justice spokesperson said: 'This project is being conducted for research purposes only. It has been designed using existing data held by HM Prison and Probation Service and police forces on convicted offenders to help us better understand the risk of people on probation going on to commit serious violence. A report will be published in due course.'
Officials say the prison and probation service already use risk assessment tools, and this project will see if adding in new data sources, from police and custody data, would improve risk assessment.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Record
2 hours ago
- Daily Record
New State Pension age changes set to delay retirement payments for millions of people
The State Pension age is set to rise from 66 to 67 between 2026 and 2028 with a further rise planned to 68. Pension Credit – Could you or someone you know be eligible? The State Pension age is set to start rising from 66 to 67 next year, with the increase due to be completed for all men and women across the UK by 2028. The planned change to the official age of retirement has been in legislation since 2014 with a further rise from 67 to 68 set to be implemented between 2044 and 2046. The State Pension age review, published in 2023, considered the impact of bringing the official age of retirement forward to 2041-2043, which had been a hot topic during the Rishi Sunak administration due to more people living longer, which essentially puts pressure on the UK Government to continue supporting the State Pension - in its current format. The then Conservative government had planned to review the State Pension age rising to 68 within two years of the general election, but those plans were effectively kicked into the long grass when Sir Keir Starmer and the Labour party came into power on July 4, 2024. But it could be something the UK Government looks at, and soon, as it must follow the principle of giving people 10 years notice of any changes to the State Pension age - or potentially end up with another situation which has affected an estimated 3.6 million women born in the 1950s. Phoenix Insights has warned that around three million people would see a delay to their retirement plans if the State Pension age increase to 68 is brought forward. The latest figures from the Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) show there are now 13 million people claiming the State Pension, including over 1.1m in Scotland. Some 34 per cent are on the New State Pension (post-April 2016) while 66 per cent are receiving the Basic (or Old) State Pension (pre-April 2016). People on the full New State Pension receive £230.25 per week and as the payment is typically made every four weeks this amounts to £921. Annual payments will be worth £11,973 over the 2025/26 financial year. However, it's important to be aware that not all of the 4.1m people on the New State Pension receive the full amount as it is linked to National Insurance Contributions. People need to pay at least 10 years' worth of National Insurance Contributions (NICs) to be entitled to any State Pension and around 35 years for the full rate, which can be more if someone has been 'contracted out'. Someone on the full Basic State Pension receives weekly payments of £176.45, or £705.80 every four-week payment period. Annual payments will be worth £9,175.40 over the 2025/26 financial year. Patrick Thomson, Head of Research Analysis and Policy at Phoenix Insights, said: 'The State Pension remains at a critical juncture with questions remaining over its long-term affordability and the future of the Triple Lock. Projections suggests there will be five million more State Pensioners in the UK by 2070 compared to just one million more people of working-age.' Four key findings about the State Pension Phoenix Insights found that: Around a fifth (18%) of adults say they could live on the state pension alone in retirement A third (35%) of the pre-State Pension age group (60-65yrs) have zero private pension saving 45% of adults expect to work beyond their State Pension age to plug gaps in savings 3 million people would see a delay in State Pension payments if the retirement age increase to 68 is brought forward to 2041-2043 Mr Thomson continued: 'Accelerating the State Pension age could mitigate some of the cost challenge, but recent life expectancy projections are less optimistic making policy change potentially more difficult. Bringing forward the State Pension age increase to age 68 to the early 2040s would impact nearly three million people and not everyone will be able to work to a later State Pension age. 'We are expecting another State Pension age review in this parliament which should offer more clarity on the timetable of the future increase to age 68.' He added: 'It's important that any future change to the State Pension is combined with policy interventions to support greater retirement adequacy, including enabling people to remain in work later in life and boosting pension saving through auto-enrolment.' Future State Pension increases The Labour Government has pledged to honour the Triple Lock or the duration of its term and the latest predictions show the following projected annual increases: 2025/26 - 4.1% (the forecast was 4%) 2026/27 - 2.5% 2027/28 - 2.5% 2028/29 - 2.5% 2029/30 - 2.5%
BBC News
4 hours ago
- BBC News
Cleveland PCC's concern over Serco electronic-tagging contract
A police and crime commissioner (PCC) has written to the government to raise concerns around the electronic tagging of criminals. Cleveland PCC Matt Storey described revelations in a Channel 4 documentary - which featured an undercover journalist getting work to fit tags in Teesside with private contractor Serco - as "troubling".The programme revealed a backlog of visits to offenders, with high-risk and violent criminals left unmonitored for up to two Antony King said the company's performance continued to improve. The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) confirmed receipt of Mr Storey's letter to secretary of state Shabana Mahmood, although it has not formally Storey criticised private sector contract awards for essential public services where "profit over the quality of service" was prioritised. He said: "Time and again we see high-value contracts awarded to low-cost bidders with histories of underperformance, ultimately placing further strain on the very communities these services are meant to protect."The MoJ told the Local Democracy Reporting Service the footage was filmed last year and claimed the situation had improved.A spokeswoman for the department said: "While the backlog of outstanding visits has been significantly reduced, Serco's overall performance remains below acceptable levels."We continue to hold them to account for that and will not hesitate to impose further financial penalties where necessary."Mr King, managing director of citizen services at Serco, said: "We are proud of the challenging work our people do, working with multiple partners across the criminal justice system in delivering an essential and critical public safety service, often with complex and ever increasing requirements. "Our performance continues to improve, which the MoJ recognise, and we continue to monitor record numbers of people in the community supporting our colleagues in probation and the Home Office." Follow BBC Tees on X, Facebook, Nextdoor and Instagram.
Edinburgh Reporter
9 hours ago
- Edinburgh Reporter
Firefighters facing misconduct have left or quit the service
Rogue firefighters have either been sacked or have quit after facing gross misconduct charges including violence, bullying, theft and harassment. It has emerged that 32 Scottish Fire & Rescue Service (SFRS) officers left the service in disgrace between 2020-21 and February this year. Data obtained under Freedom of Information shows that 25 firefighters were sacked during the period after facing gross misconduct hearings over charges including, physical violence or bullying, serious health and safety breaches, theft/fraud, unlawful discrimination/harassment, breach in confidence and misusing SFRS property. A further seven officers resigned prior to scheduled gross misconduct hearings. SFRS say they are unable to identify the specific allegations involved in the various cases due to risks of identifying those involved. But it came to light earlier this year that a number of firefighters were forced to quit after a scam involving on-call payments was exposed. Officers were alleged to have fleeced SFRS by colluding to claim bogus on-call allowances at an unnamed fire station before they were uncovered. In a separate incident, a serving officer was also forced to quit after allegedly stealing from a youth volunteer scheme bank account. The incidents came to light in the SFRS 2023/24 annual audit report. It says: 'During 2023/24 management alerted the ARAC [Audit Risk Assurance Committee] to two separate incidents involving alleged fraudulent activity. The first involved collusion by serving officers to fraudulently claim on-call allowances at a station. 'Police Scotland were alerted to the alleged activity and a fraud action plan was developed.' According to the report, those involved in the scam have since quit and that the second incident involved 'alleged theft from a third-party YouthVolunteer Scheme bank account by a serving officer'. Separately, fire chiefs say they are co-operating with HM Fire Service Inspectorate in Scotland (HMFIS) who are currently investigating SFRS's 'organisational culture' amid fears bullying, sexism and racism are rife within its ranks. The watchdog opted to broaden the scope of its probe into their 'HR/workforce planning' after evidence of widespread homophobic, harassment and discriminatory behaviour was uncovered within UK fire services. An investigation into allegations of a toxic culture found fire brigades south of the border were riven with 'pockets of abhorrent behaviour' such as sexist, racist and homophobic language. HMFIS say their decision to expand the remit of their investigation was triggered by the 'great degree of public interest in the organisational culture of the emergency services across the UK'. They said: 'The Chief Inspector's plan 2022-25 indicated an intention to carry out an inspection of HR/workforce planning – recruitment, attrition, diversity and skills within the SFRS. 'We have revised our plans for that inspection and have taken the decision to look at wider organisational culture. 'This decision has been influenced by the findings of several reports conducted as a result of serious high-profile incidents regarding the conduct of staff within the emergency service sector, both fire and police, across the United Kingdom. 'Whilst the majority of the cases involving the fire and rescue service have related to services outside Scotland, we believe this is an area of significant public interest and worthy of inspection.' They added: 'We have amended the scope of our proposed inspection and decided to focus on … the organisational culture within the SFRS.' Sarah O'Donnell, SFRS Deputy Chief Officer (Corporate Services), said: 'We take a zero-tolerance approach to any form of misconduct and we will thoroughly investigate any claimed breaches of our Code of Conduct or any behaviours that have failed to meet our high standards. 'We know we must foster a culture where we all take accountability for our behaviour and SFRS staff are supported and encouraged to report any concerns about behaviour that breaches our high standards. 'A confidential service has been launched that enables staff to anonymously report concerns freely and without fear.' DCC O'Donnell added: 'We are cooperating fully with HMFSI on its inspection of our culture and we will act on any recommendations brought forward.' xr:d:DAFvKR1PG70:26,j:1502358307026513352,t:23110111 Like this: Like Related
