
2nd man convicted of human smuggling after family froze to death at Manitoba border files notice of appeal
Both men convicted of human smuggling following a trial last year have now filed notices of appeal, in a case where a family of four from India froze to death as they tried to walk across the international border from Manitoba in blizzard conditions in 2022.
A lawyer for Harshkumar Patel filed the notice in United States District Court in the District of Minnesota on Friday, after lawyers for co-accused Steve Shand filed his notice of appeal on Wednesday.
The notice said Patel plans to appeal both his conviction and sentence, and that he intends to challenge the constitutionality and application of sentencing guidelines in the case.
Last week, Patel and Shand were sentenced in a Minnesota courtroom to lengthy prison terms for their roles in carrying out a scheme to bring Indian migrants into the U.S. from Canada.
Patel, an Indian national arrested in Chicago last year, was sentenced to just over 10 years in prison for co-ordinating the smuggling operation and hiring Shand, a Florida resident, to drive the migrants once they walked over the border into the U.S.
Shand was arrested near the border the night the family died. He was found, along with other Indian nationals, in a van stuck in the snow on the Minnesota side of the border that night.
Last week, he was handed a sentence of six and a half years in prison to be followed by a period of supervised release.
The two men were tried and convicted in the federal courthouse in Fergus Falls, Minn., last November, after a jury deliberated for less than 90 minutes before returning with guilty verdicts on all four charges each of the men faced related to bringing unauthorized people into the U.S., transporting them and profiting from it.
The men's notices of appeal come more than three years after four members of the Patel family (who were not related to Harshkumar Patel) died while trying to walk across the border.
The frozen bodies of 39-year-old Jagdish Patel, his 37-year-old wife, Vaishali, their 11-year-old daughter, Vihangi and their three-year-old son, Dharmik, were found in a snow-drifted Manitoba field about 12 metres from the U.S. border on Jan. 19, 2022.
The temperature that day was –23 C, but the wind chill made it feel like the –35 to –38 range.
U.S. federal prosecutors had recommended sentences of nearly 20 years for Patel, and nearly 11 years for Shand. Both men's lawyers had asked for lower sentences than what prosecutors were seeking.
Patel's lawyers argued at trial he was wrongfully accused in the case, while Shand's described their client as an unsuspecting cab driver duped by Patel into shuttling migrants into the U.S. after they walked across the international border illegally.
Court heard Patel, who appeared at his May 28 sentencing in an orange uniform and handcuffed, is likely to be deported to his native India after completing his sentence. Shand left the courthouse with his lawyers, and will be taken into custody at a later date.
In April, a judge rejected requests to acquit or order new trials for the men, whose lawyers had argued the evidence against their clients was insufficient.
To date, no one in Canada is facing charges in the case. RCMP previously said the investigation was ongoing, and did not respond to a request for an update last week.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


CTV News
28 minutes ago
- CTV News
Archeologists find human remains on Bruce Peninsula
An investigation is underway in a remote area of the Bruce Peninsula after human remains were found. According to police, officers were notified on Aug. 14 that remains were found by archeologist working in the area. The remains have since been collected and taken for further analysis. Police said the case has been deemed a coroner's investigation and remains ongoing under the direction of the Office of the Chief Coroner and the Ontario Forensic Pathology Service (OFPS), with support from the Grey Bruce OPP Crime Unit. Police did a search of the surrounding area and no additional remains were found.


CTV News
28 minutes ago
- CTV News
Judge weighs detainees' legal rights at ‘Alligator Alcatraz' in Florida Everglades
MIAMI — A federal judge on Monday considered whether detainees at a temporary immigrant detention centre in the Florida Everglades have been denied their legal rights. In the second of two lawsuits challenging practices at the facility known as 'Alligator Alcatraz,' civil rights attorneys sought a preliminary injunction to ensure that detainees at the facility have confidential access to their lawyers, which they say hasn't happened. Florida officials dispute that claim. The civil rights attorneys also wanted U.S. District Judge Rodolfo Ruiz to identify an immigration court that has jurisdiction over the detention centre so that petitions can be filed for the detainees' bond or release. The attorneys say that hearings for their cases have been routinely cancelled in federal Florida immigration courts by judges who say they don't have jurisdiction over the detainees held in the Everglades. At the start of Monday's hearing, government attorneys said they would designate the immigration court at the Krome North Service Processing Center in the Miami area as having jurisdiction over the detention centre in the Everglades in an effort to address some of the civil rights attorneys' constitutional concerns. The judge told the government attorneys that he didn't expect them to change that designation without good reason. But before delving into the core issues of the detainees' rights, Ruiz wanted to hear about whether the lawsuit was filed in the proper jurisdiction in Miami. The state and federal government defendants have argued that even though the isolated airstrip where the facility was built is owned by Miami-Dade County, Florida's southern district is the wrong venue since the detention centre is located in neighbouring Collier County, which is in the state's middle district. The hearing ended without the judge making an immediate ruling. Ruiz suggested that the case against the federal defendants might be appropriate for the southern district because a U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement office in Miami is responsible for oversight of the detention centre under an agreement between the state and federal governments. But Ruiz also questioned whether the case against the state defendants might be better in the middle district, because all of the purported civil rights violations occurred at the facility itself, which is located in Collier County, several miles outside the southern district. All parties have agreed that if the complaints against the state are moved to another venue, then the complaints against the federal government should be moved as well. The hearing over legal access comes as another federal judge in Miami considers whether construction and operations at the facility should be halted indefinitely because federal environmental rules weren't followed. U.S. District Judge Kathleen Williams on Aug. 7 ordered a 14-day halt on additional construction at the site while witnesses testified at a hearing that wrapped up last week. She has said she plans to issue a ruling before the order expires later this week. Meanwhile, Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis announced last week that his administration was preparing to open a second immigration detention facility dubbed 'Deportation Depot' at a state prison in north Florida. DeSantis justified building the second detention centre by saying U.S. President Donald Trump's administration needs the additional capacity to hold and deport more immigrants. The state of Florida has disputed claims that 'Alligator Alcatraz' detainees have been unable to meet with their attorneys. The state's lawyers said that since July 15, when videoconferencing started at the facility, the state has granted every request for a detainee to meet with an attorney, and in-person meetings started July 28. The first detainees arrived at the beginning of July. But the civil rights attorneys said that even if lawyers have been scheduled to meet with their clients at the detention centre, it hasn't been in private or confidential, and it is more restrictive than at other immigration detention facilities. They said scheduling delays and an unreasonable advanced notice requirement have hindered their ability to meet with the detainees, thereby violating their constitutional rights. Civil rights attorneys said officers are going cell-to-cell to pressure detainees into signing voluntary removal orders before they're allowed to consult their attorneys, and some detainees have been deported even though they didn't have final removal orders. Along with the spread of a respiratory infection and rainwater flooding their tents, the circumstances have fuelled a feeling of desperation among detainees, the attorneys wrote in a court filing. The judge promised a quick decision. ___ David Fischer And Mike Schneider, The Associated Press


National Post
28 minutes ago
- National Post
Air Canada flight attendants ordered back to work but remain on strike: What's next?
There is chaos in the skies — or more precisely, on the ground — as the labour dispute between Air Canada and its 10,000 flight attendants, represented by the Canadian Union of Public Employees (CUPE), drags on. Article content On Saturday, the federal government ordered the striking attendants back to work and declared there would be binding arbitration between the two parties by the Canadian Industrial Relations Board (CIRB). But the union said no, a decision that could end in jail time for its leaders. Here's what to know. Article content Article content Article content 'Air Canada has really refused to bargain with us, and they refused to bargain with us because they knew this government would come in on their white horse and try and save the day,' CUPE national president Mark Hancock said. He said the union felt the 'whole process has been unfair.' Article content On Monday, the CIRB reiterated that the strike by the flight attendants was illegal, and has ordered the union's leadership to direct its members to return to work. The union said it has received National Post's request for comment and will respond soon. Article content Meanwhile, labour experts say this has happened before, but rarely. Article content Sundeep Gokhale, an employment and labour lawyer and partner at Sherrard Kuzz LLP, told CTV News on Monday: 'We haven't seen this type of defiance in quite a long time in terms of an outright refusal despite government orders as well in legal decisions requiring employees to return to work.' Article content Article content In 1978 a strike by the Canadian Union of Postal Workers was met with back-to-work legislation. When the workers refused, the government arrested the entire CUPW national executive. A month later, a federally appointed judge sentenced union president Jean-Claude Parrot to three months in jail and 18 months' probation for defying Parliament. Article content Article content Hancock seemed aware of the precedent when he told reporters on Monday: 'We will not be returning to the skies. If it means folks like me (are) going to jail, so be it.' Article content In a word, stranded. Air Canada cancelled hundreds of additional flights on Sunday in the wake of the union's response. The airline has said it will do what it can to rebook passengers on other airlines, but this is a busy time of year for flying, and there are limited alternatives available.