American West to leverage US executive order with critical minerals cocktail in Utah
American West Metals is dialling up the heat on its critical minerals ambitions, with a new exploration blitz aimed at unlocking copper, molybdenum, gallium and indium at its 100 per cent-owned West Desert Project in Utah.
In the wake of United States President Donald Trump's March executive order directing all government agencies to fast-track domestic mineral production, the company has wasted no time moving to drill-ready status - armed with permits and a portfolio of metals that read like a Pentagon wish list.
Top of that list is indium, a rare but essential metal used in smart devices, defence tech and solar panels, which the US currently imports in full. American West's West Desert project already has the country's largest undeveloped indium resource and sits within Utah, ranked the world's number one mining jurisdiction by the Fraser Institute.
The project's existing JORC resource includes 33.7 million tonnes grading 3.83 per cent zinc, 0.15 per cent copper and 9.08 grams per tonne (g/t) silver for 1.29Mt of zinc, 49,053t of copper and nearly 10M ounces of silver. Silver recently came very close to achieving $US35 (A$54) an ounce for the first time in years.
A further JORC-compliant resource for indium contains 23.8M ounces, yet only 35 per cent of historical drill samples have been assayed for the metal - giving American West plenty of room to grow the figure.
But it's the company's recent focus on molybdenum and gallium that's likely to catch attention. Molybdenum is vital to strengthen high-performance alloys, widely used in missiles, fighter aircraft and advanced manufacturing, and recent West Desert intercepts have raised eyebrows.
New drilling results include 417.55 metres at 0.02 per cent Mo, 194.14m at 0.05 per cent Mo, including 19.66m at a high-grade 0.2 per cent, and a 10.5m hit at a serious grade of 1.03 per cent Mo, with an internal hit of 1.67m at a blistering 4.05 per cent Mo. American West says a maiden molybdenum resource model is now underway.
Gallium - another US-imported critical metal - was intersected across a staggering 628m, with hits including 10.4m at 40.9g/t and 4.12m at 65.95g/t. Notably, less than 10 per cent of the project has been assayed for gallium to date, highlighting the upside potential.
While the critical metals narrative builds, the company is also advancing a new high-grade copper zone — including hits such as 17.22m at 1.04 per cent copper, 0.58g/t gold and 12.46g/t indium and 3.05m at 2.58 per cent copper, 0.91g/t gold, 10.7g/t silver and 36.31g/t indium, sitting just outside the current resource envelope.
Even the iron ore at West Desert may not go to waste. The project's zinc-copper-silver-indium mineralisation is hosted in magnetite skarn, which has already shown potential to yield an iron ore concentrate grading up to a very significant 68 per cent iron as a byproduct. This is well above the international iron ore benchmark of 62 per cent.
Outside the known deposit, drilling continues to hit high-grade sniffs. One hole delivered 0.92m at 20.42 per cent zinc, 0.76 per cent copper, 1.04g/t gold, 33.13g/t silver and 54.47g/t indium in a previously untested zone.
Another historic hole encountered 3m at 3.5 per cent copper, 7.65 per cent zinc and 28g/t silver from nearly 900m depth beneath the circa-1900 Utah mine.
The company says it is weighing up a potential spin-out or earn-in deal for West Desert, which would allow it to maintain its focus on its flagship Storm Copper Project in Canada. A 10-year mine plan for the project has already been tabled, and a PEA has modelled a net present value of US$149 million (A$230M), annual EBITDA of US$46.8M and a US$47.4M capex.
With drilling imminent, federal support rising and wars raging, American West's push for a critical metals stronghold on US soil could be coming at just the right time.
Is your ASX-listed company doing something interesting? Contact:
matt.birney@wanews.com.au
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
ABC News
2 hours ago
- ABC News
Trump-Musk bromance spirals into public spat
Elon Musk receives the key to the White House from U.S. President Donald Trump during a press conference in the Oval Office at the White House, in Washington, D.C., U.S., May 30, 2025. REUTERS/Nathan Howard (Reuters: Nathan Howard)
Sky News AU
3 hours ago
- Sky News AU
Trade talks to start between US and China next week
US President Donald Trump has confirmed trade talks between the US and China will commence next week in London. President Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping have spoken on the phone in the last 24 hours. Allegedly, the US government has asked the UK government to facilitate these talks.
ABC News
3 hours ago
- ABC News
Aldi is known for drawing inspiration from big brands. Here's how experts say the retailer does it
It's no secret that Aldi, the supermarket chain that once had the slogan "like brands, only cheaper", sells products visually similar to well-established competitors. In the cereal aisle of each store, brown boxes of Power Grain are reminiscent of their Kellogg's counterpart, and in the snack aisle packets of Blackstone chips appear to draw inspiration from Red Rock Deli. In the US, blue boxes of Aldi-brand cream-filled biscuits are so similar to Oreos that the company behind the snack giant is suing the supermarket for "blatant copying". It's not the first time the chain has landed in legal trouble over its cheaper, duplicated private-label brands. In Australia, there have been several legal cases against Aldi. But intellectual property and consumer experts are not worried about this case creating legal implications for Australian consumers, who they say are largely unphased by Aldi's "phantom labels". "Ultimately the key reason they [Aldi] do this is about visual congruence," retail expert Gary Mortimer said. "So, when we're shopping in a supermarket, it's historically a mundane, habitual, low-involvement decision-making context. 'You walk down an aisle and you think Cadbury is purple. They [consumers] are influenced by pack colour, brand name or packaging shape." Professor Mortimer said when a consumer saw a product similar to another brand's, they might infer it was the same. "What the danger is, is a customer goes, 'Well, actually, their cereal is just as good as the Kellogg's version,'" he said. "Brands themselves spend a lot of money ensuring their brand is high quality. "Then a new player enters with a private label that looks very similar and, therefore, all of that positioning you've done with that product, the private label takes advantage of that position. "Brands would be concerned about that." Professor Mortimer said the private Aldi label was perceived as higher value than, say, the Coles or Woolworths generic-brands. "You won't get Aldi-brand biscuits, you'll get Belmont." In fact, they are so popular, other chains are taking a leaf out of the Aldi playbook, creating their own, cheaper, private brands. He said Woolworths and Coles had created private labels that sold cleaning products and pet food. "To some point, supermarkets understand we won't feed our dog Woolworths pet food but we might feed them a cheaper brand like Baxter's, which is actually Woolworths owned." With Choice ranking Aldi as the cheapest supermarket in Australia in its past five surveys, legal experts say the occasional legal challenges Aldi faces for sailing "close to the wind" with its packaging and branding are largely justified. While Aldi has faced legal challenges in Australia in the past over its packaging and the likeness of its products to rivals, the University of Sydney's Fady Aoun says it is far more challenging to take Aldi to court here. The senior lecturer in intellectual property law said this was because Australia's legal systems were vastly different to those in the US, for instance. "In the realm of trademark law and other forms of forms of policing commercial practices, American law is vastly different to Australian law," he said. "And, in addition to trademark infringement, they have something called unfair competition, which Australian law doesn't adopt "Their trademark law is far more protective of arguably trading interests and goes further than the Australian law in this respect." But there are several ways legal action can be pursued. Last year in Australia the company Hampden Holdings and Lacorium Health Australia successfully sued Aldi Foods for breach of copyright in relation to children's food products. Hampden licenses intellectual property to Every Bite Counts, which sells children's food products under Baby Bellies, Little Bellies and Mighty Bellies, which are sold in Australia. In 2018 and 2019, Aldi engaged the company Motor Design to re-design the packaging for its baby food and product range. The case found that in April 2019, Aldi instructed Motor Design to reuse the Little Bellies brand as the "benchmark" for the re-design of the packaging for its Mamia dry food range. The packaging and labelling were put side by side in court documents to highlight how similar each looked. "Aldi, they sail close to the wind," Dr Aoun said. "They sometimes overstep the mark. Other times they're just short of what is impermissible. "I suspect there is a strong legal department there and that's their business mode." The court found Hampden and Lacorium's owned the packaging designs. Aldi is currently appealing against the court decision. It was approached for comment. "The typical claims in Australia here are trademark infringement, misleading and deceptive conduct and — much more difficult — the common law action of 'passing off'," Dr Aoun said. "Hampden is just a company that holds IP rights and they are the holder of the copyright," Jane Rawlings, an intellectual property barrister said. "So they weren't suing on the trademark; they were suing on the look of the packaging, how it presents itself to consumers. "That was successful because the court had found Aldi had deliberately modelled their snacks on the Baby Bellies." Separately, Aldi won a federal court appeal in 2018 against a deceptive conduct ruling over hair care products brought against the supermarket chain by Moroccanoil Israel. Dr Rawlings said this was harder to prove. "You have to show there is reputational goodwill in the brand, and in this purpose it is by using a similar name, brand or look that misleads consumers and that damages the goodwill of the brand because they're being diverted to a cheaper alternative or because the brand owner is losing sales," she said. "You have to still prove the conduct has been deceptive and what Aldi do is tread a fine line where they've got a lookalike brand but it's not enough to argue consumers are being misled." In the UK in 2023, Cider producer Thatcher's successfully won a legal battle against Aldi, claiming it "copycatted" its Cloudy Lemon Cider in "taste and appearance". This was a lookalike trademark case that argued Aldi's Taurus drink had been "deliberately riding on the coat-tails" of the cider company's reputation as a brand. Dr Rawlings said she believed registering a brand as a trademark was one of the best ways to protect it. "To be honest, and if I were a brand owner trying to protect the look of packaging, I'd be looking very seriously at trademarking registration because it's relatively cheap and then you can basically sue on the trademark registration." Ultimately, experts agree the impact on consumers is relatively low. "What Aldi will typically say is our consumers are not confused [and that] while they may draw inspiration from leading brands there's no confusion people know what they're getting," Dr Aoun said.
