logo
`Quango Cull' - almost as many State agencies now as in aftermath of financial crash

`Quango Cull' - almost as many State agencies now as in aftermath of financial crash

Irish Timesa day ago

The total number of State agencies has almost returned to the peak it reached before a so-called
'quango cull'
was announced following the 2008 financial crash, information released by Government departments shows.
A 'quango' is typically defined as an organisation to which Government departments have devolved some degree of responsibility, and which are funded by the State.
When in opposition in the run-up to the 2011 general election,
Fine Gael
promised a 'quango cull' and a 'burning of the quangos', believing there to be far too many in the State.
There were almost 300 such agencies by the time tough austerity measures were announced in 2010.
READ MORE
A subsequent 2016 review by Dr Richard Boyle for the Institute of Public Administration (IPA) found a net total of 37 agencies had been abolished in the interim. Although 62 had been shut down in total, 25 new agencies were established over the five-year period.
[
Vow to scrap quangos unashamedly populist
Opens in new window
]
Of the 62 abolished, just 10 ceased to exist entirely. The other 52 were either merged with another organisation or combined to create new bodies.
However, newly released information shows at least 33 new quangos will have been created between the end of 2015 and the end of 2025. At least four more – including AirNav Ireland, which provides air traffic management – have directly replaced another agency.
In replies to parliamentary questions submitted by
Fianna Fáil
TD
John McGuinness
, 14 of the 15 Government departments disclosed new quangos established since 2015 (the
Department of Health
was not in a position to provide the information requested).
The information supplied showed a total of 33 have been created, or planned, across the 15 departments, in addition to four that have been renamed or had their role expanded (including
Coimisiún na Meán
, the broadcasting and online media regulator, and AirNav Ireland).
The
Department of Justice
has established the largest number of new agencies with 10 quangos introduced since 2015. They include Cuan (set up in 2024), the agency that deals with domestic, sexual and gender-based violence.
Other new agencies established under the Justice umbrella include the Independent Examiner of Security Legislation, which reviews the effectiveness of related laws; the Office for Community Safety; the Judicial Council; the Legal Services Regulatory Authority; and the Gambling Regulatory Authority of Ireland.
While the department could not provide information, several large agencies have been established in the health sector. They include Children's Health Ireland (CHI) and the Decision Support Service. Two more – a pandemic and emerging threats agency, and the Assisted Human Reproduction Regulatory Authority – are proposed by the end of 2025.
Other significant agencies created in the past decade include An Coimisiún Toghcháin, the Maritime Area Regulatory Authority and Home Building Finance Ireland.
Despite its early objection to 'quangos', Fine Gael's post-2011 coalition with Labour saw a more modest reduction, with an estimated 13 per cent of agencies abolished during that government's term in office.
Details of more recent agencies were furnished in replies to a series of parliamentary questions tabled by Mr McGuinness who noted that during his time chairing the Public Accounts Committee, it had been difficult to establish how many there were.
'Many of these quangos are getting enormous amounts of money and because they are one step removed from the department, there is not a direct route to audit their finances by the
Comptroller and Auditor General
(C&AG),' he said.
'The so-called burning of the quangos never happened. It's hard to see how many of them are adhering to good practices in terms of governance, as they are not subject to the same scrutiny as Government departments.
'We need legislative change to make the C&AG responsible for all those agencies,' he said.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Russia's embassy in Dublin accuses Tánaiste of spreading 'anti-Russian propaganda'
Russia's embassy in Dublin accuses Tánaiste of spreading 'anti-Russian propaganda'

Irish Examiner

time29 minutes ago

  • Irish Examiner

Russia's embassy in Dublin accuses Tánaiste of spreading 'anti-Russian propaganda'

The Russian embassy in Ireland has accused Tánaiste and the Irish Government of spreading "anti-Russian propaganda" about recent Russian attacks in Ukraine. In a statement on Thursday morning, Simon Harris condemned "ongoing and escalating" Russian attacks on critical infrastructure in Ukraine, noting that Russia had launched more than 2,000 drone and missile attacks throughout Ukraine since the beginning of the month. Mr Harris said that, in these attacks, the Russian military has targeted "medical facilities, including a maternity hospital" as well as "first responders seeking to save lives". He said: These attacks have targeted Ukraine's towns and cities, people's homes and places of work, and Ukraine's critical infrastructure. We should be clear that these are attacks against civilians. "I condemn them completely, as I do Russia's ongoing war of aggression." Mr Harris also stated that Ireland's solidarity with Ukraine "remains steadfast". "Russia started this war. As the aggressor, it is for Russia to demonstrate a genuine commitment towards peace by halting its brutal attacks," he added. "It can do so at any time. It is past time for Russia to agree to a full, unconditional ceasefire as a first step towards arriving at a just and lasting peace." In a lengthy response on Thursday afternoon, the Russian embassy in Dublin called Mr Harris's statement "pathetic", claiming it was "yet another example of anti-Russian propaganda by the Irish government, which distorts reality and misleads the public". The embassy said Mr Harris had neglected to mention what it described as "large-scale terrorist attacks" by Ukrainian special services on "passenger and civilian freight trains in Bryansk and Kursk regions of Russia with large number of killed and wounded". The embassy said that recent "retribution" strikes by Russian armed forces across Ukraine were launched in response to these "heinous crimes". The embassy also stated that these attacks were not against civilians, but against a "large number of military targets" in Ukraine, including "aviation, missile, armor and shipbuilding industry enterprises" in Kyiv and other parts of Ukraine, as well as command posts, military airfields, ammunition and fuel depots, and other "deployment sites" of the Ukrainian army. The embassy said Mr Harris's questioning of Russia's commitment to "peaceful settlement of the Ukrainian crisis" was "misplaced and dishonest" "He should know that Russia had been consistently proposing political and diplomatic ways to avoid conflict in 2014, 2021, and 2022, which have been as well consistently ignored by the Western governments, including Ireland, since their plan has always been not peace in Ukraine but imposition of war on Ukrainian and Russian peoples," the embassy statement added. The Irish Examiner has contacted the Department of Foreign Affairs for a response to the Russian embassy's statement.

Tánaiste told Trump trade representative tariffs ‘threaten' US-Ireland relationship
Tánaiste told Trump trade representative tariffs ‘threaten' US-Ireland relationship

Irish Times

time39 minutes ago

  • Irish Times

Tánaiste told Trump trade representative tariffs ‘threaten' US-Ireland relationship

Tariffs 'threaten' relations between America and Ireland and are bad for those on both sides of the Atlantic, the Tánaiste has told US trade representative Jamieson Greer. Speaking after a virtual meeting with Mr Greer, Simon Harris , who is also Minister for Foreign Affairs and Trade, said he will stay in touch with his Washington counterpart 'as we seek to bring this trade dispute to an end'. The meeting between the pair on Thursday was described as 'positive' and 'constructive' by the Irish side. A readout from the Office of the US trade representative is not yet available. The EU had been slated for a 20 per cent tariff under the reciprocal rates announced by US president Donald Trump in April. A temporary pause took the rate down to 10 per cent through July 8th. READ MORE In late May, Mr Trump expressed frustration with the pace of talks and threatened to raise the tariff rate to 50 per cent , although he later said he would hold off on the threat until July 9th . Thursday's discussion followed on from a meeting between Mr Harris and US commerce secretary Howard Lutnick in Washington in April. According to the Irish Department of Foreign Affairs, the two politicians on Thursday 'discussed recent trade developments, including a constructive exchange of views on the ongoing negotiations between the US and EU.' Mr Harris said he outlined to Mr Greer the 'hugely successful two-way economic relationship between the US and Ireland'. 'I explained how tariffs threaten this relationship and are bad for business, bad for consumers and bad for workers on both side of the Atlantic,' Mr Harris said. The Tánaiste said he assured Mr Greer of Ireland's 'commitment to supporting a mutually beneficial agreement that works for the US and the EU'. He welcomed Mr Greer's positive meeting with European commissioner for trade and economic security, Maros Sefcovic, in Paris last week. After the meeting with Mr Sefcovic, Mr Greer said the EU had provided the US with 'a credible starting point for discussions on reciprocal trade' and the discussion showed Washington 'a willingness by the EU to work with us to find a concrete way forward to achieve reciprocal trade'. The European Commission is preparing to navigate another round of trade talks with President Trump's administration. Last week, the EU threatened to speed up retaliatory measures against the US if President Trump follows through on his threat to impose a 50 per cent levy on steel and aluminium imports. The Irish Government has been lobbying the European Commission to try to keep important domestic sectors like aviation, medtech, agricultural feed and whiskey out of the transatlantic trade war.

Defence Forces taking part in EU missions without triple lock 'could breach neutrality'
Defence Forces taking part in EU missions without triple lock 'could breach neutrality'

Irish Examiner

timean hour ago

  • Irish Examiner

Defence Forces taking part in EU missions without triple lock 'could breach neutrality'

Ireland's Defence Forces could become embroiled in peacekeeping missions that could jeopardise Ireland's military neutrality if Government proposals to scrap UN authorisation for such deployments is passed, an Oireachtas committee has heard. Ray Murphy, a professor at the Irish Centre for Human Rights, University of Galway, said if Ireland took part in an EU force without a UN mandate — with the monitoring and controls coming with that — it could end up in situations not originally envisaged that would end up breaching our neutrality. Prof Murphy was one of three academics who took part in a three-hour session at the Oireachtas defence and national security committee, which is holding hearings on the Defence Bill 2025. The draft legislation proposes to remove the requirement for UN approval to send Defence Forces abroad. It also plans to increase from 12 to 50 the number of personnel that can be sent overseas without the Government needing the support of the Dáil. Defence Bill 2025 The bill would authorise Irish troops to take part in an 'international force' for the purposes of peacekeeping, conflict prevention, and international security 'consistent with the principles of the United Nations charter'. Examples of such bodies include the OSCE, the EU, or 'any other body' that operates in manner consistent with UN principles. All three academics at the committee are strongly opposed to the Government proposals to remove the 'triple lock'. It is not clear if the committee is due to hear from academics who are non-committed on the issue or who are in favour of removing the triple lock. Prof Murphy said: 'Any deployment of Defence Forces with an international force will be subject to certain mandatory principles. These are that the particular international force will be mandated to operate for peacekeeping, conflict prevention, and/or strengthening international security, in accordance with international law and consistent with the principles of the UN.' He asked who would determine if a regional body 'operates in a manner consistent' with the UN charter and international law, especially if Security Council or General Assembly approval is not obtained. Situations on the ground 'can change' Prof Murphy said situations on the ground can change and that Irish troops 'could become embroiled in something' that wasn't originally envisaged — and that such a situation could 'certainly jeopardise' military neutrality. He described the proposals as a 'betrayal' to commitments made by governments to its citizens and that they would grant any government 'excessive authority'. Karen Devine, lecturer in European politics at DCU, told the committee that as an academic her job is to 'tell the truth'. She said public support for neutrality has been consistent over the decades, with four in five people in favour of it. She alleged that 'militarists', consisting of the EU, Nato, and the military-industrial complex, 'seek to eradicate' Irish neutrality including the triple lock and want to 'militarise' the EU. She further alleged that these were joined by 'university agents', (professors she effectively identified), think tanks, and the 'mass media', who promoted this agenda.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store