'Time to sing a new song, not kill the boer'
Three decades into democracy, and some people argue there are things we should leave in the past as a nation.
One of these things is the song Dubul' Ibhunu - Kill the Boer, they say.
Pastor Bert Pretorius from the South African Community of Faith-Based Fraternals and Federations says while it may not be illegal to sing this song, doing so harms the nation.
He says such liberation-era songs perpetuate division and hostility in a society where the nation is striving for unity
"It is time to move on. While these songs hold a historical significance, their relevance diminishes in the context of a democratic South Africa," he says.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Citizen
4 hours ago
- The Citizen
US demands spark growing discontent amid tariff negotiations
The US has reportedly set conditions to restore relations. Ministers belonging to the two largest parties, ANC and DA, in the government of national unity (GNU) are said to be growing frustrated as the United States (US) continue to make more demands during ongoing tariff negotiations. South Africa is in talks with Washington in the hope of securing a deal that would see the steep tariff rate imposed by the US reduced. Earlier this month, President Donald Trump's administration introduced a 30% tariff on all South African exports. ALSO READ: US tariffs: Here's why talks over trade deal have been 'complex' Although Trump had initially delayed implementation for 90 days in April to allow for negotiations, the tariffs officially came into effect last week. The trade standoff comes amid broader tensions between the two countries. These include South Africa's case against Israel at the International Court of Justice (ICJ), policies such as broad-based black economic empowerment (B-BBEE) and the Expropriation Act, as well as claims of the persecution of Afrikaners. US makes further demands to SA amid tariff talks In June, Freedom Front Plus (FF Plus) leader Corne Mulder travelled to the US and later returned claiming that the White House officials his party engaged with had set conditions to restore relations. The conditions allegedly set out by US officials included exempting US companies from B-BBEE, allowing land expropriation with compensation, a public condemnation of the 'Kill the Boer' chant and treating farm murders as a priority crime. According to City Press, the US has further requested that South Africa grant visas to 30 Kenyans linked to Resettlement Support Centre Africa (RSC Africa), an organisation that has worked with the North American giant for over two decades to assist prospective refugees. READ MORE: Ramokgopa dismisses claims US tariffs target BEE policy but admits it needs 'tweaking' These individuals would reportedly help facilitate the resettlement of Afrikaners. This latest demand has added to South Africa's frustration, with government reportedly expressing its dissatisfaction informally. Ramaphosa's administration is also displeased with delays in receiving responses to its trade proposals. However, the government has reportedly remained firm in its refusal to get rid of any of its policies. New trade proposal South Africa recently submitted a revised offer to Washington aimed at reducing the 30% tariff. The proposal builds on one put forward in May and specifically addresses issues raised by the US in the 2025 national trade estimates report. Deputy President Paul Mashatile also announced that another delegation will soon be sent to the US to push for better terms. Earlier efforts included a high-profile May visit to the White House led by President Cyril Ramaphosa and joined by Cabinet ministers, Cosatu President Zingiswa Losi, businessman Johann Rupert, and professional golfers Ernie Els and Retief Goosen. Ramaphosa also recently held a phone call with Trump in an attempt to ease tensions. In addition, government has introduced support programmes will help offset the 30% tariff. Thirty-five of South African exports will remain exempt. These include products like copper, pharmaceuticals, semiconductors, critical minerals, stainless steel scrap and energy-related products. NOW READ: Business confidence increases, but will come under pressure from US tariff
IOL News
4 days ago
- IOL News
EFF backs government in rejecting US State Department's human rights report
EFF spokesperson Sinawo Thambo says the US is hypocritical in their report on human rights. Image: File The EFF and the South African government have come together to dismiss the recent United States State Department Human Rights Report, calling out the US for its hypocrisy on human rights issues. The report claimed that South Africa's human rights record has "significantly worsened," and documented several instances of arbitrary or unlawful killings committed by the government or its agents. But both the EFF and government claim this assessment is flawed and biased. It also claimed that the EFF incited violence against Afrikaner farmers, claiming that the party achieved this by reintroducing the contentious song 'Kill the Boer' song at its gatherings and through other acts of incitement. The report said that a provincial police commissioner confirmed in July that police had fatally shot at least 40 criminal suspects in shoot-outs since April. A January report from the South African Human Rights Commission (SAHRC) was also referenced. This report detailed the 2021 unrest in KwaZulu-Natal and Gauteng, which led to 337 deaths and 3,400 arrests. However, both the EFF and the the Department of International Relations and Cooperation (Dirco) criticised the US report for applying double standard on human rights. The EFF pointed out that the US has a history of using human rights narratives to justify sanctions, isolation, and even military aggression against other nations. "It is the same tactic used in Iraq under the lies of 'weapons of mass destruction', which left over a million people dead while US corporations looted oil fields,' EFF spokesperson Sinawo Thambo said. "The US has no moral standing to lecture any nation on human rights. This is a country that cages migrant children in detention centers; that has rolled back reproductive rights and stripped millions of women of the freedom to control their bodies," The party also criticised the report for selectively presenting incidents of police brutality while ignoring the broader context of South Africa's struggle against violent crime. "These cases, picked from our broader struggle against violent crime, are inflated to serve Washington's narrative that our nation is unfit to govern itself," the EFF said. 'This report was clearly crafted to smear South Africa for daring to assert its sovereignty, reclaim its land, and stand in solidarity with the oppressed peoples of the world, particularly the people of Palestine,' Thambo said. The Ministry of International Relations and Cooperation's spokesperson Chrispin Phiri also expressed profound disappointment with the report, describing it as "inaccurate and deeply flawed." Phiri said the report's reliance on contextual information and discredited accounts is highly concerning. "The report cites an incident involving the deaths of farm workers and, despite the matter being actively adjudicated by our independent judiciary, misleadingly presents it as an extrajudicial killing," Phiri explained. The government noted that South Africa operates a transparent system where information is freely available from law enforcement agencies and Chapter 9 institutions, which are constitutionally mandated to protect and advance human rights. The government also noted the irony that the US, having exited the UN Human Rights Council, would seek to produce one-sided fact-free reports without any due process or engagement. "This is particularly striking given the significant and documented concerns about human rights within the United States, including the treatment of refugees and breaches in due process by its agencies, such as ICE," the government said. "In contrast to the US report, the UN Human Rights Office in Geneva has praised South Africa's Land Expropriation Act, signed into law by President Cyril Ramaphosa, as a "critical step in addressing the country's racially imbalanced land ownership". This recognition underscores the integrity of South Africa's legislative processes aimed at rectifying historical injustices in a constitutional and human-rights-based manner,' Phiri said.
The South African
4 days ago
- The South African
South Africa-US spat ramps up as DIRCO fires back
The SA government has rejected the latest US State Department human rights report's portrayal of the country's democratic and legal systems. Image: GCIS The South African government has strongly rejected the latest US State Department human rights report, calling it a 'deeply flawed and inaccurate' portrayal of the country's democratic and legal systems. ADVERTISEMENT In a statement issued by the Department of International Relations and Cooperation (DIRCO), officials said they were 'deeply disappointed' by the US's assessment, particularly its claims that human rights conditions have 'significantly deteriorated' in South Africa over the past year. The report, released on Tuesday, criticised South Africa's handling of the Expropriation Act, suggested a lack of accountability for alleged human rights abuses, and raised alarm over violence and rhetoric directed at Afrikaners – including concerns over the controversial 'Kill the Boer' chant. AfriForum Raises Alarm Over Afrikaner Safety The report has already triggered a response from civil rights group AfriForum, which renewed its call for President Cyril Ramaphosa to publicly denounce the chant and take stronger action to protect the rights of Afrikaners and other minorities. AfriForum warned that the strained diplomatic relationship with the US could worsen, and that failure to act may prolong or increase tariffs on South African exports. ADVERTISEMENT The organisation said Ramaphosa's inaction 'undermines the interests of all South Africans' by placing 'ANC ideology over constitutional obligations and the welfare of citizens.' DIRCO Pushes Back DIRCO responded sharply, accusing the US government of producing a report that 'misrepresents facts and ignores judicial processes currently underway in South Africa.' They cited an incident involving the deaths of farm workers that the report framed as extrajudicial killings, despite the matter being under ongoing judicial review. 'This is not only premature but a fundamental distortion of the facts,' DIRCO said. ADVERTISEMENT 'South Africa's constitutional democracy includes independent oversight institutions that are functioning and active.' The ministry also defended South Africa's land reform efforts, referring to recent praise from the UN Human Rights Office, which called the Land Expropriation Act a 'critical step toward addressing racially skewed land ownership' – directly contradicting the US report's claims. US Criticism Called Hypocritical DIRCO went further, pointing out what it called the irony of criticism from a country that recently withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council. 'The United States faces documented human rights issues of its own, including systemic discrimination, treatment of refugees, and questionable practices by its immigration enforcement agencies,' the statement said. ADVERTISEMENT DIRCO also questioned the political motivations behind the report, suggesting it reflects President Donald Trump's foreign policy priorities rather than objective human rights assessments. Tensions Set to Rise The latest exchange adds fuel to growing diplomatic tensions between Pretoria and Washington, following the US's imposition of tariffs and increasingly critical rhetoric regarding South Africa's international alliances and domestic policies. While the US remains a key trade partner, South African officials have signalled that diplomatic engagement through formal channels – and not external pressure – will guide the country's response. 'We remain committed to open dialogue, but we will not accept mischaracterisations that damage our international reputation without basis,' DIRCO said. ADVERTISEMENT As both countries dig in their heels, observers warn that the rift could escalate into broader consequences for trade, diplomatic cooperation, and international perceptions of human rights credibility on both sides. Have DIRCO taken the correct stance to hit back at the allegations? Let us know by leaving a comment below, or send a WhatsApp to 060 011 021 1 Subscribe to The South African website's newsletters and follow us on WhatsApp, Facebook, X and Bluesky for the latest news.
