Podcast hosts discuss the generational divide over Trump's tariffs
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
43 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Florida Democrats challenge Trump's plans to cut mail-in ballots before 2026 midterms
TALLAHASSEE, Fla. (WFLA) — President Trump announced his plans to sign an executive order to eliminate mail-in ballots ahead of the 2026 midterm elections. This move has reignited fierce debate surrounding voting by mail, and Florida Democrats are fighting back, challenging the president's constitutional authority.'We're going to start with an executive order that's being written right now by the best lawyers in the country, to end mail-in ballots,' Trump said from the Oval Office. Florida accuses 2 companies of over charging school districts for instructional materials The president posted on Truth Social Monday morning saying, 'ELECTIONS CAN NEVER BE HONEST WITH MAIL IN BALLOTS/VOTING, and everybody, IN PARTICULAR THE DEMOCRATS, KNOWS THIS.''We would get secure elections; we get much faster results of machines. I mean they say we're going to have the results in two weeks, with paper ballots you have the results that night,' Trump said. In the Sunshine State, Florida has a long history of making sure elections are secure and fair. The state legislature passed a bill back in 2021, led by current Chief Financial Officer Blaise Ingoglia, which made a slew of changes to the state's elections law. But just like with this recent call, state Democrats are still not on board. 'Florida actually has the largest population of seniors in the country. We have a number of Floridians who are disabled and just who aren't able to get to the polls. And we know that vote by mail has been a safe and convenient way for people to vote,' said State Rep. Fentrice Driskell (D-Tampa). Driskell said, just like in 2021, she believes her Republican colleagues could attach this idea to legislation next session.'I don't think that the case was ever fully made for why we needed to take such drastic changes. It was more so of the legislature trying to serve the political will of Donald Trump and furthering the big lie that Donald Trump won the 2020 election. And so, it makes me very nervous that we are on such uneven footing. I thought we'd move past all of that but here we are again,' Driskell said. 8 On Your Side sat down with political analyst Tara Newsom to dig into the current laws on the books.'President Trump will do this, but it doesn't mean he constitutionally can. Article 1, section 4 of the constitution is clear that the time, place and manner of elections is vested in the states.' Newsom added that coupling up Trump's call to end mail-in ballots with the plans to redistrict mid-decade may be too much maneuvering for voters to support. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Newsweek
an hour ago
- Newsweek
Texas Capitol Evacuated After Shooting Threat
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Parts of the Texas Capitol were evacuated on Tuesday evening following reports of an active shooter threat. The Texas Department of Public Safety (DPS) said the evacuation, which happened at around 6:30 p.m., was prompted by a threat posted online. "Earlier today, an individual posted a message on social media regarding the ongoing political situation at the Texas State Capitol. In that message, the individual calls on others to go to the Capitol building and take action by shooting and killing those who will not allow lawmakers to leave," the Texas DPS said. "For the safety of those at the Texas State Capitol, and out of an abundance of caution, the Texas Department of Public Safety (DPS) evacuated the public from the Capitol building around 6:30 this evening. It will remain closed to the public for the remainder of the day." DPS said it is working to identify the suspect who posted the threat online, and added that no further details will be released until the investigation is completed. The Texas House Democrats released a statement thanking State Troopers for their response and condemning the incident. "Violence and threats have no place in our democratic process, and we unequivocally condemn any threats against public servants or law enforcement, regardless of political differences," they said. Texas State Troopers at the Texas Capitol in Austin on Monday. Texas State Troopers at the Texas Capitol in Austin on Monday. Stephen Spillman/AP This is a developing story. More to follow.
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Appeals court blocks New Mexico's 7-day waiting period for gun purchases, saying it violates 2nd Amendment
A federal appeals court on Tuesday halted New Mexico's seven-day waiting period for gun purchases, ruling that it likely infringes on citizens' Second Amendment rights. The 2-1 ruling by the 10th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals leaves the law on hold pending a legal challenge and returns the case to a lower court. The waiting period went into effect in May of last year and included violators being subject to a misdemeanor, but it does have an exception for concealed permit holders. Democrats had enacted the measure in an effort to allow for more time for federal background checks on gun buyers to be completed. "Cooling-off periods do not fit into any historically grounded exceptions to the right to keep and bear arms, and burden conduct within the Second Amendment's scope," Judge Timothy Tymkovich wrote for the majority. "We conclude that New Mexico's Waiting Period Act is likely an unconstitutional burden on the Second Amendment rights of its citizens." Nra And Conservative Legal Group Sue Democrat Governor Over 7-Day Waiting Period To Buy Guns The Mountain States Legal Foundation and National Rifle Association filed the lawsuit on behalf of two New Mexico residents, arguing that the law was unconstitutional and delayed access to firearms for victims of domestic violence and other citizens. Read On The Fox News App The lawsuit referenced the U.S. Supreme Court's landmark 2022 decision in New York State Rifle and Pistol Association v. Bruen in which a new standard to determine whether a gun restriction is unconstitutional was established. To meet that standard, the government must show there is a "historical tradition of firearm regulation" that supports the law. Michael McCoy, director of the Mountain States Legal Foundation's Center to Keep and Bear Arms, celebrated the ruling. "The court found that there was no analogous law from that era that would support the modern day law that's at issue," McCoy said. "For now, it means New Mexicans can go buy their firearms without an arbitrary delay imposed." Federal Appeals Court Rules California Ammunition Background Checks Unconstitutional John Commerford, executive director of the National Rifle Association's Institute for Legislative Action, also praised the court's decision, saying it "serves as a key piece in dismantling similar gun control laws across the country." In a dissent, Judge Scott Matheson argued that New Mexico's waiting period "establishes a condition or qualification on the commercial sale of arms that does not serve abusive ends." Gov. Michelle Lujan Grisham, a Democrat, said she was disappointed with the ruling and claimed it would likely cost lives. "New Mexico's waiting period law was carefully crafted to minimize gun violence while respecting Second Amendment rights," Lujan Grisham said in a statement, pointing to other exceptions for gun purchases by law enforcement officers and transactions between immediate family members. "Waiting periods prevent impulsive acts of violence and suicide, giving people time to step back and reassess their emotions during moments of crisis," she added. Since she was sworn in as governor in 2019, Lujan Grisham has signed several gun control measures, including a "red flag" law allowing a court to temporarily remove guns from people suspected of being at risk of hurting themselves or others and restrictions on firearms near polling places. In 2023, the governor suspended the right to carry guns in public parks and playgrounds in Albuquerque in response to shootings across the state that killed children. Lujan Grisham declared a state of emergency in Albuquerque earlier this year, saying that a significant uptick in crime warranted the help of the state's National Guard. She also declared a state of emergency last week over violent crime and drug trafficking across parts of northern New Mexico. Legal experts have said the ruling could have wider consequences because other states, including California, Hawaii and Illinois, have imposed similar restrictions on gun purchases. In New Mexico, the waiting period applies to all licensed dealer firearm sales for handguns and long guns. The only exception applies to concealed carry permit holders, law enforcement and immediate family transfers. Those in support of the waiting period laws argue that research links the law to reduced suicides and crimes of passion limiting impulsive behavior. Officials in New Mexico have not said if they will seek review from the full 10th Circuit or appeal directly to the U.S. Supreme Court. The Associated Press contributed to this article source: Appeals court blocks New Mexico's 7-day waiting period for gun purchases, saying it violates 2nd Amendment Solve the daily Crossword
