‘People inside Moderna are afraid': As the anti-vaccine climate intensifies, a big local firm has much to lose
Since then, the veteran pharmaceutical executive has applied for about 40 biopharma jobs in Massachusetts. He has gotten only half a dozen interviews and no job offers.
Advertisement
'Am I worried? Yes,' said the 64-year-old Somerville resident. 'I think it's entirely possible that I might not land another job.'
Morrow's concerns are hardly unfounded. The recent downturn in biotech has
Moderna vaulted to the forefront of biotech during the pandemic, becoming a major pillar of the region's economy, but Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr.'s skepticism of vaccines, and mRNA in particular, has cost the company dearly.
Advertisement
Late last month, the
On Monday,
The move marked a reversal of what he had promised a key Republican senator during his confirmation hearings, when Kennedy had pledged to maintain the panel.
Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. during a swearing-in ceremony in the Oval Office on April 18.
ERIC LEE/NYT
Morrow, who has worked in the pharma industry for about 30 years, including 17 years at GlaxoSmithKline, said anti-vaccine activists have been 'remarkably effective' at distorting the truth about cutting-edge science, including how safe and effective mRNA shots are.
'It makes it harder for anyone who wants to do science to get a job,' he said.
Morrow said he was let go in a third round of layoffs in 2024 and estimated that at least 100 Moderna employees lost jobs in Massachusetts last year. Those layoffs were never publicly disclosed, he said.
Moderna acknowledged laying off about 50 digital employees in February this year, but has not disclosed layoffs in other departments. A Moderna spokesperson, Christopher Ridley, said the company had no comment about layoffs.
Even before President Trump took office, Massachusetts' biopharma hub had been in a prolonged slump because of high interest rates, investors pulling back from risky biotech stocks, and a steep decline in private financing.
Advertisement
For the first time in more thana decade, total employment in the state's life sciences sector stayed flat in 2024, according to a report by the Massachusetts Biotechnology Education Foundation.
The workforce had 143,142 employees last year, an increase of only 0.02 percent over 2023, the report said. From 2013 to 2023, industry jobs
grew at an average annual rate of 6.7 percent.
Sunny Schwartz, chief executive of the foundation, said massive hiring during the pandemic made a 'correction' almost inevitable. The uncertainty created by the presidential election likely contributed to the stagnant growth.
'The life sciences industry, like any industry, is conservative in their hiring and probably wanted to see what would happen,' she said.
At least 60 drug companies in Massachusetts made layoffs or closed in the past 12 months, according to Dan Gold, president of Fairway Consulting Group, a life sciences recruiting firm. He estimated that at least 1,000 employees lost their jobs.
Biogen, the homegrown biotech that has been a mainstay of Kendall Square, has made several rounds of
Biogen's headquarters in Cambridge.
John Tlumacki/Globe Staff
'I've been a biotech entrepreneur for 20 years, and I haven't seen a worse downturn,' said David Lucchino, the former
chief executive of Frequency Therapeutics, now defunct, and a former chair of the Massachusetts Biotechnology Council, an industry trade group.
Advertisement
Robert Langer, the prolific inventor and biomedical engineering professor at MIT who helped co-found Frequency and Moderna, agreed. He said the slump is the longest-lasting he has seen in his half-century as an entrepreneur.
The impact on the real estate market has been devastating. The biotech cluster based in Greater Boston is grappling with a record 16.3 million square feet of unleased lab space, according to the real estate firm Colliers. Nearly
Despite some noteworthy successes this year — including
Nothing has been whipsawed more than Moderna, which grew to become the second-biggest biopharma employer in Massachusetts, behind Takeda.
Before the pandemic, the company had no approved products. Then, in 2020, it won billions of dollars in federal contracts to rapidly develop a COVID vaccine as part of Operation Warp Speed during Trump's first administration.
Moderna's mRNA vaccine was cleared by the FDA in December 2020. The
Advertisement
'It's been a long fall from grace,' said Tyler Van Buren, an analyst at TD Cowen,
a financial research and advisory firm. To a large extent, he said, Moderna was 'a victim of circumstance.'
The company was built 'to save the world, and the world stopped wanting or needing the COVID vaccine,' Van Buren added. He also faults Moderna for failing to diversify its pipeline by developing other scientific platforms besides mRNA, in contrast to the German biotech BioNTech, which partnered with Pfizer on its COVID
vaccine.
Although the first Trump administration touted Moderna's COVID shot as a remarkable achievement, Health Secretary Kennedy has said certain vaccines for respiratory diseases, including mRNA shots, have 'never worked.'
Reached for comment by the Globe, Moderna said Monday that 'mRNA vaccines funded by Operation Warp Speed were essential to ending the COVID-19 pandemic, preventing an estimated 20 million deaths worldwide, including more than 1 million in the United States. The efficacy and safety profile has been confirmed in over a billion people worldwide.'
A view of Moderna's Cambridge headquarters.
David L. Ryan/Globe Staff
Moderna's share price, which peaked at $484 in 2021, is now trading at about $28, roughly what it was before the pandemic. Its workforce at the end of last year, however, was roughly seven times what it was before the pandemic, with 5,800 employees.
Moderna's chief executive, Stéphane Bancel, said in January that the company will reduce its costs by $1 billion this year. Van Buren said there is 'zero doubt in my mind' that the company will make hundreds of layoffs in the next two years, in part because the political climate toward mRNA vaccines has become so hostile.
Advertisement
Another scientist at Moderna who was laid off in December said 'multiple hundreds of workers' were let go in Massachusetts since the third quarter of 2023, and that the company has never made it public.
'It's been really opaque,' said the former employee, who insisted on anonymity because he didn't want to jeopardize his severance package. 'I
think what [Moderna's leaders] owe to Massachusetts is to be transparent about what they are doing."
A third employee, Nathan Devaud, 24, said he was laid off from a job in technical development at Moderna's Norwood facility in late February along with about 80 other people.
He had worked at the company for six months while a co-op at Northeastern University, where he earned a bachelor's degree in chemical engineering and biochemistry a year ago, and then for nine months as a full-time employee.
He said he has applied for about 25 jobs but hasn't been able to get an interview.
'It's hard to find a job on LinkedIn that doesn't have over a hundred applicants,' he said.
Morrow, for his part, said he talks to his former Moderna colleagues, and they're worried.
'People inside Moderna are afraid right now,' he said. 'They're afraid of what's going to come next. To be laid off in this environment makes it that much more stressful.'
Jonathan Saltzman can be reached at
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Associated Press
9 minutes ago
- Associated Press
Moderna to Present at Upcoming Barclays Speaking the Science Call Series on June 16, 2025
CAMBRIDGE, MA / ACCESS Newswire / June 11, 2025 / Moderna, Inc. (Nasdaq:MRNA), today announced its participation in the following upcoming investor event: Barclays Speaking the Science Call Series, on Monday, June 16th at 10:00am ET A live webcast of this presentation will be available under 'Events and Presentations' in the Investors section of the Moderna website. A replay of this webcast will be archived on Moderna's website for at least 30 days following the presentation. About Moderna Moderna is a leader in the creation of the field of mRNA medicine. Through the advancement of mRNA technology, Moderna is reimagining how medicines are made and transforming how we treat and prevent disease for everyone. By working at the intersection of science, technology and health for more than a decade, the company has developed medicines at unprecedented speed and efficiency, including one of the earliest and most effective COVID-19 vaccines. Moderna's mRNA platform has enabled the development of therapeutics and vaccines for infectious diseases, immuno-oncology, rare diseases and autoimmune diseases. With a unique culture and a global team driven by the Moderna values and mindsets to responsibly change the future of human health, Moderna strives to deliver the greatest possible impact to people through mRNA medicines. For more information about Moderna, please visit and connect with us on X (formerly Twitter), Facebook, Instagram, YouTube and LinkedIn. Investors: Lavina Talukdar Senior Vice President & Head of Investor Relations 617-209-5834 [email protected] SOURCE: Moderna, Inc. press release


Bloomberg
22 minutes ago
- Bloomberg
RFK Jr.'s Policies Shouldn't Surprise Anyone
Robert F. Kennedy Jr.'s decision to oust the Center for Disease Control and Prevention's entire panel of outside vaccine advisers is at once utterly shocking and entirely predictable. Every new action by the secretary of Health and Human Services seems more impudent than the last — all in service of undermining confidence in some of our most reliable public health tools. The magnitude of his dismissal of all 17 members of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) — an independent panel of experts that makes recommendations on vaccine deployment in the US — is unlikely to register with the public. After all, this is a wonky committee that only fleetingly entered the public consciousness during the Covid-19 pandemic, when everyone anxiously awaited its verdicts on the first vaccines. But Americans will feel the effects of Kennedy's decision in their everyday lives — and it will happen sooner rather than later.

Yahoo
28 minutes ago
- Yahoo
‘Big, beautiful bill' spurs Democratic plans for emergency actions to counter cuts
Democratic governors facing potential big budget problems exacerbated by the GOP megabill being fast-tracked in Washington are considering emergency measures to try to soften the blow. Blue state policymakers from Connecticut to California to New York are raising the specter that they will call lawmakers back for special sessions to tackle what could amount to hundreds of millions of dollars in additional costs as a result of President Donald Trump's 'big, beautiful bill.' And even some deep red states — like Florida — are taking steps to address the financial fallout. The preparations signal the depths of concerns about how the Republican package might reverberate in state capitals, even as passage is far from assured, especially given the recent vitriolic attacks on the spending bill from Elon Musk. State officials are scrambling to navigate the likely fiscal challenges in what's already the toughest budget year since before the pandemic in many states. 'The bill is destructive and risks destabilizing the entire network of supporting programs,' said New Mexico Treasurer Laura Montoya, a Democrat whose governor has all but guaranteed a special session will be necessary. The bill, which cleared the House last month and now awaits Senate action, would cut some $300 billion from the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, largely by forcing states to pay into the program for the first time. It would also kick 7.6 million people off Medicaid and save $800 billion over 10 years, according to the Congressional Budget Office. The special session threat could be a way for Democratic governors, some of whom enjoy large legislative majorities, to respond to pressure from constituents angry about cuts to health care and food benefits — even if there's little they can do to combat Trump's agenda. The details of what the governors would even ask the lawmakers to do are scant given the high degree of uncertainty around the final bill. New York Gov. Kathy Hochul, referencing potential cuts to education, school meals and Medicaid, warned earlier this year that 'nothing prohibits us from coming back in a special session to deal with anything that comes our way from the federal government.' Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz said last month 'we will definitely be back in a special session to deal with' the reconciliation package if the House-passed version is adopted. There could be immediate substantive reasons for a special session in response to the GOP bill, even though provisions like sharing the costs of the nation's largest food aid program with states wouldn't take effect until 2028. The vast majority of states start their fiscal years on July 1 — meaning that their budgets have been crafted based on current conditions even as officials leave the door open to make changes later and minimize the pain in response to the final federal legislation. 'Bottom line is states will not be able to absorb all the costs, and decisions will have to be made,' said Brian Sigritz, director of state fiscal studies at the nonpartisan National Association of State Budget Officers. 'All states will be impacted.' Some Republicans have also expressed concern at the downstream impacts of the GOP megabill. Alabama Commissioner of Agriculture and Industries Rick Pate, a Republican who recently announced a bid for lieutenant governor, previously told POLITICO that in his state 'there would be very little interest in us generating the dollars it would take to fund something huge as SNAP.' Others are using the special session chatter as a cudgel to hammer Democrats in blue states for being in a precarious fiscal situation to begin with. 'I would say that our priorities have been on the goofy side,' California Assemblymember Tom Lackey, a Republican on the budget committee, said in an interview regarding his state's poor fiscal outlook, pointing specifically to massive spending to attack homelessness that's failed to dent the problem. 'We're trying to offer too much to too many people when we can't even offer basic services.' Still, states would be impacted across the board even if it's only Democrats that have the political incentive to publicly oppose the reconciliation bill. That means states will need to turn to unpopular choices like cutting benefits or raising taxes to fill as much of the gap left by the federal cuts as possible, in addition to other maneuvers like drawing from their rainy day funds, said Sigritz. Some legislators are accepting that they will likely return to their statehouses for special sessions. Connecticut Treasurer Erick Russell, a Democrat, said in an interview that a special session will likely be necessary if the federal budget significantly shifts costs to states to ensure that lawmakers are 'building in some flexibility to try to make whatever adjustments we may need to safeguard residents of our state.' Connecticut Gov. Ned Lamont's office told POLITICO that he and legislative leaders are considering declaring a fiscal emergency in order to raise the spending cap, a move that it argues would be necessary to pay for the costs shifted to states under Republicans' megabill. New York state Sen. Gustavo Rivera, a Democrat who chairs the chamber's health committee, said he fully expects to return to Albany in a special session if the reconciliation bill clears Congress — and that he will push to 'raise taxes on the wealthy' to cover some of the Medicaid spending the federal government plans to cut. In California, a spokesperson for Assembly Speaker Robert Rivas said there is 'a scenario where lawmakers come back later this year' to deal with new budget realities brought by federal cuts. 'I'll come back any day,' said California Assemblymember Patrick Ahrens, a Silicon Valley Democrat. 'This is our job. And if we have to come back in the fall, I will gladly come. In fact, if it means protecting some of these programs, then I think we should come back in the morning, noon, weekend, holidays.' And in deep-red West Virginia, Mike Woelfel, minority leader in the state Senate and one of the 11 Democrats in the entire Legislature, said he wants his Republican governor Patrick Morrisey to call a special session if the federal cuts are adopted. 'This is the kind of thing that should trigger special sessions if we get into this hellhole that this legislation would put our most vulnerable citizens in,' Woelfel said. 'But there's political risk in (the governor) doing that.' Eric He and Katelyn Cordero contributed to this report.