Calgary host society says 'unreasonable demands' led to loss of 2027 North American Indigenous Games
Last week the NAIG Council, which awarded the Calgary host committee the 2027 games back in 2023, announced it was withdrawing the city's hosting rights "to uphold the integrity of the Games and ensure the long-term strength of the NAIG movement."
"Over the past two years, NAIG Council has worked closely with the Host Society to support their efforts — providing guidance, capacity-building support, resources, and external expertise to assist with planning and budgeting processes required to deliver a successful Games," the statement read.
"Despite the collective efforts of many, it became increasingly clear that critical benchmarks could not be met."
The statement did not say what milestones or conditions were missed by the Calgary host society.
The NAIG Council did not respond to a request for comment about the milestones or conditions missed by time of publishing.
In a statement Friday, the Host Society said an official NAIG host agreement "never came to be as the Host Society faced shifting requirements and unreasonable demands."
"At the same time, Tourism Calgary withheld committed operational funding from the City of Calgary, leaving the Host Society without the resources needed to plan and deliver the Games as envisioned," read the host society's statement.
"As Indigenous people, we recognize these challenges within the broader context of systemic barriers that continue to limit our self-determination. The actions that led to this decision run contrary to those commitments and are a step backward for reconciliation in sport and culture."
In an email to CBC Indigenous, Tourism Calgary said the host society statement was "inaccurate."
"As stewards of public funds, Tourism Calgary invests in events and organizations that demonstrate strong leadership, operational capability, good governance, transparency, and the capacity to deliver financially viable outcomes."
The statement went on to say "Given the challenges that emerged throughout the planning process, we support the NAIG Council and its difficult decision to withdraw the 2027 Games from Calgary."
"While this is not the outcome we hoped for, we continue to believe in the vision of the North American Indigenous Games and thank the NAIG Council for acting in the long-term interest of the event and its participants."
What happens now?
The NAIG Council's statement last week acknowledged that the announcement may be "deeply disappointing" to athletes, coaches, families and communities.
"We want to assure everyone that NAIG Council remains steadfast in its commitment to Indigenous youth and to the ongoing advancement of the NAIG movement," the statement said.
"Our focus now turns to identifying a new path forward — one that protects the spirit and legacy of the Games and minimizes disruption for the youth and communities we serve."
It said further updates on plans for the games would be coming.
In its statement Friday, the Calgary Host Society committed to creating a new event.
"The Host Society will not abandon our youth or the vision we began with," the statement said.
"We will immediately begin the process of rebranding and create a new Indigenous sporting event that will remain fully Indigenous-led, with sport and culture equally showcased."
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
What LeBron James Told Younger Son Before College
LeBron James is many things: NBA superstar, entrepreneur, philanthropist and even a part-time actor. He is also famously a father, and it turns out the advice he gave one of his sons before heading off the college is pretty relatable even to dad's who aren't the NBA's all-time leading scorer. That is according to Bryce James, a freshman for the Arizona Wildcats basketball team who met with reporters this week for the first time since joining the squad. 'Just working hard, coming in here, doing what you do best and also just like making sure even if you're not having good days, always have a stay positive mentality,' Bryce told the media in Tucson (per local reporter Eliav Gabay). 'Maybe you missed a shot, don't hang your head down. Always keep your head up. Just push through, stay positive.' That approach has served Papa James well, so it sounds like something Bryce will be able to use as the Wildcats pursue a spot in the NCAA Tournament (which is staying at 68 teams for now at least). He arrived at Arizona with less fanfare than his other brother, LeBron James Jr., who goes by Bronny. While Bronny was a four-star prospect among the top 30 players in the country in the class of 2023 per 247Sports, Bryce is a three-star prospect ranked No. 284 among all players and 46th among shooting guards. Arizona lists him at 6-5, 195, and notes in his bio he averaged eight points and four rebounds per game last season as Los Angeles Sierra Canyon High School won the Division I state championship in the CIF. Bronny James spent one season at USC before being selected in the second round of the 2024 NBA Draft. He made his NBA debut last fall and also spent time with the Lakers' G League affiliate, the South Bay Lakers. What LeBron James Told Younger Son Before College first appeared on Men's Journal on Aug 13, 2025
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
SNOBELEN: Loss and humiliation should spur Poilievre to be better
Prime Minister Poilievre? Next week, the good people of Battle River-Crowfoot will elect a new member of Parliament and the Conservative Party of Canada (CPC) can get back to worrying about the future. Pierre Poilievre will easily win this election and make his return to the tranquillity of Ottawa. Then, the real battle will begin. In 2026, Poilievre will face a mandatory leadership review at the CPC national convention in Calgary. Between now and then, Conservative party members will have one overriding question on their minds: Can Poilievre ever be prime minister? Under Poilievre's leadership, the Conservatives gained votes and seats in the last election, but despite the unpopularity of Justin Trudeau's clan and the political naivety of Mark Carney, they fell painfully short of winning government. That election triggered questions about Poilievre's future. The stage for Carney's rise and the Conservatives' defeat was set when Donald Trump won a second term as president. Trump is the context for everything. His ability to generate and prosper from chaos is extraordinary, as is his ability to command attention in the era of 24/7 news cycles. Trump elected Carney. The winds blowing from Washington last January were particularly icy and Canadians felt cold shivers from a former ally now suddenly and inexplicably hostile. Trump clearly wanted to starve Canada first into irrelevance and then into statehood. By the end of April, many Canadians longed for some sense of stability and, straight from central casting, the Liberals presented a new, much more serious leader. Carney is a safe-looking guy with a black belt in economics and an international reputation. What could be safer? In contrast, Poilievre is a career politician with a black belt in antagonizing. His ability to get under Trudeau's skin is legendary. He was the right guy for the wrong time. So, can Poilievre be the right guy the next time? Probably. Carney will face some stiff winds over the next few years. Canadians may find that, to quote Helen Keller, 'Security is mostly a superstition. It does not exist in nature, nor do the children of men as a whole experience it. Avoiding danger is no safer in the long run than outright exposure. Life is either a daring adventure, or nothing.' Having given false security a try for a few years, many Canadians may be ready for a daring adventure in the next election. Carney is many good things, but adventurous is not one of them. Elbows half-up is going to get tiresome. The C.D. Howe Institute reported that the Carney government's 'comprehensive spending review' will look at one-third of expenditures and produce less than one-half the savings required. A couple of years of things only getting a little worse will set the stage for a Poilievre comeback. That is, if he wants to. Poilievre will have to change if he wants to be the next prime minister. Passion doesn't have to bleed to zeal. Certain doesn't need to be strident. And daring doesn't need to be foolhardy. Poilievre is a master storyteller, but he refused to tell his story through much of the media in the last election. That isn't a good strategy; it's arrogance. Poilievre needs to keep a sharp wit and willingness to be bold, but lose the attack edge and arrogance. The good news for Conservatives is that Poilievre has been through the humiliation of an election loss. That should make him a little less smart and a lot wiser.


Fox News
an hour ago
- Fox News
BROADCAST BIAS: It ought to be a crime for media to cover DC takeover this poorly
Knees jerk at the broadcast networks every time President Donald Trump makes a dramatic move. They're going to denounce his verbiage as too reckless. They're going to suggest he's mangling all the facts. They'll suggest his motives are racist and extremist. We heard all this on ABC, CBS and NBC after the president announced he was going to take command for a month of the D.C. police and call on the National Guard to combat crime in the nation's capital. It started right away on Monday, August 11. On ABC's "World News Tonight," anchorman David Muir began by insisting it was the Democrats who owned the facts: "Tonight, President Trump ordering the National Guard to take over policing of the nation's capital. Tonight, the mayor of Washington pushing back with the crime stats, and what they actually show." White House reporter Mary Bruce, one of Joe Biden's most agreeable stenographers, offered smug opposition in ABC's clipped style: "President Trump declaring a public safety emergency in D.C., painting an apocalyptic picture, adamant crime is spiraling out of control. But his depiction stands in stark contrast to the official figures, which show crime in the capital is actually in decline. Violent crime recently hitting a 30-year low, down 26% since last year. Burglary down 19%. Murder down 12%." ABC and CBS didn't acknowledge that these "official figures" are rigged – that an officer was suspended for manipulating the crime statistics to show improvement – those "historic lows" the media touted. ABC also failed to mention their own colleagues were telling a different tale on their streaming channel, ABC News Live. Anchor Kyra Phillips described the scene near ABC studios in DC, just blocks north of the White House: "I can tell you firsthand here in downtown DC where we work, right here around our bureau, just in the past six months, there were two people shot, one person died, literally two blocks down here from the bureau. We can talk about the numbers going down, but crime is happening every single day because we're all experiencing it firsthand, working and living down here." This underlines how the statistics don't match people's experience. In May, a Washington Post poll found that 91% of DC residents see crime as a problem, with 51% saying it is an extremely serious problem. Moreover, it is in particular Black and low-income residents who are most concerned about it. They live in the neighborhoods with the worst crime. Over on "CBS Evening News," co-anchor Maurice DuBois offered a fractured fact check: "The president said, despite evidence to the contrary, that crime of the nation's capital is out of control. It has actually been declining since the pandemic." That's wrong. Violent crime spiked in 2023, which allows all the talking points about it coming down since then. The locals are not impressed if the annual number of murders comes down from 274 to 187. They don't want to become a crime statistic. On Monday, "NBC Nightly News" anchor Tom Llamas began: "The president's D.C. takeover, declaring a crime emergency and taking control of the city's police department, and sending in the National Guard. Washington's mayor calling it 'unsettling and unprecedented' as protesters take to the streets." White House reporter Gabe Gutierrez used the official stats against Trump, but added skeptics: "The head of the police union tells NBC News the crime stats have been manipulated. And any talk of a recent drop in crime is 'preposterous.' Still, the D.C. City Council calls the federal police takeover 'a manufactured intrusion on local authority' and the mayor says it caught her off-guard." It's fascinating that none of the networks pointed out Mayor Muriel Bowser is a Democrat. The city council has 11 Democrats and two independents. The elected DC Attorney General, Brian Schwalb, is a Democrat. These networks don't want you to think that Trump's "targets" here are partisan adversaries. They're somehow nonpartisan public servants. On ABC's "Good Morning America" on Tuesday, co-host Michael Strahan pushed claims from House Democrats (in this case Maryland Democrat Rep. Jamie Raskin) that any focus on DC crime is a distraction from the Jeffrey Epstein case. In May, a Washington Post poll found that 91% of DC residents see crime as a problem, with 51% saying it is an extremely serious problem. On Tuesday's "CBS Evening News," reporter Scott MacFarlane was pushing leftist fears of Trump power lust with local liberal activist Ron Moten, who said "my only caution is, one thing can lead to the next thing. You can take the police department today and we wake up and they take over our city." MacFarlane replied: "They might not give it back." Moten repeated: "They might not give it back." While pundits like MSNBC host Joe Scarborough worried Democrats were falling into a trap by being aggressive crime denialists, the networks stuck to the liberal frame. "PBS News Hour" Amna Nawaz proclaimed on Thursday: "It's all part of a federal crackdown in the nation's capital launched by President Trump, citing a crime emergency that the data doesn't fully support." This approach signals that these leftist networks think "the data" always reliably lands on the liberal point of view, on "the right side of history" and the storyline of America's problems with racism. This arrogance is especially audacious when the statistics they're using are literally "fake news."