Special football match celebrating community and culture takes place in Colchester
Players in action at the game in Colchester (Image: Colchester Council)
A special football match celebrating community and culture has taken place in Colchester on Refugee Week.
The event, co-organised by Colchester Council, saw the council's team face off against RAMA's Refugee Football Team at Shrub End Community Sports Centre on Saturday, June 21.
Advertisement
The match aimed to highlight how sport can create connections and friendships across diverse backgrounds.
The game was an energetic, spirited contest that ended with a 6-4 victory for the RAMA team.
It served as an opportunity for people from different walks of life to connect through their shared love of football.
The day was made even more enjoyable with activities for spectators and children, hosted by Colchester United Football in the Community.
A group photo of both teams at the game (Image: Colchester Council)
After the match, food provided by Joyce at Rafiki was enjoyed by players and spectators alike, creating a space for celebration.
Advertisement
A RAMA team player said: "It was such a fun and exciting match.
"Everyone played with heart, and you could really feel the sense of community on and off the pitch."
A player from the Colchester Council team added: "This was more than just a game – it was a great chance to meet new people, share stories, and enjoy being part of something positive."
The event demonstrated the power of football in uniting people from all backgrounds.
The match celebrated community and culture (Image: Colchester Council)
Jocelyn Law, councillor responsible for community and public protection, said: "This event was a wonderful opportunity to come together as a community and celebrate the rich diversity that makes Colchester such a special place to live.
Advertisement
"Refugee Week is about understanding, respect, and unity – and what better way to reflect that than through a friendly football match and a day of shared experiences.
"We thank everyone who took part, supported, or simply came to enjoy a day of unity and celebration."
The match formed part of the broader Refugee Week celebrations, which aimed to foster understanding and highlight the contributions of refugees to society.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
28 minutes ago
- Yahoo
I'm A Huge Fan Of Formula 1, And I'm Totally Fine With The Most Unrealistic Parts Of Brad Pitt's F1
When you buy through links on our articles, Future and its syndication partners may earn a commission. Warning: Spoiler Alert! There are spoilers around every corner in this story about the racing in F1, so consider this your caution flag before proceeding. This weekend, F1 ,starring Brad Pitt and Javier Bardem, hits the 2025 movie schedule, and as a Formula 1 fan, I've been excited for this movie ever since they began shooting during the 2023 F1 season. Honestly, I expected it to be somewhat unrealistic, and it was. That didn't bother me, though. Let me explain why. Setting aside the fact that the movie never once showed race qualifying or the three practice sessions that every race has, the in-race tactics of the team led by Sonny Hayes (Pitt) and his teammate Joshua Pearce (Damson Idris) are nothing like you'd see in a real Grand Prix. Harkening back to another Jerry Bruckheimer-produced racing classic, Days of Thunder, there are a lot more 'rubbin' is racin'' moments than would ever happen in a real race. Sonny's cheeky moves to disable his opponents and even his car would be sniffed out immediately by the race stewards, and he would almost certainly be black-flagged (disqualified) from the race and possibly suspended from racing. While 'rubbin'' is a somewhat normal part of NASCAR, it's insanely dangerous in F1, where the cars are much more delicate (and much faster). In F1 these days, safety is paramount; the race officials would never, ever let a team get away with dangerous tactics like that. During the Italian Grand Prix at the world-famous Monza, the rain starts to fall hard. This isn't weird; unlike American racing, F1 races don't stop for rain (most of the time). What is weird is the discussion the team has between the drivers, Sonny and Joshua, about what tires they are going to use. The discussion is between 'slicks,' which are the normal racing tires and have no tread at all, and 'intermediates,' which are tires racers use for light rain, which do have some tread to push away the water. There is almost no situation where, in a rain as hard as it is in the movie, cars would ever stay on the track on slicks. They would have literally no grip at all. If anything, the discussion would be between intermediates or 'full wet' tires (tires with even more tread for harder rain). Staying on slicks would almost certainly end in disaster, and it does in the movie. One thing I definitely expected to see in F1 was a big, fiery crash, and boy oh boy was there one! Joshua flies off the track (because he stayed on slicks in the rain) and crashes into the barrier with tremendous force in a fireball. These kinds of crashes are the type you expect in any racing movie, but they are exceedingly rare in real races. Most crashes in a real Formula 1 race are actually kind of underwhelming; a car loses control and spins onto the gravel or into a wall, and some carbon fiber goes flying; there's almost never a fire these days, and the drivers usually climb out of their wrecked car unaided. There used to be a lot more terrible, and often deadly, crashes in F1. The movie Rush, from 2013, features one that was absolutely true to life in a race from the 1970s. However, ever since the death of the legendary Ayrton Senna (who still has millions of fans today, including Alexandra Daddario) at the San Marino Grand Prix in 1994, Formula 1 has gone all in on making the cars as safe as possible, and they have largely succeeded. That's not to say dramatic crashes never happen. During the 2020 season, Haas driver Romain Grosjean flew into a barrier at the Bahrain Grand Prix, and his car exploded into a huge fireball. Grosjean escaped safely, with a few minor burns to his hands, much like Joshua in F1. So, while the crash in the film is something that could happen, it's incredibly rare. While it may seem like I'm complaining about the racing scenes in F1, none of these things bothered me at all. As I wrote, I expected the movie to be over-the-top. Heck, I wanted it to be over-the-top. The racing scenes are amazing. As my colleague Eric Eisenberg wrote in his review of F1, F1 is an impressive technical achievement. It repeatedly offers the visceral experience of being strapped to the hood/side/back of one of the title sport's speedy cars. F1 is so much fun, especially for a fan of racing, that playing fast and loose with reality doesn't matter at all. All the racing scenes, from the moment we first see Sonny competing at the 24 Hours of Daytona, through the last bit at the Rally Mexico are amazing. Because the production had the full support of Formula 1, every racer from the 2023 season make some kind of appearance. It was like spotting Easter Eggs for a fan like me. 'Look! There's Max Verstappen! Hey, it's Fernando Alonso!' There are also the tracks. Silverstone, Spa, and Monza are three legendary tracks, and we get to see all of them extensively in the movie. It's just a really fun ride. F1 is the epitome of a popcorn-chomping summer blockbuster. It's not a documentary, and it's not Drive To Survive (which you can watch with a Netflix subscription). Expecting it to be is, frankly, silly. It will make you a fan of F1, though. At least, I hope it will, because it's a fantastic sport. If the lack of realism does upset you, I think you need to relax and think like Sonny in the last lap, let the car do the flying, and just float into the zone.
Yahoo
41 minutes ago
- Yahoo
🎥 Toone and Bronze put England in control against Jamaica
The Lionesses made a strong start against Jamaica in their Euro 2025 warm-up friendly, with Ella Toone and Lucy Bronze striking in the first half. Toone opened the scoring with a trademark finish after controlling on the edge of the area and curling her 20th England goal into the net past Liya Brooks. Advertisement Jamaica had a goal ruled out for offside before England struck a second before half time when Bronze rose highest to meet Jess Carter's inswinging cross into the box before Toone added a third to cap a dominant first 45 minutes. Can the Lionesses see out victory ahead of their Euros opener against France on Saturday? 📸 DARREN STAPLES - AFP or licensors
Yahoo
44 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Steelers $132 Million 'Sweet Deal' With D.K. Deserves Brutally Honest Analysis
Steelers $132 Million 'Sweet Deal' With D.K. Deserves Brutally Honest Analysis originally appeared on Athlon Sports. The "insider'' truth about the NFL salary cap? Any of us can make the numbers dance almost however we wish. Advertisement A best example? The Pittsburgh Steelers made one of the most monumental trades in franchise history this offseason by acquiring D.K. Metcalf from the Seattle Seahawks for a 2025 second-round pick. Why "monumental''? Because it's also one of the richest deals ever given, too. It is, on paper, billed as a "four-year contract extension worth $132 million.'' So, do the math: That's $33 million APY, putting Metcalf in the very top echelon among the league's non-QBs. But ESPN's Dan Graziano is here to spin this in another direction, calling it a "pretty sweet deal'' for the Steelers. Why does he see it as what has come to be called "team-friendly''? Advertisement "This looks like a pretty sweet deal for Metcalf,'' he says. "But in the current galaxy of top wide receiver contracts, this one isn't so bad for the team. The Steelers will pay the 27-year-old Metcalf $35 million this year -- a $30 million signing bonus and a $5 million salary -- and $25 million in 2026. "After that, it's completely up to them. His 2027 salary of $20 million never becomes guaranteed ...'' That's all true. And it's also quite common for a "long'' contract to feature what we call an "escape hatch'' at some point before the seeming official length of the deal. So yes, because the deal is escapable even though it appears that the 27-year-old is contractual tied to Pittsburgh until 2030. ... in a sense this can actually be "just a two-year commitment.'' Advertisement But wait. Let's do some more math. Along with the trading for Metcalf, and the "four years,'' he also got $60 million guaranteed. So even in the unlikely event that this thing is a disaster, Pittsburgh is still on the hook for $30 million per year for 2026 and 2027. And if you look at the NFL's highest-paid wide receivers list, you see two things about Metcalf ... 1. Cincinnati Bengals WR Ja'Marr Chase: $40.25 million 2. Minnesota Vikings WR Justin Jefferson: $35 million 3. Dallas Cowboys WR CeeDee Lamb: $34 million 4. Pittsburgh Steelers WR D.K. Metcalf: $33 million 5. Philadelphia Eagles WR A.J. Brown: $32 million 6. Detroit Lions WR Amon-Ra St. Brown: $30.003 million 7. Miami Dolphins WR Tyreek Hill: $30 million 7. San Francisco 49ers WR Brandon Aiyuk: $30 million 9. Cincinnati Bengals WR Tee Higgins: $28.75 million 10. Miami Dolphins WR Jaylen Waddle: $28.3 million One, he is presently listed as the fourth-highest-paid wideout in NFL history. And two, even in Graziano's generous view of "sweetness,'' if the Steelers unhappily dump him after two poor years, D.K. will still be in the top seven highest-paid guys. Advertisement So while ESPN insists "this is a nice deal for Pittsburgh,'' the truth is, it's only "nice'' if Metcalf either performs like he's around the fourth-best wideout in the NFL or like he's the seventh-best wideout in the NFL. And if Pittsburgh dumps him at age 29 in two years to save $26.5 million via that "escape hatch''? It's unlikely this will have been viewed as a "sweet deal.'' Related: Steelers Behind-The-Scenes Look At 'Aggressive' Trade And Metcalf's View On Rodgers This story was originally reported by Athlon Sports on Jun 28, 2025, where it first appeared.
