Opinion - Don't overlook the Big Labor funding behind the LA protests
Case in point: Among the dozens of lessons both seem incapable of learning from last November's electoral drubbing is that Americans are solidly in favor of enforcing the nation's sovereign borders and expelling as many as possible of the millions of lawbreakers who breached them thanks to the calculated apathy of the previous administration.
Apparently unfazed by facts, however, David Huerta, president of the California chapter of Service Employees International Union, last Friday, traded on the full faith and credit of his position to join those violently protesting a legal raid at a Los Angeles worksite by officials from the U.S. Department of Immigration and Customs Enforcement.
He was subsequently arrested for trying to physically block a vehicle trying to enter the property.
Again, Huerta made no attempt to distance himself and his actions from his role as SEIU's California director. To the contrary, he first made sure to don his purple SEIU T-shirt in order to make clear to everyone that he considers obstructing law enforcement one of his legitimate job responsibilities.
Even more brazenly, his own SEIU affiliates in California have used member dues to support at least one group spearheading the protests — the Coalition for Humane Immigration Rights — and to finance the informal 'immigration rapid response' network that has been equally at the center, and in which SEIU itself also participates.
And rather than disavow Huerta's irresponsible, illegal behavior, state and national leftists quickly circled the wagons around Huerta. After all, SEIU California is a major funder of liberal causes and candidates in California.
Syndicated columnist Kurt Schlicter, shrewdly noted this week that the scenario 'provides (the Trump administration) an opportunity to defund the government support to (non-governmental organizations) that launder government money to fund this kind of violence.'
They could start with Huerta's union.
SEIU California and its affiliates siphon millions of dollars a year from Medicaid by confiscating dues from thousands of Californians participating in a federal program that pays a modest subsidy in exchange for providing in-home care for an elderly or low-income client.
Because they work at home, usually looking after a loved one, the union representing the caregivers — many of whom don't even realize they are union members — has relatively little to do. But that doesn't stop Huerta's organization from seizing 3 percent of their annual wages — among the highest dues rates in the country.
In a very real sense, Medicaid is therefore bankrolling the protests in Los Angeles. Here's a thought: Instead of arresting Huerta and the other lawbreaking protestors, why not just cut off their source of funding by prohibiting unions from plundering Medicaid?
Hundreds of thousands of government employees all over the country have exercised their First Amendment right to opt out of union membership and dues since it was affirmed in 2018 by the U.S. Supreme Court.
One of the primary factors behind this movement is widespread anger over unions that use confiscated dues money to promote a radical political agenda instead of representing the legitimate workplace concerns of their members.
SEIU-affiliated care providers in the Golden State need to ask themselves how Huerta's embarrassing spectacle helps enhance their pay, benefits and working conditions.
It doesn't. It simply reinforces what's been obvious for years: The welfare of their rank and file hasn't been a priority for public employee unions in decades, assuming it ever was.
Modern government-employee unions like SEIU exist almost exclusively to fund the failed policies of the left with workers' hard-earned dues dollars; workers who are increasingly fed up with it.
It isn't just worksites overrun by violent agitators that are burning while labor icons like Huerta fiddle. It is also their fading hopes of ever being taken seriously or being handed political power again.
Aaron Withe is CEO of the Freedom Foundation, a national nonprofit government union watchdog organization.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Newsweek
a minute ago
- Newsweek
White House Says Slavery is Being Taught Wrong, Should Not Be So Negative
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Lindsey Halligan, the White House official leading a review of the Smithsonian Institution, argued you "can't really talk about slavery honestly unless you talk about hope and progress" during a Newsmax appearance on Wednesday. Halligan, a special assistant to the president, said she had written to the Smithsonian "asking for more information regarding their exhibits" after claiming the group's museums had become "laboratories for political experiments." She said: "It's not about whitewashing, it's about full context. So while slavery is obviously a horrible aspect of our nation's history, you can't really talk about slavery honestly unless you also talk about hope and progress and I think we need to be focusing on the progress that we've made then and we need to stop focusing so much on the lack of progress. "We need to keep moving forward as a country. Our 250th anniversary as a country is coming up next July and we're hoping the Smithsonian and D.C. is beautiful and amazing and a place that all Americans want to come visit during that time." A Smithsonian Institution sign is seen on the National Air and Space Museum on the National Mall on March 28, 2025 in Washington, DC. A Smithsonian Institution sign is seen on the National Air and Space Museum on the National Mall on March 28, 2025 in Washington, DC. Kevin Dietsch/GETTY More to follow


CBS News
a minute ago
- CBS News
FTC sues L.A. Fitness operators for "exceedingly difficult" gym cancellation policies
The Federal Trade Commission on Wednesday sued the operators of the popular gym franchise L.A. Fitness and other gyms for allegedly subjecting members to what it called "exceedingly difficult" cancellation policies. Filed in California federal court, the lawsuit accused Fitness International and Fitness & Sports Clubs of intentionally using complicated cancellation procedures to prevent their customers from ending their gym memberships and other recurring charges. The California-based companies "have illegally charged hundreds of millions of dollars in unwanted recurring fees" as a result, the FTC said in its complaint. Fitness International and Fitness & Sports Clubs run gym chains including L.A. Fitness, Esporta Fitness, City Sports Club and City Studio, according to the FTC, which said they collectively operate more than 600 gym locations and have upwards of 3.7 million members nationwide. "The FTC's complaint describes a scenario that too many Americans have experienced – a gym membership that seems impossible to cancel," said Christopher Mufarrige, the director of the Consumer Protection Bureau, in a statement released by the trade commission. "Tens of thousands of LA Fitness customers reported difficulties – cancellation was often restricted to specific times or required speaking to specific managers who were often not present or available." Both companies offer gym memberships for fees as low as $30 per month and as high as $299 per month, and require customers to pay for the first and last month of their memberships upfront before incurring monthly dues and annual fees, the FTC said. In its complaint, the commission detailed "restrictive" and confusing cancellation requirements, with an in-person process that's difficult to access being one method, and a mail-in process being another. "Each of these cancellation methods is opaque, complicated, and demanding—far from simple," the complaint said. "In particular, Defendants have not adequately disclosed how to cancel when consumers are signing up for their memberships and have presented different, often contradictory, cancellation requirements during sign up, in membership agreements, and on the Defendants' websites." Fitness International addressed the lawsuit in a statement, saying "the allegations are without merit" and its leadership was "disappointed that the FTC has chosen to pursue this complaint." "It is important to note that most of our memberships, and all of our personal training memberships, are purchased in person at our club locations," said Jill Hill, the president of club operations at Fitness International, in the statement. Hill said the company also complied with the FTC's now-void "click-to-cancel" rule that aimed to make it easier for consumers to cancel recurring subscriptions and memberships. Although the rule did not take effect, Hill said Fitness International has maintained an online program for members to cancel their subscriptions, in addition to the in-person and mail-in options. "Our company works diligently to comply with all health club state laws regarding membership cancellations and to offer at a minimum every cancellation method specifically required by each state," Hill said. "Over the years, the company has taken many steps to improve its enrollment and cancellation processes."


New York Post
30 minutes ago
- New York Post
Trump vows US ban on wind and solar projects as energy bills soar: ‘Days of stupidity are over'
President Donald Trump declared war on renewable energy Tuesday, vowing the federal government will block new wind and solar projects while electricity bills across America skyrocket at twice the rate of inflation. 'Any State that has built and relied on WINDMILLS and SOLAR for power are seeing RECORD BREAKING INCREASES IN ELECTRICITY AND ENERGY COSTS. THE SCAM OF THE CENTURY!' Trump wrote in a Truth Social post. 'We will not approve wind or farmer destroying Solar. The days of stupidity are over in the USA!!! MAGA'. Advertisement 4 Trump declared war on renewable energy, vowing the federal government will block new wind and solar projects. He didn't mention that surging electricity demand from AI and data centers is a key driver behind soaring bills. AFP via Getty Images 4 'We will not approve wind or farmer destroying Solar. The days of stupidity are over in the USA!!! MAGA,' Trump wrote on Truth Social. @realDonaldTrump/TruthSocial The fiery proclamation comes as American households face brutal electricity price hikes. So far this year, electricity prices have risen between 5% and 9% — with some states and metro areas facing even higher increases. Advertisement Maine residents saw bills explode 36.3% higher, while Connecticut ratepayers absorbed an 18.4% spike and Utah families faced a 15.2% increases. The Energy Information Administration forecasts electricity prices will climb 13% from 2022 to 2025 — the fastest pace in decades. The average American household's annual bill is expected to rise by about $219 in 2025 versus 2022, to around $1,900/year. Advertisement Surging electricity demand from AI and data centers is a key driver behind soaring bills, along with aging grid infrastructure that utilities are modernizing and passing costs to consumers. Rising natural gas prices — used for power generation — add more upward pressure on rates. 4 Trump didn't mention that surging electricity demand from AI and data centers is a key driver behind soaring bills. Soonthorn – Trump's renewable energy crackdown has already delivered devastating blows to the industry. Advertisement On July 4, he signed into law the 'One Big Beautiful Bill' that kills the popular 30% federal solar tax credit for homeowners. The newly enacted law gives Americans just months to install residential solar systems before losing thousands in tax breaks. His administration also froze the $7 billion Solar for All program, a Biden-era initiative that sought to make solar power accessible to low-income Americans. Trump also slammed the brakes on new wind and solar permits on federal land. Offshore wind leasing got the axe entirely. Trump's Commerce Department escalated the renewable energy offensive in August by extending and increasing tariffs on wind turbines and components. Wind turbines now face a punishing 50% tariff rate across 407 new categories. 4 Trump also slammed the brakes on new wind and solar permits on federal land. Offshore wind leasing got the axe entirely. Thomas – Advertisement The administration has also imposed strict new permitting requirements for wind farms, causing delays, permit freezes and outright project cancellations. High-profile casualties include Idaho's Lava Ridge Wind Project and New Jersey's Atlantic Shores development. Projects that already received approval can still be reviewed or revoked under the new rules. Advertisement Trump consistently brands wind and solar as 'expensive' and 'unreliable,' arguing government subsidies burden taxpayers and drive up energy costs. But the renewable energy industry warns these policy reversals threaten thousands of jobs and could slow clean energy growth just as demand explodes from data centers, electric vehicles and artificial intelligence.