Ohio property tax repeal campaign preparing to collect signatures
In a short meeting, the Ohio Ballot Board signed off on a proposed constitutional amendment abolishing property taxes in the state. The only question before the board was whether the proposal contains one or multiple amendments.
Supporters contend lawmakers have been unwilling or unable to make significant enough changes as property taxes climb. But critics warn eliminating that revenue stream could cripple important services like schools and first responders.
SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
The day after the ballot board meeting, Beth Blackmarr described her mood as 'busy.'
'Busy, busy, busy,' she said, 'I mean, here we go — we've got to hit the ground running.'
Blackmarr is part of the organization Citizens for Property Tax Reform which is leading the repeal campaign. With the ballot board's decision, the group is now able to start gathering signatures to appear on the ballot.
To go before voters, they'll need 10% of the electoral turnout from the last governor's race (just shy of 415,000). Additionally, in 44 of Ohio's counties, they'll need signatures from at least 5% of the governor's race turnout. In practice, campaigns turn in hundreds of thousands more signatures than necessary to make up for any rejections.
Blackmarr said they want to start collecting 'as soon as humanly possible,' and work could begin as early as next week. Asked whether they'd work with paid circulators, she just laughed.
'Many of us are youthful at heart, but senior citizens that are just really working out of our pockets,' she said. 'There's no big money backing this at all. It's all volunteer.'
What would happen if Ohio abolished property taxes?
Blackmarr argued Ohio's current property tax system is broken. She points to other states like New Jersey and Texas that have far more generous initiatives to keep seniors, vets and the disabled in their homes.
'You can't have senior citizens who have paid for their homes — fully paid for — having to move out because they can't afford property tax,' she insisted.
Blackmarr contends those kinds of protections are low-hanging fruit. Lawmakers have had continual warnings and 'ample opportunity' to act. Instead, she argued, they've dithered with changes at the margins.
'I suspect it's because they built a wobbly tower of property tax law over these decades,' she said, 'and they're afraid to pull one of the blocks out, because they're afraid the whole thing's gonna come tumbling down.'
That 'tumbling down' is exactly the concern many critics voice about the plan. The most recent annual report from the Ohio Department of Taxation puts 2023 property tax collections at about $18.5 billion. That's an enormous amount of funding to just disappear. It's roughly double the amount reported for state income taxes, and a billion more than Ohio's sales and use tax.
Spread evenly, it would cost every single Ohioan more than $1,500 to make up that gap in funding.
Blackmarr argued repeal will just force lawmakers 'to come up with an alternative.' But that's a big ask — particularly for Republicans allergic to tax increases.
Still she's right about dramatic increases in property taxes. The same Department of Taxation report shows assessed values climbing almost 40% in five years while tax collections have risen more than 21%.
In a statement following the ballot board decision, House minority leader Allison Russo said the proposal 'clearly demonstrates frustration by Ohioans on this issue' and blamed lawmakers for failing to act.
'However, this particular initiative concerns me because while it eliminates the property tax, it doesn't explain how we'll replace the funds that support police, fire departments, public education, and other critical services,' she said.
Russo argued Democrats have signed on to bipartisan legislation providing direct relief but Republican leaders haven't prioritized those bills.
Blackmarr acknowledged that as their campaign gains steam, pressure will grow on lawmakers to pass legislation or propose their own ballot measure to undercut their efforts.
'At the end of the day it goes to the voters,' she said. 'They have to make the decision for themselves.'
And if lawmakers' intervention means voters have to choose between competing visions, that's just fine with Blackmarr.
'Wouldn't that be nice, you know?' she said.
Follow Ohio Capital Journal Reporter Nick Evans on X or on Bluesky.
SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Yahoo
2 days ago
- Yahoo
Amendments to protect 'equal rights,' reverse Ohio Constitution's ban on gay marriage given OK
Aug. 11—There will be two new citizen-initiated amendments circulating around Ohio following a state board's decision to split a proposed initiative guaranteeing equal rights under the law and formally remove the Ohio Constitution's gay marriage ban into separate amendments. The initial proposal was cleared by Ohio Attorney General Dave Yost last month, pending further clearance from the Ohio Ballot Board, which has the responsibility to determine whether proposed constitutional amendment initiatives contain one or more proposals. On July 9, the board determined the organizer's petition contained "two distinct proposed amendments: (1) a proposed constitutional amendment that would create more than a dozen protected classes, and (2) a proposed constitutional amendment related specifically to marriage." Now that the proposal has been split in two, organizers officially have the state's permission to begin collecting signatures, Yost announced Friday. The first proposed amendment, titled the "Ohio Equal Rights Amendment," would amend the state's constitution to expressly forbid the state from abridging someone's rights under the law "on account of race, color, creed or religion, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity or expression regardless of sex assigned at birth, pregnancy status, genetic information, disease status, age, disability, recovery status, familial status, ancestry, national origin, or military and veteran status." The second proposal would strike out the portion of Ohio's constitution which says: "Only a union between one man and one woman may be a marriage valid in or recognized by this state and its political subdivisions." It would replace that text with a mandate that the state "shall recognize and treat equally all marriages regardless of race, sex, or gender identity." The amendment would, however, give individual clergy the option to refuse to "solemnize" marriages of their choosing. Ohio has recognized same-sex marriages since the U.S. Supreme Court's 2015 ruling in Obergefell v. Hodges, an Ohio-based case that directly struck down the state's constitutional and legal bans on gay marriage and guaranteed it as a federal right. Yost's office explained that, in order to get these proposals on a statewide ballot, petitioners will now need to collect "signatures from registered voters equal to at least 10% of the vote cast in the most recent gubernatorial election." "Those signatures must come from voters in at least 44 of Ohio's 88 counties, and for each of those counties the number must equal at least 5% of the vote cast in the most recent gubernatorial election," a Friday press release from Yost's office reads. ------ For more stories like this, sign up for our Ohio Politics newsletter. It's free, curated, and delivered straight to your inbox every Thursday evening. Avery Kreemer can be reached at 614-981-1422, on X, via email, or you can drop him a comment/tip with the survey below. Solve the daily Crossword


Fox News
6 days ago
- Fox News
Don't California my Ohio: Cincinnati mob attack shows state is heading in a dangerous direction
As an Ohioan, I've watched with horror as my home state, the heart of the heartland faces a crisis ripped straight from California's playbook. On July 26, 2025, a mob in downtown Cincinnati brutally attacked four people including Holly, a single mom now suffering from severe brain trauma. Violent crimes like these are a wakeup call to our national conscience. "Don't California My State" has become a national warning, but even in Republican strongholds like Ohio, weak local leadership has invited in California-style chaos fostering victim-shaming and mob rule. It's time to reject this betrayal and restore law and order. The viral footage from Cincinnati's Fourth and Elm is chilling as four victims attacked by a mob while 100 bystanders watched, some filming, and only one calling 911. Holly, celebrating a friend's birthday stepped in to help someone being assaulted and was knocked unconscious. Her life has changed forever. And instead of leadership, Councilwoman Victoria Parks shamelessly claimed online that the victims "begged for that beat down." This kind of victim-shaming is pulled straight from California's soft-on-crime script where leaders deflect blame instead of jailing violent offenders. Parks' words aren't only heartless but represent a complete collapse of moral and civic responsibility. The Cincinnati crisis is a direct result of the Democrat-led policy failures that began in 2020. Soft on crime policies emboldened criminals and endangered communities. Cities like Los Angeles, Minneapolis and now Cincinnati are paying the price. And even in Republican-led states like Ohio, Texas and Florida, we're not immune when local leaders import this failed ideology. Cincinnati's police force has been gutted by nearly 200 officers due to the "defund the police" movement. Democrat Mayor Aftab Pureval was vacationing in Canada as the attack went viral, issuing a weak response only after immense public pressure and outrage days later. His inaction mirrors California's Proposition 47, which downgraded retail thefts to misdemeanors and fueled a wave of retail crime. Now Ohio is experiencing the same pattern of complacency from weak budgets, and understaffed police departments to a justice system that coddles criminals. As Republican Ohio Senator Bernie Moreno and Republican Ohio gubernatorial candidate Vivek Ramaswamy recently warned, Democrat policies are turning our cities into war zones. Beyond the leadership failures, the silence of nearly 100 bystanders with only one calling 911 reveals a total breakdown of public trust. Weak leadership has left citizens feeling powerless. In California, lax enforcement normalized shoplifting; in Cincinnati, it's normalized mob violence. Mayor Pureval's delayed response and Parks' shameful victim-blaming send a dangerous message: criminals won't face consequences. Even in a red state like Ohio, local Democrat leaders are importing this "Californication" and abandoning the safety and justice we once took for granted. This isn't just about pointing fingers, it's a call to action. Cities like Philadelphia, Minneapolis, Denver and New York saw homicides decline in 2025 after local lawmakers voted to increase police budgets despite pressure from local activists. Ohio must follow suit by fully funding law enforcement, empowering prosecutors to lock up violent offenders, and rejecting leaders who excuse crime. The six suspects in the Cincinnati attack facing charges of felonious assault and aggravated rioting must face real justice and not leniency. And Parks' disgraceful remarks demand accountability; she should either resign or be removed. Any elected official who mocks and shames victims of violent crime has failed the very people they were elected to serve and does not belong in public office. As an attorney and proud Ohioan, I'm done with the excuses. Holly's brain trauma is a direct result of failed leadership. We deserve safe streets, where moms can celebrate and businesses don't fear the next mob. We're not California yet but without action, Cincinnati's chaos will become America's new norm. Holly's story and the silence of 99 bystanders should serve as America's wake-up call.


Boston Globe
24-07-2025
- Boston Globe
JD Vance isn't running for president yet, but don't tell that to Democrats eyeing 2028
In an additional post, Newsom told Vance to 'enjoy your family time' as 'the families you're tearing apart certainly won't.' 'Had a great time, thanks,' the vice president fired back nonchalantly. The spat encapsulated an emerging dynamic on the national political stage. More and more, high-profile Democrats —especially those who could run for the presidency in 2028 — see Vance as a particularly fitting foil for their broader attacks against President Trump and his Republican Party. Get Starting Point A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday. Enter Email Sign Up The 40-year old Ohioan is, for now, the most obvious heir apparent to Trump as the GOP standard-bearer in 2028. He is a leading presence on the party's big money circuit: on Tuesday, he traveled to Nantucket for a GOP fund-raiser where tickets ran for $100,000 each. Advertisement Vance's prominence, along with his penchant for picking fights with political rivals, makes him an appealing target to Democratic hopefuls looking to command attention and build their own brands. In other words, by attempting to define Vance ahead of 2028, they might be able to further define themselves to voters in the process. Representative Ro Khanna, another California Democrat with presidential ambitions, has recently tried to pressure to Vance over the metastasizing Jeffrey Epstein controversy surrounding Trump, who had been an acquaintance of the late financier before having a falling out with him. The administration is facing blowback across the political spectrum for not following through on promises to release new information about the convicted sex trafficker's activities and clients. Advertisement Recently, Khanna resurfaced the vice president's 2021 comments raising the conspiracy theory that Epstein did not kill himself in prison and lamenting that 'now we just don't talk about it.' 'What changed, @JDVance?' asked Khanna on X. Meanwhile, a number of Democrats mentioned as 2028 contenders pointed to Vance's tiebreaking vote that advanced Republicans' 'Big Beautiful Bill' in the Senate earlier this month. When Vance visited Pennsylvania last week to tout the bill, Governor Josh Shapiro put out a sharp statement urging voters in the state to not forget 'he was the deciding vote on the federal budget that will do real damage while ballooning our national deficit.' Former transportation secretary Pete Buttigieg and Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez of New York both said Vance was the 'deciding vote to cut Medicaid.' Other Democrats have continued to take shots at Vance's political brand. During a visit to the early primary state of South Carolina, Governor Andy Beshear of Kentucky talked about his electoral success in his state's extremely conservative eastern region, which features heavily in Vance's famous family memoir 'Hillbilly Elegy.' 'That includes Breathitt County in Appalachia, which is the county JD Vance pretends he's from,' quipped Beshear. (Vance spent time as a child in the Kentucky county, but primarily was raised outside Cincinnati.) Advertisement But Vance's position as No. 2 is an unusual one. Though Trump was just elected, it is his second term, and the 2026 midterms will usher in his lame-duck status, along with the start of the 2028 race in earnest. The 2028 presidential campaign, of course, might as well be an eternity away in political time. Democrats who are prominent now could fade away, and Vance's own stock could rise or fall before then. He has not announced any decision publicly on running for president, and Trump has not said whether he would endorse him if he did. Some of Vance's allies on Capitol Hill, however, believe Democrats are attacking him already because he is the strongest contender to succeed Trump. 'JD Vance, he is not just the front-runner, he is going to be the nominee,' said Senator Jim Banks, an Indiana Republican. 'Democrats know it.' Vance, said Republican Senator Eric Schmitt of Missouri, is 'a very important voice in our party.' 'So I think they're all sort of climbing all over themselves trying to gain some sort of attention,' Schmitt, a close ally of the White House, said of Democrats. 'Who can be the sort of chief resister? There's a bunch of tactics. I just think the problem for the Democrats right now is they really don't have a message that resonates.' For Vance, the attacks might be welcome, in that they further elevate him as a bogeyman to Democrats in a GOP environment where the most valuable currency is increasingly the hatred of liberals. Conservative media have consistently covered Vance's spats with Democrats; Fox News praised him for 'trolling' Newsom over his posts about Disneyland. A spokesperson for Vance did not respond to a request for comment. Advertisement Some Democrats believe Republicans' sprawling domestic policy law will prove to be deeply unpopular and that failing to link it to Vance would be a missed opportunity. 'I think it's important that he doesn't get a free ride on that,' said Senator Tina Smith, a Minnesota Democrat, who is vice chair of the party's official arm for Senate races. 'It's pretty hard to predict in American politics what's going to happen next month, let alone what's going to happen in 2028,' she said, 'but he's a young guy who is going to be around for a long time.' Some Democrats see value in incorporating Vance into their political messaging whether the 2028 race includes him or not. The party base is hungry for a new generation of leaders to aggressively counter Trump right now, said Andrew Mamo, a Democratic strategist who is advising several Senate candidates in key states. 'JD Vance is a great foil because if you punch him, oftentimes he'll punch back, and you can get in a boxing match,' Mamo said. 'That's what Democrats who are trying to capture national Democratic attention want to do.' Indeed, Vance often responds to attacks on social media. He appears to spend considerable time on X in particular, where he has more than 4.4 million followers, sometimes even engaging with low-profile accounts in addition to prominent politicians. In February, Khanna earned the most aggressive pushback of any of Vance's would-be Democratic rivals when he criticized the vice president for defending a staffer in Elon Musk's Department of Government Efficiency who had been fired for making racist statements targeting Indian Americans. Advertisement Khanna, who is of Indian descent, asked Vance on X if he would tell the staffer to apologize, 'for the sake of both of our kids.' (Vance's wife, Usha, is of Indian descent, and their children are mixed-race.) In response, Vance fumed that Khanna was engaging in 'emotional blackmail over a kid's social media post,' and added, 'you disgust me.' Speaking to the Globe on Tuesday, fresh off a swing through South Carolina himself, Khanna framed his focus on Vance in broader terms, saying he believed the 2028 GOP nomination would be 'wildly contested.' 'He's trying to make an intellectual argument for Trumpism, and I think regardless of whether he has future ambitions or not, I would still focus on taking on the arguments that he's making to push back against his conception of America, his conception of conservatism,' said Khanna. 'I think he's the one person who's trying to give an intellectual veneer to Trumpism and my temperament is to push for ideas, and so it's a foil against what he's doing.' Tal Kopan of the Globe staff contributed to this report. Sam Brodey can be reached at