CRPF to hold fresh trials for procurement of 200 sniper rifles after intervention by Delhi HC
While SSS Defence cleared the 100-metre, 800-metre and 1,000-metre field trials, it failed in the 400-metre.
Sources in the defence and security establishment said Indian small arms manufacturer SSS Defence challenged the tendering process in court after two other competitors used superior ammunition than the one specified by the CRPF. According to the petition filed by SSS Defence, CRPF had issued a tender for procurement of 200 sniper rifles, along with 20,000 numbers of .338 Lapua Magnum ball/lock base ammunition.
New Delhi: The Central Reserve Police Force (CRPF) is set to conduct a retrial for the procurement of 200 sniper rifles and 20,000 ammunition following intervention of the Delhi High Court, ThePrint has learnt.
It was then revealed that while SSS Defence used ammunition specified by CRPF, its two competitors used Hollow Point Boat Tail (HPBT) ammunition—which provides more stability and better accuracy—in the field trials.
Use of HPBT rounds provided the other two bidders, PLR Systems (a joint venture between Adani Group and Israel Weapon Industries) and ICOMM (a MEIL group company in collaboration with CARACAL from UAE), an unfair advantage, argued SSS Defence before the Delhi High Court.
On 8 April, the high court interim order noted that CRPF offered to hold a retrial as per the requirements of the tender, and quashed SSS Defence's disqualification from the process. The three bidders for the contract had all failed various parts of the two field trials held in January and February of this year, however, SSS Defence was the only bidder to be disqualified.
The first field trial held in Pune in January, saw the SSS Defence sniper rifle clear the 400-metre test, while PLR failed. However, given that the trial was inconclusive, it was decided to hold a second field trial in February.
It was after the second trials were concluded, that SSS Defence noticed the difference in the ammunition used by the two other bidders and at the end of February raised the violation of tender norms with the authorities. This was followed up with meetings with CRPF officials. But at the end of March, SSS Defence received a notice that their bid was rejected during the technical evaluation stage of the bid, without any reasoning given.
Subsequently, SSS Defence approached Delhi High Court, which in an order dated 8 April, quashed rejection of its bid, while CRPF submitted to the court that it would hold a retrial for procurement of 200 sniper rifles.
SSS Defence is a Bengaluru based small arms manufacturer which last year bagged and fulfilled a contract for the export of .338 Lapua Magnum calibre sniper rifle to a friendly foreign country.
It was the first time an Indian manufacturer exported sniper rifles to a foreign country.
Last year, the CEO of the Bengaluru-based small arms manufacturer in a rare instance, spoke out against the Indian Army's fresh order for 73,000 SIG 716 G2 rifles from the US.
Also Read: Indians prefer tech tie-ups to atmanirbharta, US & Israel as partners—Takshashila Institution survey
Procurement process in a nutshell
The original tender was floated in September 2024, with a clear requirement for 200 sniper rifles, along with a day scope and 20,000 rounds of the .338 Lapua Magnum ball/lock base ammunition.
In December 2024, SSS Defence submitted two rifles along with ammunition as samples to the CRPF. Field trials were scheduled for January 2025, in Pune. But the tests were inconclusive, which led to a second set of field trials organised for February 2025.
The second field trials were held in Gurugram at the end of February, following which SSS Defence noticed discrepancies in ammunition used by the other bidders. Despite raising it with the authorities at the end of March, it was rejected by CRPF during the technical evaluation stage.
On 8 April, the Delhi High Court ordered the quashing of the rejection, and ruled that the process would be held again and completed within 45 days.
(Edited by Amrtansh Arora)
Also Read: Kerala Police has its eyes on Indo-Russian AK-203, set to be first police force to procure it
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Mint
17 minutes ago
- Mint
India slaps anti-dumping duties on key chemical imports from China, EU, Japan, and Switzerland
New Delhi: The government has imposed anti-dumping duties on imports of Vitamin-A Palmitate and Insoluble Sulphur from China, Japan, Switzerland and the European Union (EU), aiming to shield domestic manufacturers from low-priced imports that regulators say are hurting local industry. According to a finance ministry notification issued late on Friday, the five-year duties follow investigations by the Directorate General of Trade Remedies (DGTR), which found that both substances were being exported to India at unfairly low prices, below cost or fair market value, and were undercutting Indian producers. These products are critical inputs for sectors such as pharmaceuticals, food, cosmetics and tyre manufacturing. For Vitamin-A Palmitate—used in fortified foods, nutraceuticals and pharma formulations—the DGTR found 'material injury' to domestic producers due to large-scale dumping from China, the EU and Switzerland. The compound, widely used in small dosages, continues to be largely import-dependent in India. Effective immediately, duties will range from $0.87 to $20.87 per kg. The highest duty has been imposed on Chinese exporters other than Shangyu NHU BioChem Co. Ltd., which will face a lower rate of $14.95/kg. Swiss producer DSM Nutritional Products Ltd will attract a duty of $0.87/kg, while other Swiss exporters will face $8.2/kg. A flat rate of $11.09/kg will apply to imports from the EU. Vitamin-A Palmitate in the strength of 1.6 MIU/Gm, used for animal feed, has been excluded from the levy. India imported $48.6 million worth of Vitamin-A Palmitate in FY25, with the bulk of the shipments coming from China and Europe, according to commerce ministry data. While the move comes as a relief for domestic Vitamin-A makers, industry players flagged India's broader dependence on imports for this compound, which is crucial for nutritional and pharmaceutical applications. 'While the anti-dumping duty provides protection to domestic manufacturers of the compound, it could raise input costs for drug makers in the short term, especially those relying on imports from Switzerland and China,' said Yogendra Sharma, a drug manufacturer. 'However, the price impact is expected to be manageable given that Vitamin-A is used in small dosages and accounts for a minor fraction of total formulation cost.' 'With global supply chains realigning, India is now far more proactive in using WTO-compliant instruments to protect its domestic industry. The Vitamin-A Palmitate case is another example of this assertiveness,' said Manish Kr Shubhay, a multidisciplinary dispute resolution expert and Partner at The Percept Law Offices. The anti-dumping duties are payable in Indian currency, based on the exchange rate notified by the Revenue Department on the date of filing the bill of entry. In a related notification, the government also slapped five-year anti-dumping duties on imports of Insoluble Sulphur from China and Japan, used primarily by tyre manufacturers to improve rubber vulcanization. DGTR's investigation found that exporters from both countries were dumping the product at depressed prices, adversely affecting profitability and pricing power of Indian producers. Depending on the exporter, the duties range from $259 to $358 per metric tonne. Chinese imports will face a flat $307/MT levy. Among Japanese exporters, Shikoku Chemicals will be charged $259/MT, while all others will attract the highest rate of $358/MT.
Hindustan Times
19 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Indian techie claims toxic manager blamed his father's death for project delay: ‘That was the final straw'
A techie's post on resigning from his toxic workplace has shocked many online after he claimed that one of his managers blamed his personal life, including his recent wedding and the death of his father, for project delays. Posting anonymously on Reddit, the employee detailed his experience working at the "highly toxic huge Indian company" since 2022, when he joined as a fresher on an ₹8.5 lakh CTC. The techie claimed that even after doing meaningful work for a year, his promotion was blocked by a senior manager. 'I wasn't among the people constantly trying to please him. I focused on delivering results and improving the product," he added. Unhappy with how he was treated, he resigned but was convinced by one of his seniors to stay on, promising him a 55% hike in the next appraisal cycle in April 2025. The condition was verbal, not formalised in writing. 'Yes, I know I should've gotten it in writing. But I trusted the person involved," he said. However, when appraisals finally arrived, he received only a 37% raise. Upset over this betrayal, the techie revealed that his breaking point came during a private conversation with his team lead. In the span of a few months, he had gotten engaged, married, and tragically lost his father. During the one-on-one, her manager reportedly told her, 'You should have resigned around your wedding. Do you even realise how much your marriage delayed the work? Because of your father's situation and the leave you took, my timeline commitment couldn't be fulfilled." Stunned by the statement, he hit back: 'Please watch what you're saying and think before you speak. Choose your next words carefully.' The techie revealed he resigned soon after, and even in a tough job market, he said that he knew he had taken the right call. His post has resonated with many in the Indian tech space. "I know how it is to be under a toxic person. You stood up for yourself, and we are proud of that. And one day you will be glad that you did. You will surely get into some good company," said one of them. Another wrote, "Having worked in corporate for years, I don't even know how such people continue to exist. Going back on commitment for agreed upon raise is very common, but it would be very rare for someone to even say a fraction of what your manager told you regarding your father's situation and your marriage."
Time of India
31 minutes ago
- Time of India
Trump Administration Coal Mine Expansion: Trump administration approves coal mine expansion to boost Asia exports, ET Manufacturing
Advt Advt The US Interior Department approved a plan by Signal Peak Energy to expand coal mining, providing exports for Japan and South Korea, the agency said on Friday, as it responded to President Donald Trump's energy-emergency approval authorizes the Montana-based coal company to recover 22.8 million metric tons of federal coal and 34.5 million tons of adjacent non-federal coal and extend the life of the Bull Mountains mine by nine Secretary Doug Burgum, who is also co-chair of Trump's Energy Dominance Council, said unlocking more federal coal enables the US to bolster ties with allies abroad."President Trump's leadership in declaring a national energy emergency is allowing us to act decisively, cut bureaucratic delays and secure America's future through energy independence and strategic exports," he January 20, Trump declared an energy emergency to speed permitting, roll back environmental protections and withdraw the US from an international pact to fight climate Peak had initially sent its plan to expand its mining operations to the Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement in 2020, but it has been under federal review and subject to litigation since Interior Department completed the environmental impact statement for the mine expansion according to its new policy to speed such reviews to a maximum of 28 this week joined Energy Secretary Chris Wright and Environmental Protection Agency Administrator Lee Zeldin in Alaska to promote an LNG project, as well as other energy exports destined for Asian Bull Mountains mine in Montana, located in Musselshell and Yellowstone counties, employs over 250 workers and primarily supplies Japan and South groups have tried to block the expansion of the mine over concerns about its water use and greenhouse gas emissions."It's utter hogwash that we have to sacrifice the climate, water resources, wildlife and area ranching operations in order to send coal overseas to be burned by foreign countries," Anne Hedges, executive director of the Montana Environmental Information Center, said in a statement.
