logo
Indian top court orders round-up of tens of thousands of stray dogs in Delhi

Indian top court orders round-up of tens of thousands of stray dogs in Delhi

Straits Times3 days ago
Sign up now: Get ST's newsletters delivered to your inbox
Data presented in India's Parliament showed more than 3.7 million cases of dog bites and 54 suspected human deaths from rabies in 2024.
NEW DELHI – India's Supreme Court on Aug 11 ordered the removal of tens of thousands of stray dogs from the capital, citing public safety concerns after a surge in dog bites.
India is home to millions of stray dogs, and
deadly attacks – particularly on children and the elderly – are regularly reported by Delhi's media.
At least 60,000 stray dogs live on the streets of Delhi, according to India's Livestock Census of 2012, the most recent data available.
Some suggest that number to be now far higher, with large rival dog packs patrolling parks and residential neighbourhoods across the city.
The country accounts for more than a third of global rabies deaths, according to the World Health Organisation, a crisis exacerbated by a lack of sterilisation programmes and legal restrictions on canine culling.
The court asked the city authorities to set up dog shelters within eight weeks, and maintain daily records of the canines captured.
'What is important, and without which the entire exercise would (be) futile – not a single stray dog should be released,' it said. This applies to Delhi and its satellite suburbs, a megacity home to some 30 million people.
Top stories
Swipe. Select. Stay informed.
Singapore Keppel to sell M1's telco business to Simba for $1.43b, says deal expected to benefit consumers
Business Singtel, StarHub shares fall after announcement of Keppel's M1 sale
Singapore ST Explains: Who owns Simba, the company that is buying M1?
Business Lower-wage retail workers to receive up to 6% pay bump from Sept 1
Singapore PM Wong's National Day Rally to begin at 6.45pm on Aug 17
Singapore ST Explains: What is Vers and which HDB estates could the scheme be rolled out in?
Singapore Hyflux sought other funding sources for Tuaspring as it had problems getting bank loans: Prosecution
Opinion Trump's trade deals have one giant contradiction
The court warned of action against animal activists who obstruct the removal of dogs.
It also ordered a 24-hour helpline to be set up to report dog bites and officials must publicise locations where anti-rabies vaccines are available.
Data tabled in the Indian Parliament showed more than 3.7 million cases of dog bites and 54 suspected human deaths from rabies in 2024.
Other estimates peg the number to be nearly twice as high, with Delhi alone accounting for roughly 2,000 cases of dog bites every day.
In middle class neighbourhoods, many of Delhi's strays are beloved by their residents despite lacking formal owners, with some dogs clothed in special canine jackets to keep warm during the winter.
But they are also a hazard to humans, with the Indian media regularly reporting on the mauling of young children by aggressive dog packs. AFP
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

VinFast to spin off R&D assets in 39.8 trillion dong deal with founder
VinFast to spin off R&D assets in 39.8 trillion dong deal with founder

Business Times

time9 minutes ago

  • Business Times

VinFast to spin off R&D assets in 39.8 trillion dong deal with founder

[HANOI] Vietnamese electric vehicle maker VinFast Auto announced plans to spinoff part of its research and development unit into a newly formed company, which will then be sold to the automaker's founder in a deal worth about US$1.5 billion, according to a filing. The newly-formed company, Novatech Research and Development, will be carved out from VinFast Trading and Production (VFTP) and will initially remain a direct subsidiary of VinFast, according to the statement. VinFast will own about 38 per cent stake in Novatech, it added. Novatech will hold assets related to costs of completed research and development projects. After the creation of the new entity, VinFast will sell all of its shares in Novatech to its founder and chief executive officer Pham Nhat Vuong for about 39.8 trillion dong (US$1.5 billion), according to the statement. The transaction 'reflects a further effort by the founder to facilitate VinFast's long-term growth,' the statement said. VFTP will remain a direct subsidiary of VinFast and continue to operate its core EV manufacturing business in Vietnam and conduct future research and development on new products and technologies. Vuong, who is Vietnam's richest man with a US$10.9 billion fortune according to the Bloomberg Billionaires Index, has pumped more than US$2 billion of his own money into VinFast and has said he's willing to support the company until his cash runs out. VinFast earlier this month inaugurated a factory in the Indian state of Tamil Nadu which will have an initial production capacity of 50,000 vehicles a year. It expects to open a plant in Indonesia by October. In 2024, VinFast delivered 97,399 EVs globally and expects to at least double that this year, with 200,000 deliveries in Vietnam. BLOOMBERG

Melania Trump Makes $1 Billion Threat Against Hunter Biden Over Epstein Claim
Melania Trump Makes $1 Billion Threat Against Hunter Biden Over Epstein Claim

International Business Times

timean hour ago

  • International Business Times

Melania Trump Makes $1 Billion Threat Against Hunter Biden Over Epstein Claim

First lady Melania Trump has threatened Hunter Biden with $1 billion notice over what she claims to be his "false, defamatory, disparaging, and inflammatory statements" against her. According to her, he made false claims that serial pedophile Jeffrey Epstein introduced her to US President Donald Trump. Through her attorney, Alejandro Brito, the first lady sent a letter to the former first son and his longtime lawyer, Abbe Lowell. Brito, who serves as litigation counsel for Melania, sent the letter to Hunter on Wednesday (August 6). In the letter, the attorney demanded that Hunter retract the content immediately and issue an apology, or face legal action. "This law firm serves as litigation counsel for The First Lady of the United States of America, Mrs. Melania Trump (hereinafter referred to as "Mrs. Trump"). Please direct all future correspondence relating to this matter to my attention. This correspondence serves as a demand under Florida Statute § 770.011 that you immediately retract the false, defamatory, disparaging, and inflammatory statements made about Mrs. Trump, which are contained in the video published on YouTube on August 5, 2025, titled "Hunter Biden Returns" ("Video"). Failure to comply will leave Mrs. Trump with no choice but to pursue any and all legal rights and remedies available to her to recover the overwhelming financial and reputational harm that you have caused her to suffer," the letter read. X Epstein Claim In the letter obtained by Fox News, Brito highlighted the two statements made by Hunter against the first lady during his interview with Channel 5. The son of the former US President claimed that "Epstein introduced Melania to Trump. The connections are, like, so wide and deep". He also said, "Jeffrey Epstein introduced Melania, that's how Melania and the First Lady and the President met. Really? Epstein made the intro? Yeah, according to Michael Wolff". The attorney further stated that the video featuring "false, disparaging, defamatory, and inflammatory statements" circulated online among "tens of millions of people worldwide". As a result, the first lady suffered "overwhelming financial and reputational harm". The lawyer also stated that the source for Hunter's claims was "serial fabulist Michael Wolff, whose lies were published by The Daily Beast in the article titled 'Melania Trump 'very involved' in Epstein Scandal: Author". "Following receipt of our cease-and-desist demand letter just a week ago, The Daily Beast issued an apology to Mrs. Trump and retracted the false and defamatory statements contained in the article by deleting it in its entirety. Despite this, you have unjustifiably relied upon Mr. Wolff's false, defamatory, disparaging, and inflammatory statements about Mrs. Trump and maliciously elected to republish them," the attorney wrote. X Melania Trump's Threat Against Hunter On behalf of the first lady, the attorney demanded that Hunter immediately remove and retract the video, featuring "false, defamatory, disparaging, misleading, and inflammatory statements" and issue an apology. "If you do not comply with the above by August 7, 2025, at 5:00 p.m. EST, Mrs. Trump will be left with no alternative but to enforce her legal and equitable rights, all of which are expressly reserved and are not waived, including by filing legal action for over $1 billion in damages. You are on notice," the attorney wrote. Though the letter was dated August 6 and the deadline given to young Biden was August 7, the episode of Channel 5 with Andrew Callaghan was available on YouTube as of Thursday (August 14).

Explainer-Can Trump take long-term control of Washington's police?
Explainer-Can Trump take long-term control of Washington's police?

Straits Times

timean hour ago

  • Straits Times

Explainer-Can Trump take long-term control of Washington's police?

Sign up now: Get ST's newsletters delivered to your inbox Protesters hold a banner near the White House, as U.S. President Donald Trump announced he is placing the D.C. Metropolitan Police Department under direct federal control and deploying National Guard troops to Washington, D.C, in Washington D.C., U.S., August 11, 2025. REUTERS/Ken Cedeno U.S. President Donald Trump on Wednesday said he will seek long-term federal control of Washington's police force to crack down on crime in the nation's capital. But Trump can expect a flurry of lawsuits if he tries to do so without Congress's approval. Here is why. WHO CONTROLS DC LAW ENFORCEMENT? The Democratic mayor of Washington, Muriel Bowser, has authority over the city's Metropolitan Police Department. But a federal law from 1973 known as the Home Rule Act allows the president to take control of the MPD for 30 days during an emergency. Trump invoked this provision of the Home Rule Act on Monday, saying in an executive order that there is a "crime emergency" in the city. Bowser has pushed back on Trump's claims of unchecked violence, highlighting that violent crime hit its lowest level in more than three decades last year, according to city data. CAN TRUMP EXTEND HIS CONTROL OF MPD FOR LONGER THAN 30 DAYS? Top stories Swipe. Select. Stay informed. Singapore Jalan Bukit Merah fire: PMD battery could have started fatal blaze, says SCDF Singapore askST: What to do in the event of a fire at home? Singapore 4 housebreaking suspects taken to Bukit Timah crime scene under police escort Asia AirAsia flight from KL to Incheon lands at the wrong airport in South Korea Singapore Reformative training for teen who cheated man of $47k Rolex watch on former stepdad's instructions Opinion Could telco consolidation spell the end of attractive mobile plans? Asia Strong India-Singapore ties key to economic growth amid 'volatile landscape': DPM Gan Singapore From quiet introvert to self-confident student: How this vulnerable, shy teen gets help to develop and discover her strength Trump on Wednesday suggested that he could extend the 30-day federal takeover without congressional approval. 'If it's a national emergency, we can do it without Congress, but we expect to be before Congress very quickly,' Trump said. But legal experts said the law is clear: A presidential takeover is limited to 30 days, unless Congress votes to extend it through a joint resolution. Any legislation to extend Trump's control over the police department would likely fail in the Senate where Democrats can use procedural rules to block most bills. CAN TRUMP 'FEDERALIZE' DC MORE BROADLY? Trump has repeatedly threatened to put DC under full federal control, but that appears very unlikely. The Home Rule Act delegated the day-to-day work of municipal government to the mayor's office and a city council. To exert full federal control of D.C., Trump would need Congress to repeal that law. Such a repeal would require 60 votes in the U.S. Senate, where Trump's Republican Party has a 53-47 advantage. Democrats have been supportive of home rule for DC and are not expected to cross party lines to endorse Trump's vision. WHAT ABOUT THE NATIONAL GUARD AND FEDERAL AGENTS? Trump has broad control over the D.C. National Guard's 2,700 soldiers and airmen. They report directly to the president, unlike counterparts in other states and territories. Trump said on Monday he was deploying 800 National Guard troops to Washington. Trump in recent months has also directed federal law enforcement agencies such as the FBI to increase the police presence in Washington. Trump has broad authority to reallocate federal agency personnel. CAN TRUMP'S ACTIONS IN DC SERVE AS A MODEL FOR OTHER CITIES? Trump has said the federalization of Washington's police force could serve as a model for other U.S. cities. He has previously said he would expand his efforts to other Democratic-run cities such as Chicago that he claims have failed to address crime. But Washington is unique because of the district's legal status and the Home Rule Act provision allowing for a presidential MPD takeover. There is no similar legal authority Trump can cite to take over police departments in other cities. The Tenth Amendment vests in states a police power to provide for the health, safety, and welfare of state citizens. Trump could decide to send the National Guard or other military to support law enforcement in other cities, as he did when he sent 4,000 National Guard troops to Los Angeles to quell protests and support federal immigration enforcement actions. Unlike the D.C. National Guard, which reports directly to the president, each states' National Guard serves as a militia force that answers to their governors except when called into federal service. Trump's decision to take control of the California National Guard was a break from a longstanding tradition against using the military to police civilians within the country. California has sued the Trump administration, alleging the president improperly called the National Guard into service and violated a 19th-century law that generally prevents the military from engaging in domestic law enforcement. The president said the National Guard presence was justified because protests and acts of violence in Los Angeles were "a form of rebellion" that necessitated a military response. A judge heard testimony this week in California's lawsuit, which ultimately seeks a ruling that would return its National Guard troops to state control and a declaration that Trump's action was illegal. REUTERS

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store