logo
Seeking at Least 14% Dividend Yield? Analysts Suggest 2 Dividend Stocks to Buy

Seeking at Least 14% Dividend Yield? Analysts Suggest 2 Dividend Stocks to Buy

This month started with President Trump's tariff announcement sparking worries about trade wars, a weak dollar, and a possible recession. However, since the April 8 low, the S&P 500 has staged a rally, climbing 11%, after the Trump Administration signaled its willingness to de-escalate the tariff competition, and Beijing responded in kind. Add in a Q1 earnings season delivering more upside surprises than expected, and suddenly, optimism is making a comeback.
Stay Ahead of the Market:
Discover outperforming stocks and invest smarter with Top Smart Score Stocks.
Filter, analyze, and streamline your search for investment opportunities using Tipranks' Stock Screener.
It's still too early to call it a full recovery, but if momentum holds, this could turn into a self-sustaining rally, which will offer plenty of opportunities for investors to maximize their income.
One popular way of boosting portfolio income, whether stocks go up or down, is investing in dividend stocks. The best dividend stock offers a combination of reliable payments, high yields, and share price growth – sound attributes for any income stream.
Wall Street analysts are on board, suggesting two strong dividend stocks with yields north of 14%. According to the TipRanks database, both stocks also offer a solid double-digit upside potential over the next year. Let's dive in and take a closer look.
Angel Oak Mortgage (AOMR)
The first stock we'll look at is Angel Oak Mortgage, a real estate investment trust (REIT), whose main business thrust is in the acquisition of first-lien non-QM loans and other mortgage-related assets from the U.S. mortgage market. Through these investments, Angel Oak has built and maintains a portfolio capable of generating attractive risk-adjusted returns for its shareholders, returns that are realized through cash distributions – dividends – combined with capital appreciation. The company's key strength is its ability to maintain these returns across interest rate and credit cycles.
Angel Oak is an externally managed REIT, and is affiliated with the larger company Angel Oak Capital Advisors LLC, an alternative credit manager that counts a vertically integrated mortgage origination platform among its subsidiary assets. Through this connection, Angel Oak Mortgage REIT has connections to all aspects of the mortgage business, from sourcing and acquiring loans, to allocating assets and managing the portfolio. The connection with Angel Oak Capital Advisors provides a key advantage for the mortgage REIT.
As noted, Angel Oak Mortgage REIT is committed to strong capital returns, particularly to the dividend. The company last declared the dividend payment on February 6 of this year and paid it out on February 28, at a rate of 32 cents per common share. At that rate, the dividend annualizes to $1.28 per share and gives a powerful yield of 15%. This most recent declaration marked the 10th quarter in a row for the 32-cent dividend payment.
Angel Oak supports its dividend with sound financial results. The company's last release covered 4Q24, and in that report it showed a top line, the net interest income, of $9.9 million. This was up 20% year-over-year and was in line with the market's expectations. At the bottom line, the company reported a Distributable Earnings of 42 cents — 16 cents per share better than the forecast and more than enough to fully cover the dividend.
For B. Riley analyst Randy Binner the key points here are Angel Oak's high dividend yield and the overall portfolio quality. He writes, 'The dividend yield, plus our implied return to target, sets up a favorable risk-reward in our view. We forecast another good quarter of NII generation and will look for updates on non-QM growth opportunities in light of potential changes at the GSEs. 10-yr Treasury yields moved from 379bps to 457bps in 4Q24, lowering economic book value from $14.02 to $13.10 at YE24. Given that rates moved lower in 1Q25 and the 10-year ended at 421bps, we expect to see some recovery in BVPS…'
'We believe the portfolio has prepayment/refi protection as mortgage rates in the underlying portfolio are weighted towards higher coupons. Delinquency trends were favorable in 4Q24, and we expect that trend to continue in 1Q25, given our view that residential mortgage is among the better credit risk areas, as other areas have seen spread widening,' the analyst added.
These comments support Binner's Buy rating on the stock, while his $12 price target points toward a potential one-year upside of 41%. Together with the dividend yield, the total return on this stock can reach as high as 56% for the coming year. (To watch Binner's track record, click here)
Overall, there are 3 recent analyst reviews on record for Angel Oak Mortgage REIT, and they are unanimously positive for a Strong Buy consensus rating. The shares are currently priced at $8.48 and their $12.17 average price target implies a 43% upside by this time next year. (See AOMR stock forecast)
TXO Energy Partners (TXO)
Next on our list is an energy company, TXO Energy Partners. Like mortgage REITs, energy production firms like TXO have a reputation for delivering strong dividends. TXO earns the income that supports its dividends from the solid hydrocarbon acreage positions in several of the nation's best energy-producing regions. These include the Williston Basin of North Dakota and Montana; the San Juan Basin, straddling the Four Corners; and the famous Permian Basin along the Texas–New Mexico border. The company prioritizes its acreage holdings by several factors, including low geologic risk, low decline rates, and high recoveries, all relative to drilling and completion costs.
This strategy has led TXO to build up a portfolio of profitable plays in both oil and natural gas, capable of generating benefits for the company and returns for shareholders. Company management has focused its land buys to acquire proven oil and gas production locations, in areas with long and well-known records of hydrocarbon generation. The goal is to build an energy portfolio that is more predictable and reliable than the higher-risk unconventional recovery plays.
On the financial side, TXO realized $109.3 million in net cash provided by operating activities during calendar year 2024. That top-line figure provided a solid sum of cash available for distribution: $79.1 million. The total cash available for distribution was more than double the equivalent figure reported at the end of 2023.
Distributions mean dividends, and TXO's last declaration, made on March 4, was for a payment of 61 cents per common share. The dividend was paid out on March 21, and the $2.44 annualized rate provided a yield of 14.5%. This last declaration marked the 8th consecutive quarter that TXO has paid out a common share dividend.
TXO has caught the attention of Stifel analyst Selman Akyol, who sees the solid capital return and low-cost business model as attractive attributes for the company.
'We believe TXO Partners offers investors an attractive investment opportunity given its return of capital framework, which is supported by low production decline rates, low leverage and manageable capex levels. Furthermore, we believe each basin TXO is in presents its own unique growth opportunity set. Finally, the management team is well experienced and has a track record of extracting incremental value out of assets, and applying its skill set to potential acquisition targets… TXO aims to payout 100% of its cash available for distribution, which currently is resulting in a 4Q annualized yield of 14.4%. While distributions are variable and directly impacted by commodity prices, we believe low production decline rates are supportive of a higher payout,' Akyol opined.
Akyol quantifies his stance on TXO with a Buy rating, and he gives the stock a $20 price target that suggests a gain of 18% on the one-year horizon. Add in the dividend yield, and this stock can bring a one-year return of 32.5%. (To watch Akyol's track record, click here)
While there are only 2 recent reviews on record here, they are both positive – giving TXO a Moderate Buy consensus rating. The stock has a current selling price of $16.95, and its average target price of $21.50 implies a one-year upside potential of ~27%. (See TXO stock forecast)
To find good ideas for stocks trading at attractive valuations, visit TipRanks' Best Stocks to Buy, a tool that unites all of TipRanks' equity insights.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

US Steel Sale to Nippon Steel Poised to Close After Trump Deal
US Steel Sale to Nippon Steel Poised to Close After Trump Deal

Yahoo

time32 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

US Steel Sale to Nippon Steel Poised to Close After Trump Deal

(Bloomberg) -- Nippon Steel Corp. won conditional US approval for its $14.1 billion purchase of United States Steel Corp., capping a lengthy saga in a tie-up that will create one of the world's largest steel companies. Shuttered NY College Has Alumni Fighting Over Its Future Trump's Military Parade Has Washington Bracing for Tanks and Weaponry NYC Renters Brace for Price Hikes After Broker-Fee Ban Do World's Fairs Still Matter? As Part of a $45 Billion Push, ICE Prepares for a Vast Expansion of Detention Space In a release Friday, the companies said they've committed to a national security agreement proposed by the Trump administration, which earlier cleared the deal subject to those terms. As part of the $55-per-share deal, the Japanese company will invest an additional $11 billion by 2028, including an initial commitment in a greenfield project that would be completed after 2028. Nippon had previously raised its pledged additional investment in an effort to win President Donald Trump's approval. Nippon Steel will also spend an extra $3 billion after 2028 for a new steel mill, according to people familiar with the matter. That would push the total additional investment — on top of the purchase price — to $14 billion. Earlier Friday, Trump formally opened the door to approving the sale of US Steel by submitting the agreement to the companies and amending former President Joe Biden's move to block the agreement in an executive order. The president's action cleared the sale so long as the companies comply with the government's terms. 'President Trump promised to protect American Steel and American Jobs — and he has delivered on that promise,' White House spokesman Kush Desai said in a written statement. 'Today's executive order ensures US Steel will remain in the great Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, and be safeguarded as a critical element of America's national and economic security.' Nippon Steel and US Steel in the release said they had received regulatory approvals and that 'the partnership is expected to be finalized promptly.' The deal is expected to close by June 18, the merger agreement deadline, Japan's Nikkei reported on Saturday, without saying where it got the information. Trump earlier this week said the US would receive a so-called golden share in the post-transaction company, though it's not clear what that would entail. The companies confirmed that the US would get a golden share but didn't elaborate. The terms of the security agreement include significant and unprecedented US control measures, as well as certain control over some board seats and requirements that some leadership roles go to American citizens, according to a person familiar with the pact, speaking on condition of anonymity. The golden share does not include an equity stake in the company, the person said. Earlier: Nippon Steel Plans $6 Billion Investment in Its Japanese Mills 'The Japanese government believes that this investment will strengthen the ability of the Japanese and US steel industries to generate new innovation and lead to the strengthening of the close partnership between Japan and the US,' Japan's Minister of Economy, Trade and Industry, Yoji Muto, said in a written statement. 'We welcome the decision of the US government.' Trump and Biden as well as former Vice President Kamala Harris campaigned against the deal, before the former president blocked it in January. Trump has since reversed his position, insisting that the agreement would preserve steel jobs in the US. The text of the security agreement hasn't been released. Trump and others have previously announced other elements of the deal, including bonuses to steelworkers, a requirement to keep existing blast furnaces running for a decade, and government veto power to retain control over the board of the US Steel subsidiary. Trump has also hailed the accord as vindication of his trade policies, which have seen the administration levy tariffs in a bid to pressure companies to shift more manufacturing to the US. Japan has been engaging in negotiations with the US over trade in a bid to avoid higher levies Trump has threatened. Trump's decision to champion Nippon Steel's bid offers to provide fresh momentum for those talks. Trump held a rally in Pennsylvania two weeks ago, at US Steel's iconic Mon Valley facility, celebrating the deal with a crowd of steelworkers, even though it had not yet been finalized. Earlier: US, Mexico Near Deal to Cut Steel Duties and Cap Imports Trump also used that event to announce he was doubling his tariffs on steel and aluminum, raising them to 50% from 25%. Since that rally, government officials, company executives and deal advisers worked to hammer out the finer details and get the final signatures. The deal creates a combined company that will be the world's second-largest steelmaker. It will become a formidable domestic competitor to Nucor Corp., which for a generation has dominated the American steel industry. The acquisition also clears the way for enhanced steelmaking in areas the US has lagged in recent years, including the type of steel critical to bolster ailing electric grids across the country. The Japanese steelmaker's takeover became a political lightning rod after the leadership of the United Steelworkers – based, like US Steel itself, in Pittsburgh – staunchly opposed the tie-up. Biden sided with them, as did Trump. The deal has taken a winding path with extensions, a Biden block, a legal fight, and then Trump's decision to reexamine it before ultimately clearing it. Nippon Steel and US Steel have steadily tried to address worries, with Vice Chairman Takahiro Mori making repeated visits to the US to clinch the deal. Divisions within the union were laid bare through the process, with local union leaders expressing support for the deal and breaking with their national leadership. Trump's reversal was a few months in the making. In February, he surprised the parties by blessing some kind of a minority stake — an announcement they hadn't been privy to and didn't understand. The deal, then and now, was built on Nippon Steel buying US Steel entirely. The question was mitigation measures. The president said he supported a 'planned partnership' between the companies on May 23, without providing details of an announcement that appeared to bless the original deal with additional mitigation measures. --With assistance from Jennifer A. Dlouhy, Meghashyam Mali and Yoshiaki Nohara. (Updates with potential closing timeframe in eighth paragraph.) American Mid: Hampton Inn's Good-Enough Formula for World Domination The Spying Scandal Rocking the World of HR Software New Grads Join Worst Entry-Level Job Market in Years As Companies Abandon Climate Pledges, Is There a Silver Lining? US Tariffs Threaten to Derail Vietnam's Historic Industrial Boom ©2025 Bloomberg L.P.

People Who Voted For Trump In 2024 Are Sharing How They Really Feel About The Tariffs
People Who Voted For Trump In 2024 Are Sharing How They Really Feel About The Tariffs

Yahoo

time35 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

People Who Voted For Trump In 2024 Are Sharing How They Really Feel About The Tariffs

I was pretty shocked the other day to read about actual price differences caused by tariffs, and I wanted to learn specifically about how Trump voters feel about the tariffs — whether they think they're a good idea or not. So, I decided to ask Trump voters to tell me what they really think about the tariffs; and, for good measure, I turned to the answers to a post on the subreddit Ask Trump Supporters that asked, "Do Trump supporters see the new tariff policy as a smart negotiating tactic with allies, or is there concern it could backfire?" Here are some people's answers: 1."I love the idea of Trump pushing the tariffs. It will teach the consumer what is really important to be spending their money on and learn how to be conservative. Plus bring back the businesses to the grand ol' USA." —Anonymous, 72 years old, Kansas City, Missouri 2."Not me, but my grandad. He has said that he regrets voting for Trump, even though he hates Harris. One, the tariffs are going to make his small business (golf balls) suffer, and he's worried about my business (cosmetics) suffering, too." "Two, he thinks Trump has dementia, because of the way Trump has been talking and stuff. He also thinks Trump is really violent. Also, my grandad was absolutely horrified when Elon did the Nazi salute thing (why did everyone just forget about this?) because, even though my grandad is Catholic, he has multiple Jewish friends, and was actually the one who kickstarted my interest in the history of the Holocaust. When Trump made that 'joke' about wanting to be the new Pope, that was the breaking point for him." —Anonymous 3."Good decision, time will prove it was a good one." —Anonymous, 78, Moline, Illinois 4."Tariffs are not going to help small businesses or consumers. A tariff is a tax that is passed on to the consumer. The government will collect this tax. What they will do with it is anyone's guess." "Trump lied to his voters. Tariffs increase prices of goods and services. Once prices go up they will never come down. Many small businesses will close as they will not be able to pay the insurmountable prices added to products which were already too high. Many people will lose their jobs, and things will just get worse. Meanwhile, Trump is making all types of deals in the Middle East for his business. God bless America." —Anonymous 5."My boyfriend voted for him in 2016, 2020, and 2024, and he still argues that China (or whoever) pays the tariffs." —Anonymous, 46, California Related: This FSU Student Had A Scathing Message For Donald Trump, And It's Going Mega Viral 6."Absolutely genius. Europe is already buckling. They want reciprocal free trade, but are not yet willing to remove VAT on imports and all the other shenanigans they pull to restrict trade. Trump is not falling for it." —u/whateverisgoodmoney "What exactly has been gained by all this chaos?" —u/dsteffee "Nothing yet. Trump is offering time to negotiate. But in a few months, deals come off the table, and they must suffer the tariffs or comply." —u/whateverisgoodmoney 7."Well, I'm skeptical and on the fence. There are countries that totally deserve, like, a 300% tariff, like China. And I've always been very, VERY suspicious of a global economic system that seems to favor a country like China just too much. Let's see what happens." —u/Ivan_Botsky_Trollov "I just don't get how this hurts China. How does this not favor China more and potentially catapult China into being the reserve currency/preeminent economic superpower? To me this feels like the US just conceding the top spot for nothing, while China gets to swoop into all of these other countries and say, 'We've got you, we won't abandon you like the US did,' slowly building their sphere of influence until they have the political and military cache to strongarm the US in diplomatic situations." —u/Ok-Release1928 8."I hope it's just a negotiating tactic in order to get other countries to lower their tariffs against us, something everyone should support. But I think Trump might actually just love tariffs and hate deficits." —u/flyingchimp12 Related: "There's No More Hiding Their Ideology" — People Cannot Believe This "Terrifying" Post By Trump Is Real 9."It's a risky gambit, I won't deny that. But what we were doing was unsustainable and going to bankrupt us in time, most likely much sooner than we'd like, and I don't hear Democrats offering any better alternatives, just screaming, 'Trump Bad!'" "What Trump's trying to do — if it succeeds — could pay off big-ly, enough that even the more moderate of Trump's opponents might be forced to admit that he did a good thing. Heck, if Trump can simply get the countries with tariffs on us right now to lower their existing tariffs in exchange for our previous tariff rates, that alone would do a lot. If we can get reciprocal tariffs with countries that enjoy other benefits from the US, such as funding or alliance stuff, even better." —u/Jaded_Jerry 10."This isn't about making life easier for investors. Sure, once a new business is established, it'll be more competitive with experience, and perhaps not need tariffs to be competitive in four years." "What it's really about is empowering those willing to do work, and making those businesses viable before the next presidency. I'm sure some tariffs will remain in four years, and hopefully the next president sees the wisdom in maintaining them." —u/neovulcan 11."I think it's more than a negotiating tactic, though he is obviously using them to that effect at times. But I think Trump is not a free trader at his core, and do not think his goal is just to get other countries to lower their trade barriers to zero (they won't do that anyway)." "I think Trump views us as having gone way too far in the direction of maximizing short-term profit by eating the seed corn of industry, so to speak. It's a long-term and potentially watershed policy shift with huge ramifications. There are definitely nerves and there are definitely risks." —u/KnownFeedback738 12."I don't have confidence that the tariff policy laid out last week will be successful. They were also calculated incorrectly, and Trump likely exceeded the legal authority he is using to levy the tariffs." —u/Gaxxz 13."Somehow, back in the 1950s-1980s, people managed to buy lots of American goods without even owning credit cards, generally. I wonder if local manufacturing jobs helped. The 1970s oil crisis created inflation twice as high as it's ever been in your life (unless you're over 50). And nobody even knows. By the Reagan '80s boom, it was forgotten. All it did was spur the invention of fuel-efficient cars." Scott McPartland / Getty Images, NBC —u/itsakon 14."More competition for workers in USA means wages go up." "30% extra import tax means the cost price of a Nike shoe they sell for $90 in the USA goes up from 10 dollars to 13 dollars. Nike can decide if they charge the three dollars extra to customers, take it from their enormous yearly profit, or if they build more shoe plants in the USA so there is more work in the USA. If they choose A or B then the government has three dollars they don't have to get somewhere else." —u/lordtosti 15."We don't have enough thinking-type jobs to sustain young US workers. I don't know if the country will make more money, but the goal is better jobs than young workers currently can access." —u/noluckatall 16."It's a risk. But Trump is not the habit of letting things age — he wants to make deals. Some countries he might want to keep tariffs on, if it's judged to be good for the US. Otherwise, tariffs should be lower a year from now." —u/jackneefus finally: "I honestly don't know; at this point, I'm waiting to see what happens." —u/beyron What do you think? I'm interested in hearing all your opinions down in the comments below. Or, if you have something to say but prefer to stay anonymous, you're more than welcome to write in to the anonymous form below. Please note: some comments have been edited for length and/or clarity. Also in In the News: Well, Well, Well, For The Second Time In 2 Weeks, People Are Letting JD Vance Know EXACTLY How They Feel About Him In Public Also in In the News: This Dem Lawmaker Is Going Viral For His Extremely Shady Question To Secretary Kristi Noem Also in In the News: This Conservative Said He Wears A Fake ICE Uniform For A Really, Really, Really Gross Reason

House Budget Bill Targets $300B in SNAP Cuts — 4 Potential Impacts To Benefits
House Budget Bill Targets $300B in SNAP Cuts — 4 Potential Impacts To Benefits

Yahoo

time35 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

House Budget Bill Targets $300B in SNAP Cuts — 4 Potential Impacts To Benefits

Americans who depend on food stamps to help them buy groceries could see their benefits slashed if Congress passes President Trump's budget bill, which he personally dubbed the 'Big Beautiful Bill.' Find Out: Read Next: The bill certainly includes big cuts to the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP), a federal program that helps about 40 million Americans buy healthy food, according to the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA). The U.S. House passed a version of the bill in late May that includes nearly $300 billion in SNAP cuts, according to a report from the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities (CBPP), which cited Congressional Budget Office (CBO) estimates. The bill is now being weighed by the Senate, where it's expected to face a tougher fight. A few key Republican senators have voiced opposition to the House version. However, as USA Today reported, much of that opposition has to do with a desire to cut more spending from the bill, protect certain energy subsidies or avoid slashing Medicaid funding. There is little, if any, GOP opposition to cutting SNAP benefits, at least publicly. The SNAP cuts do face plenty of opposition from advocacy groups, though. Jason Gromley, Senior Director for Share Our Strength and its No Kid Hungry campaign, called the bill 'a vote to increase childhood hunger.' 'This proposal reflects the largest and most extreme cuts to SNAP in history,' Gromley said in a press release. 'These cuts will do nothing to improve the lives of Americans, and will make it even harder for those who do receive benefits to afford enough food to feed their families.' According to the CBPP, here are four ways the proposed cuts will impact SNAP benefits. More than 2 million children will see food assistance to their families either 'cut substantially' or ended altogether. That figure is based on CBO estimates of the bill's SNAP provisions impact. It doesn't include provisions that prevent future benefit increases, which will impact all SNAP recipients. Warren Buffett: As the CBPP noted, under current SNAP rules, adults without children in their homes are limited to three months of benefits out of every three years if they can't prove that they either meet a 20-hour-per-week work requirement, or are exempt from the requirement. The House bill would expand the restriction to parents of children over the age of 6, and to older adults aged 55 to 64. Expanding the work requirement would cut SNAP by $92 billion through 2034, according to the CBO. It also would take food assistance away 'entirely' from 3.2 million adults in a typical month. One result is that about 1 million children would see their food benefits reduced substantially. The House bill would cut federal spending on school lunches and breakfasts by $700 million, according to the CBO. This would affect about 420,000 children in an average month by ending their school meals and/or cutting off their summer SNAP payments. The House bill also would eliminate all SNAP assistance for up to 250,000 foreign-born residents — including roughly 50,000 children — who are legal residents of the U.S. Many are refugees and people granted asylum who've proven to have fled violence and persecution in other countries, according to the CBPP. More From GOBankingRates 4 Affordable Car Brands You Won't Regret Buying in 2025 This article originally appeared on House Budget Bill Targets $300B in SNAP Cuts — 4 Potential Impacts To Benefits

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store