Lebanon's President Aoun urges Hezbollah to give up arms
BEIRUT - Lebanon's President Joseph Aoun called on Hezbollah and other political parties on Thursday to hand over their weapons to the army, a move the powerful militant group is resisting as Washington ramps up pressures for it to remove its arsenal.
"It is the duty of all political parties... to seize this historic opportunity without hesitation and push for the exclusivity of weapons in the hands of the army and security forces and no one else," Aoun said in a televised speech in the defence ministry's headquarters.
Hezbollah, which emerged badly damaged from its war with Israel last year, has said calls for the Iran-aligned group to disarm only serve Israel.
"Those who call for submitting arms practically demand submitting them to Israel ... We will not submit to Israel," the group's chief Sheikh Naim Qassem said on Wednesday.
The U.S. has been pushing Lebanon to issue a formal cabinet decision committing to disarm Hezbollah before talks can resume on a halt to Israeli military operations in the country, five sources familiar with the matter told Reuters.
Aoun said a proposal to Washington that will be presented to the cabinet next week stated that Israel should stop its attacks on Lebanon and withdraw from the posts it occupies in the south of the country, along with Hezbollah handing over its weaponry to the Lebanese army.
The proposal seeks to secure $1 billion annually for 10 years to support the army and the security forces and includes plans for an international conference to take place later in the year to support reconstruction efforts in Lebanon. REUTERS
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
AsiaOne
23 minutes ago
- AsiaOne
Trump officials told Congress Israel agreed to match $39m for GHF, sources say, World News
WASHINGTON — Senior Trump administration officials told Congress this month that Israel agreed to match a US award of US$30 million (S$38.92 million) to the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation, two sources familiar with the matter told Reuters, a previously unreported contribution to the controversial armed private aid operation. Aside from the US contribution, which the US State Department announced in June, the sources of the foundation's funding have been opaque — GHF does not disclose its donors. Israel faces intensifying international pressure over the humanitarian crisis in Gaza and its promotion of GHF's aid operation, which has distribution sites only in southern Gaza and has been called dangerous and ineffective by aid groups and the United Nations - claims the group denies. Aryeh Lightstone and Charles Leith, aides to Trump's Middle East envoy Steve Witkoff, briefed US Senate and House of Representatives committees on July 8 and 9 about the GHF operation, according to the two sources. They told the congressional committees that Israel had agreed to match the $30 million that the US awarded to GHF in June, enough to fund the organisation through the end of July, according to the sources, who spoke on condition of anonymity. Lightstone and Leith did not respond to a request for an interview and the White House referred questions to the State Department. Donors "have pledged or disbursed tens of millions of dollars to GHF," a State Department spokesperson said, without identifying those donors. "The United States has pledged tens of millions of dollars," the spokesperson continued, adding that the US aid "does not come close to encompassing the total amount of help the administration has given the people of Gaza since January 2025." The Israeli government did not respond to requests for comment. President Donald Trump said on Monday that the US had dispensed US$60 million for Gaza humanitarian aid. The State Department, however, has made no other announcements beyond the US$30 million approved for the GHF in June. A third source familiar with the matter said some US officials believe Trump likely was conflating the US and Israeli funds. Lightstone and Leith told Congress the hope was that by August, other donors would see GHF's success and contribute to its operation, allowing the foundation to double its distribution sites from four to eight, according to the sources. Reuters could not verify whether Israel had disbursed the US$30 million to GHF, which uses private for-profit US military and logistics firms to transport aid into the Palestinian enclave for distribution to its sites. Speaking on Wednesday to the Hudson Institute think tank, GHF Executive Chairman Rev. Dr. Johnnie Moore, a former evangelical adviser to the White House during Trump's first term, said that as a private US charity, the foundation did not have to disclose its donors. He indicated that GHF required more money. "The biggest problem is just we need more of it, and US$30 million is not going to get it done," he said, in an apparent reference to the US contribution. GHF said in an email to Reuters that it was focused on distributing as much food as was safely possible and was continuing to press the Israeli government to allow it to open additional distribution sites, including in northern Gaza. It declined to comment on its donors or funding. Starvation in Gaza GHF has been criticised by the United Nations, aid groups and others over what they say is an unsafe aid distribution model and a breach of humanitarian impartiality standards, allegations that GHF denies. [[nid:720803]] Israel alleges that the UN-led aid system that has traditionally served the residents of Gaza has let Hamas-led militants loot aid shipments intended for civilians. Hamas denies the accusation. A recent US government internal analysis found no evidence of systematic theft of US-funded aid by Hamas. Starvation has been spreading in Gaza, and a hunger monitor on Tuesday said a worst-case scenario of famine is unfolding and immediate action is needed to avoid widespread death. In his Wednesday remarks, Moore denied that famine is developing. "That's made up. There's not a famine. There's acute hunger. There's not enough food in the Gaza Strip," he said. Gaza health authorities have been reporting increasing deaths from hunger-related causes and images of emaciated Palestinian children have drawn international condemnation. Trump this week declared that many people were starving, contradicting Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, who has said there was no starvation in the densely populated coastal enclave, largely destroyed by Israel's military offencive that has killed over 60,000 people according to Gaza health officials. Trump promised to set up new food centres and said the top priority in Gaza was feeding people. Gaza's food stocks have been running out since Israel, at war with Palestinian militant group Hamas since its fighters killed 1,200 people and took 251 hostages back to Gaza in October 2023 according to Israeli tallies, cut off all supplies to the territory in March. That blockade was lifted in May but with restrictions that Israel says are needed to prevent aid being diverted to militant groups. Israel says it has no aim to starve Gaza. This week it announced steps to allow more aid in, including pausing fighting in some locations, air-dropping food and offering more secure routes. [[nid:720753]]
Business Times
23 minutes ago
- Business Times
Cambodia deputy PM says 19% US tariff rate averts collapse of its garments manufacturing sector
A TARIFF rate of 19 per cent on Cambodia's exports to the United States has helped it avert the collapse of its vital garment and footwear sector, allowing the country to remain competitive with its peers, its deputy prime minister told Reuters on Friday. Sun Chanthol, Cambodia's top trade negotiator, thanked US President Donald Trump for his understanding in Cambodia's negotiations to reduce a tariff rate that had initially been set at 49 per cent then later 36 per cent - among the world's highest levies - and for his intervention in a deadly conflict between Thailand and Cambodia. 'First off the bat I have to thank President Trump for providing a rate that's competitive vis-a-vis our neighbouring countries and express gratitude to President Trump for his noble intervention for a ceasefire and peace,' Chanthol said in a phone interview. 'If the US maintained 49 per cent or 36 per cent, that industry would collapse in my opinion,' he said of the garment and footwear manufacturing sector, the biggest economic driver in the country of 17.6 million people. 'People would go to Indonesia, Vietnam... a 16 per cent difference would have been huge. We can live with 5 per cent, anything around that. We are very grateful, for protecting our industry and its employees.' 'We have close to 1 million workers, mainly women, each one of those workers supporting 4-5 members of their family. It would have been a huge impact if this would have been bad,' he added. A NEWSLETTER FOR YOU Friday, 8.30 am Asean Business Business insights centering on South-east Asia's fast-growing economies. Sign Up Sign Up Cambodia has a big trade surplus with the United States, with its exports to the US market accounting for 37.9 per cent of its total shipments in 2024, valued at close to US$10 billion, according to official data. Much of that was textiles and shoes, a sector crucial to an economy projected by the International Monetary Fund to reach US$49.8 billion this year, driven by manufacturing of goods for brands that include Adidas, H&M, Ralph Lauren and Lacoste. The deputy premier said what had been agreed with Washington was a framework, with a deal to be finalised later. Chanthol also said Cambodia had agreed as part of the deal to buy 10 Boeing 737 MAX 8 aircraft for its national carrier Air Cambodia, with the option to purchase another 10. 'We don't have a lot of purchasing power compared to other countries,' he said. 'Our approach was we put everything on table, negotiate in good faith, ensure both countries will benefit from this trade deal.' REUTERS
Straits Times
an hour ago
- Straits Times
Gaza hunger presents Trump with moral test familiar to past presidents
Sign up now: Get ST's newsletters delivered to your inbox Images of malnourished Palestinians in the war-ravaged enclave have disturbed US President Donald Trump enough to take action. WASHINGTON – As the Gaza Strip tips into famine and images of starving children trigger new demands for action, US President Donald Trump faces a test all too familiar to his predecessors. Time after time, American presidents have found themselves watching suffering in faraway countries with the knowledge that they could act to save innocent lives. Images of death and misery in places such as the Balkans, Rwanda, Darfur and Syria, to name a few, haunted their consciences – sometimes moving them to act, but often leading to excuses. The desperation in Gaza has emerged as such a test for Mr Trump. By his own account, images of malnourished Palestinians in the war-ravaged enclave have disturbed him enough to take action. 'I mean, some of those kids are – that's real starvation stuff,' Mr Trump said in Scotland on July 28. 'I see it, and you can't fake it. So we're going to be even more involved.' It was unclear what Mr Trump meant by getting 'more involved'. Days earlier, he had withdrawn his special envoy, Steve Witkoff, from talks between Israel and Hamas in pursuit of a ceasefire to end the war in Gaza. Mr Witkoff travelled to Israel on July 31 to discuss Gaza , and Israeli news outlets reported that he might even visit a food distribution centre in the territory. Top stories Swipe. Select. Stay informed. World Trump modifies reciprocal tariffs ahead of deadline; rate on Singapore likely to remain at 10% Singapore 'For one last time, let's go home': Tears, laughs as last scheduled Jetstar Asia flight touches down Singapore Over half of job applications by retrenched Jetstar Asia staff led to offers or interviews: CEO Singapore No entry: ICA to bar high-risk, undesirable travellers from boarding S'pore-bound ships, flights Business More new homes are coming up in northern Singapore Business OCBC Q2 profit drops 7% to $1.82b as interest rates fall, to pay lower interim dividend Asia Thailand seeks neutral venue for border talks with Cambodia Singapore 'Switching careers just as I became a dad was risky, but I had to do it for my family' Mr Witkoff's change of plans comes as aid groups say hunger in Gaza is reaching crisis levels. One UN-affiliated group said in a report this week that a worst-case famine scenario is unfolding, and Gaza health officials say that dozens of Palestinians, including children, have died of starvation in recent weeks. Those grim facts have been driven home by gut-wrenching images of skeletal toddlers and people fighting for food. Israeli officials reject responsibility for food shortages in Gaza, which they say are exaggerated and caused by Hamas. 'There is no policy of starvation in Gaza, and there is no starvation in Gaza,' Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said. Hamas 'robs, steals this humanitarian aid and then accuses Israel of not supplying it', he added. But Hamas denies that, and Israeli military officials privately say they have found no evidence that Hamas systematically steals aid. Such protests have not defused global anger. France announced this week that it would recognise an independent Palestinian state at the United Nations in September , and Britain said it would follow suit if Israel did not agree to a ceasefire with Hamas . And in Washington this week, one of Mr Trump's fiercest Republican allies in Congress, Representative Marjorie Taylor Greene of Georgia, condemned Israel's actions in Gaza as 'genocide'. Mr Trump has few good options. The United States supplies Israel, its close partner, with billions in annual military aid. Even if Hamas is the main obstacle to aid delivery, Mr Trump lacks influence over the militant group. His only real hope is to insist that Israel, which controls Gaza's borders, does more to clear roads and protect aid convoys. A long-term solution may require leveraging American aid to force Mr Netanyahu to accept a ceasefire on terms short of his long-time demands. Dr Stephen Wertheim, a senior fellow in the American Statecraft Programme at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, said the quandary is a familiar one for US presidents. 'President Trump's excuse-making over Gaza resonates with a long line of presidents who were pressured to address humanitarian catastrophes,' Dr Wertheim said. That pressure comes from a sense of moral duty in the country's DNA, dating as far back as John Winthrop's 1630 'City on a Hill' sermon, in which he told Puritan Massachusetts colonists that 'the eyes of all people are upon us'. As the United States grew in power and wealth, so did its sense of obligation to people in need everywhere. Before he became a free-market Republican president, Herbert Hoover ran a federal foreign aid programme that sent food to famine-stricken Soviet Russia in 1921. 'Whatever their politics, they shall be fed!' he declared. Cold War competition for global influence with the Soviet Union reinforced the instinct, on strategic grounds. Many conservatives argue that America is not a charity, and should help people abroad only when it advances the national interest. Mr Trump has made that argument explicit in his America-first foreign policy, his deep cuts to foreign aid spending and his dismantling of the US Agency for International Development. Displaced Palestinians waiting for food at a charity kitchen in Gaza City on July 23. PHOTO: SAHER ALGHORRA/NYTIMES Mr Stephen Pomper, the chief of policy at the International Crisis Group, noted that a president who preaches an America-first foreign policy has undermined an international system built over decades to prevent foreign atrocities. The United States 'looks increasingly like it rejects or is indifferent to the founding principles of the order that it helped create', he said. Still, the crisis in Gaza has echoes of past humanitarian crises that left presidents wringing their hands over how to respond. President Bill Clinton took office in 1993 as a champion of human rights and international institutions. But when machete-wielding Hutu militias started to slaughter ethnic Tutsi in Rwanda in 1994, he rejected calls for US action. Scarred by the deaths of 18 American soldiers on a peacekeeping mission in Somalia, Mr Clinton feared that even modest steps could escalate dangerously. Unchecked, Hutu killers carried out the genocide of an estimated 800,000 Tutsi. Mr Clinton later said he regretted not doing more to stop it. Mr Clinton also hesitated as Serbian forces slaughtered civilians in Bosnia-Herzegovina in the mid-1990s, rebuffing direct pleas from the likes of Elie Wiesel by saying the problem did not warrant risking American lives. The 1995 massacre of 8,000 men and boys at a UN-declared 'safe area' in the Bosnian town of Srebrenica finally moved Mr Clinton to act. A US-led bombing campaign against Serbian forces led to a peace deal credited with stabilising the region. Stopping mass killings in the Darfur region of Sudan in the early 2000s became a campaign for activists and celebrities, including Angelina Jolie and George Clooney. But even after the US State Department formally declared the atrocities there a 'genocide' in 2004, president George W. Bush refused calls to deploy US troops to stop it. He cited, among other things, concern about intervening 'in another Muslim country' at the time of the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. By the time Mr Barack Obama became president, activists and scholars – fuelled by the American failure in Rwanda – had developed new legal theories to support cross-border intervention to protect victims of atrocities. Among them was Ms Samantha Power, an influential national security aide to Mr Obama, who helped engineer a 2011 presidential directive on the subject. 'Preventing mass atrocities and genocide is a core national security interest and a core moral responsibility of the United States,' it declared. Palestinians carry aid supplies which entered Gaza through Israel in Beit Lahia, northern Gaza, on July 27. PHOTO: BLOOMBERG Mr Obama put that idea into practice in 2011, when he ordered airstrikes in Libya against government forces preparing to crush a rebellion in the city of Benghazi. Mr Obama said he acted to avert 'a massacre that would have reverberated across the region and stained the conscience of the world'. But that supposedly limited intervention expanded into a months-long Nato bombing campaign, and Libya collapsed into violent anarchy, leaving Mr Obama regretting the experience. So when he was pressured again to intervene in Syria's civil war against the country's brutal regime, he rejected pleas for airstrikes from top officials, including US Secretary of State John Kerry. Mr Obama did, however, order limited airstrikes in Syria in 2014 against Islamic State group fighters, in part to save thousands of Yazidi people trapped on a mountain in Iraq and at risk of genocidal massacre. 'Earlier this week, one Iraqi cried that there is no one coming to help,' Mr Obama said in an address to the nation. 'Well, today America is coming to help.' Gaza presents Mr Trump with an especially difficult case, as it did for former president Joe Biden. Mr Biden faced withering questions about his support for Israel's military campaign, and was shouted down at public events by protesters accusing him of complicity in genocide. But while Mr Biden often harangued Mr Netanyahu to allow more aid into Gaza – usually with limited and temporary results – he never risked a full break with the Israeli prime minister over the matter. One reason, Mr Biden's officials say, was intelligence showing that Hamas responded to signs of a potential split between the United States and Israel by hardening its negotiation position in ceasefire talks. Mr Biden felt enough of a responsibility – and also perhaps political vulnerability – that he resorted to dramatic displays of support for hungry Palestinians, sending military planes to airdrop supplies and ordering the construction of a US$230 million (S$299 million) pier to allow aid delivery by sea. Critics dismissed both measures as made-for-TV substitutes for putting decisive pressure on Mr Netanyahu. Ultimately, Dr Wertheim said, America's real problem in Gaza is itself. 'It's not that other parties are engaged in atrocities and the question is whether the United States will use its righteous power to stop,' he said. 'In this case, the issue is that the United States is complicit in Israel's conduct.' NYTIMES
