
Putin's dark childhood from mother's eye gouged out to being chased by rats
The world has been watching President Trump's meeting with Vladimir Putin with baited breath - and whilst the US leader is determined to forge a reputation as a peacemaker, it is yet to be seen how much success can be found in his Alaska summit with the President of the Russian Federation, with no deal being reached.
Putin might now hold a formidable reputation, but he undoubtedly has come a long way since the early years of his childhood, which were mired by poverty and violence in Leningrad - now called St. Petersburg.
Some experts have gone so far as to claim the Russian President's unrelenting attitude to his invasion of Ukraine can be traced back to these early experiences. The Mirror looks back at his childhood as Putin warns of nuclear war after unleashing another night of hell on Ukraine.
Putin was born on 7 October 1952, seven years after the Second World War ended, in St. Petersburg, then known as Leningrad.
His parents, Vladimir and Maria, had previously had two sons before he was born, both of whom had died. Putin is reported to be notoriously reticent about mentioning his deceased siblings, and only the name of one is known: Viktor.
The other sibling is said to have died whilst an infant, but Viktor's death during the 872-day German siege on Leningrad is reported to have occurred in "terrible circumstances" - per Psychology Today.
Aged just one year old, Maria, who was "near death" due to starvation caused by the siege, put Viktor into a children's home, hoping that he would be protected there.
Heartbreakingly, he was no safer in the home in reality, and he died from diphtheria and was buried in an unmarked mass grave - one that Putin is said to visit during official commemorations of the long siege.
By the time Putin was even born, his life was marked by tragedy, and not just that of the death of his elder brothers.
Before his parents even married, a terrifying attack from Vladimir Senior against Maria is claimed to have been the start of their relationship, due to the "disgrace" he brought upon her with his violence.
An explosive book, The Tsar in Person: How Vladimir Putin Fooled Us All, about the Russian President's life, claimed that in a "fit of rage" his father gouged out his mother's eye with a pitchfork.
The book alleges that Putin's father went with male friends to Maria's home - who was known as Marusya - when she was there by herself in 1928, according to someone who lived in the village in the Tver region.
The young woman refused to let them in, causing Vladimir Senior to become enraged. "They took the pitchfork that was standing by the fence and started breaking down the gate. She got scared, ran out of the house, and raced up to the fence.
"And Volodka [Vladimir senior, Putin's father] at that moment broke through the gate with the pitchfork and hit Marusya right in the face.
"In short, he accidentally gouged out her eye. He took her to the hospital right away. There, Marusya's eye was removed."
This was seen as a "disgrace" so Maria's mother "threatened Volodka: if you don't marry, I'll put you on trial. So they got married. Marusya was very embarrassed about her glass eye later, never looked you in the face when talking, and tilted her head to the side."
The villager added that Putin's father was notorious for abusing and terrorising local girls, "He liked to lift up girls' skirts and tie them in a knot over their heads," so that he and other local men could see their underwear.
Putin totally denies that this interpretation of his parents' characters, but he has admitted that he had a tough childhood in some respects.
In his memoir, Putin described the vermin-ridded neighbourhood he grew up in, and wrote about a time he had an encounter with a rat.
"It had nowhere to run,' Putin said. "Suddenly it lashed around and threw itself at me… Luckily, I was a little faster and I managed to slam the door shut in its nose.'
Some have argued that experiences like this one, along with the fact that he was scrawny, small and often bullied and attacked in his area as a child, have influenced his attitude that there can be no backing down from a fight.
His close pal from his schooldays is reported to have said about him, "He could get into a fight with anyone… He had no fear… If some hulking guy offended him, he would jump straight at him – scratch him, bite him, pull out clumps of his hair."
At home his parents are said to have doted on him wildly, but outside of the house, this certainly was not the case, "As he himself admits, it was then, in neighbourhood brawls, that he learned lessons that he has followed ever since – to take on any and all adversaries, never to retreat, and to fight to the finish," reports The Week.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Daily Mirror
18 minutes ago
- Daily Mirror
'Time traveller' spotted in Trump and Putin photo with eerie similarity to 1959
US President Donald Trump shared two photos of meetings between American leaders and their counterparts from Russia and the Soviet Union, with many people noticing a striking similarity Eagle-eyed online sleuths have noted an odd detail involving an apparent "time traveller" in photos showing meetings between Donald Trump and Vladimir Putin and between Richard Nixon and Nikita Khrushchev. US President Trump met with despot Putin for the Alaska summit last week where he hoped to squeeze out conditions for a peace deal with the Russian President. During the meeting, where Putin issued steep demands for peace, the two leaders appeared cordial and, at times, friendly. One photo from the meeting, shared by the US President on TruthSocial, showed Trump pointing his finger squarely at a smirking Putin's chest while an interpreter seemingly guiding the conversation between the pair. The snap was accompanied by another photo of then-Vice President Nixon and Soviet Union leader Khrushchev, with a similar finger pointing incident during the so-called "Kitchen Debate" in Moscow, in 1959. While Trump appeared to highlight the similarities between his gesture and his Republican predecessor, as an apparent show of strength, eagle-eyed people online noted another similarity. At the centre of both images were interpreters who appeared strikingly similar. The unidentified men were noted for having physical similarities including their hair, face shape and their clothes, namely a shirt, suit and tie. X/ Twitter user Carole Tahan said: "A time traveller from the Nixon/Khroutchev encounter (1959) to the Trump/Putin Alaska summit (2025). The striking resemblance of the 2 interpreters!" Another commenter, going by the handle @polymath1959 added: "2025 upper panel - Trump vs Putin 1959 lower panel - Nixon vs Khruschev. Weird fun fact? Same interpreter in both, not aged a day!" Body language expert Judi James also noted the similarity, telling The Mirror: "They even seem to have booked a double of the guy who stood between the leaders back then, to stand in the same spot with the same look of concern on his face, suggesting this is serious stuff." The US pursued a strategy of containment against the Soviet Union, which resulted in Washington DC challenging the emergence of communism in multiple countries, including Vietnam, as well as assisting its enemies, such as in Afghanistan. But Trump has struck up a more positive tone with Putin that had not been seen since Russia illegally annexed Crimea from Ukraine. Putin last enjoyed cordial relations with a Republican when George W. Bush was President. The pair met in 2001, with the former President commenting he looked into Putin's eyes and "found him to be very straightforward and trustworthy, and we had a very good dialogue. I was able to get a sense of his soul." Bush also said Putin "was a man deeply committed to his country and the best interests of his country and I appreciate very much the frank dialogue and that's the beginning of a very constructive relationship." Trump has had a friendly relationship with Putin and has spoken warmly about him, even appearing to favour him in talks about ending the war in Ukraine.


Telegraph
18 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Russia is the new dividing line on Britain's Right
The Right has a problem with Russia. With his usual succinctness and sagacity, Charles Moore last week gave expression to an anxiety that has been exercising many conservatives: 'If perverted liberalism leads to neo-Marxism, could not perverted patriotism lead to neo-fascism?' Could Moore be right? Nigel Farage is our equivalent of Oswald Mosley, who also trumpeted his patriotism – though Farage is a more serious and more successful politician than Mosley ever was. That makes him also much more dangerous. Farage has a long record of excusing or downplaying the threat posed by Putin. He actually defended the Trump administration's bullying of Zelensky in the Oval Office. We may be sceptical about the 'Coalition of the Willing', but at least Nato's European allies are now rearming on an unprecedented scale and presenting Putin with a united front. Would that be happening under PM Farage? Pull the other one, as he might say. With JD Vance and his British ally James Orr in mind, Moore mused: 'How did the national conservatism of Edmund Burke get mixed up with the Putinist opportunism of Viktor Orban's government in Hungary?' In response, Dr Orr protested indignantly that he, Vance and other National Conservatives were in no sense apologists for Putin. Yet he claims that more people are prosecuted for free speech offences in Britain than in Russia. I'm not sure the late Alexei Navalny would agree. Orr champions the 'principled realism' of the 'New Right', arguing that 'the time has come to rally behind politicians who will put Kent before Kyiv'. Let it first be said that this is an argument among people of goodwill, most of whom probably agree more than they disagree. British conservatives, whether 'Old' or 'New', are in favour of freedom (notably of speech and of the press), King and country, the rule of law and parliamentary democracy. Religious or not, they cherish the Judaeo-Christian foundations of our society and state. Abroad, conservatives tend to support other nations who broadly share our values, particularly if they are forced to defend themselves, at the risk of being accused by Orr of suffering from 'Ukraine Brain'. Finally, conservatives rely on history as a guide in war and peace, even if (as Orr claims) 'Right-wing Zoomers' sneer at them as victims of 'World War Two Brain'. Having played a minor part in the fall of the Berlin Wall, I plead guilty to Second World War, Cold War and Ukraine brain. This is the historical context of today's politics and diplomacy. Any attempt to play down the continuity and relevance of these conflicts is as foolish as it is unconservative. And dressing up an abdication of moral responsibility for Ukraine as 'principled realism' strikes me as at best wrong-headed, at worst a betrayal of our island story. Alas, that is exactly what is meant by 'putting Kent before Kyiv'. Defending Kent is not a matter of fortifying the Channel coastline. The latter-day Hitlers and Napoleons threaten our way of life without setting foot here. If we sacrifice other peoples to appease the monstrous ideology propagated by Putin, we will be incapable of defending ourselves. It is actually Kyiv that is defending Kent, not the other way round. The late Sir Roger Scruton, the patron saint of the National Conservative movement, understood all this better than his acolytes. Having devoted much of his life to helping dissidents in the former Soviet empire, he knew who the enemy was: the ex-communist secret policeman who is now trying to rebuild that empire. But Scruton's political romanticism has been co-opted by Putin's chief ally in Europe, Viktor Orban. His goulash authoritarianism has helped to sanitise Putin's dictatorship – a soft cop, hard cop routine. The nationalist Right in Europe and the Maga Right in America have danced to their tune, seeking to diminish Zelensky's status as the symbolic hero of the free world. They promote their allies with money and influence. Elon Musk's meddling in the German election failed to stop the anti-Russian conservative Friedrich Merz being elected, but the Trump loyalist Kristi Noem helped the hardline nationalist Karol Nawrocki to win the Polish presidency. Reform's intellectual praetorian guard is a motley band, ranging from the former academic and social media influencer Matt Goodwin to a new Millbank-based think tank, the Centre for a Better Britain (CBB), chaired by the aforementioned Orr. They have a blueprint: the Heritage Foundation's Project 2025, which has set Trump's agenda. Reform's in-house thinkers hope to play an analogous role in a Faragist future. They will doubtless dismiss any similarities between Trump's ersatz authoritarianism and the Putinist original. Yet Russia remains a problem for the Right, not least in Britain. In one corner, Kemi Badenoch and the Conservatives, including most centre-Right intellectuals, remain staunch allies of Ukraine. They reject Putin and all his works. Meanwhile Farage and his camp lean towards authoritarian solutions at home and an isolationist policy abroad. My guess is that the British public, given adequate time and a level playing field, will opt for Kemi's inclusive patriotism, which precludes any hint of proto-fascism, rather than Farage's exclusive nationalism, which does not. Will the field actually be level, though?

Western Telegraph
37 minutes ago
- Western Telegraph
Russian attack hits American factory in Ukraine during US-led push for peace
The aerial assault on a part of Ukraine that has largely avoided such attacks was one of Russia's biggest this year and came amid Moscow's objections to key aspects of proposals that could end the fighting after Russia's February 2022 invasion of its neighbour. US President Donald Trump discussed the war with Russian counterpart Vladimir Putin in Alaska last week before hosting Ukrainian leader Volodymyr Zelensky and European leaders at the White House on Monday. Donald Trump (Seth Wenig/AP) Mr Trump last month questioned Mr Putin's commitment to ending the war, saying the Russian leader 'talks nice and then he bombs everybody'. In a social media post on Thursday, the US president criticised his predecessor, Joe Biden, for not providing Ukraine with the weaponry it needs to 'fight back'. 'It is very hard, if not impossible, to win a war without attacking an invaders country,' Trump wrote. 'It's like a great team in sports that has a fantastic defense, but is not allowed to play offensive. There is no chance of winning! It is like that with Ukraine and Russia.' Russia has fired nearly 1,000 long-range drones and missiles at Ukraine since Monday's White House talks, according to Ukrainian tallies. European countries are discussing how they can deploy military assets to deter any post-war Russian assault on Ukraine, but the Kremlin will not accept the deployment of any troops from Nato countries, and foreign minister Sergey Lavrov said on Wednesday that making security arrangements for Ukraine without Moscow's involvement was pointless. Mr Putin is ready to meet with Mr Zelensky to discuss peace terms, Mr Lavrov said on Thursday, but only after key issues have been worked out by senior officials in what could be a protracted negotiating process because the two sides remain far apart. Ukrainian and European leaders have accused Mr Putin of stalling in the peace efforts in the hopes that his bigger army, which has been making slow advances, can capture more Ukrainian land. Volodymyr Zelensky condemned the overnight attack which left one person dead (Jacquelyn Martin/AP) US secretary of state Marco Rubio plans to host a conference call on Thursday with the national security advisers of European countries expected to play a role in future security guarantees for Ukraine, a senior US official said. Military leaders from Ukraine, the US, the UK, Finland, France, Germany and Italy met on Tuesday and Wednesday in Washington to work out military options, said Joseph Holstead, a spokesman for the US Joint Chiefs of Staff. A source said 'everything is being considered and nothing is being ruled out' regarding security guarantees for Ukraine, apart from US boots on the ground. Military chiefs and their staffs are looking at options including 'how big' the security guarantee is and what happens if it is implemented with or without a ceasefire, the official said, noting that European defence chiefs acknowledged it is their 'responsibility to secure Europe'. Russia launched 574 drones and 40 ballistic and cruise missiles overnight, the Ukrainian Air Force said. The attack mostly targeted western regions of the country where much of the military aid provided by Ukraine's western allies is believed to be stored. The strikes killed at least one person and injured 15 others, according to officials. Mr Zelensky condemned the attack amid the push for peace, saying it was carried out 'as if nothing were changing at all'. A US electronics plant near the Hungarian border was struck, according to Andy Hunder, president of the American Chamber of Commerce in Ukraine. The Flex factory is one of the biggest American investments in Ukraine, he told the Associated Press. Russian President Vladimir Putin (Vyacheslav Prokofyev, Sputnik, Kremlin Pool Photo/AP) At the moment of impact, 600 night shift workers were on the premises, and six were injured, Mr Hunder added. Russian attacks on Ukraine since it launched its invasion have damaged property belonging to more than half of the chamber's roughly 600 members, he said. 'The message is clear: Russia is not looking for peace. Russia is attacking American business in Ukraine, humiliating American business,' Mr Hunder said. Russia's Defence Ministry said the strikes targeted 'enterprises of the Ukrainian military-industrial complex'. It claimed the attack hit drone factories, storage depots and missile launch sites, as well as areas where Ukrainian troops were gathered. Russia has repeatedly denied targeting civilian areas of Ukraine. In the western city of Lviv, one person was killed and three were injured as the attack damaged 26 residential buildings, a nursery school and administrative buildings, regional head Maksym Kozytskyi wrote on Telegram. The regional prosecutor's office said three Russian cruise missiles with cluster munitions struck the city. Moscow has shown no signs of pursuing meaningful negotiations to end the war, Mr Zelensky said. He urged the international community to respond with stronger pressure on Moscow, including tougher sanctions and tariffs. On Wednedsay he said plans for security guarantees will become clearer by the end of next week, and he then expects to be ready to hold direct talks with Mr Putin for the first time since the full-scale invasion. The talks could also be conducted in a trilateral format alongside Mr Trump, the Ukrainian president said.