
NASA is reportedly planning to build a nuclear reactor on the moon
"The first country to do so could potentially declare a keep-out zone which would significantly inhibit the United States from establishing a planned Artemis presence if not there first."
The idea of using nuclear energy off-planet is not new. Since 2000, NASA has invested $308 million towards developing small, lightweight fission power systems, though none have progressed towards flight readiness, according to the directive. The most recent effort came in 2023 with the completion of three $7.7 million industry study contracts that focused on generating 40 kilowatts of power, enough to continuously run 30 households for ten years. Unlike solar power, fission systems can operate around the clock — invaluable during the weeks-long lunar nights or Martian dust storms.
Advances in technology have made such systems increasingly compact and lightweight.
NASA formally committed to using nuclear power on Mars in December 2024 — the first of seven key decisions necessary for human exploration of the Red Planet. Based on feedback by industry, surface power needs should be at least 100 kilowatts to support "long-term human operations including in-situ resource utilisation," meaning things like life support, communications, and mining equipment to collect surface ice. It assumes the use of a "heavy class lander" that carries up to 15 metric tons of mass, and targets a "readiness to launch by the first quarter of FY30," meaning late 2029. NASA's Artemis program to return to the Moon and establish a lasting presence near the south pole has faced repeated delays. The timeline for Artemis 3, the first planned crewed landing, has slipped to 2027, a date few see as realistic given the planned lander, SpaceX's Starship, is far from ready. China meanwhile is targeting 2030 for its first crewed mission and has proven more adept at meeting its deadlines in recent years.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

ABC News
12 minutes ago
- ABC News
Trump ‘serious about sanctions' relating to Russia
Donald Trump's special Envoy Steve Witkoff has spent three hours sitting with Russian President Vladimir Putin in Moscow. Now while there has no talk of a ceasefire in Ukraine, US President Donald Trump says great progress was made. And US media is now also reporting that Presidents Trump and Putin could hold a face to face meeting as early as next week. But time is running out because this all comes as the clock ticks down on Friday's deadline from the White House for Russia to begin negotiating peace with Kyiv or face punishing new sanctions. ABC NewsRadio's Sarah Morice spoke with Rose Gottemoeller, who was the former Deputy Secretary General of NATO and is now a Research Fellow at Stanford University's Hoover Institute. She says President Trump has shown he's serious about sanctions.

Sky News AU
42 minutes ago
- Sky News AU
Donald Trump blasts late-night hosts Stephen Colbert, Jimmy Kimmel and Jimmy Fallon
US President Donald Trump has ruthlessly mocked several of his late-night talk show host adversaries during a White House press conference. On Wednesday, Trump spoke to reporters, where he claimed Stephen Colbert has 'no talent' before turning his sights to Jimmy Kimmel and Jimmy Fallon. Trump's remarks about Colbert follow the 'Late Show' cancellation by CBS and Paramount that will see the long-running show end entirely. The president revealed he thinks Fallon and Kimmel's shows are next to be cancelled, as Colbert had 'better ratings' than both of his fellow hosts. 'Fallon has no talent; Kimmel has no talent. They're next, I hear; they're going to be gone,' Trump said.

News.com.au
42 minutes ago
- News.com.au
Australia must work with other countries to protect artists amid AI boom, senior opposition senator says
Australia alone cannot protect the country's content makers from data-ravenous artificial intelligence and must work with other countries, opposition finance spokesman James Paterson says. The warning comes as artists sound the alarm over AI models feeding off their works to continue advancing. AI itself cannot produce original content, so it must be trained using whatever humans have created. It also scrapes as much data from as many sources as it can to answer queries, including news organisations. The models are usually monetised by their big tech backers, such as OpenAI, Google and Meta, without compensation to people doing the heavy lifting. Echoing Productivity Commission recommendations, Senator Paterson said on Thursday the answer was not more regulation. 'I think we need to be mindful of the fact that Australia is a medium power, that we're not the main source of innovation and development in this industry, that most of these companies are headquartered overseas, either in Silicon Valley, or indeed in China, or elsewhere in the world, and our ability to regulate them is limited,' Senator Paterson told Sky News. 'I think it would be far better if we work with governments of aligned thinking to work on this collectively in a way that is enforceable against these companies, which are enormous and which have their own intellectual property which they can quickly move from jurisdiction to jurisdiction to find the most attractive settings and the most attractive policy settings that allow them to flourish and to innovate. 'And if Australia just becomes a hostile jurisdiction to that, then we don't win from that, we only lose from it.' Australian rock legend Peter Garrett is among the most vocal Australian artists pushing for tighter rules on AI. He said the idea of tech firms using his music to train AI without his consent was 'horrifying' and called it a 'massive breach of copyright'. Garrett has also advocated for 'robust laws to ensure copyright holders are adequately remunerated, licenses applied and transparency around the actual processes used when a creator's work is exploited'. Australia has managed to strike deals with American tech titans to compensate media companies for content shared on their social media platforms, so there is precedent. But AI is still very much an emerging technology and most governments and businesses have not worked out an economic road map for it. To make matters more complex, non-Western countries have proven capable of producing competitive alternatives, such as China's DeepSeek. China is a notoriously difficult country to enforce copyright. In a report released this week, the Productivity Commission warned against taking a 'heavy-handed' approach to AI regulation, saying to do so could stifle innovation and cause Australia to fall behind other countries. Instead, it recommended making existing regulations fit-for-purpose. That included plugging gaps around consumer protection, privacy, and copyright. The commission said AI-specific regulation should only be considered as a 'last resort' for specific use cases where existing laws were clearly insufficient to mitigate harms. It also called for a pause on mandatory 'guardrails' for high-risk AI until the reviews of existing regulations were complete.