California Assembly committee kills 2 bills restricting trans athletes' participation in girls sports
One bill,
introduced by Assemblymember Bill Essayli
(R-Riverside), would have prevented transgender students from participating in sports teams and using bathrooms and locker rooms that don't align with their gender assigned at birth.
The other bill,
introduced by Assemblymember Kate Sanchez
(R-Rancho Santa Margarita), would have restricted transgender athletes from playing girls' and women's sports from elementary school through the college level.
"CA Dems just killed my bill to protect girls' sports. They DO NOT CARE that girls no longer have a level playing field and it's absolutely ridiculous,"
Sanzhez said on social media
in response to her bill being rejected.
Essayli also
issued a response
to his bill being rejected on social media, saying, "Assembly Democrats doubled-down on their war against women and parental rights."
"The vast majority of Californians and Americans agree: keep boys out of girls sports," Essayli continued. "Assembly Democrats are radically out of touch with commonsense Californians and the voters will hold them accountable to restore justice and fairness in girls sports."
Tuesday evening, in a story
first reported by Politico
, CBS Sacramento confirmed that Essayli would resign from his role in the California Assembly to become the new U.S. Attorney for the Central District of California, effective as of Wednesday.
California Assembly Speaker Robert Rivas voted no on Sanchez's bill.
"I'm not going to support a bill that takes rights away from a protected class of people," Rives said. "Gender identity is a protected class here in California."
After his vote, Rivas would not stop to speak to the press, leading reporters to chase him up a capitol stairway where he eventually made his way into his office and away from cameras.
Tuesday's vote comes after Governor Gavin Newsom announced his opposition to trans athletes in women's sports
on the debut episode of his new podcast
, where he sat down with Republican political activist Charlie Kirk.
"We are fighting a battle against people who want to squash our ability to express ourselves," transgender advocate Katherine Darrow said.
The hearing on transgender rights, which occurred a day after Transgender Day of Visibility, took center stage at the California State Capitol, leading to overflowing crowds and people lining up in hallways to testify on both sides of the bills.
"Opportunities I and so many other female athletes have worked so hard for now feel out of reach," said a female high school athlete who identified herself only as Jaden.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Newsweek
17 minutes ago
- Newsweek
Trump's Pick To Oversee Social Security COLA Says 'Need To Sunset' Program
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. President Donald Trump's pick for commissioner of the Bureau of Labor Statistics has argued for "sunsetting" Social Security, calling it a "Ponzi scheme." Trump nominated Heritage Foundation economist E.J. Antoni to lead the BLS less than two weeks after firing the agency's former commissioner, Erika McEntarfer, in response to weaker-than-expected job numbers. The dismissal has fueled concerns that upcoming BLS reports could be altered to advance Trump's political agenda. Newsweek has contacted Antoni for comment via his profile on the Heritage Foundation's website. Why It Matters Social Security provides benefits to more than 70 million Americans every month, paying out retirement, survivor and disability benefits. Often referred to as the "third rail" of American politics for its enduring popularity, advocating against the program is considered politically perilous to members of either party. The BLS is the federal agency responsible for producing essential inflation data, including the Consumer Price Index for Urban Wage Earners and Clerical Workers—the official index used to calculate Social Security Cost of Living Adjustments. As commissioner, Antoni would oversee how that data is produced and published. President Donald Trump listens to questions from reporters after speaking on economic data in the Oval Office in Washington, D.C., on August 7. President Donald Trump listens to questions from reporters after speaking on economic data in the Oval Office in Washington, D.C., on August 7. Win McNamee/GETTY What To Know Speaking on KTRH's Houston's Morning News in December, Antoni said Social Security was set up as a "Ponzi scheme" where "today's investors are—their funds are being used to pay yesterday's investors." A Ponzi scheme is a fraudulent investment setup where money from new investors is used to pay existing ones. Social Security payments are financed from a dedicated payroll tax collected from current workers. Any excess that is not used is kept in dedicated trust funds: the Old-Age and Survivors Insurance trust fund and the Disability Insurance trust fund. These trust funds are scheduled to reach depletion in 2034 unless Congress acts, according to the 2025 Social Security Trustees report. "And unless you are going to grow the number of investors at an exponential rate, that system is eventually going to collapse. Well, since we can't grow the workforce at an exponential rate, especially today when our population is actually in a state of decline, you're not going to be able to sustain a Ponzi scheme like Social Security," Antoni continued. "Eventually you need to sunset the program." Antoni said current benefits need not be touched, but future retirees should not rely on the program. He advocated for transitioning to a system that uses private accounts "for just them." "There's plenty of money available to pay for folks who are already retired," he said. "But the people who are going to retire 10, 20, even 30, or certainly 40 years from now—I'm sorry, but the program is not going to be viable at that time." Antoni argued for "some kind of transition program where, unfortunately, you'll need a generation of people who pay Social Security taxes but never actually receive any of those benefits," he continued. "And that sounds harsh, but unfortunately that's the price to pay for unwinding a Ponzi scheme that was foisted on the American people by the Democrats in the 1930s." Who Is E.J. Antoni? Antoni is the chief economist for the conservative think tank the Heritage Foundation, which published Project 2025. According to his bio on its website, he was previously "an economist at Texas Public Policy Foundation and has taught courses ranging from labor economics to money and banking." He also holds master's and doctoral degrees in economics. Writing on Truth Social regarding Antoni's appointment to the BLS, Trump said, "E.J. will ensure that the Numbers released are HONEST and ACCURATE." In a statement on X, Labor Secretary Lori Chavez-DeRemer said Antoni would "provide the American people with fair and accurate economic data they can rely on." What People Are Saying White House assistant press secretary Taylor Rogers told Newsweek: "President Trump selected Dr. E.J. Antoni III to restore America's trust in the jobs data that has had major issues, without any real attempt at resolution, for years. Antoni's education and vast experience as an economist has prepared him to produce accurate public data for businesses, households, and policymakers to inform their decision-making." Democratic Representative John B. Larson of Connecticut said in a news release on August 11: "It should alarm everyone when a yes-man determined to end Social Security is installed in this position. I call on every Senate Republican to stand with Democrats and reject this extreme nominee—before our seniors are denied the benefits they earned through a lifetime of hard work." Jason Furman, a Harvard economist and former chair of Barack Obama's Council of Economic Advisers, posted on X: "I don't think I have ever publicly criticized any Presidential nominee before. But E.J. Antoni is completely unqualified to be BLS Commissioner. He is an extreme partisan and does not have any relevant expertise. He would be a break from decades of nonpartisan technocrats." What Happens Next It remains to be seen whether the Senate will confirm Antoni's nomination to lead the BLS, which is an independent agency under the Labor Department.
Miami Herald
18 minutes ago
- Miami Herald
More Americans than ever don't drink alcohol, poll finds. What's behind shift?
The share of Americans who drink alcohol has fallen to a record low, according to a new Gallup poll. At the same time, a record-high share of Americans believe consuming alcohol, even in moderation, is unhealthy. The results come from Gallup's Consumption Habits survey, conducted July 7-21 with 1,002 U.S. adults. In the survey, 54% of respondents said they sometimes drink wine, beer or liquor, marking the lowest such figure since 1939, the first year Gallup asked Americans about their drinking habits. It continues a recent trend of declining alcohol consumption, with the share of drinkers standing at 58% in 2024, 62% in 2023 and 67% in 2022. In contrast, for most of the past eight decades, this figure has remained above 60%. It reached a high of 71% in 1976. When the latest results were broken down by demographic groups, some notable differences emerged. Men were more likely than women to report drinking — 57% vs. 51% — and white respondents were more prone to drink than respondents of color — 56% vs. 52%. Similarly, there were slight generational differences. Among adults 55 and older, 56% reported drinking alcohol, while 50% of 18- to 34-year-olds said the same. Democrats were also significantly more likely to consume alcohol than Republicans — 61% vs. 46%. This is a relatively new phenomenon, as the share of GOP respondents who drink fell 19 points since 2023, while the share of drinking Democrats only fell by 3 points. For the first time, a majority of respondents, 53%, now say drinking in moderation — defined as up to two drinks per day — is bad for health. Meanwhile, 37% said it makes no difference, and 6% said it is good for health. The findings reflect a continuing trend of more Americans viewing drinking as unhealthy. In 2024, 45% said alcohol is bad for health, up from 39% in 2023 and 28% in 2018. Young Americans were also significantly more likely than their older counterparts to view moderate drinking as detrimental. In the survey, which has a margin of error of 4 percentage points, 66% of 18- to 34-year-olds said moderate drinking is bad for health. Meanwhile, 48% of those 55 and older said the same. Similarly, women were more likely than men to say limited drinking is unhealthy — 60% vs. 47%. And Democrats were more likely than Republicans to say the same — 58% vs. 44%. The results come as emerging medical guidance indicates that drinking alcohol — even in moderate amounts — indeed poses health risks. The U.S. government's Dietary Guidelines for Americans recommends limiting drinking to one or two servings per day. But, this advice is expected to be removed and replaced with a more general warning, according to a June report from Reuters, which notes that limited alcohol consumption has been linked to higher risks of certain types of cancer. 'The continuation of these trends may hinge on whether recent pronouncements about drinking's risks are the final word on the subject, similar to how the U.S. surgeon general's warnings about tobacco in the 1960s marked the start of a long-term decline in smoking,' Gallup concluded.
Washington Post
19 minutes ago
- Washington Post
FEMA abruptly disbands youth advisory council, but students say their climate advocacy won't stop
After a few frightening incidents seeing family and friends collapse in Phoenix's grueling heat , Ashton Dolce, 17, began to wonder why his country's leaders were not doing more to keep people safe from climate change. 'I was just dumbfounded,' Dolce said. He became active in his hometown, organizing rallies and petitions to raise awareness about extreme heat and calling for the Federal Emergency Management Agency to make such conditions eligible for major disaster declarations . Just before his senior year of high school in 2024, Dolce got the chance to really make his concerns heard: He became one of 15 students across the United States selected to join the FEMA Youth Preparedness Council , a 13-year-old program for young people to learn about and become ambassadors for disaster preparedness. 'It was this really cool opportunity to get involved with FEMA and to actually have a specified seat at the table where we could develop resources by and for youth,' Dolce said. Then came signs of trouble. On Jan. 16, the young people were told by email that a culminating summit in the nation's capital this summer was canceled. By February, the students stopped hearing from their advisers. Meetings ceased. After months of silence, the students got an email Aug. 1 saying the program would be terminated early . 'We were putting so much time and effort into this space,' he said, 'and now it's fully gutted.' In an email to students reviewed by The Associated Press, the agency said the move was intended 'to ensure FEMA is a lean, deployable disaster force that is ready to support states as they take the lead in preparedness and disaster response.' The council's dissolution, though dwarfed in size by other cuts, reflects the fallout from the chaotic changes at the agency charged with managing the federal response to disasters. Since the start of Republican President Donald Trump's second term, his administration has reduced FEMA staff by thousands, delayed crucial emergency trainings, discontinued certain survivor outreach efforts and canceled programs worth billions of dollars . Dolce said ignoring students undermines resilience, too. 'This field needs young people and we are pushing young people out,' he said. 'The administration is basically just giving young people the middle finger on climate change.' Larger federal programs related to youth and climate are also in turmoil. In April, the administration slashed funding to AmeriCorps, the 30-year-old federal agency for volunteer service. As a result, 2,000 members of the National Civilian Community Corps, who commonly aid in disaster recovery, left their program early . FEMA did not respond to questions about why it shut down the youth council. In an email bulletin last week, the agency said it would not recruit 'until further notice.' The council was created for students in grades 8 to 11 to 'bring together young leaders who are interested in supporting disaster preparedness and making a difference in their communities,' according to FEMA's website. Disinvesting in youth training could undermine efforts to prepare and respond to more frequent and severe climate disasters , said Chris Reynolds, a retired lieutenant colonel and emergency preparedness liaison officer in the U.S. Air Force. 'It's a missed opportunity for the talent pipeline,' said Reynolds, now vice president and dean of academic outreach at American Public University System. 'I'm 45-plus years as an emergency manager in my field. Where's that next cadre going to come from?' The administration's goal of diminishing the federal role in disaster response and putting more responsibility on states to handle disaster response and recovery could mean local communities need even more expertise in emergency management. 'You eliminate the participation of not just your next generation of emergency managers, but your next generation of community leaders, which I think is just a terrible mistake,' said Monica Sanders, professor in Georgetown University's Emergency and Disaster Management Program and its Law Center. Sanders said young people had as much knowledge to share with FEMA as the agency did with them. 'In a lot of cultures, young people do the preparedness work, the organizing of mutual aid, online campaigning, reuniting and finding people in ways that traditional emergency management just isn't able to do,' she said. 'For FEMA to lose access to that knowledge base is just really unfortunate.' Sughan Sriganesh, a rising high school senior from Syosset, New York, said he joined the council to further his work on resilience and climate literacy in schools. 'I thought it was a way that I could amplify the issues that I was passionate about,' he said. Sriganesh said he got a lot out of the program while it lasted. He and Dolce were in the same small group working on a community project to disseminate preparedness resources to farmers. They created a pamphlet with information on what to do before and after a disaster. Even after FEMA staff stopped reaching out, Sriganesh and some of his peers kept meeting. They decided to finish the project and are seeking ways to distribute their pamphlet themselves. 'It's a testament to why we were chosen in the first place as youth preparedness members,' Sriganesh said. 'We were able to adapt and be resilient no matter what was going on.'
