Negligence ruling upheld for Ruby Princess COVID cruise
Carnival's Ruby Princess set off from Sydney on a 13-day tour of New Zealand in March 2020 with 2671 passengers and 1146 crew on board.
The voyage was cut short after 11 days just as Australia shut its borders when COVID-19 ran rampant globally.
Twenty-eight people on the vessel died during the outbreak and 663 positive cases were reported amongst passengers.
A class action lawsuit headed by Shine Lawyers and lead applicant Susan Karpik found that Carnival was misleading and negligent in October 2023.
The company knew or ought to have known about the heightened risk of COVID-19 infection on the vessel and owed a duty of care to Ms Karpik to take reasonable care of her health and safety as a passenger, Federal Court Justice Angus Stewart said.
A panel of three judges unanimously dismissed an appeal on Tuesday after Carnival challenged those findings.
The Ruby Princess cruise should have been cancelled, Justices Brigitte Markovic, Sarah Derrington and Darren Jackson wrote.
"It was a foreseeable consequence of Mrs Karpik's boarding (the ship) that she would be exposed to the heightened risk of there being COVID-19 on board the Ruby Princess," they said.
The court also tossed a separate appeal seeking to increase the damages awarded to her by Justice Stewart.
While she was allowed $4423 plus interest for out-of-pocket medical expenses, the judge declined to award non-economic damages as she had not been diagnosed with long COVID.
She had originally sought more than $360,000 in damages for injuries, distress and disappointment.
Carnival offered to settle the case for $15 million before a trial began in October 2022.
But the offer was rejected by the passengers, who asked for $69 million.
Carnival has been contacted for comment on the appeal's dismissal.
Shine Lawyers joint head of class actions Vicky Antzoulatos said the firm was pleased with the appeal court's decision.
"Passengers can now proceed to have their individual claims assessed," she said in a statement.
"We hope this result will lead to a meaningful resolution of their claims so that they can finally put this sorry episode of their lives behind them."
Justice Stewart will determine the next steps in the case at a later date.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
SBS Australia
3 hours ago
- SBS Australia
Federal judge dismisses COVID cruise ship class action appeal but negligence ruling upheld
Federal judge dismisses COVID cruise ship class action appeal but negligence ruling upheld Published 29 July 2025, 6:46 am Federal judge dismisses COVID cruise ship class action appeal but negligence ruling upheld ABSTRACT: The Federal Court has dismissed two appeals related to the class action against Princess Cruise Lines over the Ruby Princess COVID-19 outbreak in 2020. One appeal sought to increase compensation for a passenger, while the other was filed by Carnival Cruises, challenging an earlier court finding of negligence.
West Australian
7 hours ago
- West Australian
New market forces
It's no secret that Australia's marketing leaders are facing more challenges and opportunities than ever before. But is the environment for marketers in WA any different? In the absence of State-specific intelligence, I recently went out to uncover the themes that Western Australian chief marketing officers (CMOs) were facing. Not surprisingly, change was top of the agenda. But having collated the findings into a report called 'The evolving role of the CMO – The Western Australian Perspective' – the scale and pace of that change is all the more apparent. It appears that two CMO typologies have emerged– those who have influence across and throughout their organisation, and those whose influence stays within their marketing remit. If diversity in responsibility was consistent across the respondents, so too was the increasing need to solve more diverse problems. As one CMO I spoke to said: 'The role of the CMO these days is quite hard to articulate. Every role I have had, I've taken on things you would argue wouldn't be part of a traditional CMO function'. Any recruiter writing a job description for a CMO in WA would have their work cut out. Faced with so much change, we also found that WA CMOs must be comfortable in the uncomfortable and able to shift focus if there's strategic merit. As one CMO put it: 'Sometimes you just need to run towards the fire and hope there aren't too many fires at once'. Interestingly though, CMOs acknowledged the importance of the rest of the business in adopting a similar mindset, as one said: 'There's time when we just need to pivot and say 'right, let's go'. So, we must be agile, the Board has to be agile, and our processes must facilitate that agility'. More broadly, the 'brain drain' of talent leaving WA is being acutely felt – and whilst post-Covid there has been 'brain gain' across the State, the marketing industry still has bigger brands with greater opportunity enticing the best talent to head East or overseas. And, in terms of the contribution that marketing can make to an organisation and its future, the CMOs I spoke to were able to speak with confidence about demonstrating impact, but less confidently about the organisation's belief in marketing as a function for delivering growth. Finally, it was little surprise that the need to frequently navigate complex stakeholders and organisational bureaucracy was also raised. Just how much of the role is dedicated to this need was difficult for most to quantify, but one CMO claimed it took around 60% of their time. And why is all of this important? It's fair to say that the pace in which change affects practitioners in our State will be variable. But make no mistake, if you are a marketer or CMO in WA, and change isn't happening around you just yet, it won't be long before it happens to you. Therefore, it's critical that the CMOs of present and future remain adaptable, and open to embracing new thinking. If we cannot, then marketing's role as a value driver will be brought into question – both in our own State and beyond. To request your copy of the full report, email
7NEWS
7 hours ago
- 7NEWS
Negligence ruling upheld for Ruby Princess COVID-19 cruise
The operator of a cruise ship that embarked just as the COVID-19 pandemic gripped the globe will remain liable to pay passengers impacted by the virus after a failed appeal. Carnival's Ruby Princess set off from Sydney on a 13-day tour of New Zealand in March 2020 with 2671 passengers and 1146 crew on board. The voyage was cut short after 11 days just as Australia shut its borders when COVID-19 ran rampant globally. Twenty-eight people on the vessel died during the outbreak and 663 positive cases were reported amongst passengers. A class action lawsuit headed by Shine Lawyers and lead applicant Susan Karpik found that Carnival was misleading and negligent in October 2023. The company knew or ought to have known about the heightened risk of COVID-19 infection on the vessel and owed a duty of care to Karpik to take reasonable care of her health and safety as a passenger, Federal Court Justice Angus Stewart said. A panel of three judges unanimously dismissed an appeal on Tuesday after Carnival challenged those findings. The Ruby Princess cruise should have been cancelled, Justices Brigitte Markovic, Sarah Derrington and Darren Jackson wrote. 'It was a foreseeable consequence of Mrs Karpik's boarding (the ship) that she would be exposed to the heightened risk of there being COVID-19 on board the Ruby Princess,' they said. The court also tossed a separate appeal seeking to increase the damages awarded to her by Justice Stewart. While she was allowed $4423 plus interest for out-of-pocket medical expenses, the judge declined to award non-economic damages as she had not been diagnosed with long COVID. She had originally sought more than $360,000 in damages for injuries, distress and disappointment. Carnival offered to settle the case for $15 million before a trial began in October 2022. But the offer was rejected by the passengers, who asked for $69 million. Carnival has been contacted for comment on the appeal's dismissal. Shine Lawyers joint head of class actions Vicky Antzoulatos said the firm was pleased with the appeal court's decision. 'Passengers can now proceed to have their individual claims assessed,' she said in a statement. 'We hope this result will lead to a meaningful resolution of their claims so that they can finally put this sorry episode of their lives behind them.' Justice Stewart will determine the next steps in the case at a later date.
