Days Numbered For Voyager Probes As NASA Shuts Off Instruments To Prolong Life
No human-made objects have traveled further into the final frontier than Voyager 1 and Voyager 2. However, both space probes are reaching the end of their service lives. NASA announced that engineers at the Jet Propulsion Laboratory are shutting off instruments on both spacecraft to limit energy use and prolong their time in operation. Since their launches in 1977, both Voyager probes have traveled over 12 billion miles from Earth and entered interstellar space.
Both Voyager probes are equipped with a radioisotope power system, a nuclear battery that uses the heat of decaying plutonium to generate electricity. The system produced 470 watts of power at launch, but that figure decreased over time as the plutonium deteriorated. NASA states the power output was 335 watts at the start of 1997, and it has fallen by 7 watts every year. With that information, the nuclear batteries are producing around 139 watts right now.
Read more: There's A Relic Runway From America's Failed Supersonic Future Hiding In The Everglades
NASA personnel have openly stated that the agency's goal is to have both Voyager probes still operational for their 50th anniversary in 2027. The probes can only make it two more years by carefully managing the shrinking power supply. Each spacecraft launched with ten scientific instruments, and only three on each probe will be powered by the end of March after recent cullings. They'll be down to two instruments by 2026. It's not like flipping a light switch, though — there's a good chance that the instruments won't be able to be turned back on. Linda Spilker, a Voyager project scientist at JPL, said:
"Every minute of every day, the Voyagers explore a region where no spacecraft has gone before. That also means every day could be our last. But that day could also bring another interstellar revelation. So, we're pulling out all the stops, doing what we can to make sure Voyagers 1 and 2 continue their trailblazing for the maximum time possible."
Besides the fading nuclear batteries, the Voyager probes have also run into technical issues after nearly a half-century of hurtling through space. Voyager 1 has dealt with a degrading diaphragm clogging its thruster fuel tubes with silicon dioxide. The probe doesn't use the thrusters to move but to keep its communication systems pointed toward Earth to send and receive data. Troubleshooting these problems can be an anxiety-inducing experience because it takes nearly an entire day to send a command to either probe with the vast distances involved.
It can't be understated how monumental an effort the Voyager program has become to keep both probes still going outside of our Solar System for so long. As a point of reference, President Jimmy Carter was sworn into office in 1977, the same year as the Voyager launches, and died last year after being the first president to reach their 100th birthday. Voyager 1 and Voyager 2 are still exploring the unknown.
Want more like this? Join the Jalopnik newsletter to get the latest auto news sent straight to your inbox...
Read the original article on Jalopnik.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Boston Globe
34 minutes ago
- Boston Globe
At Brown, engineers work on laser-powered lightsails that could make it to Mars in hours instead of months
A highly reflective lightsail pushed by light energy in the same way sailboats are pushed by the wind could travel as fast as one-fifth the speed of light, reducing the time it takes to reach nearby stars from a few thousand years to a few decades, according to Miguel Bessa, an associate professor in Brown's School of Engineering who co-leads research with Richard Norte, an associate professor at TU Delft. Get Rhode Map A weekday briefing from veteran Rhode Island reporters, focused on the things that matter most in the Ocean State. Enter Email Sign Up 'The aim of it is to try to make sails that are so thin and so reflective, which are hard to make at the same time, because what you're talking about are sails that need to be about a thousand times thinner than a human hair,' Norte told the Globe. 'Once you get to this very low mass, then you can really push lightsails very quickly.' Advertisement A machine used to create the ultra-thin holes in a lightsail designed by Brown University and Delft University of Technology. Image courtesy of Norte lab, TU Delft and Bessa lab, Brown University. A piece of the lightsail designed by Brown University and Delft University of Technology researchers say may one day help reach another star system in a lifetime. Image courtesy of Norte lab, TU Delft and Bessa lab, Brown University. The project builds on research started by the Bessa and Norte discussed their partnership with the Globe and explained how working together has opened their eyes to innovative ideas in their respective disciplines. This interview has been edited for length and clarity. Advertisement Q: What are lightsails and how have they been used before? Norte: There actually have been sails deployed in space called 'solar sails' and generally these are using the light from the sun. These have actually been Bessa: Because that laser has so much energy, it's very controlled light. We can impress a lot of speed in the lightsail (about one-fifth the speed of light, or 670 million mph). Compared with — twin spacecraft sent to explore our solar system in 1977, which are now in interstellar space — how could your research speed up space exploration? Norte: If you were to take Voyager's speed, which has been going for about 47 years and just left the solar system, and have it go to the nearest star, which is Alpha Centauri (about 25 trillion miles away), it would take about 10,000 years to get there. Whereas, if you started to make these sails out of these thin materials that we're developing, you can really cut that time down to about 20 years. Something in the order of about a generation rather than, the entirety of humanity. ... Even if you just look within our solar system, it already gets very interesting what we can do with what we've developed. Let's say, Mars. The fastest fly-by probe that we've ever made to Mars is about four months. But with the sails that we're making, we could cut that time down to about 32 hours. Advertisement Bessa: There are some challenges that are remaining in making this happen. And it's very unlikely that the university or a group of universities, like in this case, would be able to make it get to Alpha Centauri. But maybe it's not that far away. The bits are there; you just need the right investment and professionals in aerospace to really scale it up. What has been one of the biggest challenges in fabricating a laser-powered sail versatile enough to survive space travel? Bessa: The holes that you have to create to interface with light and reflect it in the right way, they have to be extremely small. In the light sail that Richard (Norte) fabricated with a student, you have the 60 centimeters by 60 centimeters membrane, but you have billions of holes. Billions, right? With a 'B.' It's not easy to fabricate this in a realistic timescale with low enough costs to make it reasonable. That's something we haven't seen before. Richard really was the first one to show it. Norte: It's counterintuitive that you'd poke holes in something and make it very reflective, but we designed them in such a way that they interfere with the light they reflect. A process for designing ultra-thin membranes with billions of nanoscale holes may one day help small spacecraft reach the stars. Image courtesy of Norte lab, TU Delft and Bessa lab, Brown University. What sparked the idea for this project? Norte: Funny enough, I actually saw it in the Advertisement Bessa : The only thing I find funny is that I'm a mechanical engineer, and because of Richard I've been working on photonics with him on these crazy projects and I'm having a blast, really. Do you see a non-space use for this, too? Norte: In terms of the optical element itself, I see many uses. But this idea of pushing something with a laser is because you really need long distances for this to accelerate it. In terms of Earth-based things, mirrors are a special element that are useful for high-precision measurements. So, the optical element itself is interesting for many different applications. But the idea of pushing these sails to fast distances, I'm not sure that I can say that I can think of other things to use this for outside of space exploration. What else is there to explore in our solar system? Norte: I think people think that the solar system, for instance, is all figured out, right? It's not. I think there's a moon around Saturn where there's maybe oceans of methane. Wouldn't it be great to send microchips into it? That's a huge mission to send anything there. People are measuring gravitational anomalies out around the outer edge of our solar system, like past Pluto. There might even be another planet or maybe some kind of black hole that we can't see. We've only reached it with Advertisement What do you need to do to complete this project successfully? Norte: We got quite a good amount of funding to try to do our first few launches in Earth's gravity of these sails. You can think of it as getting a rocket and firing it off but chaining it down so you can see what the dynamics look like and how it works. We're trying to do actually some launches with a high-powered laser. I have students in the lab burning a lot of things, blowing up some stuff with lasers. I don't know if you're familiar with this movie 'Weird Science' from the '80s, that's what my labs turned into. A lot of high-powered lasers and people trying to lift giant objects. We're trying to lift a macroscopic sail that we can see with our eyes. Carlos Muñoz can be reached at
Gizmodo
40 minutes ago
- Gizmodo
Mars Orbiter Captures Rare View of Ancient Volcano Poking Above the Clouds
Floating in orbit above Mars, NASA's 2001 Mars Odyssey orbiter captured a panorama of the Red Planet's biggest volcanoes, Arsia Mons, peeking over a sea of clouds. The picturesque moment offers an exceptionally rare view of a Martian volcano, showing the landform at an angle in space that captures the planet's horizon. 'We picked Arsia Mons hoping we would see the summit poke above the early morning clouds. And it didn't disappoint,' Jonathon Hill, the operations lead for Odyssey's camera and a mission planner at Arizona State University's Mars Space Flight Facility, called the Thermal Emission Imaging System, or THEMIS, said in a statement. THEMIS can view Mars in both visible and infrared light. Launched in 2001, Odyssey has been circling around Mars for over two decades, studying the Martian surface. But in 2023, the orbiter began taking breathtaking panoramic views of the Martian horizon. Because THEMIS can't pivot to get these stunning views, the orbiter flips on its side, rotating a full 90 degrees. That way, it captured Mars' 'limb,' the edge of the planet's horizon. This is THEMIS' fourth limb observation since 2023. Odyssey captured the image on May 2, just before dawn. In it, Arsia Mons stands 12 miles (20 kilometers) high and measures 70 miles (450 km) in diameter. For comparison, Earth's tallest volcano, Mauna Loa, stands 6 miles (9 km) above the seafloor and measures 75 miles (121 km) in diameter. Arsia Mons is also one of Mars' cloudiest volcanoes and the southernmost of the three Tharsis volcanoes that form Tharsis Montes, or Tharsis Mountains. These mountains are often surrounded by water ice clouds, particularly early in the morning. The clouds form when air expands as it blows up the sides of the mountain and then rapidly cools. This view also allows scientists to study Martian weather and phenomena like dust clouds and how they change over the course of the seasons. Odyssey might be able to capture a few more of these panoramas before its eventual retirement, likely at the end of this year.
Los Angeles Times
44 minutes ago
- Los Angeles Times
Trump's NASA cuts would destroy decades of science and wipe out its future
Like all sponsors of science programs, NASA has had its ups and downs. What makes it unique is that its achievements and failures almost always happen in public. Triumphs like the moon landings and the deep-space images from the Hubble and Webb space telescopes were great popular successes; the string of exploding rockets in its early days and the shuttle explosions cast lasting shadows over its work. But the agency may never have had to confront a challenge like the one it faces now: a Trump administration budget plan that would cut funding for NASA's science programs by nearly 50% and its overall spending by about 24%. The budget, according to insiders, was prepared without significant input from NASA itself. That's not surprising, because the agency doesn't have a formal leader. On May 31 Donald Trump abruptly pulled the nomination as NASA administrator of Jared Isaacman, a billionaire entrepreneur, space enthusiast, and two-time crew member on private space flights, apparently because of his ties to Elon Musk. The withdrawal came only days before a Senate confirmation vote on Isaacman's appointment. While awaiting a new nominee, 'NASA will continue to have unempowered leadership, not have a seat at the table for its own destiny and not be able to effectively fight for itself in this administration,' says Casey Dreier, chief of space policy at the Planetary Society, a leading research advocacy organization. Things haven't been helped by the sudden breakup between Trump and Musk, whose SpaceX is a major contractor for NASA and the Department of Defense, the relationship with which is now in doubt. The cuts, Dreier says, reduce NASA's budget to less than it has been, accounting for inflation, since the earliest days of Project Mercury in the early 1960s. Superficially, the budget cuts place heightened emphasis on 'practical, quantitative,' even commercial applications, Dreier told me. Programs transmitting weather data from satellites, valued by farmers, remain funded, but studies of climate change and other studies of Earth science are slashed. Astrophysics and other aspects of space exploration also are eviscerated, with 19 projects that are already operating destined for cancellation. (The Hubble and Webb space telescopes, which thrill the world with the quality and drama of their transmitted images, are spared significant cuts.) The budget cuts will undermine the administration's professed goals. That's because many of the scientific projects on the chopping block provide knowledge needed to advance those goals. The proposed budget does include two longer-term scientific goals endorsed by Trump — a return of astronauts to the moon via a project dubbed Artemis, and the landing of a crew on Mars. The highly ambitious Artemis timeline anticipates a crewed landing in late 2027 or early 2028. As for the Mars landing, that goal faces so many unsolved technical obstacles that it has no practical timeline at this moment. (Doubts about its future may have deepened due to the sudden rift between Trump and the Mars project's leading advocate, Elon Musk.) The administration's approach to NASA involves a weirdly jingoistic notion of the primacy of American science, akin to the administration's description of its chaotic tariff policies. Trump has said he wants the U.S. to dominate space: 'America will always be the first in space,' he said during his first term. 'We don't want China and Russia and other countries leading us. We've always led.' Vice President JD Vance recently told an interviewer on Newsmax that 'the American Space Program, the first program to put a human being on the surface of the moon, was built by American citizens. ... This idea that American citizens don't have the talent to do great things, that you have to import a foreign class of servants, I just reject that.' Among the 'foreign class of servants,' whom Vance acknowledged included 'some German and Jewish scientists' who came to the U.S. after World War II, was the single most important figure in the space program — Wernher von Braun, a German engineer who had helped the Nazis develop the V-2 rocket bomb (using Jewish slave labor) and who was recruited by the U.S. military after the war. The lunar rover that allowed astronauts to traverse the moon's surface was developed by the Polish-born Mieczyslaw G. Bekker and Ferenc Pavlics, a Hungarian. The human exploration of space, its advocates say, could cement America's relationship with its scientific allies. No mission on the scale of a return to the moon or a manned voyage to Mars could conceivably be brought off by the U.S. acting alone, much less by a Republican administration alone or within the time frame of practical politics. These are long-term projects that require funding and scientific know-how on a global scale. Because of the relationship between the Martian and Earth orbits, for instance, Mars launches can only be scheduled for two-month windows every 26 months. That necessitates building partisan and international consensuses, which appear elusive in Trumpworld, in order to keep the project alive through changes in political control of the White House and Congress. 'Celestial mechanics and engineering difficulties don't work within convenient electoral cycles,' Dreier observes. In this White House, however, 'there's no awareness that the future will exist beyond this presidency.' A representative of the White House did not respond to a request for comment. Trump's assault on NASA science and especially on NASA Earth science is nothing new. Republicans have consistently tried to block NASA research on global warming. In 1999, the Clinton administration fought against a $1-billion cut in the agency's Earth science budget pushed by the House GOP majority. (Congress eventually rejected the cut.) During the first Trump term, the pressure on Earth science came from the White House, while Trump dismissed global warming as a 'hoax.' He wasn't very successful — during his term, NASA's budget rose by about 17%. Characteristically for this administration, the proposed cuts make little sense even on their own terms. Programs that superficially appear to be pure science but that provide data crucial for planning the missions to the moon and Mars are being terminated. Among them is Mars Odyssey, a satellite that reached its orbit around the red planet in late 2001 and has continued to map the surface and send back information about atmospheric conditions — knowledge indispensable for safe landings. The Mars Atmosphere and Volatile Evolution mission, which reached Mars orbit in 2014, has provided critical data about its upper atmosphere for 10 years. In fiscal terms, the budget cuts are penny-wise and galactically foolish. The costs of space exploration missions are hugely front-loaded, with as much as 90% or 95% consumed in planning, spacecraft design and engineering and launch. Once the crafts have reached their destinations and start transmitting data, their operational costs are minimal. The New Horizons spacecraft, launched in 2006 to explore the outer limits of the Solar System (it reached Pluto in 2016 and is currently exploring other distant features of the system), cost $781 million for development, launch, and the first years of operation. Keeping it running today by receiving its transmitted data and making sure it remains on course costs about $14.7 million a year, or less than 2% of its total price tag. Terminating these projects now, therefore, means squandering billions of dollars in sunk costs already borne by taxpayers. Exploratory spacecraft can take 10 years or more to develop and require the assemblage of teams of trained engineers, designers, and other professionals. Then there's the lost opportunity to nurture new generations of scientists. The proposed budget shatters the assumption that those who devote 10 or 15 years to their science education will have opportunities awaiting them at the far end to exploit and expand upon what they've learned. The deepest mystery about the proposed budget cuts is who drafted them. Circumstantial evidence points to Russell Vought, director of the White House Office of Management and Budget and the main author of Project 2025, the infamous right-wing blueprint for the Trump administration. NASA doesn't appear in Project 2025 at all. It does, however, appear in a purportedly anti-woke 2022 budget proposal Vought published through his right-wing think tank, the Center for Renewing America. In that document, he called for a 50% cut in NASA's science programs, especially what Vought called its 'misguided ... Global Climate Change programs,' and a more than 15% cut in the overall NASA budget. The 47% cut in science programs and 24% overall is 'very suspiciously close to what Vought said he would do' in 2022, Dreier says. I asked the White House to comment on Vought's apparent fingerprints on the NASA budget plan, but received no reply. The abrupt termination of Isaacman's candidacy for NASA administrator is just another blow to the agency's prospects for survival. The space community, which saw Isaacman as a political moderate committed to NASA's institutional goals, was cautiously optimistic about his nomination. 'Someone who had the perceived endorsement of the president and the power to execute, would be in a position if not to change the budget numbers themselves, but to take a smart, studied and effective route to figure out how to make the agency work better with less money,' Dreier told me. That may have been wishful thinking, he acknowledged. No replacement has yet been nominated, but 'I don't think anyone is thinking this is going to be a better outcome for the space agency, whoever Trump nominates,' Dreier says. The consequences of all this amount to an existential crisis for NASA and American space science. They may never recover from the shock. The void will be filled by others, such as China, which could hardly be Trump's dream. At the end of our conversation, I asked Dreier what will become of the 19 satellites and space telescopes that would be orphaned by the proposed budget. 'You turn off the lights and they just tumble into the blackness of space,' he told me. 'It's easy to lose a spacecraft. That's the weird, symbolic aspect of this. They're our eyes to the cosmos. This is us metaphorically closing our eyes.'
