2 women get 12-year rigorous imprisonment for heroin possession
In default of payment of the fine, they will have to undergo further rigorous imprisonment for one year. On July 6, 2020, STF Phase Four, Mohali, police station booked Kiran Bala of Chuharpur, now a tenant at Mohalla Durgapuri, and Suman Bala of the same area, under the NDPS Act for possession of the contraband.
As per the prosecution, on that date, SI Gurcharan Singh and a police party at Jassian Road area of Haibowal, received information that the sisters were to supply heroin to a customer from their house in Durgapuri.
Later, the police party apprehended the duo riding a scooter driven by Kiran Bala. Upon checking, a large black polythene bag containing heroin was recovered. Police filed a case and arrested them.
During trial, the accused pleaded false implication and stated that nothing was recovered from them. The defence counsel contended that the alleged independent witness, Ismile alias Yusuf, who allegedly witnessed the recovery, was not examined by the prosecution.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
Elin Nordegren Show Off Her Huge Size In New Vacation Photos
33 Bridges
Undo
In the absence of his testimony, statements of official witnesses could not be believed.
The court didn't find force in the submission of the defence counsel and held, "It is now settled law that the testimony of police officials is as good as that of independent witnesses. The statements of police officials cannot be discarded merely because of the colour of their office. Whenever the case of the prosecution is based only on the statements of police officials, the only precaution for the court is to scrutinise their testimony with some more care and caution.
"
The court also turned down the submission of the accused about false implication in the case. The court observed that in view of the law laid down by the Supreme Court in the aforesaid case and in view of the facts, possession of the accused is fully proved on record, and they failed to give a satisfactory explanation for that.
"Moreover, there appears to be no justification for the police to falsely implicate the accused, from whose possession a huge quantity of contraband was recovered. It is highly improbable that such a huge quantity of intoxicant material would be arranged by the police officials in order to falsely implicate the accused," the court remarked.
MSID:: 122902813 413 |
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indian Express
19 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Gujarat Police begins process to have its own head constable prosecuted under GujCTOC Act following arrest in prohibition case
Six years after the Gujarat Control of Terrorism and Organised Crime (GujCTOC) Act came into force, the police in the state has initiated the process to assess if it could have one of its own suspended personnel prosecuted under the law. The case pertains to the recent arrest of a head constable by the State Monitoring Cell (SMC) that functions directly under the office of the chief of Gujarat Police. Head Constable Sajan Virabhai Vasrani is accused of taking bribe in lieu of smooth passage of a consignment of liquor, which is prohibited in the state. If it comes through, Vasrani's prosecution would become the first such case of a policeman being booked under the law that came into force in 2019. On July 19, the SMC received information that the driver of a heavy vehicle was transporting a gas capsule container filled with Indian Made Foreign Liquor (IMFL). On the Bharuch-Vadodara highway, the Vadodara Rural Police stopped, searched and seized the consignment. The Local Crime Branch (LCB) of Vadodara Rural Police seized 20,340 bottles of IMFL worth Rs 1.73 crore and arrested one Fagluram Umaram Jat. Two others, Anil Jagdish Prasad and Manish Bhaiji, were declared 'wanted' and booked under sections of the Gujarat Prohibition Act on July 20. However, the SMC said in its statement on Saturday, it received information that the members of this bootlegging gang had allegedly paid a bribe of Rs 15 lakh for the consignment to be transported through Gujarat unmolested. In its statement, the SMC said it found 'that the accused persons had paid a bribe of Rs 15 lakh to someone known only as Rahulbhai in Bharuch. The money was transferred to Gandhinagar via angadia (a traditional, informal courier system) with instructions that the amount was payable to a person bearing a specific Rs 10 note. The sender of the IMFL consignment, Anil alias Pandia Jagdishprasad Jat of Rajasthan, had sent the Rs 15 lakh by angadia the same day, according to the statement. On the other end, a man named Hardik had taken possession of Rs 5 lakh from the angadia firm and had further sent the other Rs 10 lakh via same mode to a man named Rakesh, in Junagadh, the statement further said. In Junagadh, this amount of Rs 10 lakh was picked up by a man named Rocky, allegedly on the instructions of Vasrani who turned out to be a Police Head Constable posted with the SMC itself in Gandhinagar, according to the statement. On June 23, DGP Vikas Sahay transferred Vasrani to his parent police department in Dwarka district, placed him under suspension, and initiated an SMC-led departmental inquiry against him. On the other hand, the SMC alleged that Vasrani switched his phone off and went underground the day he was transferred. However, he was apprehended by his colleagues at the SMC on July 25 under section 35(1)(j) (arrest without warranty) of the BNSS (Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita), and was handed over to Vadodara Rural Police as accused in the FIR filed under the Prohibition Act. The SMC statement said that it had obtained and filed as evidence five voice recordings between Head Constable Vasrani and Jat, who is the main accused in the case filed under GujCTOC Act. The SMC has now begun proceedings to have Vasrani added to the same FIR. DIG Nirlipt Rai told The Indian Express, 'There is a process to book someone under GujCTOC. For that, we have to gather the evidence, and then we will file our report before the Inspector General (IG) of the Border Range, who has jurisdiction over Dwarka. The Range IG will then decide whether to add him to the FIR. GujCTOC is meant to take action against those helping people engaged in organised crime.'
Time of India
34 minutes ago
- Time of India
Two Dhar youths arrested with cannabis
Indore: The crime branch of Indore police on Saturday arrested two youths from Dhar with 2.475kg of cannabis. The contraband, valued at approximately Rs 50,000 in the international market, was allegedly being sold to addicts in Indore after being sourced at lower prices. Additional DCP Rajesh Dandotiya said that acting on specific intelligence, the duo was intercepted. During questioning, the accused, 20-year-old Zeeshan Khan and 19-year-old Rehan Khan, confessed to buying cannabis at cheap rates and selling it in the city to drug users at higher prices for quick monetary gains. A case was registered against Zeeshan, who installs and repairs ceiling fans, and Rehan, a mechanic by profession, under section 8/20 of the NDPS Act.
Time of India
34 minutes ago
- Time of India
Over 1K with criminal backgrounds checked during late night combing op
Indore: Indore police carried out an extensive surprise combing and patrolling operation across the city late on Friday night, targeting goons, habitual offenders, and anti-social elements. A total of 1,015 individuals with criminal backgrounds were checked during the operation, out of which 492 were subjected to appropriate legal action. The police also issued over 289 warrants, including 67 permanent, 84 arrest, and 138 bail warrants, along with 136 summonses. In move against reckless driving, especially under the influence of alcohol, 97 offenders were booked under 185 sections of the Motor Vehicle Act, and 12 others faced action for rash driving. Additionally, 17 cases were registered against individuals for consuming alcohol in public places. In separate actions, Aerodrome police arrested one person with a country-made pistol and a live round, while MIG police registered four cases against those carrying illegal firearms. Tilak Nagar police also apprehended a history-sheeter for violating his externment order. Preventive action was taken under various sections of the BNS against 71 habitual offenders. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like This may be of interest to you! Undo The crackdown also involved action against 203 criminals with a history of violent offences, 61 burglars, 31 robbers, 73 individuals involved in knife crimes, 15 drug peddlers, 37 history-sheeters, 37 individuals under surveillance, 42 externed or NSA detainees, nine involved in crime against women, and 15 linked to incidents of arson or property damage. Several absconding criminals were also apprehended during the operation and legal proceedings have been initiated against them. Police also collected affidavits from many of the suspects and prepared dossiers on several offenders, warning them against engaging in future criminal activities.
