How a plague of 'mutating' super rats are taking over Sydney and becoming resistant to poison: 'Impossible to kill'
New research led by Edith Cowan University PhD student and environmental toxicologist Alicia Gorbould found the mutation in over half the rats tested in Brisbane, Melbourne, Perth and Sydney between 2021 and 2024.
The mutation suggests the rats have developed a resistance to second-generation anticoagulant rodenticides, also known as SGARs, but other animals continue to be inadvertently killed by these types of rat poison.
SGARs are deadly to secondary predators, such as tawny frogmouths, Australian boobooks and eastern barn owls, that feed on rodents.
Black rats are the most common introduced rat in Australia and experts warn their increase in resistance to poison could pose a serious risk to the country's wildlife.
Ms Gorbould also expressed fears of a public health crisis as Australians may be using larger quantities of poison in an attempt to rid rats from their home.
However, instead of working effectively, this would serve to introduce more poison into the food chain, and into waterways.
Animals that consume the poison, which prevents blood clotting, die from internal bleeding.
Research carried out by Ms Gorbould and her team found genetic mutation Tyr25Phe, which is associated with resistance to anticoagulant rodenticides, in 53.7 per cent of the rats they tested.
The tests were carried out on the tails of 191 rails caught in Australia's fourth most populated cities.
Alarmingly, the gene was found in over 80 per cent of black rats tested in Perth, over 45 per cent in Sydney, 39 per cent in Melbourne.
Tyr25Phe was found in none of the 10 rats tested in Brisbane.
'If you're using one of the baits that don't work … people will probably try to use more, and more, and more,' she told Daily Mail Australia.
'And so it's feeding back into that cycle of increasing the rates of resistance in the population, increasing those non-targeted poisonings, and then we're ending up essentially with a public health issue because we've got these rats that can't be controlled.'
Second-generation rodenticides are so potent they are banned in the United States, Canada and the European Union.
The poison makes it way up the food chain and kills other animals in a huge risk to Australia's biodiversity.
Scientists at Deakin University previously found rat poison was to blame for killing powerful owls.
In 2022, in a study looking at the prey of powerful owls, the team dissected 160 possums.
They found rat poison in 91 per cent of brushtail possums and 40 per cent of ringtail possums tested.
Ms Gorbould urged Australians to consider against using rat poisons and instead look to non-poison alternatives.
She suggested snap traps and electrocution traps while pointing out that 'prevention is better than cure'.
The scientist advised the best thing people can do is make sure they don't have places for rodents to live by removing waste from their yards.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
13 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Aussie grandmother who slipped in Woolies unleashes on supermarket
A furious grandmother has been left with a shattered wrist and a long, painful recovery after she slipped over in her local Woolworths. Dusanka Koljibabic was shopping at the Melville Woolworths in Perth 's southern suburbs when she suddenly lost her footing. The 69-year-old slipped and fell in the aisle less than a minute after a little girl, who had been playing with a cleaning product, sprayed it on the floor. The impact shattered her wrist, requiring surgery and a metal plate. Since then, her injury has taken a huge toll on her daily life. 'I was unable to shower, dress, or undress myself, cook, clean, do any gardening. Most definitely I wasn't in the position to drive,' she told 7News. 'I felt like my life was turned upside down in an instant. 'I feel like as a customer I have been ignored and it's through no fault of my own.' But five months on, Koljibabic says the supermarket giant continues to deny liability. She was offered a one-off $3000 payment, an 'insulting' offer she refused. While private health insurance has covered some of the costs, Koljibabic says she's already spent at least $5,000 and faces up to two years of rehabilitation. Woolworths told Daily Mail in a statement: 'We take the health and safety of our customers and team members very seriously. Our team members work hard to ensure the safety of all customers while in the store'. The case has highlighted the challenge of proving negligence in supermarket slip-and-fall incidents. In 2012, the High Court ruled that stores have a 15–20minute window to identify and remove hazards. But Ms Koljibabic believes that policy doesn't account for incidents like hers and says the substance on the floor was invisible to her and staff members. Her lawyer is considering taking legal action against the parents or guardians of the girl who sprayed the cleaning product. In 2017, a Sydney woman who was awarded $151,000 in compensation after slipping on a grape at her local Woolworths lost the payout on appeal. The NSW District Court initially ruled in her favour, with Justice Maiden SC finding it likely the grape had been dropped by a staff member before the store opened. The court accepted that Woolworths had adequate cleaning systems and staff training, but concluded there was no evidence the pre-opening inspection had been properly carried out that day. However, that ruling was later overturned on appeal. The woman not only lost the compensation but was also ordered to pay Woolworths' legal costs.
The Guardian
13 hours ago
- The Guardian
‘Self-termination is most likely': the history and future of societal collapse
'We can't put a date on Doomsday, but by looking at the 5,000 years of [civilisation], we can understand the trajectories we face today – and self-termination is most likely,' says Dr Luke Kemp at the Centre for the Study of Existential Risk at the University of Cambridge. 'I'm pessimistic about the future,' he says. 'But I'm optimistic about people.' Kemp's new book covers the rise and collapse of more than 400 societies over 5,000 years and took seven years to write. The lessons he has drawn are often striking: people are fundamentally egalitarian but are led to collapses by enriched, status-obsessed elites, while past collapses often improved the lives of ordinary citizens. Today's global civilisation, however, is deeply interconnected and unequal and could lead to the worst societal collapse yet, he says. The threat is from leaders who are 'walking versions of the dark triad' – narcissism, psychopathy and Machiavellianism – in a world menaced by the climate crisis, nuclear weapons, artificial intelligence and killer robots. The work is scholarly, but the straight-talking Australian can also be direct, such as when setting out how a global collapse could be avoided. 'Don't be a dick' is one of the solutions proposed, along with a move towards genuinely democratic societies and an end to inequality. His first step was to ditch the word civilisation, a term he argues is really propaganda by rulers. 'When you look at the near east, China, Mesoamerica or the Andes, where the first kingdoms and empires arose, you don't see civilised conduct, you see war, patriarchy and human sacrifice,' he says. This was a form of evolutionary backsliding from the egalitarian and mobile hunter-gatherer societies which shared tools and culture widely and survived for hundreds of thousands of years. 'Instead, we started to resemble the hierarchies of chimpanzees and the harems of gorillas.' Instead Kemp uses the term Goliaths to describe kingdoms and empires, meaning a society built on domination, such as the Roman empire: state over citizen, rich over poor, master over slave and men over women. He says that, like the biblical warrior slain by David's slingshot, Goliaths began in the bronze age, were steeped in violence and often surprisingly fragile. Goliath states do not simply emerge as dominant cliques that loot surplus food and resources, he argues, but need three specific types of 'Goliath fuel'. The first is a particular type of surplus food: grain. That can be 'seen, stolen and stored', Kemp says, unlike perishable foods. In Cahokia, for example, a society in North America that peaked around the 11th century, the advent of maize and bean farming led to a society dominated by an elite of priests and human sacrifice, he says. The second Goliath fuel is weaponry monopolised by one group. Bronze swords and axes were far superior to stone and wooden axes, and the first Goliaths in Mesopotamia followed their development, he says. Kemp calls the final Goliath fuel 'caged land', meaning places where oceans, rivers, deserts and mountains meant people could not simply migrate away from rising tyrants. Early Egyptians, trapped between the Red Sea and the Nile, fell prey to the pharaohs, for example. 'History is best told as a story of organised crime,' Kemp says. 'It is one group creating a monopoly on resources through the use of violence over a certain territory and population.' All Goliaths, however, contain the seeds of their own demise, he says: 'They are cursed and this is because of inequality.' Inequality does not arise because all people are greedy. They are not, he says. The Khoisan peoples in southern Africa, for example, shared and preserved common lands for thousands of years despite the temptation to grab more. Instead, it is the few people high in the dark triad who fall into races for resources, arms and status, he says. 'Then as elites extract more wealth from the people and the land, they make societies more fragile, leading to infighting, corruption, immiseration of the masses, less healthy people, overexpansion, environmental degradation and poor decision making by a small oligarchy. The hollowed-out shell of a society is eventually cracked asunder by shocks such as disease, war or climate change.' History shows that increasing wealth inequality consistently precedes collapse, says Kemp, from the Classical Lowland Maya to the Han dynasty in China and the Western Roman empire. He also points out that for the citizens of early rapacious regimes, collapse often improved their lives because they were freed from domination and taxation and returned to farming. 'After the fall of Rome, people actually got taller and healthier,' he says. Collapses in the past were at a regional level and often beneficial for most people, but collapse today would be global and disastrous for all. 'Today, we don't have regional empires so much as we have one single, interconnected global Goliath. All our societies act within one single global economic system – capitalism,' Kemp says. He cites three reasons why the collapse of the global Goliath would be far worse than previous events. First is that collapses are accompanied by surges in violence as elites try to reassert their dominance. 'In the past, those battles were waged with swords or muskets. Today we have nuclear weapons,' he says. Second, people in the past were not heavily reliant on empires or states for services and, unlike today, could easily go back to farming or hunting and gathering. 'Today, most of us are specialised, and we're dependent upon global infrastructure. If that falls away, we too will fall,' he says. 'Last but not least is that, unfortunately, all the threats we face today are far worse than in the past,' he says. Past climatic changes that precipitated collapses, for example, usually involved a temperature change of 1C at a regional level. Today, we face 3C globally. There are also about 10,000 nuclear weapons, technologies such as artificial intelligence and killer robots and engineered pandemics, all sources of catastrophic global risk. Kemp says his argument that Goliaths require rulers who are strong in the triad of dark traits is borne out today. 'The three most powerful men in the world are a walking version of the dark triad: Trump is a textbook narcissist, Putin is a cold psychopath, and Xi Jinping came to rule [China] by being a master Machiavellian manipulator.' 'Our corporations and, increasingly, our algorithms, also resemble these kinds of people,' he says. 'They're basically amplifying the worst of us.' Kemp points to these 'agents of doom' as the source of the current trajectory towards societal collapse. 'These are the large, psychopathic corporations and groups which produce global catastrophic risk,' he says. 'Nuclear weapons, climate change, AI, are only produced by a very small number of secretive, highly wealthy, powerful groups, like the military-industrial complex, big tech and the fossil fuel industry. 'The key thing is this is not about all of humanity creating these threats. It is not about human nature. It is about small groups who bring out the worst in us, competing for profit and power and covering all [the risks] up.' The global Goliath is the endgame for humanity, Kemp says, like the final moves in a chess match that determine the result. He sees two outcomes: self-destruction or a fundamental transformation of society. He believes the first outcome is the most likely, but says escaping global collapse could be achieved. 'First and foremost, you need to create genuine democratic societies to level all the forms of power that lead to Goliaths,' he says. That means running societies through citizen assemblies and juries, aided by digital technologies to enable direct democracy at large scales. History shows that more democratic societies tend to be more resilient, he says. 'If you'd had a citizens' jury sitting over the [fossil fuel companies] when they discovered how much damage and death their products would cause, do you think they would have said: 'Yes, go ahead, bury the information and run disinformation campaigns'? Of course not,' Kemp says. Escaping collapse also requires taxing wealth, he says, otherwise the rich find ways to rig the democratic system. 'I'd cap wealth at $10 million. That's far more than anyone needs. A famous oil tycoon once said money is just a way for the rich to keep score. Why should we allow these people to keep score at the risk of destroying the entire planet?' If citizens' juries and wealth caps seem wildly optimistic, Kemp says we have been long brainwashed by rulers justifying their dominance, from the self-declared god-pharaohs of Egypt and priests claiming to control the weather to autocrats claiming to defend people from foreign threats and tech titans selling us their techno-utopias. 'It's always been easier to imagine the end of the world than the end of Goliaths. That's because these are stories that have been hammered into us over the space of 5,000 years,' he says. 'Today, people find it easier to imagine that we can build intelligence on silicon than we can do democracy at scale, or that we can escape arms races. It's complete bullshit. Of course we can do democracy at scale. We're a naturally social, altruistic, democratic species and we all have an anti-dominance intuition. This is what we're built for.' Kemp rejects the suggestion that he is simply presenting a politically leftwing take on history. 'There is nothing inherently left wing about democracy,' he says. 'Nor does the left have a monopoly on fighting corruption, holding power accountable and making sure companies pay for the social and environmental damages they cause. That's just making our economy more honest.' He also has a message for individuals: 'Collapse isn't just caused by structures, but also people. If you want to save the world then the first step is to stop destroying it. In other words: don't be a dick. Don't work for big tech, arms manufacturers or the fossil fuel industry. Don't accept relationships based on domination and share power whenever you can.' Despite the possibility of avoiding collapse, Kemp remains pessimistic about our prospects. 'I think it's unlikely,' he says. 'We're dealing with a 5,000-year process that is going to be incredibly difficult to reverse, as we have increasing levels of inequality and of elite capture of our politics. 'But even if you don't have hope, it doesn't really matter. This is about defiance. It's about doing the right thing, fighting for democracy and for people to not be exploited. And even if we fail, at the very least, we didn't contribute to the problem.' Goliath's Curse by Luke Kemp was published in the UK on 31 July by Viking Penguin
Daily Mail
15 hours ago
- Daily Mail
James Magnussen on the huge mistake Aussie men make with their health
Aussie men are ticking time bombs, with Olympian James Magnussen revealing he made a mistake that is all too common and can lead to real health issues. Magnussen. 34, is a retired Australian sprinter who won gold in the men's 100 metre freestyle at the 2011 World Aquatics Championships in Shanghai and again in 2013 at Barcelona. He also earned a silver medal at the 2012 London Olympics in the 100 metre freestyle, finishing just 0.01 seconds behind Nathan Adrian. He formally retired from competitive swimming on June 5, 2019 at the age of 28, concluding a career that yielded 15 or more major international medals . Magnussen announced in early 2024 that he would come out of retirement to compete in the Enhanced Games, aiming to break the 50‑metre freestyle world record for a $1million prize. He admitted using performance‑enhancing drugs to transform his physique in preparation for the event. But prior to that, he was required to undergo a full medical examination, something he described as 'scary' because he hadn't done one since he retired from professional swimming. 'I hadn't done a blood test in seven years to know what my testosterone levels were,' Magnussen told The 28 Year Old Male podcast. 'Turns out they were pretty normal before I did the thing, smack bang in what was normal for testosterone levels. 'But I hadn't tested them in seven years since I'd been an athlete. 'I actually had to do a full health screening before I started the games. Heart, lungs, kidneys, liver, all these things. 'There was a little bit of nervous energy from me when I got the test done because I was like 'oh I haven't been sick much, but I've definitely enjoyed life'. 'I was like 'how is my body holding up? What effects has sport or has life generally had on my body? And I healthy?'. 'Cause I actually don't know.' Magnussen is not alone. According to Australian Government statistics, approximately 60 per cent of Australian men do not regularly engage in health check-ups - particularly those aged 18-44. He said it was vital for Aussie men to buck that trend and get to the doctor, to detect and get ahead of underlying issues before they became a major problem. 'When you look at it, and it stares you back in the face of this is where your health is at, this is a full picture of your health,' he said. 'It's OK, now I know what I need to improve or change or do anything like that. 'But as guys, most of us wait until we're sick or wait until something goes wrong and then you go to the doc. 'They will go 'oh you know, you've got this underlying issue that's been there for years but you just never had a checkup'. 'It's a good lesson for all guys out there,' he said. 'I've actually said to a few of my mates since I got back, I'd never had any of this testing done, but you should probably go see a doctor and get this, just to know where you are at. 'It's probably not a bad point in your mid thirties or your late thirties to not know what's going on.'
