Australia ‘confident' in US nuclear sub deal despite review
Australia plans to acquire at least three Virginia Class submarines from the United States within 15 years, eventually manufacturing its own subs. (AP pic)
SYDNEY : Australia said Thursday it is 'very confident' in the future of a US agreement to equip its navy with a fleet of nuclear-powered submarines, after the Trump administration put the pact under review.
The 2021 AUKUS deal joins Australia, the United Kingdom and the United States in a multi-decade effort to balance China's growing military might.
It aims to arm Australia with a fleet of cutting-edge, nuclear-powered submarines from the United States and provides for cooperation in developing an array of warfare technologies.
US President Donald Trump's administration has advised Australia and the United Kingdom that it is reviewing AUKUS, a spokesperson for the Australian department of defence confirmed Thursday.
Defence minister Richard Marles said he was 'very confident' Australia would still get the American submarines.
'I think the review that's been announced is not a surprise,' he told public broadcaster ABC.
'We've been aware of this for some time. We welcome it. It's something which is perfectly natural for an incoming administration to do.'
Australia plans to acquire at least three Virginia Class submarines from the United States within 15 years, eventually manufacturing its own subs.
The US Navy has 24 Virginia-class vessels, which can carry cruise missiles, but American shipyards are struggling to meet production targets set at two new boats each year.
Critics question why the United States would sell nuclear-powered submarines to Australia without stocking its own military first.
Marles said boosting the US production of US Virginia Class submarines was a challenge.
'That's why we are working very closely with the United States on seeing that happen. But that is improving,' he said.
Government forecasts estimate the submarine programme alone could cost Australia up to US$235 billion over the next 30 years, a price tag that has contributed to criticism of the strategy.
Australia should conduct its own review of AUKUS, said former conservative prime minister Malcolm Turnbull, noting that Britain and now the United States had each decided to re-examine the pact.
'Australia, which has the most at stake, has no review. Our parliament to date has been the least curious and least informed. Time to wake up?' he posted on X.
Former Labor Party prime minister Paul Keating, a vehement critic of AUKUS, said the US review might 'save Australia from itself'.
Australia should carve its own security strategy 'rather than being dragged along on the coat tails of a fading Atlantic empire', Keating said.
'The review makes clear that America keeps its national interests uppermost. But the concomitant question is: Why has Australia failed to do the same?'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New Straits Times
a day ago
- New Straits Times
Malaysia needs to recalibrate long-term strategy
THE strategic rivalry between the United States and China has intensified in recent years, evolving into a long-term contest for primacy across technology, trade, ideology and defence. While the epicentres of this contest may lie in the Taiwan Strait, South China Sea and East Asian high-tech corridors, the ramifications reverberate far into Southeast Asia — placing heightened expectations on the foreign and defence policies of niched powers such as Malaysia. For Malaysia, the stakes have never been higher. After all, our strategic geography — located along the vital sea lanes of the Malacca Strait, a maritime choke point further connecting the Indian and Pacific Oceans — renders our country a natural focal point in this zero-sum contest. But unlike the US or China, Malaysia does not seek hegemony. Instead, it seeks relevance through diplomacy, strategic autonomy and non-alignment. However, such a posture is becoming harder to sustain when both great powers demand visible allegiance — whether in the form of defence procurement, port access or rhetorical support in multilateral forums. Recent developments only underscore this pressure. The US has called for Indo-Pacific partners to commit up to five per cent of their gross domestic product on defence spending, an unrealistic ask for a country like Malaysia, which is still navigating post-Covid-19 pandemic economic recovery. Similarly, great powers continue to deepen its presence in the South and East China Seas, testing the limits of many countries on their exclusive economic zone, as evidenced by repeated forays of their defence assets in these waters. While Malaysia has lodged diplomatic protests on some of these incursions, it has not escalated these incidents publicly, preferring quiet diplomacy without acquiescence and occasionally airing the concerns in institutional mechanisms such as Asean; often behind closed doors. But the room for ambiguity is narrowing. The revival of US-led security coalitions such as the Quad (with India, Japan, and Australia) and AUKUS (with Australia and the United Kingdom), as well as the Five Power Defence Arrangements (Australia, Malaysia, New Zealand, Singapore and the UK), demonstrates that security alignments are being reconfigured. These alliances suggest a rebalancing of defence resources and infrastructure away from ad hoc deterrence and towards integrated defence ecosystems. Thus, what is Malaysia's long-term strategy in navigating this geopolitical rivalry? FIRST, we must clearly articulate a doctrine of strategic autonomy. It involves having sufficient economic, diplomatic and defence capabilities to independently determine national interests without succumbing to pressure from any single external actor. SECOND, we should deepen multilateralism. As Asean chair, Malaysia has a unique platform to reinvigorate regional diplomacy, particularly through the Asean Defence Ministers' Meeting Plus, the East Asia Summit, and the Asean Regional Forum. They should be retooled to facilitate Track 1.5 and Track 2.0 dialogues that can defuse tensions and offer third-party mediation options in flashpoints in IndoChina such as Myanmar or the Thailand-Cambodia border skirmish; of which the latter is being adeptly handled by Prime Minister Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim as Asean chair. THIRD, Malaysia's defence modernisation must be calibrated and intelligent. We should prioritise unmanned systems, cyberdefence and maritime domain awareness — areas that offer asymmetrical advantages. The recent acquisition of Turkish-made drones and the partnership with the UK, France and South Korea on defence industrial collaboration provide a useful template. FOURTH, Malaysian diplomacy must evolve in line with 21st-century expectations. This involves embedding economic statecraft into foreign policy. The China-US contest is as much about 5G networks, semiconductors and artificial intelligence supply chains as it is about military deployment. Malaysia's participation in frameworks such as the Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership, the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership and digital economy partnerships can serve as hedging tools against overdependence. LASTLY, the political leadership must communicate this complexity to the public. Geopolitics can no longer be confined to bureaucratic corridors. The Malaysian public needs to understand why defence spending, diplomatic engagements and new partnerships matter in ensuring national sovereignty, food security and economic resilience. A well-informed populace can be a bulwark against foreign misinformation and manipulation.
Free Malaysia Today
a day ago
- Free Malaysia Today
Trump makes G7 summit return in crisis mode
US President Donald Trump last attended a G7 summit in Canada in 2018. (AP pic) WASHINGTON : US President Donald Trump, whose second term has been devoted to going it alone, makes his return to the Group of Seven in crisis mode after Israel attacked Iran. The G7 summit starting Sunday in the Canadian Rockies town of Kananaskis marks the first major global gathering of Trump's second term, in which he has been even more brash in shattering diplomatic norms. Looking to avoid a dust-up, Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney had set the agenda on largely uncontroversial themes such as building global supply chains for critical minerals. That agenda could now be upended as Israel launched a massive military campaign against Iran on Friday, saying it was taking pre-emptive action against its adversary's contested nuclear programme. The Trump administration has closely aligned the US with Israel, taking aim even at close allies who criticise its offensive in Gaza. But Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu openly defied Trump, who hours earlier had called for a diplomatic solution and whose friend and roving envoy Steve Witkoff had been due to hold new talks with Iran on Sunday just as the G7 opened. A senior Canadian official said there would be no attempt at the G7 to reach consensus on a joint communique on the issues of the day and that leaders instead would be asked to endorse 'short, action-oriented statements'. 'Of course it would be desirable for a summit statement to be issued, but as the summit is being held in a very complex international situation, I believe that the unity of the G7 should be given the highest priority,' Japanese foreign minister Takeshi Iwaya said. The last time Trump attended a G7 summit in Canada in 2018, he stormed out early and took to social media to disassociate the US from the statement and brand then-prime minister Justin Trudeau as 'dishonest and weak'. The bad blood never ended, and Trump on returning to office mockingly said Canada should be the 51st US state. Trudeau handed over the premiership in March to Carney, a former central banker who told Trump firmly in the White House that Canada was 'never for sale'. Like Trump, 'Trudeau liked being the centre of attention', said John Kirton, founder of the G7 Research Group at the University of Toronto. Trudeau at least at first was seen as 'young, handsome and – I'm quoting others – hot. Carney is none of these things', Kirton said. Carney has instead patched up with Trump through his analytical skills and competence, Kirton said. Trump also has an incentive to keep the peace in Kananaskis – the US will lead the G7 in 2027. 'He doesn't want to kill the G7 golden goose before he can produce the 'biggest, best summit ever' for the whole world stage two years from now,' Kirton said. The G7 club of major industrial democracies – Britain, Canada, France, Germany, Italy, Japan and the US – was formed in the 1970s to coordinate economic policy and grew in scope to take on some of the world's security hotspots. Trump since returning to the White House has upended the global economic system by imposing tariffs and has sought to negotiate with Russia over Ukraine – an issue that will also figure prominently when he heads to a Nato summit in The Hague a week after Canada. The US president can be expected to push back in Kananaskis if allies seek to moderate him, said Rachel Rizzo, a senior fellow at the Atlantic Council. 'He does not view these organisations as ways to deepen and expand American power and influence. He sees these fora as constraining America,' she said. Europeans will observe Trump at the G7 to see how he treats their alliance, said Max Bergmann, director of the Europe, Russia and Eurasia programme at the centre for strategic and international studies. 'Our allies and partners in Europe are really questioning the US commitment and they are asking themselves, is this a relationship that is going to be maintained?' Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky plans to attend the G7 and hopes to meet Trump. The two clashed bitterly at the White House on Feb 28 but Trump since then has voiced frustration at Russia's reluctance on peace overtures. In a key step distancing himself from Trudeau, Carney has also invited Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi. Relations sharply deteriorated after Trudeau publicly accused India of masterminding the assassination of a Sikh separatist in Canada.
Free Malaysia Today
a day ago
- Free Malaysia Today
Judge blocks Trump's use of national guard in protest-hit Los Angeles
US national guard soldiers assemble during deployment for duty for the Los Angeles protests. (AP pic) WASHINGTON : The Trump administration slammed a judge's 'extraordinary intrusion' on presidential powers Thursday, after he ruled that the decision to send the California national guard to protest-hit Los Angeles was 'illegal.' The ruling by US district judge Charles Breyer ordering Donald Trump to return control of the reserve force to California's governor Gavin Newsom infringes on the president's authority as commander-in-chief, the department of justice said in an emergency appeal. Breyer stayed his order until Friday, however, giving the administration time to launch a swift appeal. Within minutes the higher court issued its own ruling staying Breyer's order for several more days to give it time to consider the appeal, with a hearing set for June 17. The stay means Trump would still control the national guard in California during protests planned for Saturday. Sporadic though spectacular violence has rocked Los Angeles over days of demonstrations against immigration raids launched by the Trump administration. But the clashes fell 'far short' of the 'rebellion' the president described to justify his decision to send in the national guard, Breyer said in a 36-page opinion released earlier Thursday. Trump's actions 'were illegal … He must therefore return control' of the guardsmen to Newsom, Breyer said. 'That order is an extraordinary intrusion on the President's constitutional authority as Commander in Chief,' the justice department wrote in the appeal. Newsom, however, was quick to celebrate Breyer's order, potentially a much-needed win in just one of several fronts that wealthy, Democratic California is currently fighting against the White House. Trump 'is not a monarch, he is not a king, and he should stop acting like one,' the 57-year-old Democrat said. Protests over the immigration crackdown first began in Los Angeles on Friday, and were largely confined to just a few blocks of the sprawling city. Damages include vandalism, looting, clashes with law enforcement and several torched driverless taxis. Trump, who has repeatedly exaggerated the scale of the unrest, deployed 4,000 national guard troops and 700 US marines to Los Angeles despite the objections of local officials, claiming that the city was 'burning' and they had lost control. It was the first time since 1965 that a US president deployed the national guard over the wishes of a state's governor. Critics have accused Trump of a power grab. Anger at Trump's crackdown and the use of masked, armed immigration agents, backed by uniformed soldiers, is rousing protests in other cities, though Los Angeles was calm on Thursday night. The ruling came after California's stand-off with the administration ratcheted up earlier Thursday, when a sitting US senator was handcuffed and forcibly removed from a press conference on the immigration raids. The shocking incident was slammed by furious Democrats who said it 'reeks of totalitarianism.' Video footage shows California senator Alex Padilla, a Democrat, being pushed from the room at a federal building in Los Angeles as he tried to ask Homeland Security secretary Kristi Noem about the raids. 'I'm Senator Alex Padilla. I have questions for the secretary,' he said as two men grappled with him in front of journalists, including from AFP. Footage filmed by Padilla's staff outside the room shows the senator being pushed to the ground and handcuffed. The incident 'reeks of totalitarianism,' Senate minority leader Chuck Schumer said, calling for an investigation. The White House hit back, claiming it was a 'theater-kid stunt' and claiming without evidence that Padilla 'lunged toward secretary Noem.' Trump was elected last year after promising to launch historic mass deportations. But with his mounting crackdown rippling through industries heavily reliant on immigrant labor, Trump said he had heard employers' complaints and hinted at a forthcoming policy shift. 'We're going to have an order on that pretty soon, I think,' he said. Breyer's ruling comes two days ahead of the nationwide 'No Kings' protests expected on Saturday, the same day Trump attends a highly unusual military parade in the US capital. The parade, featuring warplanes and tanks, has been organised to celebrate the 250th anniversary of the founding of the US army but also happens to be on the day of Trump's 79th birthday.
