Iconic '90s Hip-Hop Duo Performs Together for the First Time in Years
Iconic '90s Hip-Hop Duo Performs Together for the First Time in Years originally appeared on Parade.
Back like they never left! Will Smith and DJ Jazzy Jeff reunited at the Capital Summertime Ball in London on Sunday, June 15.
Smith, 56, and Jeff, 60, looked straight out of the 90s as they posed together for photos. The pair's last public outing was at the 2023 Grammy Salute to 50 Years of Hip-Hop. They later hit the stage to perform mega hits like the theme song from The Fresh Prince of Bel-Air.
You can check out a video from Capital's official TikTok account below:
Smith and Jeff formed the duo DJ Jazzy Jeff & the Fresh Prince in the mid-1980s after meeting at a house party in Philadelphia. Come 1987, they released their debut album, Rock the House, which garnered acclaim thanks to its clean, humorous storytelling style.
In 1988, they released their second album, He's the DJ, I'm the Rapper, which featured the still-beloved hit song 'Parents Just Don't Understand.' The following year, 'Parents Just Don't Understand' won the first-ever Grammy Award for Best Rap Performance.
Of course, we can't talk about Will Smith and DJ Jazzy Jeff without mentioning 'Summertime.' The legends dropped the single in 1991, winning them a second Grammy. Their other notable albums include Homebase and Code Red.
Smith and Jeff's fame also transitioned to television when Smith starred on The Fresh Prince of Bel-Air from 1990 to 1996 and Jeff had a recurring role as Jazz.
🎬SIGN UP for Parade's Daily newsletter to get the latest pop culture news & celebrity interviews delivered right to your inbox🎬
Nowadays, The Fresh Prince of Bel-Air is still a beloved series with a theme song that's stood the test of time, as evidenced by Smith's and Jeff's epic U.K. reunion.
Smith also performed the Men in Black theme song. He appeared in three of the franchise's four films: Men in Black in 1997, Men in Black II in 2002, and Men in Black 3 in 2012.
Iconic '90s Hip-Hop Duo Performs Together for the First Time in Years first appeared on Parade on Jun 15, 2025
This story was originally reported by Parade on Jun 15, 2025, where it first appeared.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CNET
an hour ago
- CNET
I Took a Quick Tour Through Longevity Culture. Here's What I Learned About Reverse Aging
I'm standing in a drafty room with several hundred people in London's Truman Brewery, all of us shaking our hands above our heads, woo-wooing our way to the end of another day at SXSW. I won't lie –– I'd hoped something like this would happen at some point during the week. Weird, offbeat moments such as this really separate a fun conference from a boring one. This particular moment is a mini taste of a "longevity rave" –– an event style that's popping up around the world, run by those who believe music, movement and connection can impact our health and happiness in the long term. "Genetics is a very small determinant of health –– other factors are more important," Tina Brown, a social entrepreneur and systems architect who co-founded Longevity Rave, told us just minutes earlier. "The joy of living is a really powerful motivator." The idea of living longer, healthier lives is nothing new, but the science of aging is now better understood than ever, and methods to reduce the often substantial gap between our lifespans and the length of time we're able to stay healthy (known as health spans) are becoming more accessible. I've long been skeptical about the idea of investing significant time and money into trying to live longer –– but perhaps that's because I just assumed it wasn't for people like me. Back in 2017, I interviewed billionaire tech entrepreneur Bryan Johnson about his mission to level up everyone, including himself, by implanting chips in our brains so that we could compete with AI. This conversation has haunted me over the years. Even though I've dabbled in biohacking myself (I have a chip in my hand to do basic smartphone-related tasks), I'd advocate for a cautious approach. Entrepreneur Bryan Johnson talks about taking extreme measures in the name of longevity. Hubert Vestil/SXSW Conference & Festivals via Getty Images Since then, Johnson's name has become synonymous with taking extreme measures to reverse aging and extend his life — among them, injecting the blood of his 17-year-old son into his 47-year-old body (he has since ceased this practice in favor of "total plasma exchange"). The quest for longevity is often associated with Silicon Valley billionaire biohacker boys like Johnson and Twitter founder Jack Dorsey, which makes it feel alienating and inaccessible. That's why at SXSW London, I was curious to see not one but two all-female panels discussing reverse aging and extending our health spans. The panels didn't indulge in the kind of anti-aging rhetoric I've grown up with, which demands that women do everything in their power to remain young and beautiful. Even though, as Canadian comedian Katherine Ryan joked during one of the panels, women should avoid stress by staying single, as "it makes you ugly, being married to a loser." The new science of aging Ryan hosts a podcast called What's My Age Again?, in which she interviews celebrities who have undergone testing to determine their biological age as a jumping-off point for discussing their own relationship to aging. Celebrity women, perhaps more than any of us, live inside a vanity pressure cooker, where their appearance is constantly judged. It's fair to say that a surge of famous women, from the Kardashians to Meghan Trainor, have been vocal about all of the many steps they've taken to reverse their aging. Cosmetic benefits aside, the health and quality of life benefits often make the most compelling case for the pursuit of longevity. With more women having babies later, they want to maintain their youthful energy to be present, active parents, said Ryan. Also, for many of us, there is a significant gap between the number of years that make up our lifespan and the number of years we remain healthy. But many believe that this gap is ours for the closing. "A person's biological age and chronological age often don't match," said Nichola Conlon, a molecular biologist and CEO of healthy aging company Nuchido, who is a frequent guest on Ryan's podcast. "Everyone associates age with a number… that kind of doesn't matter anymore." Katherine Ryan, left, and Nichola Conlon at SXSW London. Lorne Thomson/Redferns In the past, scientists thought that how we age was a fixed process determined almost entirely by our genetics. That's no longer the case (as confirmed by multiple peer-reviewed studies that confirm aging is influenced by multiple factors). "Aging is a malleable process, as we are finding," said Brown. The science is fast evolving, and there's even an XPrize Healthspan, offering $101 million to anyone who can come up with a solution to knock 10 to 20 years off someone's age. We already know that aging is influenced by a variety of factors, in addition to genetics –– largely how we live our lives. As such, it's important that we attempt to understand our bodies and treat them well, which is pretty universal advice. "You can live more healthily in middle age if you stop following general guidelines and instead follow your data," said Deepti Agarwal, a doctor specializing in healthy aging, during a panel about valuing health span over lifespan. This approach, known as precision medicine, advocates for a tailored, rather than one-size-fits-all approach to health. It takes a lot of the guesswork out of medicine, but isn't without its criticisms. Longevity, but only for a select few? Transferring the responsibility for aging to the individual can reduce support for public health measures, said Timothy Caulfield, a professor and the research director at the Health Law Institute at the University of Alberta, speaking not at SXSW, but on the Atlantic's How to Defy Death podcast (a deep dive I'd recommend if you want to learn more). It's all very well emphasizing that you have control over your own longevity if you have the time, money and resources to take care of yourself, he said. But that's simply not the case for many people, meaning that seeking to prolong longevity has the potential to exacerbate existing inequalities. He added that it also sends the message to people that "if you're not doing it, you're failing." It also creates space for the wellness industry to exploit people's anxieties by selling them products based on sketchy science-adjacent claims that aren't necessarily supported by a robust body of evidence, said Caulfield. There is an important conversation to be had about equal access to longevity treatments as it becomes more mainstream, said Cat Wiles, founder and CSO of marketing agency Spark, who appeared on the panel alongside Ryan and Conlon. "We're already starting to see warning signs about inequality," she said. Age spans might be increasing among the wealthy elite, but in poorer areas, the reverse is often true. Private health companies are already giving people who can afford it tools to improve their health, and it would be worrying to think insurance premiums could be tied to your biological age, Wiles added. Conlon has hope, though, that we'll reach a point at which longevity medicine is so affordable that it will become "unethical" for doctors not to help you slow down or reverse your aging. Plenty of the more extreme measures taken by the billionaire biohackers –– Johnson's blood exchange, for example –– will likely remain inaccessible (as well as unsavory) to most of us. The same might not be true of other solutions. Nuchido, Conlon's company, makes NAD Plus supplements, which are popular among celebrities and have some evidence to support their use for anti-aging, although they are the subject of much ongoing research. During the health span panel, Tamsin Lewis, a doctor who founded the de-aging company Wellgevity, said that intravenous NADs are not the answer to slowing down your rate of aging. It will slow down your finances, though. Instead, she and the other women on her panel advocated prioritizing cheaper interventions. What actually works? It might not be what you want to hear if you're ready to throw money at the problem, but the best scientific evidence we currently have to support healthy aging and longevity are the obvious solutions: We need to prioritize nutrition, exposure to sunlight, movement and building muscle. "We wear this meat jacket, but it's very much a scaffolding for our longevity," said Lewis. "It protects our brain, bones, hips, sleep and blood sugar levels." Other key factors include getting enough sleep, minimizing stress, maximizing resilience and bolstering our emotional and mental health. "The movement of longevity has got bogged down in biohacking bros," said Nikolina Glauc, co-founder and CEO of GlycanAge, a company that uses biomarkers to detect disease on a molecular level. The biggest thing that has made a difference for her in her own quest to extend her lifespan is psychotherapy, she added. As Lewis closes out the session with breathwork and the mini rave, I feel as though I've been on an entire journey through longevity culture. I feel skeptical about some of the pricey reverse aging options that I've come across, which feel a little like exploitative wellness culture dressed up in dubious science. I also worry about unequal access to reverse aging solutions and the social and public health impacts. At the same time, I feel buoyed by some of the research currently underway, particularly by what Brown calls the "science of connection," which she's exploring through dance, music and community. "In the end, humans need to be with other people," she said. Of all the advice I've received, it feels like the easiest to follow –– and even if it doesn't wind back the clock for me, it will at least keep me sane and happy for the duration of my lifespan.
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Travis Kelce Reacts to Wedding Photos With Taylor Swift on Sunday
Travis Kelce Reacts to Wedding Photos With Taylor Swift on Sunday originally appeared on Athlon Sports. After keeping a low profile for several months, Kansas City Chiefs tight end Travis Kelce and his girlfriend, Taylor Swift, are slowly stepping back into the spotlight. Swift broke her social media silence to announce she finally reclaimed her masters at the end of May. She wrote in a letter, "I've been bursting into tears of joy at random intervals ever since I found out that this is really happening. I really get to say these words: All of the music I've ever made... now belongs... to me." The 14-time Grammy winner and 35-year-old All-Pro turned heads stepping out for dinner in Palm Beach not long afterward. The couple quietly put down temporary roots in Southern Florida as the Chiefs star trains for the 2025 NFL season. Less than a week later, photos of the 10-time Pro Bowler and Swift attending a family wedding in Tennessee went viral on social media. The famous couple attended the nuptial of Kelce's cousin, Tanner Corum, who tied the knot with Samantha Peck on June 6. The "Enchanted" singer and Kelce appeared to have a blast at RiverView Family Farm in Knoxville, grooving along in the seats during the bride and groom's first dance and happily posing with Kelce's extended family. Corum's younger sister, Ashton Corum, posted an album of photos that featured multiple pictures with Kelce and Swift. She captioned the post, "Had the best time celebrating the CORUMS!! @ @tannercorum16 love y'all more than anything🤍🤍." Kelce showed Ashton's post some love on Sunday and hit the like button. For the wedding, Swift wore a Rousseau floral midi dress ($1,945) and Acquazurra platform heels ($995). She wore a Cartier necklace ($27,250), Larkspur and Hark earrings ($1,200), and the custom "TNT" tennis bracelet Kelce gifted her last story was originally reported by Athlon Sports on Jun 8, 2025, where it first appeared.
Tom's Guide
2 hours ago
- Tom's Guide
Do you even need Dolby Atmos? I test soundbars for a living, and here's what I think
It's a fact of life: most of the best soundbars boast Dolby Atmos. If you don't know what Dolby Atmos is, first, why are you here? Second, don't worry, I'll tell you. So what is Dolby Atmos? Dolby Atmos is basically a spatial audio format built into soundbars (and other audio gear). It makes the sound feel like it's coming from all around you. On soundbars with extra channels like surround speakers and subwoofer, this sensation is all the more heightened. Soundbars come with channel setups; these act like codes, so you know what you're getting. For example, a 2.0 channel setup (like the Majority Elias, which I'll discuss later) has two stereo channels in the soundbar and no subwoofer or surround channel speakers. An 11.1.4 setup, like the JBL Bar 1300X, has 11 stereo and surround channels in the soundbar, a sub channel, and 4 Dolby Atmos channels. Confused? You're not alone. I know — it's actually really complex. Dolby Atmos is everywhere, but beyond its mad channel setups and confusing names, do you really even need it? Although I'd be the first person to jump at getting an epic surround home cinema setup, I can also acknowledge that my apartment doesn't really bode well for Dolby Atmos, and here's why. So if you get a cheaper soundbar, it probably has something called upfiring speakers. These types of soundbars lack channel (secondary) speakers, so they rely on speakers that shoot sound upwards to provide that surround-sound experience. For example, The Majority Elias (£99, UK-only) is a soundbar that has "Dolby Atmos". Those quotes are doing a lot of legwork right now. Sure, the brand paid for the Dolby Atmos license, and the upfiring speakers inside the soundbar that is somewhat capable of Atmos. However, if you live in an apartment like mine, these particular upfiring speakers are completely useless. I live in a gorgeous period property — it was built in 1792. As a result, my apartment's Georgian ceilings are high. Like, 16 foot high ceilings. Yep, I know. That's high. As a result, height upfiring speakers simply don't work in my home. Similarly, if your ceilings are angled (like, you live in a penthouse or your cinema room is the attic), the sound waves will struggle to bounce off the surface as planned. However, this is only the case for cheap 2 channel soundbars. If you have a soundbar with rear and side upfiring speakers and high ceilings, this probably won't be as much of an issue. So if you have flat ceilings between 8-12 foot tall, you're probably good to go. If you don't, your lovely upfiring speaker soundbar may as well be as Atmos-less as the $99 Sony HT-S100F, which you should definitely buy instead. Full candor, this soundbar used to be $99. The price just got raised to $159. This makes it far less competitive, which is a shame for Sony. Even so, it's probably the best cheap soundbar available on the market right now. It sounds excellent, much, much better than other $159 soundbars I've tested. The bass is great considering there's no subwoofer, and there's a range of listening modes. 5.1 is not Dolby Atmos — it is basic surround sound. If you haven't already noticed, basic tiers of even the best streaming services lack Dolby Atmos. You'll need to look for 'Dolby Atmos' in the audio quality section. Streaming services will literally say 'Dolby Atmos' in the movie information. If it says '5.1' that is not Dolby Atmos. It is more basic surround sound. It's worth noting that streaming services compress size of the file. This means the file will cut out elements at the high and low end of the frequency range to save space, and results in a weaker-sounding track. Just like with Bluetooth audio, you'll never get as high-quality audio on streaming as you will on Blu-ray. Netflix's cheapest tier ($7 a month), Disney Plus's cheapest tier ($10 a month), and Hulu ($10 a month), do not have Dolby Atmos. Apple TV+ ($10 a month) and HBO Max ($10 a month) have Dolby Atmos in the basic tier, so I'd recommend either of these sites for the cheapest way to get Dolby Atmos on streaming. Amazon Prime Video ($3 a month on top of Prime) offers Dolby Atmos on the ad-free tier, so would be a fantastic streaming service if you've already got a Prime account. You can even get a free 30-day trial of Amazon Prime Video right now. For the best Dolby Atmos, I'd recommend getting some Ultra HD 4K Blu-rays. I test all soundbars with UHD 4K Blu-rays on a Panasonic Blu-ray player, and oh boy, does it make all the difference. Obviously. Not all 4K UHD Blu-rays have Atmos, though, so you'll still need to check the box. So, if you don't have the aforementioned streaming services, and you don't have 4K UHD Blu-rays, I don't think you need Atmos. The best Dolby Atmos soundbar I've tested is the JBL Bar 1300X — which is amazing. It's also $1,700. However, if $1,700 is just a little (or in my case, a lot) out of reach, I'd recommend the Polk Audio Signa S4. This 3.1.2 setup is $399, which is much more affordable than other surround soundbars I've tested. It's also often on sale for $299. Most people agree that more like 5.1.2 is the minimum, which would price you out of the Polk Audio option, too. However, in a pinch, I found 3.1.2 to be perfectly serviceable. It just won't be as good. As a result, if your budget is below about $300, then 'true' Dolby Atmos is likely not going to happen. The cheapest one I've seen recently is the TCL Q75H Class, a massive $599 (and that's cheap!). You can get a 3.1.2 setup for $300 (like the Polk Audio Signa S4 on sale), but a true Atmos soundscape (with real height channels) will definitely run more like $500. If you've got the following: Then yes, you do need a Dolby Atmos soundbar. And you'll have an amazing time immersed in movies, TV shows, heck, even gaming (if you have the Xbox Series X or Xbox Series S). Dolby Atmos really does make movies feel more immersive. Obviously it will — it's literally an audio format designed for that sole purpose. If you can afford an excellent soundbar and you want to get 360° audio out of your movies, then by all means, get a Dolby Atmos soundbar. My favorite is the JBL Bar 1300X, but there are plenty more excellent options out there — all of which I've mentioned here. I adore this soundbar. It has a stonking 11.1.4 channel setup so it's truly Dolby Atmos and immersive. I felt like I was inside the TV screen, no matter what movie I was watching. It's high-quality, and has a premium price to boot. If you've decided you don't need a Dolby Atmos soundbar, Sony HT-S2000's $499 offering could be a fantastic purchase. The 3.1 channel soundbar is compact and has crisp dialogue.
