Unused '$10 million' highway to southern border crossing is DEMOLISHED amid Trump migrant crackdown
A highway connecting a planned port of entry in Mexico and southern California is being demolished as President Donald Trump ramps up his mass deportation goals.
Bulldozers have been seen tearing up a quarter mile of roadway that would have linked Tijuana and Otay Mesa, a neighborhood southeast of San Diego.
The road, an extension of state route 11, was built two years ago and was set to lead right to the new Otay Mesa Port of Entry East, a facility that has been fully built on the Mexican side.
This port of entry, which will have 'state-of-the-art inspection facilities', is being created to relieve traffic at the existing border facility in Otay Mesa.
However, the American side of the port has yet to be built at all. It is two years behind schedule and is now being redesigned by the San Diego Association of Governments, according to Border Report.
It comes weeks after the Department of Transportation said it would be officially disbursing the $150 million grant, first approved under the Biden administration, to build the border crossing facility on the American side.
The April 15 announcement confirmed that the Trump administration came to a altered agreement with state authorities that got rid of a 'zero-emission vehicle charging provision.'
It is unclear whether new demands from Trump officials are the reason the road is being torn up. The cost of the demolition is approximately $4 million on top of the $10 million that went into building it in the first place, a contractor told Border Report.
The San Diego Association of Governments (SANDAG) and the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) have said they are 'currently collaborating with federal partners on the project's final design.'
'Thanks to the prior administration's lack of focus, this critical project sat in limbo for two years. No more,' Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy said in a statement.
'We moved to finalize this deal so we can help protect our Southern border and crack down on drug trafficking while preventing tax dollars subsidizing pointless Green New Deal priorities.'
DailyMail.com approached the White House and the Department of Transportation for comment.
SANDAG said they plan to break ground on the port of entry by this fall. They anticipate it to be fully operational by late 2027.
Federal and state officials say the port will strengthen border security while also providing another option for commercial and passenger vehicles to move between California and Baja California.
The San Ysidro border crossing, approximately five miles away from the one in Otay Mesa, is already the busiest thoroughfare into the United States, welcoming an average of 40,000 personal vehicles per day from Mexico last year.
As of 6am PDT on Tuesday the average wait time to cross at San Ysidro was 95 minutes, according to US Customs and Border Protection (CBP).
The new port of entry in Otay Mesa will 'provide an alternative for nearly 3,600 trucks that cross the existing Otay Mesa and Tecate Ports of Entry daily, which are operating at capacity,' according to the Department of Transportation.
Recreational vehicles travelling through the port will be subject to dynamic tolling, a system where tolls are priced based on the level of congestion on the road.
The port will also be equipped with state-of-the-art inspection equipment for Border Patrol officers and a Commercial Vehicle Enforcement Facility, where federal agents will be able to inspect the cargo of trucks to make sure they do not have illegal contraband or exceed the weight limits of state highways.
Efforts to make crossings between Mexico and Southern California more efficient come as Trump is looking to make good on his campaign promises of securing the border and deporting a record number of illegal migrants.
US Border Patrol continues to stem the immigration flow into the US, announcing in April that it had apprehended a record low average of 264 migrants per day in March.
This is a 95 percent decrease from March 2024, when border patrol agents arrested an average of 4,488 migrants per day.
The Trump administration has run into resistance from civil liberties advocates who are suing over the government's attempts to rapidly deport illegal migrants.
One of the most notable cases is Kilmar Abrego Garcia, a man who was living in Maryland and was mistakenly deported to a notoriously hellish prison in El Salvador.
The government insists that the El Salvador native is a member of MS-13, but multiple courts have expressed skepticism, with the Supreme Court ordering Trump to 'facilitate' the return of Garcia to the US so he can be given due process.
In the meantime, the Trump administration unveiled a new plan offering migrants up to $1,000 if they choose to voluntarily leave the country.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
NBC News
31 minutes ago
- NBC News
Trump administration claims Columbia violated Title VI, threatening school's accreditation
The Trump administration said Wednesday it has notified the accreditor for Columbia University that the school violated Title IV, threatening the university's accreditation status by saying it "no longer appears to meet the Commissions accreditation standards." The U.S. Department of Education's Office for Civil Rights (OCR) and the Department of Health and Human Services' Office for Civil Rights (HHS OCR) "determined that Columbia University acted with deliberate indifference towards the harassment of Jewish students, thereby violating Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964," according to press release from the Education Department. The release says the school has been in violation since the start of the war in the Middle East that began on Oct. 7, 2023 when Hamas invaded Israel.
New Statesman
41 minutes ago
- New Statesman
The People's Republic of iPhone
Photo by In Pictures Ltd./Corbis via Getty Images On Friday 23 May, Donald Trump threatened to impose a 25 per cent tariff on what is arguably the world's most successful consumer product, the iPhone. This would be a historic tax hike on American consumers, because Apple currently sells around 70 million iPhones in the US for about $1,000 each; the US government would ask for $17.5bn in additional taxes on a single product line from a single company. But what Trump wants is actually more extreme: he believes that in order to escape his punitive tariff, Apple might bring production of the iPhone back to America. There are two reasons that this is wishful thinking. The first is that the iPhone is the apex product of globalisation. It would be impossible to make something as complex as a smartphone with the resources of a single country. Apple's supplier list runs to 27 pages of companies, many of which are themselves multinationals with long lists of their own subsidiaries. It is not the product of one country – more like 50. It will never be the case that the iPhone can be described as a purely American product. As Patrick McGee explains in Apple in China, in light of the company's long history of contract manufacturing, the vast sums it has invested in China, the knowledge and skills it has imparted to Chinese workers and the Chinese factories it has developed, it makes more sense to describe it as Chinese. Trump's discomfort with Americans using Chinese phones is not without foundation. What Apple has achieved in China is a spectacular example of industrial strategy. Apple's investment in China for a single year, 2015, was $55bn – greater than the combined research and development spending of every business in the UK. Around the same time, Apple's engineers were working in 1,600 Chinese factories. 'We were unwittingly tooling them up,' a former Apple executive told McGee, 'with… incredible know-how and experience.' It is unclear how other countries can loosen China's grip on technological manufacturing; an American iPhone would cost more than three times the price of current models, according to one analyst. But this is a power that China has been helped to acquire by the Western capitalists who rushed to exploit its people for cheap labour, and who never stopped to consider the long-term implications. A former Apple vice-president told McGee: 'We weren't thinking about geopolitics at all.' For all the Silicon Valley rhetoric about changing the world, Apple does not appear to have understood how successfully it was doing just that. We're reminded to question the information we see on our screens, but the screen itself is also an illusion. The devices of digital modernity are made, we are told, by companies that are American, German, Japanese and Korean. The brightest minds compete in an unending race to make the displays ever more crisp, the computers ever more intelligent. We choose between phones and laptops made by Google, Microsoft, Apple or Amazon, televisions made by Philips or Samsung, games consoles made by Sony or Nintendo. But there is only really one company. It makes products for all of these companies, and hundreds of other businesses around the world. It is called Hon Hai Precision Industry. Hon Hai began in 1974, in a shed in a suburb of Taipei called Tucheng ('dirt city', in Mandarin), in which ten people moulded knobs and dials for televisions from molten plastic. Their boss was Terry Gou, the 24-year-old son of a police officer, and recently released from national service. As personal computers began to proliferate, Gou moved to making components, mostly sockets and connectors; the trading name for the company, Foxconn, refers to connectors. The 'fox' part is simply an animal Gou admires. He also admires Ghengis Khan, and wears a bracelet from a temple dedicated to the Mongol emperor. Gou was instrumental in Apple's return from the brink of defeat. In 1997, Steve Jobs and Jony Ive had created the iMac, which offered to replaced the complicated and boring world of personal computing with an aspirational consumer product that connected easily to the internet. Apple quickly realised why everyone else made beige boxes – making anything else was expensive and difficult – but the company's designers and executives had an additional problem, which was that if they didn't do exactly what Steve Jobs told them to do, he would scream at them and then sack them. Every engineer who doubted the design eventually left and the 'unmanufacturable' iMac was finally manufactured by the Korean company LG. When Apple's exacting demands became too much for LG, it began looking for another company to build its products, and in Taiwan it found Terry Gou. Subscribe to The New Statesman today from only £8.99 per month Subscribe In Gou's factory at the end of the 1990s, the roof was made from corrugated metal and the air conditioning was reserved for equipment, not people. Around the building, banners reminded workers of the wisdom of 'Uncle Terry', which included such aphorisms as 'work hard on the job today or work hard to find a job tomorrow' and 'hungry people have especially clear minds'. Gou, more than anyone else, took advantage of the opportunities offered by the special economic zone that had been established around Shenzhen, in Guangdong province on the east coast of mainland China, in 1980. At the time the zone was created, Shenzhen was a town of around 70,000 people; by 2020, it had a population of 17.5 million. This accelerated growth was the result of the 'Guangdong model', in which local government and private businesses (often led by Taiwanese entrepreneurs such as Gou) collaborated to produce growth. Gou's factory was subsidised and outfitted by the state; the advanced machines on which he began making Apple's designs had been paid for by the Chinese Communist Party. China also provided its people, in vast numbers. Among the sources that McGee has obtained for Apple in China are documents showing that when Apple needed to increase production – in the weeks before a new iPhone went on sale, for example – the Chinese state would be able to secure an additional 800,000 workers for its production lines. This would be done by government-backed companies, which would send buses into rural areas to draw workers from China's 'floating population' of internal migrants. These migrant workers numbered in the hundreds of millions, a larger workforce than that of the European Union. Apple was an exceptionally demanding client, led first by Steve Jobs and then, after his death, by his trusted lieutenant, Tim Cook, whose forensic eye for detail was even more exacting than his predecessor's temper. On his first day as CEO, Cook presided over an operations meeting that lasted for nearly 13 hours. But this was also what China needed: a company that would push its factories to ever greater standards and quantities of production. Jobs, Cook and Gou helped to make China the global factory. By 2010, the executives of Silicon Valley joked that within 20 years, there would be two companies left. Wal-Mart would be the only shop, and everything it sold would be made by Foxconn. As the Guangdong Model brought economic growth to China, Apple discovered that the country was also becoming its most important new market. Despite the role the company had played in China's industrial development, access to this market still came at a price. In 2016, Cook and two of his top executives visited the headquarters of the Chinese Communist Party, where they promised to invest $275bn in the country over the following five years. McGee points out that this sum is more than twice the amount (in real terms) that America had invested through the Marshall Plan in rebuilding Europe after the Second World War. The effects of this investment can be seen on government buildings around the UK. The technology transfer enabled by Apple and others enabled the rise of a new generation of native Chinese companies, such as Huawei. China ceased to be a taker of foreign technology and began pushing its own technology into other states, including Britain. Huawei equipment was installed in the UK's mobile networks, and cameras made by companies such as Hikvision (of which the Chinese state is the largest shareholder, and which human rights organisations have alleged supplies equipment used in the mass surveillance of Uyghur people) appeared at sensitive sites in the UK. Some were worn by our own police officers. Attempts have been made to ban Chinese technology from our infrastructure, but it will be years before it is removed, if it ever is. The trade policy of the Trump administration is an erratic series of pronouncements made via social media, which are almost always delayed and abandoned. And if Trump does persist in battling Apple, he will be abruptly reminded that trillions of dollars of American savings are invested in the company. Xi Jinping has no such concerns. Apple must appease him or lose access to the world's largest group of consumers. As the trade war between America and China grows, then, it must be asked if the world's most influential technology company can avoid picking a side – and to what extent it already has. Apple in China: The Capture of the World's Greatest Company Patrick McGee Simon & Schuster, 448pp, £25 Purchasing a book may earn the NS a commission from who support independent bookshops [See also: The lost futures of Stereolab] Related This article appears in the 04 Jun 2025 issue of the New Statesman, The Housing Trap
Reuters
44 minutes ago
- Reuters
Reddit sues AI startup Anthropic for allegedly using data without permission
June 4 (Reuters) - Reddit (RDDT.N), opens new tab sued the artificial intelligence startup Anthropic on Wednesday, accusing it of stealing data from the social media discussion website to train its AI models despite publicly assuring it wouldn't. The complaint filed in San Francisco Superior Court is the latest battle over AI companies' alleged unauthorized use of third-party content. Anthropic's backers include (AMZN.O), opens new tab and Google parent Alphabet (GOOGL.O), opens new tab. "We disagree with Reddit's claims and will defend ourselves vigorously," an Anthropic spokesperson said. According to the complaint, Anthropic has resisted entering a licensing agreement even as it trained its Claude chatbot on Reddit content, despite assuring last July it had blocked its bots from accessing Reddit's platform. Reddit quoted Claude admitting it was "trained on at least some Reddit data" and did not know if that content was deleted. It also said Anthropic's bots have accessed or tried to access Reddit content more than 100,000 times, undermining the company's allegedly styling itself as an AI "white knight" committed to trust and honesty. "Anthropic refuses to respect Reddit's guardrails and enter into a license agreement," unlike Google and OpenAI, the complaint said. By scraping content and using it for commercial purposes, Anthropic violated Reddit's user policy and "enriched itself to the tune of tens of billions of dollars," the complaint added. In a statement, Reddit Chief Legal Officer Ben Lee said "we believe in an open internet," but AI companies need "clear limitations" on how they use content they scrape. Reddit and Anthropic are based in San Francisco, about a 10-minute walk from each other. The lawsuit seeks unspecified restitution and punitive damages, and an injunction prohibiting Anthropic from using Reddit content for commercial purposes. Anthropic introduced its newest Claude models, Opus 4 and Sonnet 4, on May 22. Overall annualized revenue has reached $3 billion, two people familiar with the matter said last week. The case is Reddit Inc v Anthropic PBC, California Superior Court, San Francisco County, No. CGC-25-524892.
