Nine Perfect Strangers Season 2 OTT Release Date: When and where to watch Nicole Kidman & Murray Bartlett's show
Nine Perfect Strangers Season 2 OTT Release Date: The much-awaited second season of the hit show is finally ready to hit your screens. After a successful first season that kept viewers hooked with mystery, drama, and top-notch performances, the series is back with a fresh storyline and new faces, including the ever-brilliant Nicole Kidman and the talented Murray Bartlett.
Mark your calendars! The first two episodes of Nine Perfect Strangers Season 2 will premiere starting May 22nd on Prime Video globally (U.S. audiences can watch it on Hulu, with some locations also streaming on Disney+).
What's
Nine Perfect Strangers Season 2 all about?
This time, the story moves to a luxury wellness retreat in the Swiss Alps. While the setting is different, the eerie vibe and psychological twists remain. Nicole Kidman returns as the mysterious wellness guru Masha, but the guests are new - each one hiding a secret, each one on a journey that could change their life… or ruin it.
Joining Kidman are Murray Bartlett (known for The White Lotus), Liv Ullmann, Dolly de Leon, and Maisie Richardson-Sellers, among others.
Quick recap of Nine Perfect Strangers Season 1
Season 1 was set in a luxurious wellness resort in California, where nine strangers arrived hoping to heal. But under Masha's unconventional methods, things got dark and deeply emotional. The show was based on Liane Moriarty's bestselling novel, and it quickly became a fan favourite for its layered storytelling and big performances.
Apart from Nicole Kidman's powerful screen presence, the show is loved for its slow-burn tension, unpredictable storyline, and unique take on self-help culture. With a new season, a new location, and a fresh batch of characters, fans are excited to see what unfolds next. Excited about Nine Perfect Strangers Season 2? Drop your thoughts @indiatimes.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
3 hours ago
- Time of India
Hollywood Vs AI: What is Midjourney? Here's all details about Disney and NBCUniversal suit against AI firm over copyright infringement
Two major studios have taken legal action against an AI firm. Disney and NBCUniversal have filed a lawsuit against Midjourney. They claim the AI company used their copyrighted characters without approval. Studios File Federal Lawsuit On Tuesday, Disney and NBCUniversal filed a copyright infringement lawsuit. The case was filed in the US District Court for the Central District of California. The lawsuit focuses on Midjourney, an AI image tool. The studios allege that Midjourney created and displayed many images copied from their copyrighted works. These images were available through Midjourney's website and shared with paying users. Unauthorized Image Generation The studios said they contacted Midjourney earlier to stop these actions. But the company continued to update its image service. New versions of the tool reportedly produced clearer images. Many of these images resembled characters owned by Disney and NBCUniversal. The lawsuit claims that these actions violate copyright laws. Also Read: Stellar Blade PC Version: How to pre-order game? Here's release date, platform, specifications, PC requirements and more What is Midjourney? Midjourney, an AI image generator , allows users to type image descriptions. The AI then produces pictures in seconds. It is one of the most widely used text-to-image tools and has numerous users. Subscriptions start at $10 per month. Its highest-tier plan costs $120. The service had around $300 million in revenue last year. It had 21 million users by September 2024. Disney and NBCU believe this success came by using protected content. Live Events Copyright Concerns The lawsuit includes examples of characters, such as Deadpool, Spider-Man, Darth Vader, Elsa, Olaf, Buzz Lightyear, Shrek, and more. The companies argue that Midjourney has not paid for the right to use these images. They also stress that using copyrighted content without permission affects the creative industry. They say AI must follow the same laws as other technology. Also Read: Call of Duty: Is Warzone going to shut down after Black Ops 7? Here's all about Blackout 2 rumors Studios Demand Accountability Disney and NBCUniversal say Midjourney has copied their work and distributed it without payment. They want the court to stop the company from using their intellectual property . The studios believe this case is part of a larger issue. They say protecting copyright is important to support creative work in the US. FAQs What is Disney and NBCUniversal's main claim against Midjourney? They claim Midjourney used their copyrighted characters without permission to create and share images through its AI platform. Why is this lawsuit important for the entertainment industry? It raises concerns about AI tools using copyrighted material without consent, which could affect the creative economy and copyright law enforcement.
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
3 hours ago
- First Post
Major movie studios join fight against AI as Disney, Universal sue image-generator Midjourney
The lawsuit, filed in federal district court in Los Angeles, alleges that Midjourney pirated the libraries of the two Hollywood studios to generate and distribute 'endless unauthorised copies' of their iconic characters read more Disney and Universal have launched the first copyright lawsuit by major studios against artificial intelligence. Reuters Disney and Universal have filed a copyright lawsuit against the popular artificial intelligence (AI) image-generator Midjourney. This marks the first time major Hollywood companies have entered the legal battle over generative AI. Copyright infringement claims The lawsuit, filed in federal district court in Los Angeles, alleges that Midjourney pirated the libraries of the two Hollywood studios to generate and distribute 'endless unauthorised copies' of their iconic characters, such as Darth Vader from Star Wars and the Minions from Despicable Me. The studios described Midjourney as a 'quintessential copyright free-rider and a bottomless pit of plagiarism,' stating that piracy remains piracy, regardless of whether the infringing content is created by AI or other technologies. Additionally, the studios claimed that the San Francisco-based AI company ignored their requests to stop infringing on their copyrighted works and to implement technological measures to prevent such image generation. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Midjourney's counter In a 2022 interview with AP, Midjourney CEO David Holz likened his image-making service to a 'search engine' that pulls in a wide array of images from across the internet. He compared the copyright concerns surrounding the technology to how such laws have evolved alongside human creativity. Holz argued that just as individuals can learn from others' pictures to create similar works, AI systems should be afforded the same consideration. Growing frustration against AI developers Major AI developers generally do not disclose their data sources, maintaining that the use of publicly accessible online text, images, and other media to train their systems is protected under the 'fair use' doctrine of American copyright law. The studios' lawsuit joins a growing number of legal actions against AI platform developers, including OpenAI and Anthropic, in both San Francisco and New York. Meanwhile, the first significant copyright trial involving the generative AI industry is currently underway in London, with Getty Images challenging the artificial intelligence company Stability AI. With inputs from agencies
Economic Times
3 hours ago
- Economic Times
Disney, Universal sue image creator Midjourney for copyright infringement
Disney and Universal sued Midjourney, alleging its AI image generator illegally replicates iconic characters like Darth Vader and Shrek. Calling it a 'bottomless pit of plagiarism,' the studios seek an injunction and damages, claiming Midjourney used their copyrighted works to train and monetise its tool. Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Walt Disney and Comcast's Universal filed a copyright lawsuit against Midjourney on Wednesday, calling its popular AI-powered image generator a "bottomless pit of plagiarism" for its use of the studios' best-known suit, filed in federal district court in Los Angeles, claims Midjourney pirated the libraries of the two Hollywood studios, making and distributing without permission "innumerable" copies of characters such as Darth Vader from "Star Wars," Elsa from "Frozen," and the Minions from "Despicable Me".The studios claim the San Francisco company rebuffed their request to stop infringing their copyrighted works or, at a minimum, take technological measures to halt the creation of these AI-generated the studios argue, Midjourney continued to release new versions of its AI image service that boast higher quality infringing recreates animated images from a typed request, or the suit filed by seven corporate entities at the studios that own or control copyrights for the various Disney and Universal Pictures film units, the studios offered examples of Midjourney animations that include Disney characters, such as Yoda wielding a lightsaber, Bart Simpson riding a skateboard, Marvel's Iron Man soaring above the clouds and Pixar's Buzz Lightyear taking image generator also recreated such Universal characters as "How to Train Your Dragon's" dragon, Toothless, the green ogre "Shrek," and Po from "Kung Fu Panda.""By helping itself to plaintiffs' copyrighted works, and then distributing images (and soon videos) that blatantly incorporate and copy Disney's and Universal's famous characters -- without investing a penny in their creation -- Midjourney is the quintessential copyright free-rider and a bottomless pit of plagiarism," the suit alleges."Midjourney's infringement is calculated and willful."Disney and Universal asked the court for a preliminary injunction, to prevent Midjourney from copying their works, or offering its image- or video-generation service without protections against infringement. The studios also seek unspecified suit alleges Midjourney used the studios' works to train its image service and generate reproductions of their copyrighted characters. The company, founded in 2021 by David Holz, monetizes the service through paid subscriptions and generated $300 million in revenue last year alone, the studios is not the first time Midjourney has been accused of misusing artists' work to train their AI systems.A year ago, a California federal judge found that 10 artists behind a copyright infringement suit against Midjourney, Stability AI and other companies had plausibly argued these AI companies had copied and stored their work on company servers, and could be liable for using it without ruling allowed the lawsuit over the unauthorized use of images to proceed. It is in the process of a 2022 interview with Forbes, CEO Holz said he built the company's database by performing "a big scrape of the Internet."Asked whether he sought consent of the artists whose work was covered by copyright, he responded, "there isn't really a way to get a hundred million images and know where they're coming from."
