Muir: Stakeholder group to examine NAP proposals
The minister made the comments today (Monday, June 30) as he issued an update on the ongoing public consultation for the revised NAP.
"The Nutrients Action Programme, was introduced 18 years ago to fulfil our legal requirement to reduce water pollution from agricultural sources, with much good work undertaken to date by farmers," Minister Muir said.
"The legally required NAP review is an important opportunity to shape the actions we can take together over the next four years," he added.
Minister Muir said that "it is vital we take further actions to improve water quality in our rivers, lakes and loughs".
"I am firmly committed to delivery of the Lough Neagh Action Plan and Programme for government commitments, and in doing so, an urgent and collective endeavour is critical," he said.
The minister said that when the public consultation on the updated NAP closes at 11:59p.m on July 24, 2025, DAERA will set up "a timebound stakeholder task and finish group"
This group will include an external facilitator and representatives from farming, agri-food, environmental groups and the department.
"Working collaboratively and taking into account the consultation responses, plus any other potential solutions, the group will be asked to propose measures and actions, that are evidence-based and workable at farm level within realistic timeframes, as well as meeting legislative requirements," Muir said.
The minister also said that as part of this process a draft Economic Impact Assessment will be prepared on the revised proposals.
A further eight-week public consultation will then be carried out on the updated proposals and the draft Economic Impact Assessment.
Minister for the Department of Agriculture, Environment and Rural Affairs for Northern Ireland, Andrew Muir
Minister Muir reiterated that he "will work with everyone as part of the current NAP review and that no final decisions have been taken".
"I extended the original public consultation period to give interested parties more time to consider the complex proposals and previously outlined my commitment to establishing a focused stakeholder group to help inform the way ahead.
'I have also made clear that some of the draft measures will of course require funding support and officials within my department are considering how we can meet that need in the time ahead.
'Following the work of the focused stakeholder group, I also intend to undertake a further eight-week consultation, in the spirit of openness and transparency, to give the public and wider stakeholders an opportunity to provide views on any updated proposals, before taking my final decisions on the updated NAP to the Executive for agreement," he said.
Minister Muir encouraged anyone who has not yet responded to the NAP public consultation to do so.
"We are also providing further clarification on the DAERA website in response to issues raised during the consultation process.
"I am determined that we chart a way forward together to protect and improve our environment and support sustainable and successful farm businesses," he said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Agriland
6 hours ago
- Agriland
UFU: Impartiality 'extremely important' for NI NAP stakeholder forum
Everything is yet to be played for in developing a new Nitrates Action Programme (NAP) for Northern Ireland, according to Ulster Farmers' Union (UFU) president, William Irvine. Speaking at this year's Clogher Valley Show, he said: 'We still have to see the terms of reference for the new stakeholder forum. 'The appointment of an independent chairperson will be extremely important within this process.' According to the UFU president, the direct appointment of a chair by Minister of Agriculture, Environment and Rural Affairs, Andrew Muir is not acceptable. Irvine added: 'Such an approach cannot be considered as being an impartial process. The farming and food industry stakeholder groups must have a role in the appointment of the chairperson, whose job it will be to drive forward the work of the new forum. 'Minister Muir says that he wants to see a new NAP agreed that will not harm the future prospects for food production. 'The UFU will be holding him to this commitment.' Irvine has also confirmed that getting key changes to the recently published UK finance bill will remain a key priority for the UFU during the period ahead. This legislative measure is the parliamentary vehicle through which the chancellor can introduce changes to Inheritance tax. The UFU president explained: 'We want to come up with a solution that meets the unique circumstances that confront farmers here in Northern Ireland. 'However, all the UK farming unions are at one on this fundamentally important matter.' According to Irvine, the union will make every effort to lobby politicians from all parties in the UK government on the inheritance tax issue over the coming weeks. It is anticipated that these measures will include a meeting with the chancellor, Rachel Reeves. Meanwhile, an alternative inheritance tax proposal has been drawn up by the UK farming unions and the Central Association for Agricultural Valuers (CAAV). If implemented, proposal would see potential inheritance tax liabilities reduced by a seventh every year for seven years after an agricultural holding is passed on to the next generation as a working farm business. According to Irvine: 'It's an approach that would mean that no inheritance tax would be paid on land and assets that are retained as part of a working farm business. 'But at a more general level, the envisaged measure would act to draw in more tax for the exchequer than the proposals that are currently on the table.'
Agriland
a day ago
- Agriland
Minister Muir responds to concerns raised over NI Nutrients Action Programme
Department of Agriculture, Environment and Rural Affairs (DAERA) Minister Andrew Muir has responded to concerns raised over Northern Ireland's Nutrients Action Programme (NAP). Opposition mounted in recent months against the draft NAP proposals announced this year by Minister Andrew Muir. In May, Minister Muir launched a public consultation on the NAP for 2026-2029, which he said contains 'additional measures which have been developed based on scientific research'. The main additional measures include further restrictions on use of chemical phosphorus fertiliser and a farm phosphorus balance limit for more intensive farms. In late May, representatives from across the farming and food industry in NI, including the Ulster Farmers' Union, wrote to Minister Muir, to highlight concerns about proposed changes. In the letter, industry said: "We are particularly concerned about how the science is being used, the complete lack of economic impact analysis and inconsistencies between certain measures within this consultation document and other policies which makes it difficult for stakeholders to comment on these proposals." The letter warned that the impact of proposals could be "far-reaching for the rural economy and indeed all of NI and it is therefore untenable that a proper impact assessment has not been carried out". Minister Muir has now responded to the open letter from the agri-food industry. His response letter, dated August 4, says: "The NAP was introduced 18 years ago to fulfil our legal requirement to reduce water pollution from agricultural sources. "I wish to again recognise the hard work farmers and others have undertaken to date to address water quality. "Your statement reiterating that the agri-food sector is fully committed to improving water quality and the sustainability of the environment within which it operates is greatly appreciated." Minister Muir in his letter said that the legally-required NAP review is an "important opportunity to shape the actions we can take together" over the next four years. The current consultation on the NAP 2026-2029 closed on July 24. "I welcome all the responses received, which will be collated and considered in the coming weeks," the minister said. "My department is currently finalising the next steps and the processes for the development of the NAP 2026-2029, and stakeholders will receive information about this in the coming weeks. "In particular, given the level of interest from a range of stakeholders in the NAP, and some of the issues raised to date, I have decided to provide an additional level of engagement within this process and further consultation." In the short-term, once the consultation responses have been analysed, they will be considered by a stakeholder task and finish group with an external facilitator, the minister confirmed. This group will include representatives from farming, agri-food, environmental groups and the department. "It will also be able to consider and bring forward alternative solutions for consideration by working collaboratively," Minister Muir explained. "The group will take into account the proposals consulted upon, the consultation responses to date, and any other potential solutions raised within the group." The group will be asked to propose measures and actions that will meet legislative requirements, are evidence-based and workable at farm level within realistic timeframes, according to the minister. "During this process, consideration will be given to the economic impact of the proposals including the revised proposals and a draft economic impact assessment will be prepared," he said. "The group will provide an additional level of engagement in the policy development process. "When its work is completed, the department will then undertake a further, statutory compliant, eight-week consultation. "This will give wider stakeholders and the public an opportunity to provide views on any updated proposals. "I will take these into account in making my final decision on the updated NAP, which will be referred to the executive committee for consideration." Minister Muir said he acknowledges that some of the proposed measures in the NAP consultation will require investment, and officials within his department will consider how that funding need can be met. He said he is due to meet the Finance Minister to discuss the support that can be provided. The minister also said that in relation to sewage pollution, "I wish to repeat my clear view that agriculture is not the only contributor to what has been happening at Lough Neagh and many other waterbodies across NI". "I have been consistently on the record that the separate regulatory regime with NI Water on wastewater known as SORPI needs to change and I will be bringing proposals to my executive colleagues on the matter over the time ahead," Minister Muir added.
Agriland
3 days ago
- Agriland
MEP calls on DAFM to 'review and revise' approach to GAEC 2
An Irish MEP has called on the Department of Agriculture, Food and the Marine (DAFM) to revise its approach to the Good Agricultural and Environmental Condition 2 (GAEC 2). GAEC 2 is the conditionality standard of the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) related to the protection of peatlands and wetlands. Last week, the department launched an appeals process for farmers seeking to have their land removed from the standard. However, farm organisations voiced concerns about several conditions attached to the appeals process. Midlands North-West MEP Ciaran Mullooly has also called on DAFM to "immediately clarify and withdraw unnecessary conditions it is imposing on landowners seeking to appeal the classification of their land under GAEC 2". He criticised the department's requirement that landowners applying for an appeal may have to provide: A signed declaration from the appellant that the parcel(s) in question has/have never been drained and he/she plans to carry out drainage works in 2025 as required; Evidence to show that the appellant plans to carry out drainage work in 2025 e.g. contractor quotations, estimate of costs etc as required. 'This demand completely misunderstands the purpose of the appeals process,' Mullooly said. 'Farmers are appealing the peat soil designation because they believe it is scientifically incorrect - not because of what they plan to do with the land next year. 'The decision on whether land is peat soil or not must be based on soil science - not hypothetical future land use or drainage plans. To suggest otherwise is to undermine the integrity of the entire process," he said. Ciaran Mullooly MEP The Midlands-North-West MEP said that the department risks "confusing and intimidating landowners". 'Once again, we see bureaucracy being used in a way that frustrates rather than facilitates access to a fair and transparent appeals process. "Farmers are entitled to have incorrect classifications overturned. That entitlement must not be made contingent on signing unnecessary undertakings or presenting irrelevant contractor paperwork," he said. The MEP is calling for the department to "immediately review and revise its approach to GAEC 2 peat soil appeals and ensure the process remains grounded in science, fairness, and farmers' rights". The Irish Farmers' Association (IFA) previously said that the department has made amendments to the appeals process. In an update to the appeal document, DAFM outlined that the documents which have caused concern are not required where no drainage works are planned on previously undrained/drained GAEC 2 land parcel(s) in 2025. Following the amendments, IFA Rural Development Committee chair John Curran said that it is "now clear that all farmers have the opportunity to appeal the indicative GAEC 2 status of individual parcels". 'The clarification also makes the need for signed declarations/proof of drainage works obsolete. "These requirements should be removed from appeal application requirements," he added.
