St George flags to stay on Worcestershire lampposts but not roundabouts
Earlier on Monday, the authority had issued a statement saying "lamp columns on the highway should not have anything attached to them, unless agreed by the council". This, the council said, was to ensure there was no risk to visibility, or the proper functioning of the lighting, or the safety of those attaching items plus that of passers-by and motorists.Following the national party's comments, the council's highways lead said on Tuesday that the flags would stay, and issued a fresh safety message. "There are many ways that people can show their pride by flying the St George's flag – in your own front and back gardens, on your cars, in your windows and on community buildings where agreed by the whole community," said the council's cabinet member for highways Karl Perks."Climbing up lampposts and attaching flags to them may not be the best thing to do, mostly because it's dangerous and could cause damage. There are no specific plans to remove the flags."Flags have emerged in other areas of Worcestershire in addition to Bromsgrove, including Hollywood, Wythall and Worcester. Leader of the council Joanne Monk said: "In Worcestershire, we are proud of our English and British identities."I of course support flying both flags proudly throughout the county. Our national flags are a symbol of our national pride, and I will champion efforts that celebrate our nation."
However, a council spokesperson said mini-roundabouts in Bromsgrove town centre that had been painted with red crosses would be addressed by maintenance staff.That may cause disappointment among some residents who told the BBC they approved of the markings, calling them a symbol of national pride.Bromsgrove resident Terry Johns, 71, said: "I think it's brilliant - all the islands should be like that. We should fly the flag more often - if you go to America, like I've done, you see it everywhere, on all the public buildings and schools." Another resident added: "I quite like it, I certainly don't find it offensive."But Paul Neil, also from Bromsgrove, said: "It's a nuisance - council services are stretched as it is. Have they really got to go around cleaning this up? "It's also distracting to drivers. I don't see what point they are trying to make." A woman who wished not to be named said: "I have nothing against any flag, but to me this isn't about pride - I find it unpleasant." With reference to the roundabout paint, a council spokesperson said: "All road markings on the county's highway network are strictly regulated for safety, including those on roundabouts of any size."Changes to agreed road markings must not be made other than by approved contractors, in line with these regulations."Unofficial actions on the highway network could be distracting or cause confusion to some road users so will therefore be removed."
'Shameful'
In recent weeks in Birmingham, Union and Cross of St George flags have been hung in the Weoley Castle and Northfield areas of the city, which locals said had been done as an act of patriotism.The city council said about 200 banners had been removed while engineers worked to upgrade street lighting. It added that "unauthorised items" on lampposts could be putting the lives of not only those scaling the furniture at risk, but those of motorists and pedestrians.But residents reacted with a mix of anger and confusion on local social media groups, with many querying the council's motives.A spokesperson for the national Reform UK party said on Monday evening: "All 12 Reform UK-controlled councils across the country have today committed that they will not be removing Union and St George Cross flags from lampposts."They added the move "followed both Tower Hamlets Council and Labour-controlled Birmingham City Council shamefully removing the patriotic flags that have been hung from lampposts".Leader of Reform UK Nigel Farage MP said: "Union flags and the Cross of St George should and will fly across the country. Reform UK will never shy away from celebrating our nation."Following the removals under Tower Hamlets and Birmingham, the prime minister's official spokesperson, when asked for comment on Sir Keir Starmer's view of the actions, said: "I think the PM has always talked about his pride of being British, the patriotism he feels."Patriotism will always be an important thing to him."When asked whether the prime minister approved of putting up English flags, his spokesperson said: "Absolutely, patriotism, putting up English flags. We put up English flags all around Downing Street every time the English football team - women's and men's - are out trying to win games for us."
Follow BBC Hereford & Worcester on BBC Sounds, Facebook, X and Instagram.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Telegraph
a few seconds ago
- Telegraph
Epping has shown the way to win
The High Court has ruled that illegal immigrants can no longer be housed at the Bell Hotel. This is a great victory for the parents and concerned residents of Epping. Let it also be an inspiration to the rest of Britain. They do not want their young women being abused and assaulted on the streets. They have protested outside the hotel since July, when an Ethiopian asylum seeker housed there was arrested and charged with sexually assaulting a 14-year-old schoolgirl. Despite being slandered as 'far-Right' by the establishment and attacked by Left-wing 'Antifa' thugs, this community stood up bravely and they have won. They represent the vast majority of decent people in this country. Now the good people of Epping must inspire similar protests around Britain. Wherever people are concerned about the threat posed by young undocumented males living in local hotels and who are free to walk their streets, they should follow the example of the town in Essex. Let's hold peaceful protests outside the migrant hotels, and put pressure on local councils to go to court to try and get the illegal immigrants out; we now know that together we can win. I can say today that the English local councils controlled by the party I lead, Reform UK, will be doing everything in their power to follow Epping's lead. We are told that some 32,000 asylum seekers are now housed in British hotels, many of them young, undocumented males who have broken into the UK illegally. They should not be treated as privileged guests at taxpayers' expense, and should not be free to walk our streets. The Labour Government must now answer the question: whose side are you on? Will Keir Starmer's Government side with the decent people of Epping and elsewhere, who have had enough of seeing their young women harassed in the street by illegal immigrants and their communities changed for the worse by migrant hotels? Will Labour change policy to put a stop to it? Or will the Government try to overturn the court's verdict, and continue to side with illegal immigrants? A record 50,000 illegal immigrants have crossed the English Channel since Labour was elected last year. The signs are not good. Top lawyers representing Home Secretary Yvette Cooper made a desperate last-minute bid to stop Mr Justice Eyre granting an injunction to Epping Council on Tuesday. Shame on her. In court the Government's lawyers attacked the Epping Forest council for seeking an injunction, and complained that: 'The local authority should in fact have given some consideration to the wider public interest'. It is high time we told the elite that defending the interests of the British public must be a priority. As reported by the Telegraph, Government KCs argued that a decision to evict illegal immigrants from the Bell Hotel 'could put Britain's asylum hotel scheme at risk of falling apart', because applying for similar court injunctions could now become 'the new norm adopted by local authorities' elsewhere. Well, let us sincerely hope that they are right about that! It is high time that the outrageously expensive 'asylum hotel scheme', which nobody in Britain ever voted for, was brought down by popular demand. Let everybody who is concerned write to their local councillors and council leaders, demanding that they take action to empty illegal immigrants out of hotels in their communities. The sooner Epping-style injunctions do become the 'new norm adopted by local authorities' around the country, the better it will be for the British people. Reform will also be launching a national petition demanding Government action now. No doubt we will be attacked as 'far Right' provocateurs for daring to suggest that people follow the lead of Epping's parents and residents by protesting peacefully. But we will take no lectures on public safety from a Labour Government that has created this crisis by continuing the Tories' disastrous soft migration policies – or from the Labour MPs who voted against a national inquiry into the rape gangs scandal. Epping has shown the way to win. Now we need to step up the pressure to empty all the migrant hotels, and then detain and deport the thousands of illegal immigrants who have no business being here.
Telegraph
a few seconds ago
- Telegraph
Rural council tax to rise by £380 under Rayner plan
While helping to bolster coffers in cities, the group said this would lead to less money for local authorities in the country – despite their households facing higher council tax bills. The warning comes after Ms Rayner launched a consultation on the new funding formula in June. This closed on Friday, with changes expected to be introduced from next year. The CCN represents councils mainly covering rural towns, home to nearly half of England's population. As part of its research, it found that £1.6bn in council tax income from dozens of rural authorities would be effectively redistributed to other parts of the country, including major towns and cities in the North. Surrey County Council stands to be the biggest loser from the overhaul, according to the CCN. Tim Oliver, leader of the council and chairman of the CCN, said: 'Surrey county council will lose something in the region of £160m of funding over three years. 'Our residents will pay the highest level of council tax but we'll see no increase in our funding over the next three years. That is going to put real pressure on services. 'In the meantime, money is flowing out of Surrey to other parts of the country.' He added: 'Every year we look to make efficiencies. There is not a lot left to cut other than frontline services. So there is a very real risk that a number of councils across the country will either cut services or actually won't be able to balance their books and then will effectively declare bankruptcy.' Mr Oliver warned that the reforms would punish councils that could raise more council tax, which were typically those in 'more rural counties'. He said: 'They have bigger houses so they are in a higher tax band. It disproportionately affects higher value houses that already pay more council tax.' The reforms go some way to helping rural areas by factoring in that their public services are typically costlier to provide. But the CCN warned that they would place a 'disproportionate burden' on rural taxpayers. 'It's no surprise' Kemi Badenoch, the Tory leader, said: 'Yet again the Labour Government are showing utter contempt for people living in rural Britain. 'This latest spiteful change will steal more money out of the hands of county councils and send it straight into Labour-run urban areas. Only the Conservatives are serious about standing up for our rural communities.' Richard Tice, the deputy leader of Reform UK, added: 'It's no surprise that Ms Rayner's trying to gerrymander council tax but the truth is that councils across the country are spending money very badly and they don't need more money, they need to stop wasting it and get better value for money on what they're spending. 'The bottom line is governments can't keep foisting extra requirements and services on councils and expect people to just continue to pay regardless. You can only squeeze the pips to a certain point before they ping out of the fruit.' It comes as Rachel Reeves is mulling a property tax raid targeting wealthy households in the South as she scrambles to fill a black hole as large as £50bn in the public finances ahead of the autumn Budget. A spokesman for Ms Rayner's department said: 'We do not recognise this analysis. The current, outdated way in which local authorities are funded has left communities behind and damaged local services. 'This must change and is why we are taking decisive action as part of our Plan for Change to reform the funding system so we can improve public services, while maintaining the previous government's referendum threshold on council tax rises so taxpayers have the final say and are protected from excessive increases.'
Powys County Times
30 minutes ago
- Powys County Times
Ministers braced for further legal challenges after High Court Epping decision
Ministers could face further legal challenges over asylum hotels after a council was granted a temporary injunction blocking migrants from being housed there. Reform UK leader Nigel Farage hailed the High Court decision in Epping as a 'victory' and said he hopes it 'provides inspiration to others across the country', while the shadow home secretary argued that residents have 'every right to object' to people being housed in their area. The 12 councils where Reform UK is the largest party are understood to be exploring the prospect of legal challenges following Tuesday's ruling. The Home Office had warned the judge that an injunction could 'interfere' with the department's legal obligations, and lawyers representing the hotel's owner argued it would set a 'precedent'. Epping Forest District Council had asked a judge to issue an interim injunction stopping migrants from being accommodated at the Bell Hotel. The hotel has been at the centre of a series of protests in recent weeks after an asylum seeker who was staying there was charged with sexually assaulting a 14-year-old girl. Reacting to the news, Mr Farage said that 'young, undocumented males who break into the UK illegally should NOT be free to walk the streets anywhere. They must be detained and deported'. 'I hope that Epping provides inspiration to others across the country,' he said. Conservative leader Kemi Badenoch suggested that the migrants housed at the hotel 'need to be moved out of the area immediately', while her shadow home secretary Chris Philp said that 'residents should never have had to fight their own government just to feel safe in their own town'. He said: 'Local residents have every right to feel safe in their own streets and every right to object when their community is treated as a dumping ground.' A Labour source said the move by the Tory-led council, who did not challenge the Conservative government when they were housing asylum seekers, was politically motivated and authority leaders were 'scared' of Reform. Asked on Tuesday why the council did not previously take legal action, Epping Forest District Council leader Chris Whitbread told the PA news agency: 'It goes back to 2020 when we were in the pandemic originally, and at that time, it was used for young families, women and children, which is completely different to having it used for single males. 'Obviously, we have always raised our concerns with the Home Office, whether it be the previous government or this government, we raised our concerns.' Border security minister Dame Angela Eagle said the Government will 'continue working with local authorities and communities to address legitimate concerns'. She added: 'Our work continues to close all asylum hotels by the end of this Parliament.' Meanwhile, the council leader for Borough of Broxbourne Council, Corina Gander, told PA the High Court's injunction set a 'massive precedent' and the council would gather 'more detail about what Epping has done' before considering a bid to shut down another hotel housing asylum seekers. Lawyers for the Home Office had warned the court that an injunction 'runs the risk of acting as an impetus for further violent protests'. Edward Brown KC also said the injunction would 'substantially interfere' with the Home Office's statutory duty in potentially avoiding a breach of the asylum seekers' human rights. Several protests and counter-protests have been held in the town since a then-resident at the hotel was accused of trying to kiss a teenage girl. Hadush Gerberslasie Kebatu has denied the charges against him and is due to stand trial later this month. A second man who resides at the hotel, Syrian national Mohammed Sharwarq, has separately been charged with seven offences, while several other men have been charged over disorder outside the hotel. In a ruling on Tuesday, Mr Justice Eyre granted the temporary injunction, but extended the time limit by which the hotel must stop housing asylum seekers to September 12. He also refused to give Somani Hotels Limited, the hotel's owner, the green light to challenge his ruling, but the company could still ask the Court of Appeal for the go-ahead to appeal against the judgment. Piers Riley-Smith, for the company, asked the judge to be allowed to appeal against the ruling, citing its 'wide-reaching ramifications'. He said that there was a 'compelling reason for the appeal to be heard', including the 'precedent that would be set' by the ruling and the impact that it could have 'on the wider strategy of the (Home Secretary) in relation to the housing of asylum seekers in hotels as part of meeting their statutory duties'.
