
‘It's unbelievable': Small businesses fed up with sales tax law in Washington as legal challenge looms
(Bigstock Photo)
Curtis Costner spent Memorial Day Weekend on a trip with his father in Utah. As they passed through the so-called Silicon Slopes, he saw signs of a growing tech economy.
'There's a lot of talent, a lot of infrastructure,' Costner said. 'The state seems friendly and supportive and they would value what we do.'
He can't say the same about his home state.
Costner is president of Sands Costner, a digital marketing firm based in Tacoma, Wash., and one of many businesses affected by a sweeping new tax.
Last week, Gov. Bob Ferguson signed Senate Bill 5814, which expands Washington's retail sales tax to include advertising agencies, software development firms, IT support providers, and other digital service businesses.
It's one of several new taxes on businesses aimed at addressing the state's $16 billion shortfall.
Curtis Costner, president at Sands Costner. (Sands Costner Photo)
Starting in October, these companies will be required to collect sales tax — more than 10% in the Seattle area — on their services.
Costner said the tax could prompt clients to seek out-of-state providers.
'It makes it harder for local businesses to work with other local businesses,' he said.
John Rubino, partner at Seattle-based agency GreenRubino, said he's worried about local clients — including nonprofits and small businesses — who may not be able to absorb the added cost from the tax.
'They're just stuck with it,' Rubino said. 'It's unfair and it seems unreasonable. It's unbelievable.'
Democratic lawmakers introduced the bill in mid-April. It passed just eight days later, near the end of the legislative session in Olympia.
Rubino and Costner both feel blindsided and targeted by the legislation, which applies to digital advertising — but excludes physical ads such as billboards or newspaper placements.
'That's a completely unfair tax treatment,' Rubino said.
Legal challenges to the bill are 'ripe and appear inevitable,' according to tax law experts with McDermott Will & Emery. In a blog post last week, they cited the federal Internet Tax Freedom Act, which prohibits states from 'discriminatory taxes on electronic commerce.'
'Taxing digital advertising services while expressly excluding offline media places the new law on a collision course with ITFA,' the lawyers wrote. 'A legal challenge is all but guaranteed.'
Aaron Johnson, a tax lawyer with Ballard Spahr in Seattle, agreed.
'ESSB 5814 creates some serious concerns with the Internet Tax Freedom Act,' he said via email.
John Rubino, partner at GreenRubino. (GreenRubino Photo)
Washington is one of the only states to broadly tax digital ads. Maryland passed a similar law in 2021 that is still under litigation. That law applies to only companies with at least $100 million in annual revenue.
'If it was a great idea, every state in the country would be doing this,' Rubino said.
Washington lawmakers frame their bill as a way to tweak the state's tax system as the economy shifts toward services and digital products.
'The legislature recognizes that our state and nation have moved away from a predominantly goods-based economy towards a more service-based economy,' the bill reads. 'As a result, Washington's tax code, which is heavily reliant on sales taxes, continues to reach a narrowing share of economic activity subject to the retail sales tax.'
Sen. Noel Frame (D-Seattle), who co-sponsored the bill, called the law a 'good government update to make our tax code more appropriate for the 21st century.'
'As more and more of our economy happens with computers and technology, this bill is doing the work to modernize the tax code to match,' Frame said during a Senate floor debate on April 19.
Washington is one of a few states without a personal or corporate income tax. Most state revenue comes from sales, property, and B&O taxes — a system critics say disproportionately burdens lower-income residents.
Rubino said he supports tax reform — just not this version.
'What they're doing is not helping the regressive tax system — it's regressively hurting small business,' he said.
Emily Vyhnanek, associate director of campaigns at the progressive think-tank Budget & Policy Center, said her group was disappointed that a proposed statewide wealth tax and new payroll tax — which drew strong opposition from companies including Microsoft — did not ultimately pass.
'Both of those would have been truly progressive ways to generate revenue,' she said.
SB5814, which also includes a tobacco tax on Zyn packs, is expected to raise approximately $1.1 billion over the 2025-27 biennium. Revenue will fund education, health care, and social services.
Gov. Ferguson last week also signed House Bill 2081, which increases the state's business and occupation tax rate, and the 'advanced computing surcharge' paid by major tech companies such as Microsoft and Amazon.
It's unclear whether the sales tax expansion bill will affect advertising or marketing businesses within larger tech companies.
Costner said he's contemplating next steps for his 12-person company — including paying for a tax compliance expert or even a potential relocation.
'Either way, both those options are very costly for a company like mine,' he said, adding: 'Can we just get back to work and do the creative that we're good at?'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Yahoo
32 minutes ago
- Yahoo
US sends a shot across the bows of its allies over submarine deal
When Joe Courtney, a Democratic congressman, learnt the Pentagon was reviewing the Australia-UK-US deal designed to enable Canberra to Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data


New York Times
32 minutes ago
- New York Times
‘Golden Share' in U.S. Steel Gives Trump Extraordinary Control
To save its takeover of U.S. Steel, Japan's Nippon Steel agreed to an unusual arrangement, granting the White House a 'golden share' that gives the government an extraordinary amount of influence over a U.S. company. New details of the agreement show that the structure would give President Trump and his successors a permanent stake in U.S. Steel, significant sway over its board and veto power over a wide array of company actions, an arrangement that could change the nature of foreign investment in the United States. The terms of the arrangement were hammered out in meetings that went late into the night on Wednesday and Thursday, according to two people familiar with the details. Representatives from Nippon Steel — which had been trying to acquire the struggling U.S. Steel since December 2023, but had been blocked by the Biden administration over national security concerns — came around to Mr. Trump's desire to take a stake that would give the U.S. government significant control over the company's actions. Nippon had argued that this influence should expire — perhaps after three or four years, the duration of the Trump administration. But in the meetings, which were held at the Commerce Department, Trump officials led by Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick insisted that the golden share should last in perpetuity, the two people said. Under the terms of the national security pact, which the companies said they signed Friday, the U.S. government would retain a single share of preferred stock, called class G — as in gold. And U.S. Steel's charter will list nearly a dozen activities the company cannot undertake without the approval of the American president or someone he designates in his stead. Want all of The Times? Subscribe.
Yahoo
35 minutes ago
- Yahoo
5 of the Richest People in Real Estate
Real estate can become a strategic investment option if you know what you're doing and are willing to put in some work. While you might not make several million dollars, it can be another way to boost your bank account and wealth. Read Next: Find Out: Speaking of wealth, real estate has paid off extremely well for some investors and managers around the U.S. and beyond. Here's a look at five of the richest people in real estate. Also see what the 10 richest billionaires did with their first $1 million. Total net worth: $18.7 billion You may not be familiar with Kushal Pal Singh, but he's one of the richest billionaires in the real estate industry. He's the chairman emeritus of a leading real estate company in India called DLF. According to Forbes, the company is the biggest listed property firm by market cap in India. Check Out: Total net worth: $19.7 billion Harry Triguboff is the owner of Meriton, an apartment tower development company in Australia. He's a billionaire real estate developer — and one of the richest people in Australia. According to Forbes, he has built over 79,000 apartments and was a trailblazer, being one of the first developers see potential in apartments rather than single-family homes. Late last year, Medium called him 'the GOAT' of real estate in Australia. Total net worth: $18.9 billion Donald Bren is a big name in real estate in America. He's the chairman of Irvine Company, which, according to Sunrise Capital, has more than 120 million square feet of office space, apartments and malls across California. Per Forbes, he also owns the MetLife Building in New York. Total net worth: $18.4 billion Stephen Ross may have come from humble beginnings, but he's now one of the richest names in real estate. Ross is the CEO and chairman of Related Ross and the owner of the Miami Dolphins. Due to his real estate work, he's especially well known in Florida. According to the company's website, it has many types of properties, including office space, hotels and city centers. Total net worth: $13.2 billion Until 2015, Peter Woo was the chairman of Wheelock & Co., a property developer, and the subsidiary Wharf Holdings, per Forbes. In addition to real estate, the companies are involved in retailing and telecommunications. Editor's note: Net worth figures were sourced from Forbes. More From GOBankingRates How Much Money Is Needed To Be Considered Middle Class in Every State? This article originally appeared on 5 of the Richest People in Real Estate Sign in to access your portfolio