Green party trying to purge gender-critical voices, claims expelled former spokesperson
The Green party is veering away from its founding culture towards a more leftwing authoritarianism, its former health spokesperson has claimed.
Dr Pallavi Devulapalli said trans rights had become an obvious totem in the new climate, and accused the party of trying to purge anyone with gender-critical views.
Devulapalli, a GP and member of King's Lynn and West Norfolk council, was expelled from the party for a rules breach that she has said was due to her beliefs on gender. Her expulsion this month, she said, has exposed a rift in the party's leadership on transgender issues that threatens to widen during this summer's leadership election.
The party's current co-leader Adrian Ramsay, who has argued that members should not be thrown out for saying trans women are not women, is pressing internally for Devulapalli's expulsion to be reviewed.
A Green party spokesperson said: 'We don't comment on individual cases.'
Devulapalli was suspended last September, three months after she failed to back the party's manifesto policy on the right of self-identification for trans people during a hustings event. Last week she was informed she had been expelled from the party after attending what Devulapalli said she thought was a social gathering, but which a disciplinary panel deemed was an official party event from which she was banned because of her suspension.
Devulapalli said the move was a 'pretext' to get rid of her. She said: 'They don't like my stance on trans self ID and the trans women policy. They didn't come out and say that so they expelled me on a technicality.'
She added: 'It feels like a purge. We've seen the Greens veer away from its original founding culture towards a much more leftwing authoritarian culture. If you say or think the wrong thing then you're out – that's really worrying.'
Devulapalli is now one of 25 'Greens in Exile' – former party members who have been suspended or expelled largely for their gender critical views. Last year a court found the party had removed Dr Shahrar Ali as a party spokesperson in a procedurally unfair way that discriminated against him because of his gender critical belief. In 2021, Ali's position as spokesperson is understood to have prompted Sîan Berry, now an MP, to quit as co-leader.
Devulapalli said the party's belief that trans women are women was 'peddling a falsehood', adding: 'It denies science and denies reality and alienates the Greens from the vast majority of voters who know the truth when they see it.'
Following April's supreme court ruling that a 'woman' in the Equality Act refers only to a biological woman, the Greens' policy has come under strain. In interviews since, Ramsay, who is standing again as co-leader with fellow MP Ellie Chowns, has refused to commit to an answer, but Carla Denyer, who is standing down as co-leader, has said that 'trans women are women [and] trans men are men'. Zack Polanski, a leadership challenger, is campaigning on the slogan 'trans rights are human rights'.
Sign up to First Edition
Our morning email breaks down the key stories of the day, telling you what's happening and why it matters
after newsletter promotion
Devulapalli fears that if Polanski wins, the party will become more 'authoritarian' and less tolerant of gender critical views as it tries to appeal to disillusioned Labour supporters. She said: 'A lot of members have said they will leave the party if he's elected. People are trying to reclaim the Greens back to being a party of democratic values and science.'
Since her expulsion Devulapalli says she has had dozens of messages of support, including from fellow GPs and prominent Greens such as the party's former candidate for London mayor Jenny Jones and another former Green party health spokesperson, Larry Sanders, who called for 'debate not expulsion'.
Devulapalli said accusations of transphobia, which she denies, had contributed to a culture of fear within the party. 'People are afraid of being bullied online and being cast out of the party. But speaking up calmly, rationally and with compassion is important.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
13 minutes ago
- The Independent
Decriminalising abortion is a major step toward giving women full control over their bodies
The vote to decriminalise abortion will herald the largest changes to the law on terminations in decades. While access to abortions is generally available in practice, this legal aspect imposes unnecessary stigma, restricts autonomy, and risks criminalising women and healthcare providers, campaigners say. Removing abortion from criminal law allows it to be treated like any other healthcare issue – governed by clinical guidance, not courts. This decision aligns England and Wales with countries like Canada, New Zealand, and parts of Australia, which have seen improved access and no increase in abortion rates – only safer outcomes. And it has happened as a result of a type of MP that were once quite rare on the House of Commons ' green benches – women. During the debate, Labour MP Tonia Antoniazzi said women today were being prosecuted under an 'outdated' law passed by an all-male parliament in the 19th century. 'Originally passed by an all-male parliament elected by men alone, this Victorian law is increasingly used against vulnerable women and girls,' she told MPs. 'Women affected are often acutely vulnerable victims of domestic abuse and violence, human trafficking and sexual exploitation, girls under the age of 18 and women who have suffered miscarriage.' Campaigners have argued that women must no longer be "dragged from hospital bed to police cell" over abortion. The issue has hit the headlines in recent times with high-profile prosecutions of women such as Nicola Packer, who took prescribed abortion medicine not realising she was 26 weeks pregnant. Abortion was legalised in Britain in the 1960s amid a national outcry over women dying as a result of botched backstreet terminations. Afterwards, however, there was a nervousness among UK lawmakers, with many reluctant to tinker with the rules in case hard-fought rights were lost. In recent years there have also been moves by some to try to limit the rights, such as reducing the time limit from 24 weeks. But there has been a sea change in recent years, and it has been thanks to the election of many, many more women. MPs have been freed to come forward with changes to give women more autonomy over their lives, in the knowledge that more of the people who will be voting on the proposed changes to the law are women.
The National
14 minutes ago
- The National
Anti-indy media fears success shows Scotland trumps Westminster
Social Justice Secretary Shirley-Anne Somerville has announced that the Scottish Government will end the two-child benefit cap in March next year. While Keir Starmer hums and haws and gets his minions to leak to the press that he is looking at lifting the cap without committing himself to anything concrete, the SNP and the Scottish Government get on with doing it. Somerville said: "The Scottish Government has consistently called on the UK Government to end the two-child cap. Reports suggest that they are looking at the impact it is having. But the evidence is clear, and families and Scotland can't wait any longer for the UK Government to make up its mind to do the right thing and scrap the cap once and for all.' READ MORE: We must show voters how things would be different with independence The controversial cap was introduced by the Conservatives under Theresa May (below) in 2017. It denies child allowances in Universal Credit and tax credits to third or subsequent children born after April 2017. The cap has been blamed for being the single biggest factor in the rise in child poverty in the UK. (Image: Hannah McKay/PA Wire)Almost one third of children across the UK are classified as living in relative poverty, 70% of whom live in households where at least one parent is in work. According to anti-poverty charity the Joseph Rowntree Foundation, current levels of poverty are around 50% higher than they were in the 1970s. Thanks to the Scottish Child Payment, introduced in February 2021, Scotland is the only part of the UK where the rate of child poverty is decreasing. The Scottish Government is hamstrung by the limitations of the devolution settlement and cannot mitigate entirely the pernicious effects of UK Government tax, benefit, and economic policies. While child poverty in Scotland remains a serious problem, 22% of Scottish children were assessed as living in poverty in 2023/24, down from 26% the previous year. This is significantly lower than the child poverty rates in other parts of the UK. 31% of children in England and Wales are assessed as living in poverty, a figure that increases to 36% in the West Midlands. Unlike in Scotland, the rate of child poverty in England and Wales continues to rise. The reduction in child poverty in Scotland is a remarkable success for the Scottish Government. It is largely due to the introduction of the Scottish Child payment, which, unlike Westminster administered benefits, is not limited to the first two children in a family. READ MORE: UK 'feeding Scotland poison pills', John Swinney says Professor Danny Dorling of Oxford University said that the Scottish Child Payment was responsible for the biggest reduction in inequality caused by a single policy change since the collapse of the Berlin Wall. He said that he was unable to find any other policy which has had as big an impact on reducing inequality as the Scottish Child Payment. Yet the Scottish Government gets very little credit for this in the Scottish or British media, as Professor Dorling noted: "It's a remarkable story and the second remarkable story is how it hasn't been reported." It's not reported in England because Scotland might as well be the moon as far as the London-centric media is concerned. It's not reported in Scotland because Scotland's laughably imbalanced anti-independence media has an existential terror of reporting anything successful in Scotland for fear this might lead people to believe that Scotland can actually do better than Westminster at governance. Or worse, lead them to think that perhaps with independence Scotland could do even better. Note how BBC Scotland framed the news earlier this that Scotland is the only part of the UK where the rate of child poverty is falling. The BBC's headline was "Scotland misses targets on reducing child poverty." The news that the rate of child poverty in England and Wales was much higher and was rising was buried deep within a piece which did not explicitly spell out that Scotland is the only part of the UK where child poverty is falling; a Scottish success was spun as a failure. READ MORE: 2031 Scotland census planning underway as public input sought on new questions This tells us that a policy of boosting support for independence through good governance in a devolved government is never going to succeed, because the anti-independence media in Scotland, which is the overwhelming majority of media outlets in Scotland, will continue to loudly trumpet all the Scottish Government's failures and will either ignore its successes or find some angle to spin those as failures too. No doubt the same will happen with the new Two Child Limit Payment. The Scottish media has almost ignored the introduction of the Scottish Adult Disability Payment, whose streamlined, medically based assessment system is far less stressful and demeaning for disabled people than the complex and unnecessarily cruel assessment for the Personal Independence Payment which it replaced. No doubt the same will happen with the new Two Child Limit Payment, unless there are teething problems with the new benefit, in which case the Scottish media will be screaming SNP failure from the rafter In another Scottish success story which is being ignored, a new study has found that Scotland has been the top destination for foreign direct investment in the UK outside of London for a decade. Figures from EY – one of the 'big four' accounting firms – showed that in 2024 Scotland attracted 15.8% of the UK projects targeted for foreign direct investment (FDI), up from 14.4% in 2023 and above its decade average of 11.5%.
The Guardian
16 minutes ago
- The Guardian
MPs' abortion vote comes as calls for decriminalisation rise – along with number of prosecutions
Calls for decriminalisation of abortions have been growing louder in recent years – in line with a growing number of women being prosecuted for terminating their pregnancies. Until 2022, it is believed that only three women had ever been convicted of having an illegal abortion in the 150 years since 1861, when the procedure was made illegal under the Offences Against the Person Act. But in the last four years, at least half a dozen women have found themselves in the dock of a crown court accused of ending their pregnancy, and dozens more have been arrested or investigated by police. Two high-profile cases in particular fuelled the calls for change. Carla Foster was jailed in 2023 for an illegal abortion, before having her sentence suspended a month later by the court of appeal. And just weeks ago, Nicola Packer was cleared by a jury after spending almost five years facing the threat of prison. Thirteen people, both men and women, made a first appearance at magistrates court charged with abortion-related offences in 2022, according to freedom of information data from the Crown Prosecution Service, compared with four people in 2019 and three in each of 2020 and 2021. Data from about half of Britain's police forces showed at least 11 people were arrested in 2023 on suspicion of child destruction or inducing a miscarriage, including a 31-year-old woman in north Wales 'reported to have taken illicit substances to initiate an abortion'. There are several more known cases of women arrested in the past 18 months that are not included in the data. In the last parliament, Diana Johnson, now a Home Office minister, attempted to change the law by bringing an amendment to the previous government's Criminal Justice Bill, but the 2024 general election meant the legislation never made its way through parliament. Parliament had already seen a move towards more liberal abortion laws. In 2020 telemedicine brought the biggest reform to abortion provision in England and Wales since the 1967 Abortion Act, which set out the current framework by which terminations can be carried out. Instead of women seeking a termination in the first 10 weeks of pregnancy needing to take the first pill under medical supervision, they could receive both pills by post after a remote consultation. Although it was introduced as an emergency measure during the pandemic, telemedicine was made permanent in 2022, with MPs voting 215 in favour to 188 against. The same year, parliament also voted 297-110 to introduce safe access zones, commonly known as 'buffer zones' around clinics, to stop women seeking abortion care from being harassed by protesters. In 2019, Northern Ireland's abortion laws were also modernised, with terminations allowed up to 12 weeks, and later under limited circumstances. In a referendum in 2018, Ireland had also made abortion legal on request up to 12 weeks, and later if the foetus would be likely to die before or shortly after birth or if there is a risk of death or serious harm to a pregnant woman. In both Northern Ireland and Ireland, the culpability for a termination carried out outside of legal time frames lies with anyone who assists a woman procure an abortion, rather than the woman herself. Both countries had also previously had some of the strictest abortion laws in the world, with terminations banned in almost all circumstances. In other parts of the world, change is moving in the opposite direction. In June 2022, the United States supreme court overturned the decision of Roe v Wade, and ruled there was no constitutional right to abortion. Laws are instead now decided state by state, with 19 of them either banning abortion or restricting access. Parliament's latest vote is unlikely be the last on the subject. Medics, lawyers, politicians and campaigners recognise that the 1967 act is in need of reform. Work to establish what a new framework should look like has already begun, but as Louise McCudden, UK head of external affairs at MSI Reproductive Choices, a reproductive health NGO, said: 'Getting abortion law reform right will take time, and we want to make sure we do that in a way that takes into account expert opinion, takes into account women's voices [and] human rights groups.' But, McCudden said: 'The women who are being investigated and facing prosecution and jail can't afford to wait.' And parliament's latest vote means that now there will be no more Carla Fosters, or Nicola Packers.
